Snow Globe

Done that. 9 ITFs, 1 KHTF, 1 Hess TF, some odd missions during the 2x XP and I've now got it.

248 hours until last day job badge.

I've heard otherwise.

Actually he can't be SSK'd to level 1 and even keep the majority of his pets. They automatically die if you exempt (I think for about 3 levels you are safe though). You don't have any control over it. Once they die, you can't summon them again because you are too low to summon them. At the most you'd be allowed 2 of the lowest minions.

Yes, you have to be the team leader for street hunting (no active missions) or the mission holder to gain credit.

Pretty much, but note that exemplars are reduced to the team leader's level (no active missions) or mission holder's level so you actually still have to have someone that is lower level to get credit (at least to my limited testing).

You've been bitten by a long-standing and well-known bug. All anyone here can suggest is to send an in-game /petition (NOT /bug). A GM will look into it and correct the problem (it usually takes less than a few hours for this). To prevent this from happening in the future, place at least one item that requires upkeep like a storage rack.

Sorry, confused salvage and components. Yes, 20 per salvage, 99 per component. It has been a long day.

Edit:
20 pieces of any one type of base salvage or 99 pieces of any one type of component.

So 20 Amulets, 20 Charms, 20 echips, 20 energy sources, etc. and 99 Mystic Elements, 99 Mystic Foci, 99 Tech Power, 99 Tech Materials, etc.

I was intending on doing that. I'm about 160 million away from the goal. Given that I'm not exactly a killing machine with an Illusion/Empath, I'll take what I can get this weekend.

It wouldn't matter. Vanden wasn't the only one to catch this fact. Go back to Lemur Lad's second post...

Actually, given my experience with these forums, the status-quo tries to reign supreme. Only when a suggestion has no downsides at all does the suggestion get a "pass" or even a bit of discussion.

It is reasonably apt though.

Every single time I've mentioned it in this thread, it has been a rebuttal. If you are willing to discuss the suggestion without telling me to use the market, then we might get somewhere. Otherwise, you've stated your opinion and can move on. Given that this is my suggestion, I'll stay around to develop it further.

This is subjective feedback and you are more than welcome to your opinion. However it is only a subjective point of view and there isn't anything with that I can discuss.

If you (collectively) have got nothing more than opinion then, unlike what Redoubtable has inferred, the discussion hasn't even touched on a cost/benefit analysis. Instead it is a bunch of opinions that seek to drown the suggestion in a lot of noise. At that point there is no discussion.

About the Master of the 5th, yeah. I've been trying lately. That, Empath (before the reduction), and Leader are the reasons that my day jobs have been pushed back a bit. The day jobs are why I've been putting off getting the damage taken badges.

Yeah, and then I just have to get some of the remaining few badges that I'm missing.

And I've put forward why I feel that the suggestion is a net positive effect:

• It is consistent with uncommon and rare AE ticket purchases.
• Allows those that don't want to deal with the market to do so.
• It doesn't penalize players in either time or tickets who are looking for specific salvage to finish their recipes.
• Provides a price stabilization for common salvage on the market.

However the first half of the thread was full of long-winded "/jrangers". Rather than discussing the suggestion, I was told to do other things equally grindy.

Being told to "use the market" isn't discussion.

Like it or not, AE Tickets are a currency we have in the game.

• Influence/Infamy
• Prestige.
• AE Tickets
• Reward Merits
• Vanguard Merits
• Purple IOs
• PVP IOs

Ok the last two aren't exactly currencies. They might as well be considering how rare they are. All but the last two can be used to purchase stuff from the game.

This section is for suggestions. That you want to do a cost/benefit analysis is besides the point.

This section's descriptions doesn't mention anything about cost/benefit analysis.

As to why I've suggested this, I saw a discrepancy with how salvage was bought with AE Tickets.

Given that we -had- a red name responsible for bases and that red name is no longer red...

As to why that thread hasn't any posts in the last year is because while players want to see changes to bases, they've been on the back burner for so long that a lot of the base builders have moved on (some issues have persisted since Issue 6). There are two threads dedicated to requests for in-game existing items for decorating use for pity's sake. Or like one of the base designers in my group told me recently: "as long as players can have access to the basics (TPs, Workshops, Medical, Ouroborus pillars) then they don't care about anything else."

I suspect the reason the developers don't have interactive ideas like these is that it would further isolate people, making the city zones appear even less populated.

Red Name (pohsyb) post. Or you can look at the Issue 17 overview.

Recipes were specifically banned from storage due to market concerns. While I don't agree with those concerns, being able to email recipes will somewhat change the need for this.

And like any QoL suggestion, need isn't really a factor.

No, each type of drop is a separate roll.

Both of you should go to the NCsoft support, not the ingame /petition system:
Support Centre for our English European players
Support Centre for our North American players
Plateforme d'assistance pour les francophones
Support-Center für deutschsprachige Spieler

Actually, that is how the "name wipes" work (when done) already.

No. While I might not like the name policy, level 5 was set so that it had minimal impact on returning players. I can see the wisdom of it, if only for the people in the armed services.

Level 50s should never have to fear losing their names.

Actually I quite like the Champions naming convention. I also see it as a means of moving away from the current dedicated servers to a (I won't say server merge) more instanced global server like CO. This way any of my characters can team with any of my friend's characters whenever we like. Instead of servers, we could choose which instance to go to.

I don't think appending the global name is ugly and in CO you can display the global names of other players or not as you choose. This is entirely sensible.

I agree.