vindizzLe

Legend
  • Posts

    512
  • Joined

  1. Hey Johnny,

    Silit, March and Liberty are really upset that you did not mention them more in the write-up. Please rectify immediately.

    Your friend,
    Vinnie
  2. vindizzLe

    Praetoria: 1-40

    SPOILERS:

    He was just messing around, small son.

    SPOILERS OVER
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Grae Knight View Post
    Love them or hate them I miss the Sitting Ducks. They brought alot of character to the forums and PvP Zones.
    Seconded. I was just talking a few days ago about how I miss Cowboy Jon.
  4. Oh no, I'm not Korean.

    Misplacer was played by Silit.
    Subplacer was played by March Rain.
    and Displacer was played by Liberty.

    viva la WARE.gov!
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Premonitions View Post
    I'm curious how you managed that, I can't even fathom such a thing, Care to tell how you did it?
    How we averaged our kills? Or how we achieved them?
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Black_Assassin View Post
    Will dom > psi dart > tk blast then its just spam whats up if it itsnt dead already

    And im usually solo so i call my own targets
    Unless you're on top of a target, you will never land your full chain in damage in a one second interval. Just putting that out there.
  7. Haha, yes!

    Liberty actually had the highest K/D in the event individually.
  8. To @Red-Havok, @Johnny Turbo, @Foxy Ferret, @Andy, @Ransim, @Xanatos and anyone else that helped promote the event, design arcs, or organize the RP throughout these past few weeks leading up to this, congratulations on throwing the largest and most successful zone PvP event in years.

    Congratulations to everyone that participated for making that event as successful as it was, you were the driving force behind something of this magnitude.

    Congratulations to me for having the highest K/D ratio during the event.
  9. You're being slightly unrealistic if you think that the entirety of your chain is going to land within 1 second, unless of course you're standing right on top of a player in a PvP zone while they're suppressed.

    What is your animation chain? What are you teaming with? Who is calling your targets?

    These are things to consider if you're working on "improving" your attack chain. Your positioning, the order that you're throwing your chain, and who is selecting your targets are important things to consider.
  10. "At some point" could mean several months to a year. Possibly longer.
  11. I spent 4 hours in a near permanent state of travel suppression.

    It's good to be me.
  12. This thread is so close to 10 million views.
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by The Katalyst View Post
    The dev team is certainly responsible for a lot of things wrong with PvP, but players simply unwilling to go the extra mile to make the most out of the game is not one of them. For as much ******** as PvPers tend to do, very few of them are willing to actually do anything besides derp around Freedom RV all day.
    I'm not sure I can agree with this. Events were being run across servers regularly after the arena hit in i4. PvP has existed for a majority of this game's lifespan, test server was active for years, even after i13 changed up the rules for how we PvPed.

    A lot of players have fretted on the forums, argued and complained, but we've also put a lot of work into analyzing many of the problems that we were having in order to fix them.

    Do you not remember the constant posts we were making concerning arena crashes per Ex Libris' request so that we could alleviate that problem? What about the PvP leagues held on Infinity, Champion and Freedom? Lethal Lotteries? Lethal Lottery 2v2s? Iron Man Tourneys?

    Maybe you don't remember that stuff, but I certainly do. If that isn't the playerbase getting active and making the most of a system that honestly feels like it was cast aside from the get-go, I don't know what is.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Pareto View Post
    Loved that line.
    And then we posted the highest KD ratio of any team to ever play this game.

    Jokes.
  15. Try playing support.

    (Therm doesn't count)
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith View Post
    Vinnie--

    You can nitpick and lawyer over phrases like "in a nutshell" all day long. The comparison is apt. Racial slurs and generic insults based on ethnicity are not only in the same vein, they are generally used hand in hand. I can't believe you are so naive as to not understand that.
    How often do you see comedians "generally" making ethnic jokes with racial slurs featured in the set-up or punchline? If/when a friend tells you a "racist" joke, does he usually follow it up with a laugh, followed by "Stupid niggers"?

    Get real. The person nitpicking here is you because you keep screaming that "THE COMPARISON IS APT!" You were wrong about your analysis of a battle and you can't pull yourself around to admitting that. It's alright, I get that.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    Your mission statement tells most of the remaining cox pvp community to suck your ****. Your match writeups describe your team ******** on people. Then when I make a comment on a logo, you get get all sensitive and take issue with my tone, lol. I comment on a couple of your posts and suddenly you're the poor victim of a haunting.
    You whine more about our mission statement, match write-ups and how much we've turned this league into a "pissing contest" than I even bring up your snobby tone in another thread. I think I've already said it before that I find it hilarious that you've taken on the role of Felonious around here, it's very clear that reading comprehension must not go hand in hand with being a working graphic artist.

    [quote=BattleWraith]Nice abbreviated recap of the logo debate, including this edited quote at the end:

    Quote:
    stay away from my posts.
    What I actually said was this:

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    If you're gonna seriously act all butthurt and paranoid if I respond to you, stay away from my posts.
    I quoted you in full once and responded, then broke off a part of your quote towards the end. Stop making it seem like I was quoting you out of context. You're still reaching for the tiniest things to continue the argument about, including claiming that I'm lying about something in order to make a point.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith View Post
    Lol ok shift the goal posts again. This time away from the type of content included to how much was included.
    Your claim was that Refractor vs. Konflict was racial slurs "in a nutshell". What's interesting is that you also state that:

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    More often then not you're butting in when I'm making replies to other people anyways.
    Which is funny because you just had to make a comment about my battle when you weren't even being addressed. And you want to bring up hypocrisy to me?

    I pointed out that barrier using racial slurs as a trolling tactic years ago was an indication of his inability to properly troll people. I'm personally not a huge fan of using the word sand-******, or anything similar. If you think that a 6 bar joke set-up is similar to words like that, okay. I don't.

    Based on what I posted to barrier, you seem to think that my battle "in a nutshell" was racial slurs because I "ran out of options". Your statement is wrong no matter which way you look at it. I didn't "fall back" on racial jokes, the lengthiest round of the battle featured the least amount of race references bar for bar.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    The comparison is still apt: when "personals" and "aggression" are not sufficient to win the match
    It's a promo battle, there is no winner based on judging. Battling is premeditated, no battler is going to say that his material "isn't sufficient" before hand and decide to insert the "secret weapon" in order to gain the edge.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    Asian jokes ftw.
    Race references are overdone, it's a gamble to even try writing them or freestyling them into material.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    Lol no I haven't lost sight of that. It's just a joke. You of all people being a crybaby over "tone."
    I bring up what I mentioned in a discussion over a month ago once since that time and I'm being a crybaby. I think you're reaching.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    And this whining about me following you around--***** please.
    By whining, you mean pointing out that you do it frequently? I find it endearing that you feel the need to get riled up every time I post on the forums or say anything in arena chat.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    I made a comment to Dex about the logo. He mustered up a reasonable response.
    Here's Dex:

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Daknah
    That gp is too ugly for me to view. All ware viewed gp's must be peril approved.
    Here's you:

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    Has to have a blocky font and a gradient right? Lol.
    I follow right after:

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by vindizzLe
    Because every guildportal design that Peril has ever done featured blocky font and a gradient, right?

    Lol.
    You follow up, Dex doesn't respond until 9 posts later.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    I didn't change my tone--I just agreed that the plain logo worked well within the context of the overall site.
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    I was just referencing this one, but if you want to posture over it be my guest. It's certainly better than the majority of the other guildportal sites, but in general design terms I think it's a bit plain.
    If that's "agreeing that the plain logo worked well within the context of the overall site", okay.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    I was done with the conversation. Then you chimed in with your "i'm not out of my depth in this discussion because I've received criticism from professors at Juilliard" silliness.
    You were posting with more frequency than anyone else, I'm not exactly sure how that is an indication of your being "done" with the conversation. And even after the conversation in that thread was concluded you were drawing pictures of Xanatos and making up a new signature image for yourself that pertained to the conversation.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    If you're gonna seriously act all butthurt and paranoid if I respond to you, stay away from my posts.
    If pointing out that you have a tendency to follow me around in threads equates to being paranoid, you may need to sit down and read a book.

    And here especially:

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    stay away from my posts.
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    Which is Refractor vs. Konflict in a nutshell.
    Pot, kettle?

    At least when I responded to your jabs at HP I wasn't misinformed and it was relevant to my group as a whole.
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith View Post
    Semantics. You're rejecting my comparison based on a strict definition of "racial slur." No you didn't use some Asian variation of the n word. You did break out a bunch of more or less generic Asian stereotypes on your opponent after messing up. Calling someone else out for using a racial slur after they've run out of options--I don't see any great difference from what goes on in that video. Which amuses me, frankly. I wasn't fishing for some apologia about why you do the things you do.
    I'm not rejecting your comparison based on just the definition of racial slur, I'm rejecting it based on the entire content of the battle. This is probably the wrong fight for you to pick, I know my material a lot better than you do.

    3 rounds with more than 16 bars per round, half of round two that was written equated to about 8 bars of asian jokes, with a few added in round 3. I didn't fall back on those as a crutch because I screwed up, that was all intended from the get-go.

    Round 1 and 3, with 3 being the longest had more personals and aggression than outright racial slurs, jokes, or however it is that you want to define it.

    Mathematically speaking, the majority of the content in my battle was not centered around his race, and my hardest hitting line was a personal. Therefore, "racial slurs" (however you want to define them) were not my battle against Konflict "in a nutshell".

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    You're right the performance aspect is lost on me. How is that relevant?
    It's relevant because you feel the need to throw it back on my face the moment it gets brought up. If it's lost on you, spare me the sarcasm.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    The average high school musical probably draws a larger crowd and gets more laughs.
    Absolutely, and the average High-School musical features far more preparation and generally has a larger body of people working to oversee the event.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    And while there are some overarching principles that are general to all types of criticism, proficiency in one doesn't make you more competent in commenting on another.
    You've obviously lost sight of the fact that I initially took to the tone with which you felt the need to deliver your criticism. It was only after that you changed your tune and decided to redirect your energies towards following me around on the forums like the ghost of Felonious.

    I've never claimed to be an expert on any medium of art, I brought up performance experience as a counter to your generalized statement that I had no idea about how harsh criticism could be.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith
    An expert in American method acting won't have any great insights into German Expressionist painting based on their background.
    I'm no expert on method acting, battling, improv or any performance related medium, and you're certainly no expert on any form of art as well.

    Your approach to criticism is far different than mine, and your tone wasn't warranted. That you corrected yourself afterwards and decided to hone on me is indicative of this as well.
  19. Quote:
    Originally Posted by MisterD View Post
    I am going to try speak really slowly, since you clearly do not understand what I am trying to say.
    In order to do this, you would need to be on a voice-chat server. We would be more than happy to give you our Mumble information so that you can log on and speak to us in a Southern drawl so that we may better understand exactly what it is that you are trying to say.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by MisterD
    My argument is that being able to remove heal decay is broken. Nothing on either side of the 'is heal decay good/bad' argument. Also, I never mentioned travel suppression, but well done for bringing it up, and making it sound like I was relating the issue to TS..when I didnt. TS has NOTHING to do with being able to bypass heal decay..nothing! If you think it does, I suggest some more time pvping (again, just to clarify, since you seem to love twisting my words, I am NOT saying spamming a heal wouldnt cause TS, I know it would..but thats an entirely different point).
    The problem is that in your initial post, you claim that you do not agree with the changes made to the PvP system in i13.

    Here:

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by MisterD
    Thats right..one of the main 'features' of zone pvp balance (according to the devs, not saying I like it).
    That comes across as disingenuous then when you immediately claim that the worst aspect of the new Destiny is that it allows a player to achieve higher healing values, effectively reversing Heal Decay. Again, you claim that this is more broken than a bugged stun affect that can break Hibernate.

    Here:

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by MisterD
    It is actually WORSE than just the long stun, or the fact it breaks hibernate (interestingly, I heard it didnt break hiber for an ice tank).

    The power also has teh -resistance to healing. ie, you get higher healing values when a heal power is applied to you

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by MisterD
    And there is your high horse argument about i13 pvp again. Just in case you didnt notice, i13 pvp HAPPENED. It realllly truly ruly did!
    If by speaking slowly, did you mean utilizing phrases that belong in a five year-old's vernacular?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by MisterD
    So your argument that my statement about no heal decay being not broken..doesnt work, you know why? Because in the current pvp..we HAVE heal decay.
    Again, this makes your prior statement about potentially disliking the PvP changes made in i13 seem disingenuous. Yes, we do HAVE Heal Decay. But that's a pretty flimsy counter-arguement. That thread of logic screams out "Because the devs do it, it is so".

    Well, the devs gave us a power that reverted Heal Decay temporarily. So your arguement is also invalid. You know why? Because WE HAVE INCANDESCENCE.

    Do you see how faulty that is?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by MisterD
    Stop living in your dream i13 world, please. Making the point that something is not broken, because the very thing it breaks was added (for right or wrong) to pvp EIGHT full issues ago?
    The Incarnate powers are pretty "broken" across the board as far as numerical values go. And I believe that that is the way that they were intended to be. Ignoring ED, achieving ridiculous levels of defense, +recovery, +regen, +recharge or gaining a ridiculous resistance to mez effects was the point. Liberty isn't out of line to argue that the healing values and being able to temporarily beat Heal Decay seem to be in-character for Incandescence as far as Incarnates go. The only portion that doesn't seem to be in line is the stunning affect that it has as well.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by MisterD
    Way to cling to the past. Does that mean you wont be using your rebirth anymore either, because we sure didnt have that in i13...opps, theres another thing thats broken! Better let everyone else know.
    It's funny, for every single poster that speaks out against the changes made years ago to a system that they enjoyed so much, there's always someone else right around the corner ready to try and smack them down for "clinging to the past".

    Focus on building a better arguement about the topic, and less on attacking the poster for holding a certain view about the current state of the PvP system.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by MisterD
    Another thing, I already said this, but maybe just maybe..you will get it. I used the emp beating the fire blaster as..(wait for it, brace yourself, get a dictionary) an EXAMPLE. I never said..nerf the power because an emp can beat a blaster. I said FIX the clearly broken power. A fix..you know? Not a nerf.
    Listing a duel taking place in a zone as an example for why an Incarnate power is broken is a very poor example in multiple areas.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by MisterD
    In regard to a strong finish..I dont think I actually needed one..
    Well, you need a strong something, anything.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by MisterD
    but could you try to find a better argument than 'no heal decay is fine, just cause there was none in i13.'
    Temporarily beating Heal Decay is fine, players still have Travel Suppression to contend with. If we can't "kite around like bunnies on crack" (as you so eloquently put it) then you shouldn't have any problem getting a kill, right?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by MisterD
    Oh and a phasenub huh? I just KNOW your own of the people who stacks different phase types..because I guess to you that isnt a bug either. Obviously since you could do it in i13, its all good!
    Liberty does not run double phase on any of his PvP builds. Good effort though, chief.
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by NecroOmNomNomicon View Post
    Support oriented "support toons" like team based empaths probably shouldn't win duels with fire blasters, yeah. But you know, it's really hard to use the term "support toon" on a lot of Defenders since their debuffs are by far the more overpowering aspect in PvE and PvP, and debuffs are ca-raaazzzyyy in 1v1s. Yeah an Empath, even if they are totally built for 1v1s, probably shouldn't be winning 1v1s based on the nature and intended use of the set. But y'know what, I don't think Stalkers were meant to be shark blasters when they were invented either, so whatevs. If the Emp wants to be a beast, you just gotta complain about it and make no attempt to use powers like benumb on them, because that might actually work and THEN WHERE WOULD WE BE?
    People have been dueling with Emp Controllers for years prior to the implementation of i13 and were able to find success. It requires a more patient level of play, but it is certainly possible and not gamebreaking in any way, as there are viable counters.

    Also, anyone counting "duels" (not saying you are, specifically) in zones is outside of their mind.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by CrazyJerseyan View Post
    Youre a good guy. I cant wait to use racial slurs at every opportunity against everyone. Im thinking you could get away with it while battling, nothing is as hard hitting as a well placed and well thought out racial slur...embrace the hate.
    You'd be surprised, racial slurs really don't get as much of a reaction as you'd think.

    I don't frown upon attacking your opponent however you can, but I do think that even some things can be pretty tasteless.

    But hey, go for it. If you get punched in the face, the battle footage would probably net you a few million views.
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by BattleWraith View Post
    And I always thought Vince's BROmance was with Sneaky Prophet.
    I can't tell if this is serious, but I actually despised Sneaky as a person.