Player Summit Q&A


B_Witched

 

Posted

Preparation IS important, but it shouldn't be the end all be all of the conflict. Planning & execution go hand in hand and EVE is weak (IMO) in the execution portion of PvP. I frankly don't even consider it strong in the preparation for a battle in comparison to SB and even DF, but at least its not a weakness for EVE.

In terms of player skill in regards to PvP I don't think there is much in EVE at all because the entire game is dedicated to building fleets and getting the resources for them. Its probably the deepest current MMO in that regard and certainly takes time and dedication but little in the regard for actual tactics. There is much more social engineering than strategy, which includes those folks that get to be "friends" with people on the development team. EVE is much like checkers in that regard, there isn't a ladder or even a metric in game that directly tracks who is good and who isn't at PvP. There are things that track overall corp success, but PvP skill is really a small part of that because the game itself doesn't require skill or tactics to succeed in combat.

CoH has a different set of problems, the actual combat takes a great deal of twitch and tactical skills but the PvP community is tiny. In terms of speed its by far the fastest PvP in a MMO, but it lacks territory/resource control options. (lol, base raids) Off hand I'd agree with Fiery, comparing the two is basically impossible since they are almost complete opposites in terms of approach.


Thorizdin

Lords of the Dead
Old School Legends

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thorizdin_LotD View Post
Preparation IS important, but it shouldn't be the end all be all of the conflict. Planning & execution go hand in hand and EVE is weak (IMO) in the execution portion of PvP. I frankly don't even consider it strong in the preparation for a battle in comparison to SB and even DF, but at least its not a weakness for EVE.

In terms of player skill in regards to PvP I don't think there is much in EVE at all because the entire game is dedicated to building fleets and getting the resources for them. Its probably the deepest current MMO in that regard and certainly takes time and dedication but little in the regard for actual tactics. There is much more social engineering than strategy, which includes those folks that get to be "friends" with people on the development team. EVE is much like checkers in that regard, there isn't a ladder or even a metric in game that directly tracks who is good and who isn't at PvP. There are things that track overall corp success, but PvP skill is really a small part of that because the game itself doesn't require skill or tactics to succeed in combat.

CoH has a different set of problems, the actual combat takes a great deal of twitch and tactical skills but the PvP community is tiny. In terms of speed its by far the fastest PvP in a MMO, but it lacks territory/resource control options. (lol, base raids) Off hand I'd agree with Fiery, comparing the two is basically impossible since they are almost complete opposites in terms of approach.
The skills required in EVE are fundamentally different and more complex than CoH. To say no skill is required is a ridiculous comment. I will agree the skills are much more focused on preparation, but I don't think you quite understand that strategy is a form of preparation. There is a great deal of strategy that goes into fleet combat and the formation of a corp.
where as CoH PvP relies on each individual players twitch abbilities to kite, evade and lock a called target.

EVE is a game of Stratego. CoH is Duck Hunt.

In the end it doesn't matter which stye of PvP you prefer. I shouldn't have to tell you which games PvP is more competitive. I'm a numbers person they tend to speak for themselves.

P.s. I think Kevin Mitnick would disagree with your comment about social engineering not being a strategy...


 

Posted

I can't believe I am saying this but Tokyo actually has a point about the size of the PVP community having an effect on how competitive the PVP is.

Just look at the latest Freedom PVP League. One team is clearly dominating everyone, then you've got maybe two other teams who are close to being on par with each other but still far below the top team in skill. That adds up to about 30-35 people who determine the outcome of the league out of how many thousands of subs in COX?

Don't get me wrong, the PVP in this game is still enjoyable even in its borked post i13 form but competitive? Does ware.gov even consider any of the other teams as competition? I doubt it.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercury_Down View Post
I can't believe I am saying this but Tokyo actually has a point about the size of the PVP community having an effect on how competitive the PVP is.

Just look at the latest Freedom PVP League. One team is clearly dominating everyone, then you've got maybe two other teams who are close to being on par with each other but still far below the top team in skill. That adds up to about 30-35 people who determine the outcome of the league out of how many thousands of subs in COX?

Don't get me wrong, the PVP in this game is still enjoyable even in its borked post i13 form but competitive? Does ware.gov even consider any of the other teams as competition? I doubt it.
Wow, are you trying to tank any creditability you had in this community by agreeing with me?

Remember, if you step away from the circle jerk you can't sit back down. d;D


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokyo View Post
The skills required in EVE are fundamentally different and more complex than CoH. To say no skill is required is a ridiculous comment. I will agree the skills are much more focused on preparation, but I don't think you quite understand that strategy is a form of preparation. There is a great deal of strategy that goes into fleet combat and the formation of a corp.
where as CoH PvP relies on each individual players twitch abbilities to kite, evade and lock a called target.
I do understand, but the problem is that I don't see in my personal experience or the accounts of various groups (Goonies, BoB, etc) who've reached prominence, evidence for anything beyond zerg rush once combat starts. I see lots of prep work but nothing that even looks like battle tactics. If you believe differently then why don't you either point to some accounts of battle tactics or provide some?

Quote:

In the end it doesn't matter which stye of PvP you prefer. I shouldn't have to tell you which games PvP is more competitive. I'm a numbers person they tend to speak for themselves.

P.s. I think Kevin Mitnick would disagree with your comment about social engineering not being a strategy...
We've definitively dis proven the notion that numbers are indicative of level of competition, so clutching that piece is non-sensical. Is the over all game deeper and more complex than CoH? Yes it is, but in the specific area we're talking about, PvP, EVE is less complex tactically. Now, CoH (as I said) doesn't have resource control, logistics, or any of the other STRATEGIC factors that EVE does have BUT the actual combat in EVE is overly simplistic, slow, and in my experience driven by lag produced intentionally.

Now, I do actually agree that the PvP population in CoH hurts its competitiveness because the pool of players is too low for a robust meta-game but the size of EVE's population DOESN'T make up for its shallow combat system and again comparing them is basically useless since they focused on almost diametrically opposed approaches.


Thorizdin

Lords of the Dead
Old School Legends

 

Posted

Merc didn't mean it. He was making fun of you, Tokyo.


"His Imperial Majesty's Minister of Restraints and Leather" -LHF

Two naughty acronym teams / Ascension / Convenient / Artic and the Chillz / Fap / Other teams I can't remember (sorry.. mind is goin')

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercury_Down View Post
I can't believe I am saying this but Tokyo actually has a point about the size of the PVP community having an effect on how competitive the PVP is.

Just look at the latest Freedom PVP League. One team is clearly dominating everyone, then you've got maybe two other teams who are close to being on par with each other but still far below the top team in skill. That adds up to about 30-35 people who determine the outcome of the league out of how many thousands of subs in COX?

Don't get me wrong, the PVP in this game is still enjoyable even in its borked post i13 form but competitive? Does ware.gov even consider any of the other teams as competition? I doubt it.
Ware.gov came back to this game not for its competitiveness. We came back because we enjoy each others company and don't agree on 1 game for all of us to group in. We also all really like the mechanics of CoH pvp. The only other driving factor was to utterly destroy all the teams in this league. When we came back and registered our team people were still saying Exile was going to win the league. It is amazing how people can forget over the course of 1 year which players were more talented than others. All we could do was laugh knowing that the majority of the people on Exile could not even make a d8 team in the original FpvpL. And those that thought that Shen was the leading candidate to take down the Iowa Caucus, we have players that have captained just about every member of their original team. We can honestly say we likely know more about their players than they do. We knew how the matches were going to go the moment we solidified our roster. So to answer your question, we do not consider any of these teams remotely capable of putting up a legitimate threat against us in an official match. We are more apt to defeat ourselves than for them to defeat us. So yeah we consider them all a joke, and for the most part I think that most members of those teams realize it. But like I said at the beginning this game is not fun for its competitiveness its fun because of the mechanics which is a big plus over things like Eve, I have watched all of the Alliance Tournaments and played a few accounts running fast moving high dps ships like Hurricanes.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeSignal View Post
Merc didn't mean it. He was making fun of you, Tokyo.
I hope so Smoke. Merc is good people, I'd hate him to be affiliated with me. d;D


 

Posted

For such a dead playerbase, these discussions accumulate a ridiculous amount of back and forth circular arguments, allbeit usually the same 3-5 people going back and forth for pages upon pages.

For what it's worth, I never considered CoH PvP to be extraordinarily competitive, but where there is PvP there will be some level of competition, no matter how small the player base. Beyond that, I think that it's fairly obvious the level of competition in this game is fairly tame compared to other games where competition has a bigger emphasis, and most of those types of games aren't usually MMOs. I think the only MMO in recent memory that has come close to the level of competition of the various FPS games is probably GW. MOBA's like LoL can be fairly heated also.

In terms of MMOs, for most people the draw in PvP is less about competition and more about what is more entertaining, keeping in mind that PvP always has some level of competition. In most cases, larger sustainable populations do tend to lead to more competition, especially in terms of MMOs.

If we're going to debate which games are more competitive, I'm not sure why we are talking about MMOs.

Who cares, play the game doing what you like to do and have fun with it. The competition for most CoH PvPers is an afterthought, myself included.

/rant


@TheKatalyst
My **** is bleeding.

 

Posted

Also, one reason why CoH has the potential to be fairly competitive is the way Arena works, specifically from a social standpoint... Just look at arena chat. Most forms of truly competitive PvP come from head to head, team vs. team type of matches, which is what Arena sort of does if it weren't for the other factors making PvP in this game bad at times.


@TheKatalyst
My **** is bleeding.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thorizdin_LotD View Post
I do understand, but the problem is that I don't see in my personal experience or the accounts of various groups (Goonies, BoB, etc) who've reached prominence, evidence for anything beyond zerg rush once combat starts. I see lots of prep work but nothing that even looks like battle tactics. If you believe differently then why don't you either point to some accounts of battle tactics or provide some?
Feel free to read the PvP boards. There are ongoing topics concerning fleet tactics and strategy. Much more than here.

Quote:
We've definitively dis proven the notion that numbers are indicative of level of competition, so clutching that piece is non-sensical.
No, you haven't. Yes the number of skilled players does matter. Read your own quote below....

Quote:
Now, I do actually agree that the PvP population in CoH hurts its competitiveness because the pool of players is too low for a robust meta-game but the size of EVE's population DOESN'T make up for its shallow combat system and again comparing them is basically useless since they focused on almost diametrically opposed approaches.
Thank you for contradicting your previous quoted comment and proving my point...

The combat is shallow in your opinion and your opinion alone. I consider this games combat to be shallow. It doesn't matter how many times you say it, it doesn't make your opinion or mine a fact, that's why it's an opinion.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokyo View Post
It doesn't matter how many times you say it, it doesn't make your opinion or mine a fact, that's why it's an opinion.
This is the point in most arguments where everyone should just agree to disagree, Yellow makes a valid point in that what you two are arguing is almost entirely based on subjective opinion.

A pretty basic psychological concept that comes to mind is when people argue with eachother about opposing opinions, especially in terms of ones that are almost entirely subjective. Usually, at the end of the day, both sides just wasted a ton of time and left the argument feeling more justified in their argument. You could compare this type of argument to an Atheist and a Christian arguing, neither of you can definitively prove the other is wrong.


@TheKatalyst
My **** is bleeding.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Katalyst View Post
Also, one reason why CoH has the potential to be fairly competitive is the way Arena works, specifically from a social standpoint... Just look at arena chat. Most forms of truly competitive PvP come from head to head, team vs. team type of matches, which is what Arena sort of does if it weren't for the other factors making PvP in this game bad at times.
Can't argue against sound reasoning. I agree with both your posts completely. If only untapped potential made for good PvP. d;D


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Katalyst View Post
This is the point in most arguments where everyone should just agree to disagree, Yellow makes a valid point in that what you two are arguing is almost entirely based on subjective opinion.

A pretty basic psychological concept that comes to mind is when people argue with eachother about opposing opinions, especially in terms of ones that are almost entirely subjective. Usually, at the end of the day, both sides just wasted a ton of time and left the argument feeling more justified in their argument. You could compare this type of argument to an Atheist and a Christian arguing, neither of you can definitively prove the other is wrong.
Except He's arguing creationism and i'm arguing evolution...


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokyo View Post
Can't argue against sound reasoning. I agree with both your posts completely. If only untapped potential made for good PvP. d;D
This is a good point to stop arguing with eachother and re-unite against the true evil of this game; the CoH developers and their rather large leader.


@TheKatalyst
My **** is bleeding.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokyo View Post
Except He's arguing creationism and i'm arguing evolution...
Well, in that regard, you are both wrong. We were genetically engineered by Aliens from Planet X which is somehow set to collide with Earth in 2012 despite no warning signs.

Sorry, I wandered into that weird part of Youtube again where all the conspiracy theorists post their profound videos.


@TheKatalyst
My **** is bleeding.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokyo View Post
Xanatos you tried to stack a 3v3 in your favor during an impromptu pvp event meant for PvE newbs on Virtue server; that's pathetic and pretty much sums up your definition of competitive pvp.
Me, Vince, and Silit wanted to 3v3 you and two random newbies we found in RV. Hardly think that's a "impromptu rp event meant for pve news on Virtue server".


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xanatos View Post
Me, Vince, and Silit wanted to 3v3 you and two random newbies we found in RV. Hardly think that's a "impromptu rp event meant for pve news on Virtue server".

We both know what you three were trying to do. Kinda thought you were above pulling something like that with newbies on our home server though, it's disappointing.

Anyway, happy thanksgiving. This will be my last post to this thread. Hope you all enjoy your holiday weekends.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by macskull View Post
Battlefield 3 yeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaa
Anyone? I wanna play some BF3 on either PC or 360.


@macskull, @Not Mac | XBL: macskull | Steam: macskull | Skype: macskull
"One day we all may see each other elsewhere. In Tyria, in Azeroth. We may pass each other and never know it. And that's sad. But if nothing else, we'll still have Rhode Island."

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokyo View Post
We both know what you three were trying to do.
Everyone knew what us three were trying to do: PVP together on the same team.

Playing with friends. What a concept.

Keep changing your tune kid.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turgenev View Post
I saw the hands go up. I'd say about 15% said they currently pvp'd , and maybe 60-70% said they try if things were improved. I don't know if it was with my mechanic idea, but I like to think so. :-)
I raised my hand so fast I almost hit the person next to me while waiting in line for my question.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by macskull View Post
Anyone? I wanna play some BF3 on either PC or 360.
Busy playing Minecraft building my underground lair so that I don't get eaten by Zombies at night.


@TheKatalyst
My **** is bleeding.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xanatos View Post
Everyone knew what us three were trying to do: PVP together on the same team.

Playing with friends. What a concept.

Keep changing your tune kid.

Tokyo's response: cry about it instead of going off and finding people to play with him in a 3v3.

Adequate response: When Mebs did that (with Dex and Silit with him, I believe?) to me in zone, I just went on vent and asked Artic and iMidget to play with me. And we tied. And it was fun. Actual fun. Far more than running around RV wormholing baddies into drones or reading diatriabes as tokyo RPs with his retarded brethren.