LISAR
-
Posts
2725 -
Joined
-
Quote:Unless they make it harsher it's not going to do much.Originally Posted by Red Valkyrja
Once again I will mention that during HeroCon, the Devs hinted at possibly running the name purge before GR goes live. -
The reason they don't flat out merge the markets is the instant chaos it would cause in the sudden shift. GR gives us a nice gun runner meta game and will help even the playing field at a natural rate.
-
Maybe they just want to run games long enough to make a bit of profit before selling it to someone else.
-
Reinventing the wheel adds pointless production time.
Copy Entangling Arrow and Flash Arrow since it is the blaster version of an existing set.
Not sure about the boost range. Seems like it would be more useful to have an arrow you shoot at your feet and it cause PBOA knockback. -
What you should be asking for is an IO that reduces KB and adds KU.
-
I think the issue would be setting the shield color pallet to match the dark powers pallet.
-
Quote:I didn't know Avatars were a unique identifier here.Originally Posted by Premonitions
Yup, the name is just one aspect of my unique identity.
-
Quote:Do guys like unbalanced motors as well?Originally Posted by flashrains
Is it me, or does this name scream "HI GUYS I WILL CYBER WITH YOU" way too loudly?
-
Quote:He doesn't want to remove ED he wants to remove the memory of before ED and the way it came out.Originally Posted by Aura_Familia
Impossible.
Simply because we wouldn't have COH as it exists today without ED.
Could you imagine them trying to introduce something like purple enhancements based on the original way enhancements worked?
LOL just LOL. -
Quote:Shadowed Sentinel sounds a lot better then Faint Protector anyways.Originally Posted by Premonitions
Sometimes it's the same and sometimes it's not. It depends on how signifigant the name and it's particulars are to you.
-
Quote:I'd rather not cause the deletion of another thread.Originally Posted by Premonitions
I'm not going to listen to a woman with bunnies in her bra!
-
Quote:I'm not sure there is much of the person's body in that suit.Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow
Well, considering Tarantulas are people in cyber suits and they explode... Why not?
I'm not sure I'd be a fan of this being done for a lot of enemies, though, as ragdolls are actually a LOT of fun to play around with and these animations block ragdolls entirely. I can't tell you how many times I've been irritated that I can't knock that Carnie back over a cliff on the last hit because she has to clutch her head and scream. Strong Men don't seem to have that problem, after all.
Generally, as a rare occurrence on the occasional boss, I don't have a problem with this. And while I'm aware that not every hero or villain kills, this isn't necessarily a kill so much as it is a self-disposing villain, which tends to be a plot device used as a way to kill off a villain without actually having the hero kill him. I think Vash the Stampede made a career out of not-killing killing his enemies. -
4 only sorta works as long as something interesting happens like Mary MacComber's repeated resurrections.
-
Quote:It says not found not not allowed.Originally Posted by Zombie Man
More than likely in a restricted forum (probably Mod/Dev only).
-
The hard link between name and design is a personal issue not a community one.
-
3 missions does not a TF make...that's more like a short story mission.
-
Canada is like the current version of Sparks and America is the Original version.
It tastes a little sweeter without the caffeine but...it has no caffeine.
I miss caffeinated Sparks... -
Quote:My glorious cleavage prevents me from being wrong.Originally Posted by Premonitions
It's my God- given right as a citizen of our beautiful city! so glad to see you sharing in it so eagerly! :P
Let's go get some American Cheeseburgers! -
Quote:You are free to be wrong ^_^.Originally Posted by Premonitions
Well then I guess I just disagree with you there
-
Quote:If that name is only acceptable in one particular incarnation and the whole character has no value without it then yes.Originally Posted by Premonitions
So a person who creates a character who has chosen or is designed around one name is vcreative because they... created something? IF they never created anything else, then sure, but if that particular was put together very tightly, I don't see what's uncreative about that.
-
Quote:[see above]Originally Posted by Premonitions
Yes, but the general context of the use of original in this thread has been as a synonym of creative, accurate or not, this compunded with posts like.
Emphasis mine.
Generally the argument being made here is that people here are not creative because they create something that has a similar element to something someone else made. And that them being displeased about being forced to change their idea is just senseless whining because they are "Uncreative/Unoriginal" there are no original ideas, and very few original combinations of old ideas.
So only ideas that have multiple interpretations are creative? -
I was commenting on your use of the word unoriginal. Putting it in quotey marks doesn't change the base meaning.
It's completely possible to try and do the same thing without the intent to copy.
But that doesn't change the fact it's not an original name.
But if only one name in and of itself will fit then you are uncreative and unoriginal.
Uncreative because of your binary state and unoriginal because [see above]. -
Quote:Logic is not weird. If it's already in use it's not original. This means you can't claim you can't use your original creative name because it's in use. That type of fallacy should be embarrassingly obvious.Originally Posted by Premonitions
So... wait, you're trying to say there's something wrong with two people having similar elements?
Every person who wants a taken name is'nt trying to copy the person who has it. In fact I'd wager the overwhelming majority have no idea WHO has the name or do care. THe remaing mniority or most likely griefers. This is a very weird argument. Is it unoriginal in the sense that it already exists? well, yes, but so is everything else. And yes, I'm VERY stubborn. Don't see how that makes me wrong. -
Quote:Because it was already in use...hence unoriginal.Originally Posted by Premonitions
This is'nt even about "common" or "Unoriginal" names. I can make up a word or name, and someone else could have got it three years ago under completely different circumstances, and now something I completely pulled out of nowhere is unavailable.
That's like the literal definition of unoriginal. -
Simply put there is no room for creativity in a binary system.
If you can only think of one name you are not creative.