Cowman

Renowned
  • Posts

    911
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by The_Alt_oholic View Post
    This suckage is in DC's stuff as well now.

    Not just the character deaths like you said, but reboots and the need to completely change charactaracter until they become something that has nothing to do with the orginal character other than name.
    I'm still mad about what they did to Cassandra Cain. The Batgirl title was actually not doing badly at all; not huge, but it was holding a solid audience. So what was DC's reaction?

    Cancel the title and turn her into a cookie-cutter villain while completely forgetting her problems with language and handing her over to a writer who had NO idea how her abilities worked.

    Sure, they tried to fix it later, but it wasn't perfect and left a stain on the character. Now, of course, she's gone again; stuck in comic book limbo. Which is dangerous, since she's still popular enough that she's a perfect candidate for a cheap shock death.

    Can you tell I'm still obsessing over this? Almost as much as I obsess over..... Gert.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by McNum View Post
    So "Somewhere in between" was actually the right answer. Comic book stories are weird sometimes.
    I operate on a simpler scale. Technically, any character who dies would be "in between" since they'll always come back eventually. I just stick with dead or alive.

    So at this moment in time in the Marvel U, Jean Grey is dead.
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by McNum View Post
    I'm a bit out of the Marvel universes, but Jean Grey... Dead? Alive? Somehwere in between?
    Dead.



    And can the first quaterly death be whatever idiot thought up this moronic idea.
  4. I laughed embarrasingly hard at the "Midlife Infinite Crisis" joke.
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Patchwork_Knight View Post
    Nah, its fine he's just not scotts brother anymore. See they broke errrr fixed it.
    Now he's Scott's dad.
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Inazuma View Post
    Who knows, maybe she'll end up covered in over-exaggerated blood splatter?
    And engage in friendly conversation with people who'll never mention it.
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Dr_Illuminatis View Post
    Fixed that for Me.
    If you haven't been reading X-Force, you've been missing out.
  8. Man, Nella's lookin' bad-***!
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Energizing_Ion View Post
    And come to think of it....that episode I'm thinking of, had a normal human being as the father because when Nightcrawler was born he was blue/etc and that's what got Mystique 'uncovered' as a non-regular human being...*shrugs*
    Initially Nightcrawler's dad was just a human. I think it might have been mentioned that he was a Baron or something.

    However, during Chuck Austen's run (said in the same tone as "during Hitler's reign"), they retconned him into being the son of some demonic mutant or something. Cause being a religious person with a slightly demonic appearance was just way too subtle.
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Zikar View Post
    So... I'm one of the few that actually thought this looked better than I was expecting?
    Well that's the thing. (for me anyway)

    I don't think it looks bad. The effects looked respectable to good, and the trailer made it look pretty exciting. (though that never guarantees quality) I also liked the use of the blue and yellow outfits.

    I've just checked out on the franchise. I can't bring myself to care about the movie whether it be good or bad. Which is vaguely upsetting seeing what a big X-Men fan I am.
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Snowzone View Post
    Red Guy is most likely to be Azazel, Nightcrawler's father.
    Yeah... the movie loses even more points for reminding me of THAT horrible plot.
  12. Ehhhh....


    I mean, it LOOKS kinda cool, but it still doesn't inspire any excitement in me. I'm not a huge stickler on continuity, and a movie is ALWAYS going to have its own seperate continuity.

    But it just seems like such a blatant case of plugging in characters for no reason that I can't view it as any more than a jumbled mess. I might see it eventually, but I'm not gonna be in any hurry.

    Honestly, I'm kinda just waiting till the rights revert to Marvel and they can start over.
  13. If Cassandra Cain is there, then so am I.

    Throw in Slobo as the token male, and I'd be in heaven.


    Not sold on the name though. Still, with that line-up, it certainly wouldn't be a deal-breaker.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Lord_Nightblade View Post
    Sisko punched Q in the face. And Q never came back. Sisko wins.
    Nobody THOUGHT he came back.

    Thing is, Sisko used to be top dog of the entire Federation. So how'd his entire history get retconned into being the captain of a space truck stop?

    Boy done got Q'd.



    He left in the punching him in the face thing just cause he's that kind of omnipotent being.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nos482 View Post
    What? Ultimate Jarvis was human, gay and got a bullet to the head from Black Widow...so definetly no AI. And the movie Hulk was so not the Ultimate one. He didn“t eat a single person
    Yeah, the movies seem to be adopting some of the trappings of the Ultimate universe, but keeping the core of the characters firmly from the regular Marvel U.





    Thank goodness.
  16. Holy crap....


    This is the next "Raphael vs. Wolverine" thread.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Scythus View Post
    You may try to continue claim there's a difference, but there isn't. I believe the phrase about wearing blinders comes to mind.
    Oh the sweet, sweet irony.
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Scythus View Post
    If you think Liefeld is "awesome."
    Naw. Unless you mean "so bad it's awesome".

    No, I wasn't talking about Liefeld. I'm just enjoying a classic internet moment.
  19. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Scythus View Post
    I have yet to see Tartakovsky produce anything on that level.
    Ah yes. No skill at all. Obviously.

  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Scythus View Post
    I find it insulting to my intelligence that you insist that this is art.
    I find it amazing that you posted those two pictures as if it proves some point.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by CactusBrawler View Post
    Essentially why do people RP as Billionaire Superman?
    Well, personally, I often like to play a character who's intentionally a bit abrasive; and not just in the "angry anti-hero" way.

    One character I have is actually the ruler of a small country. He's brilliant, courageous, and has a deep sense of loyalty to his subjects. However, he's also arrogant, rude, and a bit elitist.

    Also, the dashing playboy is just a fun role to play around with. I like my angst in severe moderation, so a lighter character is appealing to me. This obviously doesn't require a fortune, but it does fit into the archetype rather well; Batman not withstanding.
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by CactusBrawler View Post
    You due to a run of bad circumstances, end up unable to get a job and have to turn to theft to feed your family. Batman will kick the stuffing out of you, despite you deliberately making sure that you were never violent in your crimes.
    Not like the police who will listen sympathetically and send you off with a pat on the head.

    They're funny that way.
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
    Not really, as Batman isn't a hero - he's a vigilante.

  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
    Batman is an unpleasant and pretty unsympathetic character, and his mentality is that of a dictator-in-waiting - if he had any superpowers, Gotham would end up like Praetoria.
    Wow.

    Batman really HAS taken Superman's place as the hero to hate on.