Zwillinger

I'm not sure that the likelihood of one big update is high. Again, it's more of a "when we're able to fit it into the schedule".

If you have a detailed list and would like to forward it to me, I will forward it along to design.

Actually no. It was stream of consciousness .

Because we do, occasionally, have time to address them. When the devs are able to slog through the list, it helps to have the reports.

Not ignored .

That's just the Paragonian spelling. You know, like how the Brits spell things with a "U"?

There, I just introduced a whole new RP element.

No not really...

I understand that viewpoint, and I certainly appreciate that there's a level of frustration associated with it.

It's a matter of priority. Text bugs with powers are higher priority, because the nature of them causes them to be exposed to a higher level of scrutiny.

When it comes to updating mission text, or other things which, while annoying, aren't game breaking, we have to ask a simple question: What other task (bug fixing, new content, testing, etc) would we have to deprioritize to allocate the time for the task. Yes, these are bugs, however there are far more pernicious bugs which require more attention, usually discovered during development (bugs are bugs, even if they don't make it to live. You'd be amazed at the amount of bugs we find well before content makes it anywhere near Beta).

We fix them when we have time, however I will be the first to admit they are not the highest priority item on our list.

I understand your stance, and appreciate your viewpoint, however I'd ask you to please ballpark it based on our established pricing.

Thanks!

Possibility very unlikely due to the overall development cost and time required for a full on AT (We've investigated it).

I think you underestimate our desire to expand the game in more creative ways.

Counter question:

Let's say, hypothetically, we introduced a new AT, but because of the amount of time and cost it would take to develop it, we had no choice but to offer it in the Paragon Market (a possible scenario).

Based on our established precedents, what do you feel would be a fair price, in Paragon Points?

I'm interested in your responses.

Per the official (read, sent from legal) rules, it's one per person. Looks like the newspost misstated that. I'll be sure we get corrected ASAP.

Thanks for bringing that to my attention.

No update on this either. To be honest, I do not expect these to be corrected anytime soon.

Both will be running PnP...

This change is indeed intended and was an inadvertently missed note. We'll correct it ASAP.

For those concerned, there should be a confirmation window that notifies you that claiming this from your mail will activate the booster. I do understand concerns about changing the way this works, however the fact that you had to search through your mail, claim it, then search through your powers list and drag it to your bar, AND THEN activate it was determined to be a suboptimal user experience.

If you previously claimed boosters, they will still be in your powers and able to be activated in the legacy manner.

Thanks!

-Z

This is a known issue and is slated to be addressed in the next patch.

Thanks!

Yeppers

And here I thought it was "If it's a sentient being..."