New armor set - vector-based resist


Aett_Thorn

 

Posted

I think a "Chi Armor set" with vector-based resistances would be a cool addendum and a refreshing change from the other resistance-based sets.

Chi Armor

Through meditation, training and effort, you have attuned your body to the flow of universal energies. This grants you hightened senses and lasting power, as well as toughen your body against incoming blows. You have no protection against attacks you can't see coming though, such as direct attacks on your psyche. Your training has also taught you to weather blows, not dodge them, and so you feel every hit, even if they don't hit as hard.

Harmonious Cloak : Your training allows you to smootht he flow of internal and external energies in your body, spreading and defusing the force of melee hits (+resist against melee)

No-mind Focus : You are now capable of perceiving the Chi flows and disturbances caused by your foes' aggressive thoughts. By following those flows, you enhance your accuracy and perception (Passive +ToHit, +perception bonus)

Yang drain : By absorbing the Yang energies of your foes, you can both focus their aggression on you and boost your own health (Taunt aura with a +regen bonus per enemy around - maybe a diminishing return)

Unseen swat : You control has improved to the point where you can deflect incoming ranged attacks with a focused spike of Chi, lessening the impact (+resist against ranged)

One with Nature : Balancing your energies with that of your surrounding, you harmonize your inner self and protect it against disturbances (Mez protection)

Karma Shroud : Nearing the mastery of Chi control, you surround yourself with a shroud of Chi which cushions you from blasts, explosions and area-based attacks (+resist against AoE)

Yin absorbtion : you have attuned your own energies to the point that you can replenish your endurance faster by absorbing the ambient energies (Passive +recovery boost)

Precotious Reincarnation : in a last-ditch manipulation of the Karmic Wheel, you can return your departing spirit to your mortal shell. Such a transfer requires energy that you drain from your surrounding foes, leaving them tired (self-rez with a very long recharge, stuns, slows and recharge-debuffs the enemies around)

Karmic Avatar : Drawing massively upon the surrounding energies, you infuse yourself with Chi. Your recovery, resistances and Regeneration are all massively improved for a time. Such an desperate effort in exhausting though, and once the rush passes, you'll be left drained and unable to recover for a while (+Melee, Ranged, AoE resist, +Recovery, +Regen god mode with the usual End-crash and a recovery AND REGEN debuff)


 

Posted

I don't think there's such a thing as positional resistance in the game.


 

Posted

That's the point, it would be a totally new armor concept. Since vectors are already coded in (for defense purposes) I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be too huge a project to tie a resistance mechanics to it - certainly less than invent a new type of protection altogether, like they did with Elusivity. And frankly it's always baffled me that one could dodge shots or fire, but could only resist the later.


 

Posted

Considering Hamidon mitos can only be damaged by certain positions, I *think* it's technically possible for a positional resist set, though it's doubtful that'd be given to players on account of it'd include full resistance to psi, and reading your power ideas it looks like a cross between Willpower and Dark Armour and would need to be very careful with the numbers for balancing..

Other than that, I wouldn't mind a chi-based armour set, though Willpower, Super Reflexes and Energy Aura can technically fill in that role through customisation.


I am the Blaster, I have filled the role of Tank, Controller and Defender
Sometimes all at once.
Union EU player! Pip pip, tally ho, top hats and tea etc etc

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by CBeet View Post
Considering Hamidon mitos can only be damaged by certain positions, I *think* it's technically possible for a positional resist set.
They can only be hit by certain positional attacks (5% notwithstanding). And no, they can't just "add a positional resistance", because resistance in this game subtracts from a type of damage being delivered. So to add positional damage, Fireball would have to go from 50% S/50% F to 33% S/33% F/33% AoE, and now every resistance set got a big ol' nerf.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Back Alley Brawler
Did you just use "casual gamer" and "purpled-out warshade" in the same sentence?
Apostrophe guidelines.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Netphenix5 View Post
That's the point, it would be a totally new armor concept. Since vectors are already coded in (for defense purposes) I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be too huge a project to tie a resistance mechanics to it
Unfortunately, from what I recall of previous discussions of positional resistance, the Standard Code Rant applies here. Positional defense works because attacks have more than one tag, but damage doesn't have multiple types. Fire Sword does fire damage and lethal damage, resisted separately, not a hybrid fire/lethal type that checks against the highest applicable resist. Also, how do existing, non-positional res buffs (Tough, for example) stack with this set's positional res?
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBeet View Post
though it's doubtful that'd be given to players on account of it'd include full resistance to psi,
Why not? The devs don't appear intent on making EVERY set have a psi hole, considering the existence of Dark Armor, Electric Armor, and Willpower. When they really want an attack that players can't resist, they just make it unresistable.


 

Posted

The way I was envisionning it, it would be coded in a roundabout way - essentially the resist would be to ALL damage types equally, BUT would only get applied if the positional tag was the correct one. No need to add damage separations or what-have-you.

So the first power would give, say, 20 % resist to S/L/E/F/C/N/T/P BUT ONLY IF DELIVERED THROUGH A MELEE ATTACK. This takes care of the Psi wall argument, since Psi is notorious for having attacks which have no positional vector, only a type label, which this set would be powerless against.

It would also solve the issue with such powers as Tough or IO set bonuses : Tough's S/L resist would be apllied no matter what the attack vector is so long as it's S/L damage, and would stack with the S/L resist from the powers if the tags match.

Frankly, unless there is a code secret that I don't envision, all it would boil down to would be an IF/ELSE test (well, more or less. ) The only truly annoying part would be adding a tab in the combat attribute window to display those vector restistance values.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Netphenix5 View Post
The way I was envisionning it, it would be coded in a roundabout way - essentially the resist would be to ALL damage types equally, BUT would only get applied if the positional tag was the correct one. No need to add damage separations or what-have-you.
Sounds plausible, but it's still a totally new mechanic that would need to be added to existing attacks, so SCR definitely applies.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hopeling View Post
Sounds plausible, but it's still a totally new mechanic that would need to be added to existing attacks, so SCR definitely applies.
Standard code rant definitely applies, as positional resistance would require a complete overhaul of how combat works in general.

The reason is that resistance isn't implemented as a separate attribute. It's a modifier for other attributes. By the time resistance kicks in, the game has already decided what you're going to be affected by and which attribute is going to be touched. It can either be a damage type (Lethal, Energy, Psi, Toxic, one of the exotic types, etc), or a buff or debuff like a modifier like your defense values, endurance, regen, mez status, etc. You can technically have resistance to Fury or other oddball things, but there's no reason for anything to give you that.

I don't think the attack type is even remembered anymore by the time individual effects are being applied.

Changing that would require changing the way every power in the game works :-/


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Codewalker View Post
Changing that would require changing the way every power in the game works :-/
Again, like they did with Elusivity? Which doesn't affect every player of CoX (only PVPers) but still had to be hard-coded in for everyone... It's not like they don't know how to do it. I didn't say it would be easy, I was just expressing an suggestion. And I still think it would be a cool set.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Netphenix5 View Post
Again, like they did with Elusivity? Which doesn't affect every player of CoX (only PVPers) but still had to be hard-coded in for everyone... It's not like they don't know how to do it. I didn't say it would be easy, I was just expressing an suggestion. And I still think it would be a cool set.
It makes no logical sense, though. Positional defense does, since you would avoid ranged/melee/AoE attacks differently, but positional resistance? You get harmed less by being stabbed with a knife than having it thrown at you?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Back Alley Brawler
Did you just use "casual gamer" and "purpled-out warshade" in the same sentence?
Apostrophe guidelines.

 

Posted

they just need to come out with new defense powerset, period haha


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by spazmeer View Post
they just need to come out with new defense powerset, period haha
Period Haha defense sounds interesting. Please expand!


Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.
~Ralph Waldo Emerson

"I was just the one with the most unsolicited sombrero." - Traegus

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Netphenix5 View Post
That's the point, it would be a totally new armor concept. Since vectors are already coded in (for defense purposes) I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be too huge a project to tie a resistance mechanics to it - certainly less than invent a new type of protection altogether, like they did with Elusivity. And frankly it's always baffled me that one could dodge shots or fire, but could only resist the later.
Cool set idea aside, I'll add to the "Standard Code Rant" here.

Since "Positional Resistance" doesn't exist in the game, to make this work they'd also have to add in "Positional Damage". Not only would they need to figure away to work it into the damage mechanics, then the would also have to add it into every single attack and every single defense/resistance set in the game.

It doesn't look as simple or easy once you realize how imbedded such a change would need to be.


Throwing darts at the board to see if something sticks.....

Come show your resolve and fight my brute!
Tanks: Gauntlet, the streak breaker and you!
Quote:
Originally Posted by PapaSlade
Rangle's right....this is fun.

 

Posted

*walks into thread*

*sigh*

Seriously? You guys are going to just rationalize the *concept* as unworkable without attempting to think of a solution that at least *simulates* vector-based resists?

Pretty sure going in and adding 3 types of resists to all attacks is more work than it's worth...

An 'IF/ELSE' line of code sounds simple but most likely can't be quickly added to the game since we're not dealing with BASIC here...

What about all the other mechanics we've got built into the game? There's got to be some creative minds who could think of something, right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcticFahx View Post
It makes no logical sense, though. Positional defense does, since you would avoid ranged/melee/AoE attacks differently, but positional resistance? You get harmed less by being stabbed with a knife than having it thrown at you?
Works if the concept of the 'armor set' is some kind of entity or source that doesn't particularly emanate from the body. For example:

-Fiery Aura, Ice Armor, Energy Aura, etc. are sources that emanate from the character and/or encapsulate the character's body. Anything that comes near or in contact with the body is affected and/or intercepted by that power.

-A spirit, deity or a power that fills or inhabits a larger area would have varying protection depending on the attack's vector. If the power is simulating a ghost floating beside you and absorbing attacks for you, it might do better at absorbing dissipated attacks (AoE) vs focused ones performed with the body (melee).

Thinking about it, I do have a character who might use something like vector resists. A character who has such an intense soul, it literally leaks out of his body (where most others are contained inside the body) in every direction for nearly 100 yards. Anything within his presence he can wrap his soul into and affect, changing it's appearance (illusions), hindering or dissipating enemy attacks or concentrating his energy into attacks of his own. Not saying he'd need vector based defense to work, but just saying it makes sense for him.


 

Posted

What would be the point of adding Positional Resitance?

If you have a toggle that adds resistance against each position (Melee, Ranged and AoE) you're in exactly the same position as if you had, say, a S/L toggle, a F/C/Tox toggle and an E/N/Psi one.

All this accompolishes is letting someone make a build where they skip one of these toggles, eg you decide to let yourself be vulnerable to AoE attacks.

How many times do you do that with existing armor sets? I find I always take all major powers to cover all bases. Sometimes I'll delay one power a bit, but its not a particularly exciting part of my career where I'm vulnerable to fire or whatever, its just work in progress.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcticFahx View Post
It makes no logical sense, though. Positional defense does, since you would avoid ranged/melee/AoE attacks differently, but positional resistance? You get harmed less by being stabbed with a knife than having it thrown at you?
Not to sound confrontational (I understand your point, believe me) but it makes as much sense to me as typed defense.

I mean, I'd like SOMEONE to explain to me why my character can be a wiz at dodging a bullet but has to be a sitting duck when hit by a ball lightning. What, the "oooohh, shiny" factor overrode his impulse to, you know, DODGE?

Yet typed defense exist in the game, so I really think an argument could be made for positional resistance - and I tried to work an explanation into each power description, you'll notice.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Harmony View Post
What would be the point of adding Positional Resitance? If you have a toggle that adds resistance against each position (Melee, Ranged and AoE) you're in exactly the same position as if you had, say, a S/L toggle, a F/C/Tox toggle and an E/N/Psi one.
The same reason we have positional defense and typed defense sets instead of just one type. *shrug* And just as I don't think a SR and a Ice armor toon end up in the same spot, neither would this set and, say, Elec or Fire armor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Harmony View Post
All this accompolishes is letting someone make a build where they skip one of these toggles, eg you decide to let yourself be vulnerable to AoE attacks.

How many times do you do that with existing armor sets? I find I always take all major powers to cover all bases. Sometimes I'll delay one power a bit, but its not a particularly exciting part of my career where I'm vulnerable to fire or whatever, its just work in progress.
It'd work the same as an SR build - sure, you'll END UP taking them all, but for the levels where the AoE toggle is unavailable, you'll be more careful around fireballs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rangle M. Down View Post
Cool set idea aside, I'll add to the "Standard Code Rant" here.

Since "Positional Resistance" doesn't exist in the game, to make this work they'd also have to add in "Positional Damage". Not only would they need to figure away to work it into the damage mechanics, then the would also have to add it into every single attack and every single defense/resistance set in the game.

It doesn't look as simple or easy once you realize how imbedded such a change would need to be.
I'm well aware of that. I wouldn't expect such a set to be available in a week. But as mentionned, things like Elusivity or the way Embrace of Fire works now had to be hard-coded THROUGHOUT the game, so it's not like it can't be done.

What it boils down to is, would teh devs think the effort worth it? That I can't answer for them. I'm just posting a concept suggestion - and, if I may be so bold, one that would be easier to implement than half the set suggestions we see float on this sub-forum, wouldn't you agree?

Oh and Leo_G : thank you for the positive feedback. It's much appreciated. At least I know SOMEONE likes the idea ("they love me, they really LOVE me !" )


 

Posted

I like the positional resistence concept. I tried to suggest one too and got the same haters. LOL

That being said, you, like my set did, have too many other abilities in this set. SR has the same M/R/AoE over and over again. no health bonus, no endurance, no worth while taunt and its fairly expensive. So, I will support this set IF, either they fix SR to have similar (additional) powers as this, or You make it so it's only concerned about the positional resistance. or if they make brute and tank SR able to hit 45% def without having to add more defensive powers.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twigman View Post
I like the positional resistence concept. I tried to suggest one too and got the same haters. LOL

That being said, you, like my set did, have too many other abilities in this set. SR has the same M/R/AoE over and over again. no health bonus, no endurance, no worth while taunt and its fairly expensive. So, I will support this set IF, either they fix SR to have similar (additional) powers as this, or You make it so it's only concerned about the positional resistance. or if they make brute and tank SR able to hit 45% resistance without having to add more defensive powers.
I played with the idea of doing a complete SR parrallel. It could be done by turning No-Mind, Reincarnation and Yin absorption into passive res powers, but I'm afraid it would then LACK in utility. Even SR gets at least Def debuff resistance. And WP or Elec get a LOT of them.

This set would need Res debuff resistance, and THAT is something I'm unsure would be possible to code in the current game system. Or the passive could add resists to other effects like slow, end drain and perception debuff maybe.

And AFAIK, SR tanks can reach 45% defense on all three vectors with no additional powers on IOs, and even on SOs I think Combat jump would get them there. I got one myself that runs at 44% AoE, 46% Ranged and 54% Melee, but I used IO set bonuses and CJ to get there. Total beast.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Netphenix5 View Post
This set would need Res debuff resistance, and THAT is something I'm unsure would be possible to code in the current game system. Or the passive could add resists to other effects like slow, end drain and perception debuff maybe.
It's worth noting that res debuff resistance already exists. Specifically, res debuffs are resisted by normal damage resistance. So your set already has res debuff resist.


 

Posted

Score, then I even outsmarted myself ! (What? No one else wanna gimme props. )


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Netphenix5 View Post
Not to sound confrontational (I understand your point, believe me) but it makes as much sense to me as typed defense.

I mean, I'd like SOMEONE to explain to me why my character can be a wiz at dodging a bullet but has to be a sitting duck when hit by a ball lightning. What, the "oooohh, shiny" factor overrode his impulse to, you know, DODGE?
You have a field that works better at deflecting certain things, like a coating of ice would diffract energy, and simply add more ice onto itself, as well as keep fire from affecting you entirely by taking all the heat from it. Defense isn't always dodging, it can also be an attack deflecting off a barrier or simply being completely absorbed by a field of some sort.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Back Alley Brawler
Did you just use "casual gamer" and "purpled-out warshade" in the same sentence?
Apostrophe guidelines.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Netphenix5 View Post
I played with the idea of doing a complete SR parrallel. It could be done by turning No-Mind, Reincarnation and Yin absorption into passive res powers, but I'm afraid it would then LACK in utility. Even SR gets at least Def debuff resistance. And WP or Elec get a LOT of them.

This set would need Res debuff resistance, and THAT is something I'm unsure would be possible to code in the current game system. Or the passive could add resists to other effects like slow, end drain and perception debuff maybe.

And AFAIK, SR tanks can reach 45% defense on all three vectors with no additional powers on IOs, and even on SOs I think Combat jump would get them there. I got one myself that runs at 44% AoE, 46% Ranged and 54% Melee, but I used IO set bonuses and CJ to get there. Total beast.

The scrappers can survive with lower base def because unless soloing you aren't taking on the whole mob. the brute/tanks have a taunt aura, so they need to be able to slot for something other than defense. I want my fire/SR brute to be slotted for HP/regen (to recover from damage spikes and AV one shots) but I can't because of the current set up. The only thing that goes well with SR is dark because of the self heal.


 

Posted

Biggest problem I see is for a Melee set if you fight more than 3 minions you will already have people getting behind you. Also means all PBAOE attacks become too hazardous to use properly because you can't just run into the middle of a bunch of mobs, you would have to constantly watch where bosses, etc are so that they don't get in wrong place.

This would actually be a more interesting concept for squishies than melees.

Besides if they are going to put new player logic in I would rather see reflective damage where some of the resisted damage can be reflected back to attacker or into a aura hitting those in melee range.


----------------------------
You can't please everyone, so lets concentrate on me.

 

Posted

OK. You dont give numbers for your set, but my impression was that the three main resistance powers (to Melee, Range and AoE) would be roughly equal in value. If that's the case, you end up with a character who resists all attack vectors by the same amount, say 50%.
This is exactly equivalent to resisting all damage types by 50%. There is literally no difference.

The current defence powersets actually use the fact they have vector and typed defence.
Parry adds Melee defence, because deflecting close attacks but not ranged ones or bombs makes sense.
Ice Armor deflects physical attacks, but not fire attacks, which combined with its lack of fire resistance gives it a hole that makes sense.

If you add positonal resistance as an idea, you'd need to answer these questions:

How do typed and vector resistances stack? Is it like defence, where you take the higher value and apply it? If you add them both can you easily get overpowered results?

What about Sonic Resonance? It currently buffs typed resistance to S/L and F/C/E/N. How will this stack with say Melee resistance? Do we need to add Melee resistance and Ranged/AoE resistance to the ally shields?
(Force Field used to only add typed defence, which meant it helped Ice tankers much more than SR Scrappers, so these oversights do happen.)

What about Thermal? It adds typed resistance to allies, but favours Fire resistance and gives little cold resistance. What should it add?

What does Tough do? Adds Melee rsistance too?

The Eye of the Magus/Demonic accolade power add resistance to all except Psi. Should it also add vector resistance?

If all the above gained ranged resistance, you've just made Carnie Ringmistresses and their ranged psi attacks much less dangerous. Do you want that?

The Vanguard Psionic Shield, available for Vanguard Merits, adds some Psi resistance. What should we do here? Its probably OK to leave it as is..

Most importantly, what else have you forgotten?
Mystic Fortune buffs?
Self Mutation?
Base empowerment buffs?
What other little used power has suddenly been nerfed or boosted unintentionally by adding this new mechanic.


Is this work really worth it for a set whose only new feature is that you resist AoE damage less than other vectors during the levelling process? I don't think so.