-
Posts
3799 -
Joined
-
<QR>
I liked the trailer. I am looking forward to seeing the movie next summer. -
-
-
Quote:This was the case for me as well however I certainly understood/understand why many were/are angry about it and especially how it was announced.Sorry to hear that. ED actually barely affected me because ironically enough I slotted most of my characters with a "diversified" mindset to begin with. I didn't even really have to respec for it to any great degree. *shrugs*
It came during a season of nerfs on top of everything else. While they may have been necessary I wouldn't expect anyone affected by it to be okay with it. And I think people posting about it have certainly cooled down quite a bit. Two or three years ago it still evoked angry posts as much as the week it was announced. -
What about the increased hit points part of Dull Pain?
-
-
Quote:Yeah, once you have saved the 20-25 for a purple you may as well save for the 35 for the currently 2 billion+ PvP recipe.Purples yes, incarnate stuff no.
EDIT: the price of purples is *extremely* high. I think what most people are doing is not buying purples directly. Instead they're getting pricey IO's like the Luck of the Gambler global recharge and selling a few of those to fund buying a purple. -
Quote:True. I accepted I would rarely if ever have time to run TFs and pre-merits that meant I was stuck with only getting Pool C rare recipes through the market so I was going to have to acquire enough inf to do so.If you want to get the most out of the game, then you need to participate in all the game has to offer.
If you don't want to participate in all the game has to offer, then you must accept that you won't get as much from it as those who are willing to do a little of everything.
Then they added merits so I was able to use Ouroboros to run arcs to get merits to random roll or buy my rare pool Cs in addition to the market.
Then they added bosses random chance to drop Pool C rare recipes so I made sure my characters who could handle bosses changed the difficulty slider to get them.
A lot of people left the game when the inventions/markets were added because they were unwilling to accept the new game changes. Nothing has changed other than the amounts and which items on the market people are complaining are too expensive. Meanwhile those who were willing to adapt to the changes or adjust their expectations are doing well. -
Quote:No.Are Hero merits the same thing as just Merits? I did the tips missions till I got all 10 point under Hero, then I did the Hero morality mission. I didn't get a hero merit, I just got a merit. Are these the same thing?
There are Vanguard Merits from Rikti stuff once you join the Vanguard at level 35.
There are Reward Merits (old merits) which are spent at Merit Vendors.
Now we have the new Hero and Villain Merits known as Alignment merits by most players. They can only be spent in The Crucible (villains) and Fort Trident (heroes).
You can buy an alignment merit for 20 million inf and 50 reward merits at The Crucible or Fort Trident.
The first time you reinforce a hero or villain morality you get 50 Reward Merits. After that it awards 1 hero or 1 villain merit. -
Quote:Same.Sure, any of my toons that don't currently have Fitness won't get any major changes. A Numi Unique in Health, basic IOs in Stamina, Swift and Hurdle and call it a day.
My warshades, stalkers and most masterminds never took Fitness and ever since the news broke I haven't been taking Fitness on my new characters. -
There have been a few times however those people didn't start off as entrenched in a flawed position when they posted and they didn't ignore/insult/complain with the first few responses.
Or to put it another way they actually came in with an open mind though they were unhappy with what they saw going on in the market. -
-
Nothing. =P
I doesn't flip at the markets except by /em flip
But I only have 7+ Billion total. -
Quote:Let me see if I can help you out here though I don't have a lot of hope on that front.I don't think I have ever seen so much effort to rationalise a morally ambiguous act. By their own admission marketers end up stinking rich. Which means people are paying more than they need to without you. That 600 million per day doesn' come out of thin air it comes from the virtual pockets of other players.
Okay so you add a little stability to the price ranges. This stability obviously comes at a great cost to the rest of us or else how could you make so much money doing it?
You guys have fun playing the market and this is a game so go for it. But for crying out loud stop trying to sell us on the fact you're the good guys. The cold hard facts are for every hundred million you make out of the markets is a hundred million the rest of us had to pay more than we really had to.
First, this is a game. Unless you are cheating there is no morality in actions. If you refuse to accept this please explain to me how you play Chess, Risk, Monopoly, Battleship, etc.
Second, regarding they are rich. Unless they cheat (sell their inf for real money) they are not really rich except within the game. When I (rarely) win at Monopoly I still cannot afford to go buy a Big Mac with my winnings because they inform me that Monopoly money has no value.
Third, you are viewing the actions of the flippers on only one of their legs: the steady higher price of inpatient buyers.
They create a price floor and a price ceiling by their actions. They give someone who simply wants to sell it now the ability to sell it now for the floor price they have created and they give the ability for somone who wants to buy it now the ability to do so.
Without their activities you see, and it does happen in the market if you know what it looks like, something that you cannot sell in a timely fashion for even the NPC vendor price. Then at times there is a run on those items and people cannot buy them at anything close to a lower price. Then they come here and post about how flippers drove up the prices of X even though the reality is flippers aren't at work on that item.
The final point I would make is a flipper cannot make inf pricing it above what impatient buyers like me are willing to pay. The items will go unsold.
So for all the things a flipper does the only "bad" one is they prevent people from sometimes getting things for less than vendor prices but I see 3 benefits against that one detriment and for me no benefit is greater than saving me time by allowing me to buy and sell now. -
Quote:Oh absolutely. Ever since that silly season of Dallas getting wiped by Bobby coming out of the shower it's been hard to trust series to not pull something like that.I'm actually toying around with the idea that the entire Zombie Apocalypse thing is a dream Rick's having while he's in his coma.
That would actually explain pretty much all the plot holes and logical inconsistencies this show ever generates.
I also toyed with the thought that he's dead and in hell of some kind. -
Quote:That chopper is one of my big curiosities. Did he actually see it or was it a hallucination as the others believed?Well we've already talked about a hypothetical fire escape but I didn't think about the possibility of the "mystery helicopter" picking him up. That would put a fun spin on things.
(I am not looking for spoilers if any exist on this I was just writing out loud.) -
I hate change however I would like to point out we went (in DC's comics) from the JSA to the JLA characters with the alternate Earths idea. This is why I hated the Crisis' series mashing it down. I loved the multiple Earths concept and I loved Elseworlds stories.
So I'd say they can re-boot the series back to the beginning as far as I am concerned but I still want it to be billionaire Bruce Wayne driven to stop crime dressed as a bat and known as Batman and I still want an orphaned Kryptonian Kal-El to grow up in the American midwest developing into Superman.
I wouldn't mind Green Lantern returning to an Alan Scott-like beginning without the Guardians.
Any speedster for Flash would be fine.
They could work out a new Wonder Woman but I really do want some elements of her iconic red, white and blue look because for me she needs it as much as Captain America.
Over in Marvel land I still need my Peter Parker learning by Uncle Ben's death but they could morph it a bit like the movie did.
Iron Man (the movie) showed they could have the same old Tony Stark become Iron Man and make it work.
As I mentioned I need my patriotic Captain America. I do prefer him somehow beginning in WWII and being revived in the modern times because I enjoy his old fashioned personality.
I would love an X-Men reboot without the constant killing of Jean Grey.
Reprints of old comics or online or on DVD and I am content with what I grew up with in the 70s and 80s and paving a way for a new beginning for them all on say Earth 123. -
What's funny (to me) about the Matt Miller comment is I thought that was the same thing said about him when WarWitch took over?
However I want to add that while I understand the personal feelings at losing the developers who have done us the service of communicating with us over the years the reality is we were simply very fortunate they were allowed to do that for as long as they were. And I think the obvious downside to it is that when they leave volutarily or otherwise it causes a greater impact than a company would like it to have.
So I understand the recent moves of only have the community people talk to the community but I do miss the old way of lots of back and forth with the devs. -
-
-
Quote:I got to say while a wild animal would be scary, zombies are still a bit more unnerving to me. But I would still be really unwilling to saw off body parts to get away. Saw open my throat to die quick? Yes. But I would expect I wouldn't live long after sawing off my hand anyway.OK, take the zombies out of the equation then. Replace the zombies trying to get through that door to eat Merle with an angry/hungry grizzly bear or Bengal tiger. Now rethink how Merle would have reacted "realistically" to a REAL LIFE threat to his life.
I am not going to do well in a zombie apocalypse without super powers. -
Quote:Correct: In 'Batman Forever' Bruce tells Dick that "Two-Face could be halfway to Metropolis by now."I think Metropolis was briefly mentioned in Batman Forever, but it's a good point. And I agree, superpowered villains and more fantastical elements can indeed work in comic book movies. It just depends on presentation. With a different script and director, even Arnold and Uma's Freeze and Ivy probably could have worked. I can easily picture Mr. Freeze being portrayed by the cold, unfeeling and inhuman Terminator, or Ivy as a deceptively deadly seductress. The problem is they were portrayed as campy and over-the-top, because that was the vibe the filmmakers decided to go for.
If the movie takes the villains seriously, so will the audience. Same goes for the superscience and magical hoodoo.
I suspect that the Thor and Green Lantern movies are going to be something of a litmus test to see if Hollywood can pull off some of those elements convincingly. If so... who knows? We might actually see Bale as Batman in a Justice League movie down the line.
In 'Batman and Robin' Batman says "This is why Superman works alone." -
-
Quote:That sounds like Marvin from Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy. Who I am far too in agreement with.It's because life is depressing. Life is always depressing. People talk about happiness, but I've found it to be a complete myth.
Me? I am not into realism in my entertainment. I prefer complete escapism. Give me Batman/Superman/Spider-Man/Iron Man* coming to the rescue. Give me happy endings (though not schmaltzy).
This is not to say you cannot work in realistic downers in an escapist show. I often think of how terrific the second season of Buffy the Vampire Slayer was. That ended on a total downer but in the third season they worked it back into a happy-ish ending.
So drama and tension? Yes. Downers like real life? No thank you. Give my hero (male/female) an obstacle to overcome but let them overcome it.
*or any other of a number of my favorite super heroes -
Dumb question but would you really have to saw your hand off to get out of handcuffs? Would the complete thumb be enough to allow you to pull your hand out? Or would that be too awkward to do?
I am clueless about saws but I am guessing Merle would have used them before.