Defender or Corruptor


BigBlackAfrica

 

Posted

I've been reading around the forums and come to the conclusion that I am doing myself a disservice by not having a Sonic toon. I am considering Time Manipulation as the other set because I want to try that out and it seems like it would be a good combo with Sonic because it also has -res in addition to other good debuffs.

The question is should I roll a Defender or a Corruptor? Is the Cor's increased damage really that important with the -res or will I want to have more of the TM powers available earlier? Or does it even matter?


 

Posted

When in doubt, roll a Corruptor! Except when it's Sonic Blast, then go with the Defender.


[U][URL="http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showthread.php?t=251594"][/URL][/U]

 

Posted

You'll probably want a Defender. The higher -resist in your blasts will add up to more damage on teams and should give you enough of a boost when solo to make up for no Scourge. With a support power set that also offers -resist the Defender looks even better.


Cascade, level 50 Blaster (NRG/NRG since before it was cool)
Mechmeister, level 50 Bots / Traps MM
FAR too many non-50 alts to name

[u]Arcs[u]
The Scavenger Hunt: 187076
The Instant Lair Delivery Service: 206636

 

Posted

If you want to go sonic blast, you want a fender.


 

Posted

A little search fu would do you well.

Defenders more defensive, able to get more varied IO bonuses as a result of thier superior buff/debuff numbers.

Corruptors do more damage when teamed generally.


When something good happens to me, I can never enjoy it....
I am always too busy looking for the inevitable punchline...


BEHOLD THE POWER OF CHEESE!

 

Posted

Sonic Attacks is about the only time I'd go with a Defender over a Corruptor.


@macskull, @Not Mac | XBL: macskull | Steam: macskull | Skype: macskull
"One day we all may see each other elsewhere. In Tyria, in Azeroth. We may pass each other and never know it. And that's sad. But if nothing else, we'll still have Rhode Island."

 

Posted

Well everyone seems to agree. I was thinking of going defender and am glad to hear that is the right choice.

EDIT: Also, my search fu is weak. I never know what keywords to use.


 

Posted

Someone needs to make an FAQ type post like one guy did to respond to "Merge the servers" threads.

Each of the ATs has their acolytes that will extol the superiority of the Defender/Corruptor over the Corruptor/Defender. Anyone making any kind of absolute statement is incorrect, except for that absolute statement I just made. Lots of considerations have to be made, which I won't be going into.


Global = Hedgefund (or some derivation thereof)

 

Posted

You should go defender now by default because of the vigilance changes that make defender damage not that bad solo (and teamed who cares because your buffs/debuffs are going to be better.)

There are exceptions for specific powersets of course but the general rule still stands.

I am actually somewhat bummed because I have a mid 30s sonic/sonic corruptor who I got a lot of badges with (since I like to get them while leveling) who is clearly inferior to a sonic/sonic defender. It makes me want to not play the character at all, and not bother creating the defender because I spent so much on the corruptor.

I have my TA/A (my first 50 way back when in '05 or whatever...w00t!) heavily invested in expensive IOs and incarnate abilities. Still, I kind of wish they hadn't made the vigilance changes because they really slant things towards defenders and ruin the balance IMO.


"Hi, my name is Ail. I make people sick."
A partial selection from my 50's on Freedom: Ail = Ice/Traps, Luck = Street Justice/Super Reflexes Stalker, Mist = Bane, Pixy = Trick Arrow/Archery, Pure = Gravity/Energy, Smoke = Fire/Fire Dominator

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiery-Enforcer View Post
When in doubt, roll a Corruptor! Except when it's Sonic Blast, then go with the Defender.
This is pretty much the perfect advice.
Except when you want Sonic/Kin or Sonic/Pain mind you.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deacon_NA View Post
Someone needs to make an FAQ type post like one guy did to respond to "Merge the servers" threads.

Each of the ATs has their acolytes that will extol the superiority of the Defender/Corruptor over the Corruptor/Defender. Anyone making any kind of absolute statement is incorrect, except for that absolute statement I just made. Lots of considerations have to be made, which I won't be going into.
Good thing no one has actually made any absolute statement then huh?

Both Fiery and mac said go Corr unless you go Sonic Blast.

StrykerX said go Defender for the better debuff mods on Sonic Blast, as did Emberly.

Test_Rat said that Defenders get better defensive numbers but that Corruptors generally do more damage.

And Ail said go Defender except for a few exceptions in which Corruptors are better.

I don't see anyone saying DEFENDERS ARE BETTER ALWAYS or CORRUPTORS ARE BETTER ALWAYS.


Support Guides for all Corruptor secondaries and Fortunatas
The Melee Teaming Guide for Melee Mans

 

Posted

Depends. I generally prefer a Corruptor. Higher damage cap, better damage scaler, and Scourge helps ensure that I am always doing damage, all the time. Besides that, I don't really have the defender 'mindset' to where I'm content with just shootin' magic healer goo all over my team. I like to make things die.


 

Posted

For me, another factor would be which set you see as your "main" set and how high your altitis is. I love Storm Summoning, and I would love to make a Storm corruptor, but I know most of my characters stall late 20, mid 30s. So I would not be getting much enjoyment out of a Storm Corr.



 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silas View Post
Good thing no one has actually made any absolute statement then huh?

Both Fiery and mac said go Corr unless you go Sonic Blast.

StrykerX said go Defender for the better debuff mods on Sonic Blast, as did Emberly.

Test_Rat said that Defenders get better defensive numbers but that Corruptors generally do more damage.

And Ail said go Defender except for a few exceptions in which Corruptors are better.

I don't see anyone saying DEFENDERS ARE BETTER ALWAYS or CORRUPTORS ARE BETTER ALWAYS.
I don't see anyone in this thread saying that other posters have made absolute statements in this thread. Do you see such a statement Silas? If so, please direct me to it, I have missed it. Not sure what your righteous indignation stems from.


Global = Hedgefund (or some derivation thereof)