Diggis

I'm pretty sure the retroactive time on them applies only to the last logout before I13 went live. If you had used your toon and regularly logged them out in a Day Job location then you will only get the time from when you last played.

I don't think the salon was the point here... I think it was the possibility of animated hair.

I'm in favour of this, it's a nice wee touch. And I'm sure there are ways around knowing who of your coalition members base's are. A simple (teamname) after the base name would suffice.

/signed

Butik,

Look me up of Union, I'm on most evenings, like to team and have a laugh. Just started a couple of toons on Villian side so might be up for joining you in a team.

Shift 1-8 is team select by default. I've remapped it to Y though \ as I have a laptop keyboard and it's easier.

[ QUOTE ]
For added effect, stick this on in the background while using the bind.

[/ QUOTE ]

Or you could do it with a little more style here

Thank you for this, I love it!

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You have 12 toons, play a different one each night and you will take 23 days for each day job badge (and thats assuming you play 24 hours a day). You don't really lose out that much.

[/ QUOTE ]

Doesnt work that easily, when they announced them, I parked all my alts up.

The ones I havent played all got the badges, the ones I have are only 30% done

[/ QUOTE ]

Thats because the retroactive counting appears to only have counted your last log out, not all of them put together. There is no reason it will not work now.

[ QUOTE ]
and turned out to be correct.

[/ QUOTE ]

Again, no one has said you were correct, you are jsut stating that. Sure the evidence says there is a fair chance you are, but until you find a dev saying you were (I'll give you a comment saying it was the cause, doesn't have to specificly say 'Praf was right' ) I'm not going to belive you next time.

(I think we might be back on the pedant area again. )

[ QUOTE ]
The "missions affected" affected is nearly all missions.

I was able to Assume what had happened based on my knowledge of programing, not on anything the devs had said (they didn't even know about it). Ravenswing would have been able to work it out too if he hadn't been so quick to make cynical asumptions about developer incompetance and duplicity.

[/ QUOTE ]

Edited for accuracy

You will get the badge...

Yes, I didn't quite understand the level of addiction we are dealing with here....

You have 12 toons, play a different one each night and you will take 23 days for each day job badge (and thats assuming you play 24 hours a day). You don't really lose out that much.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
any mission in a shared zone that is available only to Heroes or Villains

[/ QUOTE ]

It's what I said it was, a consiquence of the code to stop players doing opposite faction missions in co-op zones.

Maybe you will believe me next time?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sure, when you show me a quote where the devs say thats what it was from. Your quote above was in relation to the missions effected, not the reason it happened.

How has multibuild given farmers more of an advantage than they have now? They still will have more money than you, and they can still only use 1 build at a time in PvP. Don't multi-build, and you will only have to trick one toon out.

Try turning off hide auto powers. I seem to recall during the testing that these were hidden by that toggle.

It appears, Lionsbane, that you are the only one who doesn't like this. Your one arguement, that it is too hard to IO both builds, is easily outweighed by the numerous other reasons people like this. Added to the fact that you are more than welcome not to use it and only IO your one build, then you lose nothing except the benifit of having a build better suited to PvE that the PvP one you have.

Saying people would like both builds to be powered up, surely it's better to have 2 builds, one 'gimped' that is suited to PvE and one 'powered up' that is suited to PvP than only the one PvP version that is no fun PvE?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
...it seems to be a stealth insert.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just commenting on this quickly: the idea of "stealth" changes in a patch is a myth in the vast majority of cases.


[/ QUOTE ]

So you do do it sometimes!

[ QUOTE ]
On the topic of this particular undocumented change, I'll ask and see what I can find out.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thank you.

[ QUOTE ]
However, it becomes established wisdom that "the devs are often doing things for stupid reasons that don't work", when the truth is players are often wrong about the reasons.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe, but we aren't wrong about the side effects. This is a major pain. Sure there are workarounds, but it seems like they are using a slegehammer on a thumbtack.

[ QUOTE ]
And a reasonable number of set IOs are goals most people who play this game cant achieve.

Certainly not if they have to support two versions of the same char.

[/ QUOTE ]

But if the IOs are really only critical for PvP then you are still only supporting one, but you have the option of having a different build that will allow you to get the Inf for those IOs easier.

[ QUOTE ]
Oh... the pain of waiting a few seconds. My heart bleeds.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not talking seconds, I'm talking minutes. How long do you wait for someone who may or may not have disconnected before booting them from a team. Happens all the time.

[ QUOTE ]
This is why I solo pretty much all the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

Then why are you posting here? It doesn't really effect you does it.

They only have to click exit, not actually be out, but that means if someone is having loading issues they won't be in that zone, but you would still need to wait for them to load before choosing a new mission.

Hmm that is a pain. I would have suggested in that situation to kick that member, select the mission, and re-add that member. But that won't work for TF missions.

Excellent!

[ QUOTE ]

*nods*

This is what I was asking. I'm just wondering what powers the person you were referring to was referring to.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would also like to know....

[ QUOTE ]
I was confused by PRAF's post. I'm confused by that one.

What powers are there that are 'more associated with spandex heroes' that are missing? I mean, the majority of golden age heroes were some basic variant on Superman.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was refering to this post below. I'm with you on this, I was just trying to clear things up... Fail!

[ QUOTE ]
I do understand what you are saying but I feel there are "spandex" (and therefore more superheor relevant) powers missing when pretty much all the weapon based ones I can think of are covered.

[/ QUOTE ]