Female kittens/cats as viable Player Character models, please?


2short2care

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandX View Post
I'd love for some glove boots options that where large kitty paws!
Yes. Both small and large cat paws (fore- and hind-) would be terrific and would allow people to make kittens and/or lionesses!

The more felines, the better!



AMERIKATT: Star of Stage, Screen, and Saturday morning cartoons! (Art by Psygon and ChristopherRobin)
"(Katt-Girl) obviously reads a lot of encyclopedias" -- Kiken
Dark_Respite's video -- Avatar: COH Style!
I Support Nerd Flirting and Even More Nerd Flirting!

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amerikatt View Post
Yes. Both small and large cat paws (fore- and hind-) would be terrific and would allow people to make kittens and/or lionesses!

The more felines, the better!
Then again, generic animal paws that fit cat, dog, bear, etc. themes - i.e. pads to complement the currently available claws - would stand a better chance of adoption than a single species'.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
As opposed to discussing what, exactly? The thread is a joke, and a pretty obvious one, at that. Animal models, be they good or bad for the game, have been shot down by the development team as completely undoable. Not much else to say about it, other than small talk.
As opposed to not discussing it. If the suggestion is so ridiculous to be considered a joke, then you can simply post nothing. And since the OP had already indicated the suggestion wasn't a joke, I'd say it's viable to bring up the limitations, yeah, but only to bring perspective. I don't think the devs illicitly shot down more models/skeletons (I think it was even brought up in one of the surveys when you deactivate your account or maybe one of the Art threads), but it was commented how much work it'd be.

Not much else other than small talk? Right, I think there's plenty....like application (beast mastermind?), possible implementation (start out with just NPCs and branch out the animations over time or stances perhaps), complications (all 4-leggers don't walk/run the same, etc.). Is it no one bothers to delve into a subject because they're too lazy? Maybe an oversight? Or perhaps they just take the easiest shots at it, like using 'furry' remarks or something...>_>


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo_G View Post
As opposed to not discussing it. If the suggestion is so ridiculous to be considered a joke, then you can simply post nothing. And since the OP had already indicated the suggestion wasn't a joke, I'd say it's viable to bring up the limitations, yeah, but only to bring perspective. I don't think the devs illicitly shot down more models/skeletons (I think it was even brought up in one of the surveys when you deactivate your account or maybe one of the Art threads), but it was commented how much work it'd be.
You are right. The only thing stopping the creation of animal models is the amount of work to reanimate everything for them. There is no engine limit in place for this one.

--

Oh and redoing/creating costume pieces for them.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by LISAR View Post
You are right. The only thing stopping the creation of animal models is the amount of work to reanimate everything for them. There is no engine limit in place for this one.

--

Oh and redoing/creating costume pieces for them.

LIES!!!

Everyone knows animal models require a diesel engine and the COH engine runs on Jet Fuel.