-
Posts
911 -
Joined
-
Quote:I'm still mad about what they did to Cassandra Cain. The Batgirl title was actually not doing badly at all; not huge, but it was holding a solid audience. So what was DC's reaction?This suckage is in DC's stuff as well now.
Not just the character deaths like you said, but reboots and the need to completely change charactaracter until they become something that has nothing to do with the orginal character other than name.
Cancel the title and turn her into a cookie-cutter villain while completely forgetting her problems with language and handing her over to a writer who had NO idea how her abilities worked.
Sure, they tried to fix it later, but it wasn't perfect and left a stain on the character. Now, of course, she's gone again; stuck in comic book limbo. Which is dangerous, since she's still popular enough that she's a perfect candidate for a cheap shock death.
Can you tell I'm still obsessing over this? Almost as much as I obsess over..... Gert. -
Quote:I operate on a simpler scale. Technically, any character who dies would be "in between" since they'll always come back eventually. I just stick with dead or alive.So "Somewhere in between" was actually the right answer. Comic book stories are weird sometimes.
So at this moment in time in the Marvel U, Jean Grey is dead. -
-
I laughed embarrasingly hard at the "Midlife Infinite Crisis" joke.
-
-
-
-
Quote:Initially Nightcrawler's dad was just a human. I think it might have been mentioned that he was a Baron or something.And come to think of it....that episode I'm thinking of, had a normal human being as the father because when Nightcrawler was born he was blue/etc and that's what got Mystique 'uncovered' as a non-regular human being...*shrugs*
However, during Chuck Austen's run (said in the same tone as "during Hitler's reign"), they retconned him into being the son of some demonic mutant or something. Cause being a religious person with a slightly demonic appearance was just way too subtle. -
Quote:Well that's the thing. (for me anyway)So... I'm one of the few that actually thought this looked better than I was expecting?
I don't think it looks bad. The effects looked respectable to good, and the trailer made it look pretty exciting. (though that never guarantees quality) I also liked the use of the blue and yellow outfits.
I've just checked out on the franchise. I can't bring myself to care about the movie whether it be good or bad. Which is vaguely upsetting seeing what a big X-Men fan I am. -
-
Ehhhh....
I mean, it LOOKS kinda cool, but it still doesn't inspire any excitement in me. I'm not a huge stickler on continuity, and a movie is ALWAYS going to have its own seperate continuity.
But it just seems like such a blatant case of plugging in characters for no reason that I can't view it as any more than a jumbled mess. I might see it eventually, but I'm not gonna be in any hurry.
Honestly, I'm kinda just waiting till the rights revert to Marvel and they can start over. -
If Cassandra Cain is there, then so am I.
Throw in Slobo as the token male, and I'd be in heaven.
Not sold on the name though. Still, with that line-up, it certainly wouldn't be a deal-breaker. -
Quote:Nobody THOUGHT he came back.Sisko punched Q in the face. And Q never came back. Sisko wins.
Thing is, Sisko used to be top dog of the entire Federation. So how'd his entire history get retconned into being the captain of a space truck stop?
Boy done got Q'd.
He left in the punching him in the face thing just cause he's that kind of omnipotent being. -
Quote:Yeah, the movies seem to be adopting some of the trappings of the Ultimate universe, but keeping the core of the characters firmly from the regular Marvel U.What? Ultimate Jarvis was human, gay and got a bullet to the head from Black Widow...so definetly no AI. And the movie Hulk was so not the Ultimate one. He didn“t eat a single person
Thank goodness. -
Holy crap....
This is the next "Raphael vs. Wolverine" thread. -
-
-
-
-
Well, personally, I often like to play a character who's intentionally a bit abrasive; and not just in the "angry anti-hero" way.
One character I have is actually the ruler of a small country. He's brilliant, courageous, and has a deep sense of loyalty to his subjects. However, he's also arrogant, rude, and a bit elitist.
Also, the dashing playboy is just a fun role to play around with. I like my angst in severe moderation, so a lighter character is appealing to me. This obviously doesn't require a fortune, but it does fit into the archetype rather well; Batman not withstanding. -
Quote:Not like the police who will listen sympathetically and send you off with a pat on the head.You due to a run of bad circumstances, end up unable to get a job and have to turn to theft to feed your family. Batman will kick the stuffing out of you, despite you deliberately making sure that you were never violent in your crimes.
They're funny that way. -
-