The Hobbit Trailer


Agent White

 

Posted

So we'll probably see:

Hobbit part1 dvd, blue-ray, blue-ray/dvd/dc set
Extended editions of each.

Hobbit part2 repeat above.

Hobbit 1 and 2 collectors set.

Re-release of LoTR series with even more extras!

And Complete collectors editions of both dvd and blue-ray sets!


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chyll View Post
(As a related side note, go to Google maps. Ask for walking directions from "The Shire" to "Mordor".)
*snicker*

I did that last night at D's suggestion during our Shadowrun game - and yes, it's set in Seattle 2072. Oh, the possibilities...

Seriously, if someone were to make movies that tell the Lord of the Rings trilogy in that setting, that I would pay good money to see.


"If I had Force powers, vacuum or not my cape/clothes/hair would always be blowing in the Dramatic Wind." - Tenzhi

Characters

 

Posted

Looking good!


Although I haven't read The Hobbit in a year or more but...I thought Gloin was a part of the 12 dwarves, Gandalf + Bilbo....am I remembering wrong?


The only thing that kind of threw me in the trailer was when they had Gandalf naming all the dwarves...it seemed like they were kind of doing it so fast, just felt cheesy in some way...*shrugs*

Edit:


Also wondering how much, if any, the movie(s) will touch on Gandalf and the White Council fighting off Sauron in the woods.


Leader of The LEGION/Fallen LEGION on the Liberty server!
SSBB FC: 2062-8881-3944
MKW FC: 4167-4891-5991

 

Posted

COH term reaction to the trailer= Mag 1k stun

Know JRRT ME pretty well and have been eager to see what PJ has been up to.
I have followed the Vid Diarys of production and knew that the end result would be fantastic. Couple pts to those not in the groove:

2 Movies comprised of the Hobbit and material included as Appendix's in the LOTR.

Movie 1 is reported to end after the Eagles rescue.

Movie 2 should begin with the company meeting Beorn.

As for critiques to PJ's adaptation of LOTR, lets collectively acknowledge that the most perfect adaptation of LOTR would be basically an audiobook. The "medium" determines how any narrative is presented to an audience; Some things work great in one medium and cannot be as potent in another.

I feel PJ did a incredible job w/ the LOTR adaption as movie, despite the near-unfathamible change in TT w/ Faramir...still do not understand that jarring deviation from the core narrative and what purpose did it serve...if I ever have a chance to sit down w/ PJ and Fran, I would dive deep into this...but I digress.

The Hobbit is being filmed in unique 3d process at 48 frames a sec and should blow everyone away with clarity of images and the new tools in the form of adjustable 3d techniques developed by those mad scientist over in NZ. What I cannot wait to see is the renders and voice of Smaug. Though we probably have to wait a year for that chance at another Mag 1k stun.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Razawere View Post
...
I feel PJ did a incredible job w/ the LOTR adaption as movie, despite the near-unfathamible change in TT w/ Faramir...still do not understand that jarring deviation from the core narrative and what purpose did it serve...if I ever have a chance to sit down w/ PJ and Fran, I would dive deep into this...but I digress.....

I agree; really enjoyed the LotR movies but the one thing that I hated was Faramir's different stance compared to the books.

*shrugs*


Leader of The LEGION/Fallen LEGION on the Liberty server!
SSBB FC: 2062-8881-3944
MKW FC: 4167-4891-5991

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Energizing_Ion View Post
I agree; really enjoyed the LotR movies but the one thing that I hated was Faramir's different stance compared to the books.
Indeed. I was bothered by that and the presence of elves at Helm's Deep.


Goodbye may seem forever
Farewell is like the end
But in my heart's the memory
And there you'll always be
-- The Fox and the Hound

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenzhi View Post
Indeed. I was bothered by that and the presence of elves at Helm's Deep.
From what I remember Elves did come to help them at Helm's Deep.


Now the thing is, as far as I can remember, it wasn't "300 (humans/Rohans) vs 10,000" with 5,000 elves coming like it said in the movies, it was more like 5,000-6,000 Rohans vs the 10k orcs.

Then some more re-inforcements came (humans and elves) making it close to like 6,000-7,000 vs 10,000.


Also, Rohan's king left like 1,000 men to help guard Edoras as a "just in case Sauroman doesn't come to Helm's Deep."

That's from what I remember; again haven't read the books in a while.


Edit:


Hmm, just looked at wikipedia (yes, yes...) but it seems I was wrong about the whole thing...hmm...how do I make that stuff up?

*needs to read the books again*


Leader of The LEGION/Fallen LEGION on the Liberty server!
SSBB FC: 2062-8881-3944
MKW FC: 4167-4891-5991

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Energizing_Ion View Post
Looking good!


Although I haven't read The Hobbit in a year or more but...I thought Gloin was a part of the 12 dwarves, Gandalf + Bilbo....am I remembering wrong?

The only thing that kind of threw me in the trailer was when they had Gandalf naming all the dwarves...it seemed like they were kind of doing it so fast, just felt cheesy in some way...*shrugs*
Gloin was included, he was the one who was covered in webbing (apparently from the spider scene in Mirkwood.)

Gandalf introduced (in order):

Fili, Kili,
Oin, Gloin,
Dwalin, Balin,
Bifur, Bofur, Bombur,
Dori, Nori, Ori
and Thorin.

Oh, and it's 13 dwarves, including Thorin. iirc, the book made a point that one of the reasons Bilbo was included was so it wouldn't be an unlucky thirteen.

I think the dwarves' introductions were done so quickly for the trailer's sake. I don't think it would be that fast in the actual movie.

Edit: Oh and Sylvester McCoy (the 7th Doctor) will play Radagast the Brown!


"Everybody wants to change the world, but nobody wants to change themselves." -Tolstoy

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Energizing_Ion View Post
From what I remember Elves did come to help them at Helm's Deep.

<snip>

Edit:


Hmm, just looked at wikipedia (yes, yes...) but it seems I was wrong about the whole thing...hmm...how do I make that stuff up?

*needs to read the books again*
IIRC, Elladan and Elrohir show up right after the battle in the book. Perhaps that fuzzy recollection along with the promptings of the movie corrupted your memory.

In my opinion, the battle at Helm's Deep was symbolic of the strength of Men (racially speaking), feeding into the ongoing theme of the rise of Men (and subsequent waning of other races) heading into the new Age. Having the elves at Helm's Deep took away from this theme.

In a similar symbolic vein, Faramir was supposed to show that Man could have the strength of character to rise above temptation. I feel that movies really mucked all that up (though overall I still enjoy them).


Goodbye may seem forever
Farewell is like the end
But in my heart's the memory
And there you'll always be
-- The Fox and the Hound

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by GATE-keeper View Post
Gloin was included, he was the one who was covered in webbing (apparently from the spider scene in Mirkwood.)

Gandalf introduced (in order):

Fili, Kili,
Oin, Gloin,
Dwalin, Balin,
Bifur, Bofur, Bombur,
Dori, Nori, Ori
and Thorin.

Oh, and it's 13 dwarves, including Thorin. iirc, the book made a point that one of the reasons Bilbo was included was so it wouldn't be an unlucky thirteen.

I think the dwarves' introductions were done so quickly for the trailer's sake. I don't think it would be that fast in the actual movie.

Edit: Oh and Sylvester McCoy (the 6th Doctor) will play Radagast the Brown!

Ah okay thanks


It just felt like "Snow White and the 7 (in this case 13) dwarves" with "stupid/silly" names...when it was going through them so fast...and with one of the scenes showing one of the dwarves tossing plates and setting the table so fast... >_>


So yeah, I hope you're right about that!

Hooray for Radagast!


Leader of The LEGION/Fallen LEGION on the Liberty server!
SSBB FC: 2062-8881-3944
MKW FC: 4167-4891-5991

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenzhi View Post
IIRC, Elladan and Elrohir show up right after the battle in the book. Perhaps that fuzzy recollection along with the promptings of the movie corrupted your memory.

In my opinion, the battle at Helm's Deep was symbolic of the strength of Men (racially speaking), feeding into the ongoing theme of the rise of Men (and subsequent waning of other races) heading into the new Age. Having the elves at Helm's Deep took away from this theme.

In a similar symbolic vein, Faramir was supposed to show that Man could have the strength of character to rise above temptation. I feel that movies really mucked all that up (though overall I still enjoy them).
I guess....I like your story of how I made stuff up...so I'll stick to it


Leader of The LEGION/Fallen LEGION on the Liberty server!
SSBB FC: 2062-8881-3944
MKW FC: 4167-4891-5991

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Energizing_Ion View Post
and with one of the scenes showing one of the dwarves tossing plates and setting the table so fast... >_>
Chip the glasses and crack the plates! That's what Bilbo Baggins hates!


Goodbye may seem forever
Farewell is like the end
But in my heart's the memory
And there you'll always be
-- The Fox and the Hound

 

Posted

It did look good. I was a massive fan of the LotR trilogy, even though, in hindsight, they did mess up a few bits (Eowen is NOT a wilting flower who's obsessed with Aragorn, for petes sakes. Why did they cut the bit of her stabbing Orcs in the glittering caves? *sigh*) and making Gimli a comedic while Legolas turned into action-elf.

Looking forward to this.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Zwillinger View Post
GG, I would tell you that "I am killing you with my mind", but I couldn't find an emoticon to properly express my sentiment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_Photon View Post
NOTE: The Incarnate System is basically farming for IOs on a larger scale, and with more obtrusive lore.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Razawere View Post

I feel PJ did a incredible job w/ the LOTR adaption as movie, despite the near-unfathamible change in TT w/ Faramir...still do not understand that jarring deviation from the core narrative and what purpose did it serve...if I ever have a chance to sit down w/ PJ and Fran, I would dive deep into this...but I digress.
I believe in one of the documentaries they say that Frodo and Sam needed an obstacle at the end of the movie, and that was the reason for the change in Faramir (which I hated as well). I also think (just my opinion) that it was done to make Aragorn seem more exceptional in his resistance to the ring.

I was also not a big fan of the elves at Helm's Deep, especially because one of the reasons seemed to be that they needed some sort of impact by killing off a character, but since none of the mains could die they needed a second tier character to off.

But the change that annoyed me the most was Merry and Pippin tricking the Ents into helping. The Ents were ancient and wise, and realized that they would eventually be affected by the events going on. They weren't tricked by someone saying, "Hey, let's go left instead of right!"

All in all, though, I loved the movies, and can't wait for the next two. I would have liked to see what DelTorro would have done with them, but I'm never going to complain about having PJ return to Middle Earth.


Arc 180901: Flight of the Dreadnought