Zombie Man

OR... passing on wrong information.

We're still waiting for confirmation. Until then, we have every right to challenge that information despite how icky carebears feel when that happens.

In I18 Beta, the Shards and Components were in their own Salvage Tab (all non-tradeable) in the Salvage Window.

There was a separate Incarnate GUI Window in which the recipes for crafting components and Boosts lived and in which you can slot your Alpha Slot and in which your Alpha Boosts were stored for swapping or for storing so as to create the next higher level Boost.

Yeah, aren't players so dumb that they set themselves up for failure by making some of the stupidest and stupendously unrealistic conjectures based on not only flimsy information, but information that gets repeatedly debunked by real information?

It was pointed out by a big power point slide that the NDA for I120 was to test the new End Game Content, which is exactly what a 12-24 person Trial/TF sounds like.

People who made it out more than that were just brick brain dumb.

Yes, I know some conjectured for the fun of it, I'm talking about the ones who took the conjectures seriously and are now disappointed through their own fault.

Any disappointment here has to be laid fully and squarely on the fault of players and not one bit on the point of the Devs who said exactly what the signed-NDA was for.

This was posted and pointed out several times in the wild rear end conjecture threads:

If you're exemplaring down a lot (e.g., running Posi TFs), it would behoove you to make an exemplar build with cheap Frankenslot IOs avoiding IO Sets.

You lose the IO Set Bonuses anyway when you exemplar down. Also, high level Enhancements take a big debuffing when you exemplar. And if you build your IO Sets with low level IOs so as not to lose the Global buffs, then they're weak enhancers for your high level gaming.

A exemplar build throws all of its slots into the pre-35 level powers, making all of them 5- or 6-slotted. Frankenslotting with cheap IOs puts them way over the ED cap, which is what you want to do, since their strength will be heavily diminished at low levels.

This will give you a character that, at the level of a Posi TF, is equivalent to being slotted with SOs at that level. Plus, with inherent fitness, you'll have Stamina at that level and no slots wasted on the Fitness Pool, meaning, you'll have a full attack chain. Plus they have access to their +5 level powers.

So, again, if you exemplar down any significant amount of time, an exemplar build is cheap and very powerful -- overpowered actually.

And thus... the argument that Incarnate abilities are needed or should be available when exemplaring just doesn't hold water. Without IO Sets or Incarnate Powers, a level 50 exemplared can already be overpowered. The Devs specifically do not want exemplars to get any more overpowered than they are. Asking for Incarnate abilities to be available exemplared is a non-starter with them.

It was about 10 years from loosening of the rules to crash.

Not desirable by whom?

More sensitively to whom?

These suggestions would seem to work to me. It would be desirable by me and some others I know. I don't see this idea as lacking in sensitivity at all.

How about a little more discussing specific pros and cons and less throwing around emotional and vague no's?

The latter.

Yes.

Or, use the Greek pluralization, since it's a Greek word:

Ouroboroi.

The website doesn't show all the icons in progression from common to very rare. The uncommon upgrades adds a ring. The other upgrades add more laurel leaves. Here they are:

Spiritual:




Nerve:




Musculature:




Cardiac:

It's purpose is for End Game Content, thus, the constant insistence from the Devs that it will not be available when you exemplar down. Exemplared 50s already are overpowered when exemplared and anyone who says they aren't needs to learn to play, seriously.

That being said, by the time one is finished with all the Incarnate Slots, you could probably solo the LRSF.