*peers through the dust and embers*


Angry_Citizen

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Electric-Knight View Post
Vyver, can you, or can you not, express, with complete non-objectivity, the emotional and psychological reasons why someone, in a position such as they may have been, might possibly attempt to create such a scenario, negative or not (such as they absolutely did - if you're saying that they did not, even though they did, you're lying - so, don't even try to say that they didn't)? If you don't answer me with complete agreement to my points it will show just how phony and/or stupid you truly are.


Okay, this is actually fun.
I really tried to reply to that.

I really did.

But then my head started hurting.


 

Posted

I've learned from my time on the WOW forums that there can be only one possible answer to this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Electric-Knight View Post
Vyver, can you, or can you not, express, with complete non-objectivity, the emotional and psychological reasons why someone, in a position such as they may have been, might possibly attempt to create such a scenario, negative or not (such as they absolutely did - if you're saying that they did not, even though they did, you're lying - so, don't even try to say that they didn't)? If you don't answer me with complete agreement to my points it will show just how phony and/or stupid you truly are.
wut


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Electric-Knight View Post
... * snip*.....
Good god.

I'm not going to answer everything in that because there were just far too many words. I tend to skip through most walls of text, especially when they include things like "I'm just being me". Well of course you are. Who else would you be? Have a cracker.

Essentially though, I will admit to forming my opinions largely on what I saw on Twitter by the people posting on #SaveCoH. And I will also admit that originally, I was one of those people. A bit of satirical sideswiping at NCSoft was initially quite fun and a rather nice way of letting of steam. It was also a good way to keep up with the news about the efforts to save the game without wading through all the other stuff that I had largely no interest in.

Then there was a shift in the whole mood of things. It changed from light hearted digs into a full on smear campaign, and that's when I bowed out, because that emphasis isn't healthy (imo) doesn't reflect well on what SaveCoH is trying to achieve (again only from my point of view; others clearly have other agendas) and something I'd rather not be a part of.

My point is, if as a regularly contributing member to that campaign I found the taste in my mouth soured by the activities of what seemed to be a vocal majority, how is that going to be perceived by the people who's hearts you're trying to win? And for the record why is it not our place to criticise if we think something is heading in the wrong direction? Criticism, constructive criticism at least, is how things get improved. Ultimately of course, whether that criticism is taken on board and actioned upon is down to the people that make those kinds of decisions, but please don't tell me it's not my place to make it.

The only other thing the Titan forums seemed to be advocating in any volume was Plan Z. And as I've said in other threads, I do honestly wish the people involved the best of luck with it, but I've also seen similar efforts made before when support for a much loved game ends (for example back in the 90s a group had the idea to make an Interstate '82 mod for Battlefield 1942) and more or less without fail they get so far and fizzle into nothing. If in a couple of years something solid does come of it, all well and good, sign me up, but for now I won't be seeing this as any more than vapourware and will be placing my faith in something a little more solid.


@SteelRat; @SteelRat2
"Angelina my love, I'm a genius!"
"Of course you are darling, that's why I married you. Physically, you're rather unattractive"
http://faces.cohtitan.com/profile/SteelRat

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunder Knight View Post
... it wasn't? Wasn't he the one who started that since-deleted thread by outright calling the Titan folks idiots and racists?

Other than that, Electric Knight summed things up adequately.
I'm only talking about the thread that was deleted this evening. I guess because he's already tainted it's impossible to take individual threads on face value?


@SteelRat; @SteelRat2
"Angelina my love, I'm a genius!"
"Of course you are darling, that's why I married you. Physically, you're rather unattractive"
http://faces.cohtitan.com/profile/SteelRat

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Electric-Knight View Post
Vyver, can you, or can you not, express, with complete non-objectivity, the emotional and psychological reasons why someone, in a position such as they may have been, might possibly attempt to create such a scenario, negative or not (such as they absolutely did - if you're saying that they did not, even though they did, you're lying - so, don't even try to say that they didn't)? If you don't answer me with complete agreement to my points it will show just how phony and/or stupid you truly are.
.
Why are posts like this even remotely necessary? Honestly.


@SteelRat; @SteelRat2
"Angelina my love, I'm a genius!"
"Of course you are darling, that's why I married you. Physically, you're rather unattractive"
http://faces.cohtitan.com/profile/SteelRat

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelRat View Post
Good god.

I'm not going to answer everything in that because there were just far too many words. I tend to skip through most walls of text, especially when they include things like "I'm just being me". Well of course you are. Who else would you be? Have a cracker.

Essentially though, I will admit to forming my opinions largely on what I saw on Twitter by the people posting on #SaveCoH. And I will also admit that originally, I was one of those people. A bit of satirical sideswiping at NCSoft was initially quite fun and a rather nice way of letting of steam. It was also a good way to keep up with the news about the efforts to save the game without wading through all the other stuff that I had largely no interest in.

Then there was a shift in the whole mood of things. It changed from light hearted digs into a full on smear campaign, and that's when I bowed out, because that emphasis isn't healthy (imo) doesn't reflect well on what SaveCoH is trying to achieve (again only from my point of view; others clearly have other agendas) and something I'd rather not be a part of.

My point is, if as a regularly contributing member to that campaign I found the taste in my mouth soured by the activities of what seemed to be a vocal majority, how is that going to be perceived by the people who's hearts you're trying to win? And for the record why is it not our place to criticise if we think something is heading in the wrong direction? Criticism, constructive criticism at least, is how things get improved. Ultimately of course, whether that criticism is taken on board and actioned upon is down to the people that make those kinds of decisions, but please don't tell me it's not my place to make it.

The only other thing the Titan forums seemed to be advocating in any volume was Plan Z. And as I've said in other threads, I do honestly wish the people involved the best of luck with it, but I've also seen similar efforts made before when support for a much loved game ends (for example back in the 90s a group had the idea to make an Interstate '82 mod for Battlefield 1942) and more or less without fail they get so far and fizzle into nothing. If in a couple of years something solid does come of it, all well and good, sign me up, but for now I won't be seeing this as any more than vapourware and will be placing my faith in something a little more solid.
Well, since you've shown me such respect there... TL/DR err err, haha.


So, people using Twitter in ways that you didn't like is what you're basing your grievances against the SaveCoH/Titan crowd on.
I was not following Twitter, so I have no idea what people were doing.
We're all different. Whatever. You didn't like it. That's cool.

As for Project Z, yeah, I have had zero to do with it and have placed zero interest in it so far.
I wish them all the best and, who knows, I may attempt to get involved in it, but as long as the game is running and as long as I believe there's the smallest chance of the game returning, I'm not interested in the giant mess of chefs in that kitchen (I don't say that with disrespect - just with understanding of what such an undertaking means).
Crazier things have indeed happened.

Anyway... I don't know where you pulled "no criticism" from, but yay?


@Zethustra
"Now at midnight all the agents and the superhuman crew come out
and round up everyone that knows more than they do"
-Dylan

 

Posted

Save CoH not surprisingly drew in a whole bunch of people who want to Save City of Heroes, as the name implies. It's pretty unrealistic to believe that everybody who shares that goal is going to want to do things in the same manner as each other. There are some people with good realistic ideas (as I see them), others with less realistic but well meaning and positive ideas, some who just want to harass NCSoft until they give in and others at various points. This isn't some corporation where everybody who believes in the goal of saving the game can be fired if they don't follow the company line.

I haven't fully agreed with everything that SaveCoH as a whole, or the Titan 'leadership' as a whole have done, but I never expected to. If you're going to go through (as some other threads seem to ne) every post by every person who's been associated with Save CoH then of course you're going to find some odd opinions and ideas expressed from time to time. But for me at least the overall aim as much as I've followed it has remained sound.


 

Posted

I'm sorry. I've changed my mind, I am going to reply to this

Quote:
Originally Posted by Electric-Knight View Post

I'm not responding to this to argue, so I hope it is read in a friendly tone...
I see a mistake (that might be common) that could be the key in the divide some people seem to be expressing.
Have to admit, I did miss that in the original read through, but noted.

Quote:
I don't think that the bit I highlighted is true.
It gave us a place for all of our voices to be heard. At the time, we didn't know when the forums would be shut down or what was going on at all, really.
It gave this entire community a single place to move to and to know we had no matter what NCSoft did. It gave us a single place to collect and represent ourselves - every single aspect of the same community that exists here, should they so choose.
It was never, to my knowledge, about giving us a single voice.
Now, most people tend to flock that way. Not I and not many many people that are amongst us in both communities, but it is true that the majority of people basically fall into being led (oh, how the English language makes puns all by itself).
To clarify the "one voice" comment I made was largely metaphorical. Sure the Titan FORUM was the place that voice was largely heard, certainly in the initial stages and before the other avenues to which it travelled like Twitter and Facebook.

Quote:
And it can be detrimental. I saw it being detrimental in a different way. While there were certainly other people besides Tony heading efforts to stir up support, publicize our concerns and reach out to NCSoft, most people only took action if Tony told them to (this is not a knock on Tony whatsoever! I'd even seen him trying to get people to understand this and move away from thinking like that). It just made things a bit slower, because until Tony pointed the way, a lot of people wouldn't go ahead with something that someone else had already put together (and it also hurt when people may not have gone ahead with starting something, because they didn't realize that... they can do it without waiting for "official" approval).
To clarify again, my beef was never with TonyV and to be honest I don't have any kind of axe to grind with Titan as a whole. However I just feel the anti NCSoft sentiment has gotten a little out of control and gone a little too far. This is what I feel is detrimental to what SaveCoH set out to acheive. YMMV

Quote:
Anyway, my point is not to criticize anything to do with the SaveCoH movement (nothing is perfect and I believe much good was [and still is being] created by us all gathering under the banner that the Titan Network helped us to create and maintain). My point is to criticize those that continuously lump SaveCoH/Titan as this hive-minded clan.
It is no more so than any and every group that has existed.
The problem is that unless you're actively involved with the details of the Titan network, that clan mentality can come across when it's presented to you "in the wild" as it were. From that point of view, people can be forgiven for thinking that because it can come across as such a universal point of view, it's endorsed by the people that run it. Whether they are right or not is generally not the point, because by then the real message is lost.

Quote:
We have a ton of individuals over there (just like here) with a bunch of different opinions, ideas and ways of doing things and I imagine it will stay that way (and maybe even increase once the game goes down).
It's not supposed to be anything besides what we have here... except that we're all there to take actual efforts in bending and shaping reality into what we'd prefer, no matter the opposing force's powers to bend and shape it to their will.
I don't mean to offend (genuinely), but whilst such tenacity can be and often is admirable, doesn't there come a point where that's just blind ignorance? Granted, that mindset alone doesn't hurt anyone else but you can surely see the point of view of people that think it's a little ... "unrealistic"? (Not the best choice of words, but the only one that comes to mind)

Quote:
That's tough stuff... and that's why the incessant negativity is so annoying... it's debilitating, honestly. When you're trying to actually, you know, do things... all of the why bother? Give it up! Not gonna happen! is just a complete waste of time and energy. And that is the only thing that has ever been universally dismissed under the SaveCoH banner.
I do get that, honestly. I think a lot of the negativity comes from the "give it up already" mentality because people want to shield themselves from further disappointment. Again.. I'm not saying it's right or wrong to do that, but if you are going to have that do or die mindset, you need to bear in mind that other people will not only share it, but do what they can to avoid it, including trying to persuade you that what you're doing is a little fruitless.

Quote:
Anything else is fair game for discussion (within reason, of course, haha).
And that ties into another aspect of what you've said here...
Some people talk as though their ideas were not respected and there's no room for them there... If that is the case at all... it was more a matter of the majority of people disagreed with that "dismissed" argument.
That minority can't dominate a majority with their views and opinions.
You're right, they can't. And in those instances you've just gotta take it on the chin and move on.

Quote:
I have no idea if people see me as a member of SaveCoH, a leader in it or some fringe outsider or whatever! I honestly have no clue. I don't really have any strong ties with anyone on either "sides".
I know where my heart and mind lies and I stick to being me.
And if something goes down that I don't like, I let it be known.
And if I have ideas, I share 'em.
I don't need any credit and I don't care about any criticisms.
I recognize that it'll contribute to the whole in whatever way it organically comes about.
The thing is, even though I did take the p out of you for the gist of what you said there (for which I apologise), you're no different to me from that point of view. I don't say things to try and impress anyone, I just say things as I see them.


Quote:
This is the part that I've seen repeated and 1) I honestly don't know what tactical shifts took place that they're referring to and 2) don't know that we'd all agree what was wrong or right.

I didn't see any tactical shifts, really.
I saw a pretty reasonable gameplan suggested in the beginning. And I'd say it went pretty well.
We acted as respectful as a large online game community can be.
We reached out, we demonstrated and our efforts and demeanor were recognized in the gaming community/media.
Agreed.. although from the PoV of tactical shifts, there was always that few who were itching to bring out both barrels and the larger community did rather well to keep those people reigned in. Unfortunately as time went on and the polite efforts were ignored there seemed to be the adoption of the "F**k it.. what have we got to lose?" mindset. And really, I think that's where it all got a bit out of hand.

Quote:
However, NCSoft remained silent.
That's cool... Things continued...
People criticized the SaveCoH movement as being too polite and friendly and nothing would ever get done that way.
When things were lining up to get worse for what we wanted, Tony made the move to release personal emails of NCsoft top execs...
Other people criticized this as being too aggressive and unfriendly.

That actually got a response from NCSoft. Seemed like the right move and as good of results as we could realistically hope for under the circumstances.

People continued brainstorming different ideas for now and the possible futures.
People kept up the heat, mostly with polite public displays of love for the developers and the game and the community.

A minority of vocal naysayers and all that continued to criticize.

We got NCSoft's "final" response.
Blah blah blah... here we are.
Yup..

Quote:
You and I can disagree on what is or isn't appropriate conduct, but who are either of us to tell anyone that?
If we're both people who "say it as we see it", then why shouldn't we?

Quote:
Save CoH is a group of people with different ideas amongst themselves.
Most of the strictly following Tony died down some time after the "final response" and others took some initiatives in continuing exposure and avenues to sway things in favor of CoH returning.
Not that Tony's efforts have stopped at all either. Just saying that the initial phase of waiting only for Tony seemed to lessen (a good thing... again, not because Tony is bad, haha, he's not... I think he's been great help beyond acknowledgment! It's just that I found people finally started doing more on their own... which I believe is a great thing as well).
Like I say, I went on the Titan forums mainly just to keep tabs of the latest news. Once I "discovered" Twitter, I found that to be a much better summary of what was going on than wading through endless posts of things I really wasn't that interested in. My observations are therefore only what I saw from the goings on the #SaveCoH column. Perhaps I was wrong to assume that the two sources of information went hand in hand, but from what little time I spent on Titan, the same prominent faces appeared on the Twitter feed, so it seemed logical the two were linked.

Quote:
Titan Networks is simply a place for CoH Fans to gather in hopes that we will be able to play it (or something like it) again and that we may keep the community together.

It's up to every single individual as to whether they want their aspect of the community to continue.
And if they want to be a vocal dissenter among the majority of differently-minded people... they can go on and be that way, but don't run back here crying that they were unfair to you. You were just a tiny voice that wasn't praised. That's life.
As I said, I was never really that involved in the Titan forums other than browsing, so that "tiny voice" thing doesn't really apply to me.


Quote:
I didn't take part in any mob of attacks on anyone and I pretty much avoid the ridiculous threads around here (other than to maybe pop in and post some humor now and then... or maybe to defend someone that I just happen to see being treated unfairly).
Heh.. ironically, that's all I did too. Unfortunately that person was tagged as an undesirable, and so I was so tainted by association. But.. yanno.. I say things as I see 'em.

Quote:
No idea who might consider me a part of what, but that's on them.
I'm me and I tell it like I see it...
And your last comment there about prolific minorities and all that just comes off as bitter resentment towards some aspect of this community that I really don't know about.
I can;t imagine I am considered a part of any such thing... as I may post a lot, but I rarely am replied to and I generally only reply to respectful, good and/or funny posts... while the rest of a thread is centered around replying to the most aggressive chains of replies.

Again, that is just part of human nature it seems.
I've been tempted to post two threads of the same ideas, but one worded hatefully and toxic... and the other kind and respectfully... and show everyone the vast difference in the number of replies (no doubt, in favor of the negative one).
Bitter resentment? Maybe. However much I enjoyed playing the game over the years, the whole community thing I never really experienced, despite my efforts to take part. I dare say there'll be pictures of violins or tearful ponies or other some such ridicule, but the irony when people do that is it just fosters those feelings in the people that are affected by it.


@SteelRat; @SteelRat2
"Angelina my love, I'm a genius!"
"Of course you are darling, that's why I married you. Physically, you're rather unattractive"
http://faces.cohtitan.com/profile/SteelRat

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Electric-Knight View Post
So, people using Twitter in ways that you didn't like is what you're basing your grievances against the SaveCoH/Titan crowd on. I was not following Twitter, so I have no idea what people were doing.
In numerous entertainment-related debates that I've followed, it ALWAYS seemed like it was Twitter where the wars started, in some cases up to a year before the flames spread to other social networking sites (which until that time had been having somewhat more civilized discussions about it). And I don't just mean petty name-calling like we've seen here, but racial/ethnic/sexual harassment all the way up to death threats.

Don't know if that's what went on in this case, but I've had a phrase that I've used any times. "Why is it always Twitter that starts up the rage machine?" Reports and sightings of these extreme fights are the reason I still do not own a Twitter account.


 

Posted

Thanks for the further reply, SteelRat.
As usual, it doesn't seem like we differ much in opinions or stances and all that. I think the history behind this whole topic taints a lot of the current back and forth.
And I'm sure I drifted into being tainted with that in my reply as well.


Quote:
Originally Posted by TimTheEnchanter View Post
In numerous entertainment-related debates that I've followed, it ALWAYS seemed like it was Twitter where the wars started, in some cases up to a year before the flames spread to other social networking sites (which until that time had been having somewhat more civilized discussions about it). And I don't just mean petty name-calling like we've seen here, but racial/ethnic/sexual harassment all the way up to death threats.

Don't know if that's what went on in this case, but I've had a phrase that I've used any times. "Why is it always Twitter that starts up the rage machine?" Reports and sightings of these extreme fights are the reason I still do not own a Twitter account.
That doesn't sound all that surprising, now that you mention it; All it takes is a #hashtag and you are connecting with anyone and everyone as opposed to the smaller confines of most other social medias... Huh... #nowseesthetruepotentialoftwitter... hahaha.


@Zethustra
"Now at midnight all the agents and the superhuman crew come out
and round up everyone that knows more than they do"
-Dylan

 

Posted

I'm not going to reply point-by-point to this, but I did just want to mention:

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelRat View Post
However I just feel the anti NCSoft sentiment has gotten a little out of control and gone a little too far. This is what I feel is detrimental to what SaveCoH set out to acheive. YMMV
Here's the thing. I didn't set out to be nasty. From the get-go, I was nothing but polite and respectful. I remind everyone that I'm the guy who posted the "NCsoft is NOT our enemy" thread. My intention was to encourage nice, friendly conversation in the spirit of helping Paragon Studios to acquire the IP and rights to City of Heroes under its own banner. Early on in this ordeal, I had honestly planned on releasing a bunch of stuff to the press publicly lauding NCsoft for their foresight and caring of its community, highly encouraging people to support the company and its games, especially the new ones coming out. I was the guy who, when the idea of a protest rally was put forward, said, "Let's call it a Unity Rally instead."

However, I was clear up front that if they jerked us around as a community, they would suffer a PR black eye. It wasn't a threat, it was just a natural reaction to their actions. Truth be known, there were already a lot of people looking to wage war on NCsoft as early as August 31, and I was trying to be a positive force in telling people to hold off. In all of the interviews and media releases I did, I reiterated that I appreciated what NCsoft had done for the game and its community, and I was looking for a solution in which we all could win.

The personal turning point to me came down to two things. First, I got word from some insiders I trust that NCsoft was demanding outlandish terms for selling the IP. Second, they posted the "all options have been exhausted" communication two months before the game was due to be shut down. Even without the other info I had, this would have ticked me off because, as I said in my response, there are always options to make something like that happen. At that point, I realized that NCsoft was not only not honestly trying to negotiate releasing the IP, but they were doing their best to brush off the community and shut them up without giving any kind of serious thought to the issue.

So at that point, I felt that we had nothing to lose. I started encouraging people to post messages where NCsoft was publicly visible letting them know how they felt. Note that I've never said, "Hey, go out and trash them." I don't consider messages I've posted to be trollish. I don't post "NCsoft sux" messages. Everywhere I've personally posted messages, I've tried to explain that NCsoft has a history of killing off MMOs, which they do. I point out that they've killed off five now in the past five years, which they have. I express that as a gamer, this concerns me because the MMO genre is particularly conducive to players investing a disproportionate amount of time and money into the games within that genre, which I feel they do. Thus in my opinion, NCsoft and other MMO publishers have a moral obligation to players to do everything reasonably possible to protect those players' investments, which I feel that NCsoft is not doing.

Other players word it differently, but to be blunt, I see very few messages of the type of "NCsoft sux." I'm actually pretty proud of the SaveCoH crowd in that even the most venomous of posts I've seen have not been so trite--they've actually done a good job of conveying not only the message that they don't like NCsoft, but why they don't like NCsoft. This is important because they're not your standard trollish kind of posts; they're reaching out to other gamers to say, "Hey, you should be concerned about this," which I feel is an extremely valid message to convey.

There are those here who feel that no one should be making any negative comments, and I disagree. If NCsoft doesn't suffer any kind of PR black eye, then there is absolutely nothing stopping them--or any publisher observing events here--from doing the same thing over and over, which I think is wrong. There are also those who think that some people go too far in expressing their anger. Maybe some people do, but I think it's pretty much in line with what I expected. I don't see people threatening physical harm to NCsoft employees, illegal activities such as attempting to hack into the company and cause damage through that avenue (which I was genuinely afraid of, to be honest), or anything like that.

So to anyone who says, "Those Titan people are going TOO FAR!!!", I'm sorry but I think you need to get a little perspective. Would you rather people post nastygrams on Facebook pages and YouTube videos, or doing something truly asinine? I guess that "TOO FAR!" is totally subjective, but I think as a whole, we're doing just fine. We're exercising our freedom of speech to inform people of what's going on against a corporation that has a lot more resources than we do, and we're doing the best we can.

If NCsoft is unhappy with the negative attention they're getting... Well, they can't say I didn't warn them that there would be a backlash. I wish I could take credit for all of the shtuff going on as if I were some sort of coordination mastermind, but if you actually look at my communications you'll see that I'm actually not personally directing a lot of it. Most of this stuff is people taking their own initiative. While I might not condone every little thing that gets posted or done, I did foresee it and warn it would happen, and I'm sure not going to try to stop people from reaching out to other NCsoft customers and raise awareness of what's going on.

I also would be remiss in pointing out that even at this late date, NCsoft still holds the cards that could at any time make this pretty much a non-issue by reopening the possibility of selling the IP for reasonable terms. Yes, there will still be people who would hate them forever. Such is the price for being so dumb for two months. But the situation is still not irrevocably unsalvageable, and if they did reopen that possibility, I think that most of us--myself included--would be happy to just part ways amicably. They've pretty much passed up the opportunity to have me recommending their products barring something truly spectacular, but at least they won't have a bunch of scrappy people like me dogging them all the time.

Hope this clarifies,
--TonyV


We've been saving Paragon City for eight and a half years. It's time to do it one more time.
(If you love this game as much as I do, please read that post.)

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyV View Post
While I might not condone every little thing that gets posted or done, I did foresee it and warn it would happen...


 

Posted

I can't help but wonder how this might look to someone who didn't have a stake in the game.

I wonder if they might not look at all this hubbub and think "if five games in five years is so bad, why were these people still around to get burned after four games in four years? Why is five so bad, but four is 'ok'?". Or even "These people have known since at least the Garriott case in 2010 that this company was capable of dodgy, if not outright illegal, practices. Why didn't moral outrage compel action then? Why were they still supporting a game owned and run by such a company?". In short, why did this urge to 'defend mmo gamers against the business practices of callous publishers' only show up when our game was on the block instead of any of the others that shut down, NCSoft owned or otherwise?

An outside observer might think it appears a little hypocrital, and perhaps a touch self important. A "This didn't matter until I was effected, but now everyone should take note" situation. A bit late to start complaining about something that's been going on with little protest from us for at least five years, isn't it?

Then again, I don't really think most people outside the CoX community care. At least not any more than most of us did when some other game we didn't play shut down. As I recently mentioned elsewhere, I suspect most of them, if they even notice, will shrug it off as the bitter complaining of the last holdouts of an eight year old game that had to go F2P, one that most outsiders hadn't heard of or didn't like to begin with.


 

Posted

I don't know exactly what prompted it, but I did notice a difference between this and other games that have been shut down, or otherwise went through a complete Hellish phase.

I was in SWG when the NGE got announced, doing talk radio on the air while the protests were on, watched the exodus after it came to pass. I've also read about protests in other games, even peeked in once just to see one. I don't know if it was the organization, or the initial "positivity" of it as opposed to a rebel insurgency, or something else. But for a brief moment, the gamers were impressed. People who had never played CoH envied whatever it was that we had, and based on that alone, were hoping the game survived, so they could come on board and see what all the fuss was about. It's not going to reshape the world of commerce, but it's also nothing to scoff at.

Maybe we didn't do everything right. And maybe nothing will ever come of it to save OUR game. But maybe, just maybe, we've taken a first step. And maybe someone in another game being randomly shut down will learn something from it. And sometime far from now, we'll be looking at a wholly different business landscape, where MMO gamers are treated more like citizens than customers. Maybe. Just maybe.


 

Posted

Basically this. I have to admit some of the "comment bombs" I have seen make me giggle - it's like watching a spoiled kid throwing a temper.....




Quote:
Originally Posted by JKedan View Post
I can't help but wonder how this might look to someone who didn't have a stake in the game.

I wonder if they might not look at all this hubbub and think "if five games in five years is so bad, why were these people still around to get burned after four games in four years? Why is five so bad, but four is 'ok'?". Or even "These people have known since at least the Garriott case in 2010 that this company was capable of dodgy, if not outright illegal, practices. Why didn't moral outrage compel action then? Why were they still supporting a game owned and run by such a company?". In short, why did this urge to 'defend mmo gamers against the business practices of callous publishers' only show up when our game was on the block instead of any of the others that shut down, NCSoft owned or otherwise?

An outside observer might think it appears a little hypocrital, and perhaps a touch self important. A "This didn't matter until I was effected, but now everyone should take note" situation. A bit late to start complaining about something that's been going on with little protest from us for at least five years, isn't it?

Then again, I don't really think most people outside the CoX community care. At least not any more than most of us did when some other game we didn't play shut down. As I recently mentioned elsewhere, I suspect most of them, if they even notice, will shrug it off as the bitter complaining of the last holdouts of an eight year old game that had to go F2P, one that most outsiders hadn't heard of or didn't like to begin with.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Paladiamors View Post
I love you, I Burnt the Toast!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by JKedan View Post
I can't help but wonder how this might look to someone who didn't have a stake in the game.

I wonder if they might not look at all this hubbub and think "if five games in five years is so bad, why were these people still around to get burned after four games in four years? Why is five so bad, but four is 'ok'?". Or even "These people have known since at least the Garriott case in 2010 that this company was capable of dodgy, if not outright illegal, practices. Why didn't moral outrage compel action then? Why were they still supporting a game owned and run by such a company?". In short, why did this urge to 'defend mmo gamers against the business practices of callous publishers' only show up when our game was on the block instead of any of the others that shut down, NCSoft owned or otherwise?

An outside observer might think it appears a little hypocrital, and perhaps a touch self important. A "This didn't matter until I was effected, but now everyone should take note" situation. A bit late to start complaining about something that's been going on with little protest from us for at least five years, isn't it?

Then again, I don't really think most people outside the CoX community care. At least not any more than most of us did when some other game we didn't play shut down. As I recently mentioned elsewhere, I suspect most of them, if they even notice, will shrug it off as the bitter complaining of the last holdouts of an eight year old game that had to go F2P, one that most outsiders hadn't heard of or didn't like to begin with.
Very much this.

Tony whilst I do understand where you're coming from there are two things in your post that really stand out.

Firstly, the "Do a deal with us or else" stance is a bit.. well.. pompous. I mean honestly, who do you think you are? Whilst I do agree that CoH is / was a "venerable" title with a loyal playerbase, and the way they handled things wasn't ideal, ultimately it was a game that was in steady decline for a number of years. SaveCoH was harking on about how amazing 20,000 signatures was and what a powerful voice they had, but in the scheme of things 20,000 is nothing, really, less than nothing. GuildWars 2 sold 2 MILLION copies in its first MONTH.

Whilst they weren't very "nice" about the whole thing, ultimately what more did you expect from a company that already had and continues to have money worries. An example of this was yesterday when someone tweeted about a newspaper article in the Korean times explaining the CEOs sale of the majority of his shares and this being the primary reason for its stock market slump. I'm no market expert, but it was there in black and white that it was the reason, and yet seemingly this was lost on the majority of everyone else saying what an amazing job the Unity Rally did. City of Heroes, wasn't even MENTIONED.

Secondly, if you think the comments of the Anti-NCSoft movement is still all flowers and rainbows, you've seriously lost touch with what's going on. Again (and I realise that given it's my only source, my PoV is likely to be a little polarised) I was following #SaveCoH on Twitter until relatively recently. More or less without fail on a daily basis there were a handful of tweets linking to a news article and the tweeter encouraging everyone to comment bomb it. Not only that the stance of the posters was equally "listen to me or else". Honestly? I can almost imagine the NCSoft Christmas party being a round up of some of their favourites.


@SteelRat; @SteelRat2
"Angelina my love, I'm a genius!"
"Of course you are darling, that's why I married you. Physically, you're rather unattractive"
http://faces.cohtitan.com/profile/SteelRat

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelRat View Post
Christmas party being a round up of some of their favourites.
They don't have a Christmas party - NCsoft prefers it to be always winter, but never Christmas.


@Golden Girl

City of Heroes comics and artwork

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelRat View Post
Quote:
I'm no market expert, but it was there in black and white that it was the reason, and yet seemingly this was lost on the majority of everyone else saying what an amazing job the Unity Rally did. City of Heroes, wasn't even MENTIONED.
In all honest, do you think they would have credited it, regardless of what the truth is?

Secondly, if you think the comments of the Anti-NCSoft movement is still all flowers and rainbows, you've seriously lost touch with what's going on. Again (and I realise that given it's my only source, my PoV is likely to be a little polarised) I was following #SaveCoH on Twitter until relatively recently. More or less without fail on a daily basis there were a handful of tweets linking to a news article and the tweeter encouraging everyone to comment bomb it. Not only that the stance of the posters was equally "listen to me or else". Honestly? I can almost imagine the NCSoft Christmas party being a round up of some of their favourites.
This is one of those things where I have trouble grapsing the depth of what is implied. If corporations have the right to push the envelope of lying to9 the max in order to fluff their products to infinity and beyond, then do customers NOT have the right to do the opposite? If they don't, then the implications of that are quire disturbing, and suggest that we live in some sort of dictatorship. Only the dictators are companies, not politicians.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
They don't have a Christmas party - NCsoft prefers it to be always winter, but never Christmas.
I like winter.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimTheEnchanter View Post
This is one of those things where I have trouble grapsing the depth of what is implied. If corporations have the right to push the envelope of lying to9 the max in order to fluff their products to infinity and beyond, then do customers NOT have the right to do the opposite? If they don't, then the implications of that are quire disturbing, and suggest that we live in some sort of dictatorship. Only the dictators are companies, not politicians.



I like winter.
It has more to do with timing than content.

Seeing something wrong and speaking out against it is admirable.

Seeing something wrong and virtually ignoring it until it effects you, then clamouring for attention by stating that you are now speaking for the rights of everyone in your chosen demographic? Not so admirable.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by JKedan View Post
Seeing something wrong and virtually ignoring it until it effects you, then clamouring for attention by stating that you are now speaking for the rights of everyone in your chosen demographic? Not so admirable.
I think the bigger problem there isn't whether or not a game got axed. But while not being a perpetual gold mine, AFAIK CoH was the only one of the games that WAS still pulling its own weight. That makes things scary for pretty much every MMO in existence, because now we can't even base the long-term survivability of our games on the coldest known standard.

I was getting wary of new games already. Now... I have no idea what to think. What variable is there that still CAN be trusted?


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimTheEnchanter View Post
I think the bigger problem there isn't whether or not a game got axed. But while not being a perpetual gold mine, AFAIK CoH was the only one of the games that WAS still pulling its own weight. That makes things scary for pretty much every MMO in existence, because now we can't even base the long-term survivability of our games on the coldest known standard.
I don't believe that is true. Pulling one's own weight is not even remotely the same as meeting expectations, much less maximizing return on investment.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimTheEnchanter View Post
I think the bigger problem there isn't whether or not a game got axed. But while not being a perpetual gold mine, AFAIK CoH was the only one of the games that WAS still pulling its own weight. That makes things scary for pretty much every MMO in existence, because now we can't even base the long-term survivability of our games on the coldest known standard.

I was getting wary of new games already. Now... I have no idea what to think. What variable is there that still CAN be trusted?
Have we gotten any information on the why's of CoH closing down?

That said, it was a worry about all MMOs before this.


BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection

 

Posted

I think that part of the problem is that loyalty does tend to be a two way street. Coh was pulling its iwn weight, granted, but you cant argue that the trend wasnt steady and downward. Maybe it might have lasted a year or two but can you honestly say that your disappointment and reaction to the news wouldnt have been the same whenever it came?

People talk about other games being axed then sold on and enjoying a reprieve but those games actually have large numbers of people playing them. I played daoc for a bit and that regularly had hundreds if not thousands of players just on the shard i was in. Before i moved from union to virtue a month or so ago it was doing well if it got into treble figures. Its an oft used point of view but if coh was all that great why werent more people playing it?

Theres a combination of the larger gaming populace being fickle and the sheer number of different games on offer meaning that theres very little scope for brand loyalty to any degree - with one obvious exception but id imagine even that will be in a similar situation before long.


@SteelRat; @SteelRat2
"Angelina my love, I'm a genius!"
"Of course you are darling, that's why I married you. Physically, you're rather unattractive"
http://faces.cohtitan.com/profile/SteelRat