LISAR

Isn't Diving Avalanche one of Maid Guy's moves?

OP's a herf nerder

This is still [i]gr

Haven't you ever noticed the bones in the Shivans? They are usign the energy from the dead which makes them vunerable to weapons affecting the undead.

Dr V's zombies aren't undead since the soul has long since left. If they used the Arachnos ghost making machine tech to bind a soul to those rotting corpses then they would also be effected by the axe. All with no magic.

undead≠magic

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So he used a live commercial MMO to conduct "experiments" on other people?

Well then, I'm sure he remembered to gather the needed written permissions from not only NCSoft, but also from all people involved in these "experiments". I mean, otherwise he'd leave himself open for all sorts of nasty ethics complaints. Or worse. But as a professor, I don't need to tell him things like that, I'm just a lowly Master of Arts, and even I knew not to do anything that would get the university in trouble.

So it would be extremely sad if someone with grounds for en ethics complaint were to contact his university to make said complaint. Especially in writing. But I'm sure he's been careful and only killed the avatars of people who already agreed to be a part of the "experiment". It's just good ethics to do so.

Sorry, can't keep that level of sarcasm up...

Anyway, if you feel you've been mistreated by these "experiments", and feel vindictive, contact the university directly and complain. Even better if a group of people make a joint complaint. When entering a PVP Zone you agree to getting attacked and killed, but I don't see anywhere in the EULA of agreeing to be part of scientific "experiments". Actually, I don't see anything in the EULA about allowing people to conduct experiments on other players either.

So if you really want to cause trouble, don't just refute his paper, do an ethics complaint as well. I can't be part of it, though, didn't PVP when he was active. But if his "experiment" affected you negatively and you didn't agree to being used as a guinea pig, then you're in the clear for a complaint. Best if you have some data to back it up with, of course, but you don't have to follow the scientific method in a complaint. He, on the other hand, must in his paper.

[/ QUOTE ] Yeah!! Being vindictive will show him!

Actually, by suggesting this you at least as bad as him.

[/ QUOTE ]There is a reason these methods are in place Munki. There is nothing wrong to holding someone to the standards of their peers in the professional world. Next you are going to tell us all the groups who sent that former anti game lawyer cease and desist letters when he said he was supported by their organization were wrong.

Hero side there is a store that has a door you exit from on the side that instantly poofs you out instead of fading to black and back.

Didn't the main guy in Outlaw Star use a gun based on a lost technology that used magic for the ammo?

Isn't there a limit on how many foes you can hold aggro on. Maybe she's getting targeted from the bleed over.

That's not heal aggro that's "Well he's busy...there's another one!" aggro.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Here's a little hint: if you have any kind of a heal enemies will indeed try to target you first.]


[/ QUOTE ]

Heres a little hint, no they dont, unless you are talking PvP.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, don't know where Bad is getting this from. There is absolutely NO enemy in the game that uses a 'kill the healer' AI. It's possible that they could be introduced, but there are no enemies that have it in the game right now, as per a direct quote from Castle.

The threat formula does not include healing, especially self-healing. Just sitting next to a mob and healing yourself will not get you aggro from him. Sight-aggro may occur, but that is not due to healing. You could easily test this out by healing yourself using this power next to a gray-conned mob.

The only heals that I know of that would cause aggro are ones that affect an enemy in some way, such as Dark Regeneration, Twilight Grasp, Transfusion, and the like.

[/ QUOTE ]I still swear she's not playing the same game everyone else is.

I'ld put all my windows on interior walls to mess with people ^_^.

When I pay for this I know I'm paying for a game. When I pay for a meal at Deny's I'm not sure I'm paying for food.

I'll herf it good!

Steampunk arm should have the option to match that finish...that would be awesome...

CoH is very sensitive to how long you hold the button...

B_I doesn't time for your facts!

[ QUOTE ]
Ok, I see the problem. I screwed up typing in my resolution. It's 1680x1050. which is the native resolution for the monitor, an Acer AL2216W.

I didn't realize that I mistyped it before. It's people like me who make tech support jobs difficult.

[/ QUOTE ]No, it's people who did what you did and then insist they made no mistake that are the problem. No one doing support should have an issue with a user who freely admits fault and takes corrective action.

If you are always getting held/mezed and you find it bothersome adjust your tactics and slotting.

It's almost like people think comic book plots have no room in comic book games.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Ideas which are not very well conceived, have many/serious flaws or are just plain unworkable get shot down.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm sorry, but, really? My suggestion was really that bad?

[/ QUOTE ]yes

The grave yard would be awesome.

Maybe 1.25-1.5 exp for street mobs that aren't spawned by ambushes.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I was actually relieved to see them NOT there the last few Mayhems I ran.

I don't mind them overall since I know they're going to occur, but I have a problem with them on two specific points:
<snip>

2) Ambushes target Masterminds and TOTALLY ignore the pets. Yes, I know that if you have them on follow/defense you still have a better than average chance of survival, but still.. it's that darned Logic thing again...

"Okay men, take 'em out! NO! Not the giant menacing robots who are shooting laser beams of death at us! Take out the small scientist-looking dude behind them.. yeah... the one with the coke-bottle glasses and the comb-over. He's putting shields on the robots while hiding in a corner... he MUST be dangerous!"

[/ QUOTE ]

... how does that *not* make sense? Destroy the command/control center, watch the rest fall apart. Going after an anti-aircraft site? You don't go after the guns/missiles first, you hit the radar. Starting to invade? Take out the communications centers and any HQ you know of. Remove the commander, watch the troops become less effective or coordinated. Command and control is a far more important target. In the case of the mastermind, that target is *you.*

[/ QUOTE ]
See.. I was in the Marine Corps.. and they didn't train us to NOT shoot the guys shooting at us and only shoot at the Captain behind them.

Sure, I understand the concept of shooting the control board for an automated system... but if 6 thugs are shooting at me and one isn't.. hmmm... I think I may very well want to eliminate the ones sending lead down range first.. and maybe buy the pacifist a nice meal and a thank you card afterwards..

but that's just me

[/ QUOTE ]That's cause jarheads are suppose to distract the cannon fodder while the scary over trained special troops take out the head. Unless the more effective target is easily bombed to all hell and back.

I didn't fair much better as a member of the Army...our job seemed to be to annoy the less threating cannon fodder so the marines could shoot at the bigger targets.

I concur.

I don't get it. What was your tech iss

[ QUOTE ]
Fell for what? o.0

Also... Chainsaw SRS? I'm a girl and that made me wince and cover my crotch....

-Rachel-

[/ QUOTE ]I kinda twinged a little is that why guys cover themselves if they see someone else get hit?