getting new computer Mac or PC


Airhammer

 

Posted

I am getting a new PC shortly and mostly I do some gaming.. Mostly COH and looking to play the new Star Wars MMO when it comes out. I play some strategy ganmes and thats about it. No shooters nothing like that.

I have a PC now but am wondering about Mac but know very little about them. I definitely want to be able to play GR on the Ultra Mode.

Thanks for any advice in advance.


The hard things I can do--- The impossible just take a little bit longer.

If numbers are so much more important than a teammate who is fun to play with, forget about the game altogether and go play with a calculator instead. -Claws and Effect-

 

Posted

Get a Mac. I have a PC but my wife has a Mac, I've played CoX on it a few times and it looks very 'purdy' and runs much smoother than on my PC.


 

Posted

1. What's your budget?
2. What do you want out of a computer?
3. You do know that if you get a Mac you can also have Windows, right?

If you get something, be sure to watch the specs. I personally don't recommend the Mac Minis - if you get a desktop get an iMac (if you needed a Mac Pro you would've known it already), or get a MacBook Pro. Also note - there are NO system requirements/recommendations for the upcoming Star Wars MMO, so honestly? Kinda hard to tell there. That's not coming out for a while, anyhow.

Likewise, we don't know exactly what will do how well with GR yet - too soon to tell.

One gripe - the iMacs and Minis cannot upgrade their video; only the Mac Pros can. So if you needed to upgrade that, then you're out of luck. I'd get the best that you can at the time of purchase if you did go that route (ditto for the laptops).

By the time GR comes out, there might be some upgrades done to the iMac and MacBook Pro specs, so then might be a better time to decide if you're factoring Ultra mode. Likewise, maybe we'll have more info on SW:TOR. You'll have to wait, but you can save money in the meantime, and when you do buy you'll get more power for your money.

Honestly - if you've already bought-in with Windows (ie, have a lot of software and such for it) I'd strongly recommend coming up with more reasons to switch to Mac OR make sure you buy a copy of Windows 7 along with the Mac.

And again, consider your budget and what you want out of a computer... it has to make sense for you. For instance, the only reason I haven't upgraded my old G4 (now collecting dust) is that Apple will not make a Mac that I want (consumer tower between $1,000 and $1,2000, and I have no interest in hackintoshing). The Mac Mini is too underpowered for my wants, I don't want an iMac, and the Mac Pro is such overkill its not even funny (ie, I'm not paying that much money on a computer I can't use as a tax deduction!). I don't want a laptop (PC, Mac or otherwise), so I, personally, am out of luck.

If you do get a Mac, it'll be a good machine that with a little TLC will last you for years to come. If you do get a PC, do your research first (regardless if you buy pre-made or make it yourself), give it a little TLC and it will last you for years to come.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zortel View Post
If you're looking to play Star Wars: The Old Republic later on, get a PC. There may not be a Mac release.
Bootcamp, though.


 

Posted

Im probably looking to spend between 1600-1800. I have been looking at iMac's, Dell, Alienware, Gateway and Cyberpower ( only because thats what I have now )


The hard things I can do--- The impossible just take a little bit longer.

If numbers are so much more important than a teammate who is fun to play with, forget about the game altogether and go play with a calculator instead. -Claws and Effect-

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psyte View Post
And again, consider your budget and what you want out of a computer... it has to make sense for you. For instance, the only reason I haven't upgraded my old G4 (now collecting dust) is that Apple will not make a Mac that I want (consumer tower between $1,000 and $1,2000, and I have no interest in hackintoshing). The Mac Mini is too underpowered for my wants, I don't want an iMac, and the Mac Pro is such overkill its not even funny (ie, I'm not paying that much money on a computer I can't use as a tax deduction!). I don't want a laptop (PC, Mac or otherwise), so I, personally, am out of luck.
If you can stretch up to the core i5 iMac, it has most of what you are looking for component wise, but of course it is still an all-in-one design.

There has been lots of talk about the demand for a mid range expandable mac but Apple doesn't seem to want to make one.

Your advice to the OP is spot on though.


 

Posted

There is something of a learning curve between PC's and Macs, so before you decide, stop by an Apple Store and play with one of the iMacs or Macbook Pros (you'll see why I mention those two in a sec) and see how you like the way it behaves and the interface. As nice as Macs are, sometimes what you know brings greater satisfaction than what you don't.

If you're looking for a change, though, here's what you'll gain:

- Reliability. The one thing goal Apple has managed to maintain due to strict control over both hardware and software is a homogenous architecture. Macs will generally behave as advertised (not including the occasional technical failure, which happens to all electronics). Windows generally needs more tinkering to get games running, at the very least requiring downloading updated video drivers and installing them. And that's not including that some generic or hand built PC's need hardware tinkering (which can get expensive) to get it to run a game.

- Redundancy. Boot Camp allows you to divide your hard drive, and install Windows alongside MacOS. One reboot can switch from one to the other, and Apple made a strong effort to provide Windows drivers that integrate Windows with the Mac hardware. This means if you're dissatisfied with a game's performance Mac side, you can "switch" to Windows quickly to play.

- Possibly Extreme Portability. The Macbook Pro is 1" thick and 7 lbs, and can keep up with most desktop PC's for gaming, either in MacOS or Windows via Boot Camp.


And in the interest of fairness, here's what you'll possibly give up:

- Access to cutting edge video cards. Mac support for brand-new-on-the-market cards tends to lag behind a few months. You won't be able to order that newly released card and have it work right away in Windows and Mac. And this only applies if you buy a Mac Pro - the Macbook Pro and iMac have no way of upgrading the video.

- Tinkering. Macs generally are less friendly if you want to periodically replace the motherboard, video, or processor to gain more performance - if you're a tinkerer. You can, however, upgrade RAM or the hard drive if you're careful - there are guides online.


Other things to note are that it's unknown what hardware/operating systems the Star Wars MMO will support, though Lucasarts has historically eventually (though after a delay) released Mac versions as well. The CoH for Mac client performs well, but it's unknown whether it will support Ultra natively at this time.


Manga @ Triumph
"Meanwhile In The Halls Of Titan"...Titan Network Working To Save City Of Heroes
Save Paragon City! Efforts Coordination

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Airhammer View Post
Im probably looking to spend between 1600-1800. I have been looking at iMac's, Dell, Alienware, Gateway and Cyberpower ( only because thats what I have now )
Okay, I'm going to assume you're computer literate and capable of running a Windows machine, don't install crapware, don't do high-risk stuff (ie, pirating/stealing stuff), etc. A few things to consider then:

1. Can you get anything locally? Or will it have to be shipped? Will it cost you to get something shipped or not? Shipping can stink, that's for sure - if you can get free shipping that's always a plus. If the computer maker won't do it, check if Amazon or Newegg has what you're looking for, and see if they will.

2. Do you want to upgrade stuff later on? Major stuff, like the CPU/motherboard (which then will likely include new RAM)? If so, no to Apple, likely no to most Dells, not sure about Gateway, Alienware or Cyberpower. For instance, my Dell has a BX motherboard and case, so I can't just go to Newegg and get a new motherboard, CPU, etc. I'd have to buy all that plus a new case (basically, make a whole new computer), then gut my current computer for everything else (harddrive, CD/DVD drive, etc).

2a. Do you need or want any add-in PCI cards? The iMacs will be no good for you.

2b. Do you want to run SLI or Crossfire in the future? The iMacs will be no good for you. The PC's will depend on what you buy, so pay attention to the specs (ie, SLI/Crossfire support and the power supply). At this time Mac Pros do not support SLI or Crossfire... I hope that changes at some point

2c. Do you have any USB devices that might not supported by OSX? Check the maker's website or do a Google on it - it might work even if its not officially supported by the company.

3. How is the customer service for each company? How reliable are their systems? This will be worth some research time.

3a. Are you willing to pay more to get a computer that's better made and more reliable instead of getting the highest possible specs? How much can you handle by yourself?

3b. Do you want to get the extended warranty for the computer? How long does it last? What does it offer and protect? What does it not?

4. You cannot get a Mac Pro within your budget, new. So you're looking at iMacs. Have you compared what you'll get with an iMac's price versus a PC plus monitor?

5. PC only - can you get a clean install of Windows or an actual Windows disc? Because of how cut-throat the PC market is and how slim profit margins are, one way they make money is installing software (trials, demos, etc - "crapware"). If you can get it clean, do it. Otherwise, you might want to get PC Decrapifer or something. All my PC's have had clean installs of Windows (ie, no OEM crap) have been wonderful (and stay that way since I don't install crap).

6. Mac only - are you keeping your PC? Or do you want your Mac to do everything? If so, you'll likely want to get an OEM copy of Windows 7 to go along with it, as well as a copy of Parallels (in case you need/want to use Windows while in OSX). Be sure to check their website for any known issues.

I realize this isn't a straight answer. But its good to think about and should help you come to a decision you're happy with.

Oh, and if you don't have one already? Look into a UPS. You're looking to buy an expensive piece of hardware, so make sure its protected, you know?


 

Posted

If you do look at the iMacs, look at the 27" model with the Radeon 4850, plus be sure to double check the forums here to see what issues you might run into, regardless if you're running OSX or Windows. Everything else on that model looks pretty good. I would say look at the quad core i5 model, but that's outside your specified budget by $200 (and that's without Applecare, which is $169). I'd recommend Applecare since the iMac is an all-in-one deal, and I don't think very much of it would be user-serviceable. Sadly, you'll probably have to up your budget a bit more to get an iMac with the 4850 and Applecare.

Now, when GR comes out? You will hopefully be able to get a more powerful iMac for the same price. Waiting always pays.

If you look at Dell and Alienware, keep in mind that Dell owns Alienware. You might want to compare the specs of the Studio XPS systems with the Alienware systems, and keep in mind you always drop in a newer video card later. But pay attention to the small details - the Alienware Aurora, for instance, lets you choose your case color (big whoop) and the power supply (which is a big deal!). The Studio XPS doesn't. I don't think Dell is doing custom power supplies anymore, but that would be one more thing to consider if you decided to upgrade your video card later on... "Can my PSU handle it?" Also, the Studio XPS won't do SLI or Crossfire, whereas the Alienware will.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Airhammer View Post
I am getting a new PC shortly and mostly I do some gaming.. Mostly COH and looking to play the new Star Wars MMO when it comes out. I play some strategy ganmes and thats about it. No shooters nothing like that.

I have a PC now but am wondering about Mac but know very little about them. I definitely want to be able to play GR on the Ultra Mode.

Thanks for any advice in advance.
You're probably expecting to see me shout something to the effect of Get-A-Mac. The answer is a bit more complicated than that.

For starters, Apple computers tend to be a bit pricier than identically specced systems from Dell loaded with a Windows or Ubuntu.

However, that pricing is offset by a higher build quality and component quality. Most Apple computers are over-engineered to remove heat or withstand mobile use. Apple's customer service is also rated as one of the industry's best, so paying out that little bit extra money might pay itself back over time.

In addition, you can do a hardware install of a Windows OS by using Boot camp... so if you desperately need backwards / crosswords compatibility, you aren't totally left helpless. You also have the options of virtualization with both VirtualBox and VMWare offering OSX solutions.

The reverse... isn't actually true. You can't generally run OSX on a computer you built yourself, not without using something like an EFI loader and hacks the mods probably don't want to be talked about on this forum. In addition, the hardware / software needed to run a Hackintosh may actually make running OSX on a homebuilt system as expensive as having just bought a system directly from Apple .

In respect to City of Heroes, the question about Ultra Mode is a bit hard to answer. We know what the base hardware requirements are. RadeonHD 4850 or Geforce 9800 and up. We also know that the API in use is OpenGL, so the Ultra Mode graphics are not tied to Windows Specific commands... so they will work. Thus you can pretty much forget the MacBook and Macbook Air. You can also skip the MacBook Pro 13" and the MacBook Pro 15" 2.53GHz. You can also skip the base model Imac and the Mac Mini.

So, if you were buying a Mac, you choices for Going Rogue are limited, starting with the 2.66ghz MacBook Pro @ $2000, the 2.8ghz MacBook Pro @ $2,300, the $2500 17inch MacBook Pro, the 21" $1500 Imac, and the $1700 27" Dual Core. All of these models have a fatal flaw though. They all have Geforce 9600 GPU's, or RadeonHD 4670 GPU's. Yes, you'd be able to run Going Rogue's Ultra Mode, but I somewhat seriously doubt you'd be able to run the game on the native resolutions of their displays.

Thus, you are left with only 3 systems that have a chance of running Going Rogue on the native display. The $2000 Quad-Core Imac that does come with a RadeonHD 4850, and the Mac Pro's with the $200 RadeonHD 4870 upgrade... where the starting price is $2500... and they don't come with displays.

This... is the sticking point. $2000 on a Windows/Linux base would get you something with Crossfire or SLI, a quad-core processor with AMD Socket AM3 or Intel Socket I5 or I7, tons of ram, and plenty of hard-drive space. You wouldn't be using an "aging" Core2 Duo processor.

From a long term ownership position, sure, the Imac probably is worth that $2000 asking tag. However, we still don't have a launch date for Going Rogue, and there is the chance that Apple could do a product update with the RadeonHD 5x00 series early next year, as well as move to the I5 and I7 processors, or if some rumors are to be believed, smack Intel around (again) by introducing an AMD platform. We don't know.

Unless you desperately need a new computer between now and then, I'd save your cash and wait for the expansion to actually launch before going out and spending money.


 

Posted

I want to thank everyone for all the great responses. They have been a great help. If I wait a few more months I can get a better system so that is what I think I will do at the very least.

Can anyone name some good PC companies besides stuff like Dell ??


The hard things I can do--- The impossible just take a little bit longer.

If numbers are so much more important than a teammate who is fun to play with, forget about the game altogether and go play with a calculator instead. -Claws and Effect-

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by je_saist View Post
Unless you desperately need a new computer between now and then, I'd save your cash and wait for the expansion to actually launch before going out and spending money.
I'll agree with this 100%.

And I've not heard rumors of an AMD-based Mac before... that makes me warm and happy inside


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Airhammer View Post
I want to thank everyone for all the great responses. They have been a great help. If I wait a few more months I can get a better system so that is what I think I will do at the very least.

Can anyone name some good PC companies besides stuff like Dell ??
Keep an eye out - things like that can change depending on who's getting fat and complacent, who's refocusing, etc. Better to do that kind of research closer to buying time, I think. Still good to do now, mind you, but past performance is no guarantee of future results.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Airhammer View Post
I want to thank everyone for all the great responses. They have been a great help. If I wait a few more months I can get a better system so that is what I think I will do at the very least.

Can anyone name some good PC companies besides stuff like Dell ??
The market has... consolidated a bit. The US market is largely split among large companies on Desktops, with Dell containing Alienware; HP containing Compaq and VoodooPC; Acer containing Gateway and Emachines; Lenovo which was IBM's old PC division; and Sony who doesn't actually make a proper desktop computer these days.

If I was spending money on a brand-name system for gaming, I'd shell out the extra cash for a VoodooPC or a Falcon Northwest. Both have excellent customer service, and use good quality components.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psyte View Post
I'll agree with this 100%.

And I've not heard rumors of an AMD-based Mac before... that makes me warm and happy inside
This comes up about as often as the Mac Tablet rumor.

*Warning: Next content has absolutely nothing to do with the ongoing thread*

The basis for the rumor is that Apple wants a low power processor... that isn't an Atom. Now, as I understand it, Apple doesn't really... like... the Atom because it's actually a really weak processor in terms of instructions per clock cycle per watt. Now, my mom has one of the Atom netbooks with a 1.6ghz processor and a full gig of ram. I borrowed it to see how it compared to my laptops. My HPN5470 laptop from 2001 with a 1ghz Athlon4 (which for reference was the AthlonXp architecture) actually boots Windows Xp faster, and in the time I had to work with the Atom processor system, kept pace or turned in quicker benchmarks. So, Atom's weak. That's... not really a surprise. It's not meant to be a powerhouse processor. It's just supposed to last forever on a battery.

Unfortunately, or fortunately depending on your point of view, Intel's not exactly ready to push the I7 architecture down into the Atom's power zone. Yes, they can push the original Core 2 Duo Architecture, Banias, down there, since that's what Banias was built for... but that ceases to be a high-margin product.

That really leaves Apple with only one of two solutions for it's lower-end and energy efficient computers. ARM or AMD.

Now, from a practical point of view, Apple could indeed go with ARM since Apple has switched processor architectures before. The Darwin BSD that sits at the center of OSX has been supported on the ARM architecture for years. Theoretically Apple would just need to recompile, and poof, new solution. The Cortex A8 and A9 ARM processors also keep Intel's Atom team awake at nights with their, on paper, Instructions per clock cycle per watt performance advantage.

From a different practical point of view, Apple could go with AMD's Neo and Fusion platforms. Reason why is less work on Apple's part. No re-compiling, no worrying about binary compatibility. Just drop in and go.

The tertiary factor is that Apple is reported to be Intel's biggest customer, and Intel has bent over backwards for Apple in the past to secure contracts. Apple using any other processor vendor than Intel would be a huge smack in the face to the company. So, it is possible that Intel will continue to provide Core 2 Duo derived processors that can fit into the low-energy bracket, just to keep Apple happy.

*thread normality starts here*


 

Posted

Possibly bizarre question: can the iMac be used as a monitor for another computer? Say Airhammer upgrades machines in a few years (new Mac, new PC, whatever) or wants/needs to hook a laptop or another computer up to a (larger) display - could he do that?

I personally hate most of the all-in-ones I used to see (I don't bother looking at them, generally) since I dislike the idea of them but also the lack of this functionality. With the screen the iMac has it would be a bit of shame if you couldn't... a gamer might outgrow the iMac's hardware if they're really aggressive, but they wouldn't outgrow the display nearly as quick (if at all).

heh... just thinking my boss's Apple Cinema Display at his house has never had any gaming love... maybe I can talk him into trying COH when he finally gets a Mac Pro to replace his G5...


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psyte View Post
Possibly bizarre question: can the iMac be used as a monitor for another computer? Say Airhammer upgrades machines in a few years (new Mac, new PC, whatever) or wants/needs to hook a laptop or another computer up to a (larger) display - could he do that?
Yes and No. The tech specs for the Imac does say this:

So on paper, yes, if you bought one of the 27" Imacs, it seems like you could use it as a monitor for another computer.

***

edit: and on an incidental tangent, both 27" Imac's have the option of a RadeonHD 4850. It's a $150 add on for the lower $1700 unit.


 

Posted

Again I am thankful for all the advice it is very helpful. I was up late last night checking out stuff. I am looking at one of the 27 iMacs and Alienware for PC's. I loved the Falcon stuff but thats a lil above my budget and my gaming isnt THAT aggressive. Its mostly CoH, it will be the new Star Wars MMO and strategy games. I have an 360's for shooters and will get a PS3 for the holidays.


The hard things I can do--- The impossible just take a little bit longer.

If numbers are so much more important than a teammate who is fun to play with, forget about the game altogether and go play with a calculator instead. -Claws and Effect-

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by je_saist View Post
So, if you were buying a Mac, you choices for Going Rogue are limited, starting with the 2.66ghz MacBook Pro @ $2000, the 2.8ghz MacBook Pro @ $2,300, the $2500 17inch MacBook Pro, the 21" $1500 Imac, and the $1700 27" Dual Core. All of these models have a fatal flaw though. They all have Geforce 9600 GPU's, or RadeonHD 4670 GPU's. Yes, you'd be able to run Going Rogue's Ultra Mode, but I somewhat seriously doubt you'd be able to run the game on the native resolutions of their displays.
I run CoH at native resolution (1440x900) on my 15" Macbook Pro, and average 25-30 fps. I say "average", but it can be anywhere from 15-44 depending on how busy the area I'm in is. But mostly it hovers in the 25-30 range. That particular Mac has both an nvidia 9600M GT (which I use) and switchable to a more efficient 9400M (that I don't really use). It comes default with the 9400 turned on, so you have to make sure to switch it - via Energy Saver preference panel - to really see performance increase.

That fps is without compromises - I have all the settings turned up, except for reducing World Detail to 100% (turning it higher causes the game to become more unstable and crash). However, it does not include FSAA or Depth of Field, which have been disabled in the Mac client because the graphics engine currently uses some custom method for both that doesn't work with the Mac - something that will hopefully be remedied with the graphics update in Going Rogue.

As for Ultra, it's anyone's guess right now whether it will work. The Mac drivers for nVidia support up to OpenGL 3.2, but not *all* of the features (though there are only a handful it doesn't support). So it's up to that, what Transgaming does to include support in Cider, and how it performs on the Mac, plus simply how much time is available to make it work during the testing process and how many resources are dedicated to it.

P.S. FSAA, Ansiotropic filtering, Depth of Field, and even Ultra's real-time reflections are called Post-Proccessing Features. All of those reduce the fps just slightly, as they impact the performance of the video processor, which does most of the work. The Mac is able to hand off some of that work to the CPU - if the Cider wrapper supports it. Windows is not currently able to do that. In simpler terms, that may mean the Mac client could be capable of supporting Ultra even if the video processor isn't, or is only partially capable.


Manga @ Triumph
"Meanwhile In The Halls Of Titan"...Titan Network Working To Save City Of Heroes
Save Paragon City! Efforts Coordination

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by je_saist View Post
So on paper, yes, if you bought one of the 27" Imacs, it seems like you could use it as a monitor for another computer.
Thanks for catching that! While I'm still iffy if I'd ever get one, it does make that particular model easier to recommend to folks who are looking for such. I wish that was standard across the line, but oh well


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Airhammer View Post
I am getting a new PC shortly and mostly I do some gaming.. Mostly COH and looking to play the new Star Wars MMO when it comes out. I play some strategy ganmes and thats about it. No shooters nothing like that.

I have a PC now but am wondering about Mac but know very little about them. I definitely want to be able to play GR on the Ultra Mode.

Thanks for any advice in advance.
1: Have you checked to make sure the SW MMO is going to have a Mac version? And your other games?

2: Have you checked the specs on the Mac video to make sure it's compatible with Positron's GR video card recommendations?

3: Is there anything BESIDES games you HAVE to have running on this computer?



Note: If you're going to buy the Mac just to load a copy of Windows into it, save yourself the time, trouble and cash and just buy a regular PC.



Clicking on the linked image above will take you off the City of Heroes site. However, the guides will be linked back here.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny_Johnny View Post
Get a Mac. I have a PC but my wife has a Mac, I've played CoX on it a few times and it looks very 'purdy' and runs much smoother than on my PC.

Without knowing the specs of both the computers that COULD mean that the Mac runs better, or it could mean that your Mac has better hardware specs than the PC. The latter of which wouldn't be a fair comparison.



Clicking on the linked image above will take you off the City of Heroes site. However, the guides will be linked back here.

 

Posted

Generally good advice.

The one thing I tend to say when asked about it - for any purpose - is "Do you have any software that only runs on one?" Yes, you can reboot the mac thanks to boot camp into a Windows environment - but as someone who had done similar things for OS/2 (for instance,) I found it got to be more of an irritation after a while.

Some companies have both PC and Mac versions of their products - COH, obviously, and Blizzard's been known for it for almost their entire history (the original Warcraft, frankly, played better on a Mac.) "General use" (web browsing, email, word processing and the like) it doesn't really matter - go with personal preference. But if you're looking at gaming, research the games. I'd say "Prefer native." If the ones you're looking at will run on both, and/or the company has a track record of multiple platforms - it goes back to personal preference.

The computer, at the end of the day, is a tool. Pick whichever will get done what you want to get done in the best way possible, for as long as possible.


 

Posted

One could always install Windows and never boot into OSX