-
Posts
5889 -
Joined
-
Honestly, those shots do nothing for me. Looks borderline silly.
-
-
My DP/Energy Blaster. Cool in concept, terrible in execution.
My Kheldians. Again, cool concepts, but a completely un-fun powerset to play.
My Widow. Again, love the idea, the costume is excellent and I like the name I came up with, but dear lord do I loathe to play her. -
The government in Starship Troopers (the book, not the travesty of a film) was kind of interesting.
You only get to participate in democracy by doing some sort of government service. In other words, you can only vote if you have served in the armed forces, peace corps, volunteered for medical experiments, etc. Whatever you can do, a place is found for you to serve. Social responsibility through self-sacrifice.
I'm not sure I entirely agree with it, but it's an interesting take on democracy. -
Durakken,
There are a couple things that you're doing wrong, and changing them will result in weight loss and vastly improved health.
My background: my mother is a retired nurse, I have done volunteer work in hospitals, many of my relatives are in health care (as nurses, doctors and nutritionists) so I've gotten a lot of free professional information, my brother was a body builder and is a fitness nut, my wife used to weigh 350 pounds, at my worst I weighed 270 pounds (6'1").
I've been broke and without health insurance. All that said, here's knowledge I have that you can use:
Carbs and processed sugars
You need to eliminate them from your diet. Don't say, "Oh, I'll start my diet tomorrow/next Monday/the first of the month." Take the carbs in your house -- the bread, the pizza, the pasta, the cereal, the soda -- and throw it away today. Right now. Get up, put it all in the trash and take it outside where you can't get it. Or if they are still in unopened packages, donate it to a homeless shelter.
Carbs and sugars cause inflammation on the cellular level. You will not believe (and right now you cannot even conceive) how much better you'll feel once you've detoxed from them.
Smaller meals
Consuming most of your calories in one sitting is a terrible thing to do. It stresses your body. Also, by not eating regularly throughout the day, you've conditioned your body to go into "starvation mode." What happens is that your body goes into energy-saver mode, expending as few calories as possible. When you do eat, your body greedily holds on to every calorie you put into it. These are stored as fat.
Eating regularly retrains your body to expect food, so it no longer tries to save each tiny calorie it can. This has nothing to do with willpower, but is merely a biological fact. Never, ever "reward" yourself for "being good" with an ice cream sundae or any other sort of treat. To save your life you need to change your lifestyle.
Portion Control
You need to eat fewer calories, period. Even at 6'4" you do not need 2300 calories a day as a moderately active adult. If you want to weigh 200 pounds, you need to cut your calories.
Fruits & vegetables & proteins
If you replace your pasta with fruits and vegetables, it will seem like you are consuming more than you currently are. That's because fruits and vegetables have lower caloric density than processed foods like pasta. Also, the extra fiber will help stabilize your body in numerous ways.
Salads are important. Leafy greens and broccoli will work magic on your body. Go easy on the dressing. Less is better. Low fat is better still. By "less" I mean a single tea spoon's worth per salad. Twelve ounces of salad with 4 ounces of protein will seem like a huge amount of food. Yet the caloric intake will be nearly a wash once your body digests it. You'll feel full while at the same time losing weight.
Shop also for carrots, apples, strawberries, bananas, blueberries, tomatoes, red/green peppers, raspberries, celery, spinach, watermelon... whatever you like, so long as it is a fruit a or vegetable rather than a processed food. Apples, blueberries and watermelon are better for you than strawberries (because of the amount of sugar in them) but even strawberries are better than any pasta or bread.
Proteins should be consumed in moderation, but you do need them. Too much leads to kidney problems and issues like gout. Some protein sources are better than others. I would recommend the grain called quinoa (pronounced "KEEN-wah"). It has relatively high protein, because it is not a true cereal, and is easily the single best grain you can eat. (I recommend that anyone eat this, not just those who are overweight.) I've seen it in every health food store I've been to, but it's also available at chains like Trader Joe's (my favorite version), Kroger's and Shaws.
Quinoa is also ridiculously easy to cook: 1 cup of quinoa, 2 cups of water, bring it to a boil, then turn the stove to Low as soon as it boils and let it simmer for 15 minutes. Zoom, done, and you have enough for three or four meals. Lightly sautee some onions and red peppers in Extra Virgin Olive Oil for a couple minutes, mix it all together. Easy-peasy.
Overeaters Anonymous
Find a couple Overeaters Anonymous meetings in your area and go to them. Some meetings are better than others, obviously. The ones in the New England are the most progressive, but almost any of them will -- at the very least -- put you in touch with people who are going through (or have gone through) the exact same thing you are.
Also, they're free. Generally people donate a buck or two for the space (usually a church basement), but it's not required. No profits to be had means that people are only in it for the health.
Exercise
Exercise is important. You talk about your vertebrae rubbing together. If that's what is actually going on, then you need to see a doctor immediately. You are risking permanent paralysis and an even larger expense down the road.
Health Care Expenses
I understand what it's like to not have health insurance. I went 20 years without it, 14 while suffering from severe arthritis. If you call around, you can get free help from various sources. Many doctors have been understanding of my position and have cut the cost of their office visits (a couple even gave me free ones) and loaded me down with free samples when I needed medication. Believe me, a lot of doctors get it.
At the very least you need X-rays to show what's going on in your spine. You also need a full panel of blood work and a complete physical. Yes, these cost money, but you need to prioritize your life. You're paying to play a video game -- eliminate costs like this one for 6 months and you'll have plenty of money to get checked out. Cut out your internet, turn off your cable -- do what you have to. The library will entertain you plenty, trust me. Six months or a year from now, when your health is back on track, turn it all back on again.
I went 11 years without fixing the top of my convertible because I had to prioritize my expenses. After a while it wasn't that big a deal.
Medicine
There are some medications that I absolutely need to take because of my arthritis. Otherwise I couldn't function. While a couple are relatively cheap, most of them are incredibly expensive. Turns out that pharmaceutical companies have programs to get you medicine for little or no cost. Generally your doctor will sign you up for these programs, so you don't have to deal with the paperwork.
That said, all medicines have side effects. I was on a cholesterol medication that sent me into Acute Renal Failure and my kidneys started shutting down. Needless to say, that's potentially fatal. Fortunately, simply by not taking that med and exercising more, I was able to reverse it. Try to take as few medications as possible. Zero if you can get away with it.
Basic meal plan
This is the kind of thing and the way you should be eating:
Breakfast:
6 ounces of fruit
+ 6 ounces of low fat yogurt
*or*
6 ounces of fruit
+ 1 oz. hard cheese
*or*
6 ounces of fruit
+ 1 egg
Lunch:
12 ounces of salad
+ 1 tea spoon dressing *or* 2 tea spoon oil and vinegar
+ 4 ounces of vegetables
+ 4 ounces of protein (grilled chicken, grilled steak, grilled salmon -- nothing breaded or battered)
Afternoon snack:
4 ounces of carrots *or* broccoli *or* peppers
+ 2 ounces of low fat, low carb dip
Dinner:
4 ounces of starch (preferably quinoa, but also brown rice, potato or corn -- in that order of importance)
+ 4 ounces of protein
+ 4 ounces of vegetable (peppers, onions, snap peas)
+ 6 ounces of fruit
Easiest thing to do is stir-fry this. Even non-cooks can do stir-fry, because it only takes a few minutes.
Evening snack:
4 ounces of carrots *or* broccoli *or* peppers
+ 2 ounces of low fat, low carb dip
Drink water throughout the day.
Following this basic recipe, my wife lost 95 pounds in 9 months, with very little exercise. (She had both knees replaced, which you DO NOT want to have done, believe me.) -
"Knockin' on Heaven's Door" for Blasters.
-
Quote:Good God, no way. That's so unsigned by me I've retroactively gone back in time and uninvented ink.One idea I had would be this: You choose a name. all are available, but it places an auto "_(II)" on the end. [Or (III), (IV), (V) etc.] This doesn't show up anywhere but in the names having over heads and the search function. The first guy gets the perc of being the one without a numeral. There would be no "Captain Person (I)."
If the first character to use that name does not log into the game for 9 months or so, then Character Name_(II) gets to be "Character Name." The guy who first got the name then logs in? they get the (II), (III), etc. Again, the roman numarals would not be used in dialogues, info, or any such things. They would simply be there to differentiate if two (or more) of the same name were on.
When I was playing WoW (which I hated), I was invited to a team by a random guy. Except I didn't know it was a random guy, since he shared the same name a friend of mine used here and in other games. So I was blithely jabbering away about stuff "we" had done in Paragon City versus what was going in Lordaeron and the guy never let on that he had no idea what I was talking about.
At the most, link character name to our unique global handle, then hide the global name unless you open the info window. So all you see is "Super Dood" until you click on their info and discover it's "Super Dood @Ironik" or "Super Dood @Seldom." -
Quote:That would actually be a funny hook -- I Gotta Pee Reviews. Bounce around, talk urgently and try to get the review out before you have to rush off to pee. At the very least it would be succinct.also, not related to the other guy, but instead the guy who was in the scott pilgrim review, STAND STILL. its a thing a lot of us take for granted, most professional camera operators keep a nice,stead and pleasingly framed shot of actors and tv personalities, it draws our attention, keeps the picture focused, its easy to pay attention to. waddling around and rocking back and forth (i do this all the time, that is one reason i dont do these) will drive the audience duck-strangling crazy. the scott pilgrim guy was someone who,on points, i agreed with, but he was physically painful to watch because he looked like he had to pee.
-
Quote:130+ characters.how many toons do you have?
how many of those toons make use of the 2nd build?
i have 13 lvl 50 toons that i rotate playing.
9 of them use the 2nd build.
One uses the 2nd build, just because I experimented with it when it was first introduced. -
Yep. I take two screenshots: one of the power tray and one of the slots. Referring to them by going back and forth in the game is a pain.
-
Sleep is easily the worst power of any kind in the game. When solo it is situational and may save your bacon every once in a while but on teams? I agree with the Controller who said it's useless. Because it *is* totally useless on teams. Better off taking Leadership or something instead.
-
Quote:In the past few years, I think I've taken a total of 2 Travel powers in the two dozen new characters I've made. That's how much I use Fitness. I'm going to have so many more choices after I19 that I won't know what to do with myself.Base run speed = 14.32 mph
+ Old Sprint 50% (7.16) = 21.48 mph
+ New Sprint 100% (14.32) = 28.64 mph
Base run speed + unenhanced Swift 35% (5 mph) = 19.32 mph.
So, basically, unenhanced base speed will go from 14.32 mph to 19.32 mph, a 35% increase and less than what unenhanced Sprint used to do.
I think the OP will be in a very small minority in thinking that's too fast.
There's always Walk.
Just for fun:
Swift + 1 Run SO and Sprint + 1 Run SO and Ninja Run = 72.07 mph
Fly cap is 58.63 mph and SJ cap is 78.18 mph.
Oh god, yes. Some may recall my avatar which featured "No More Respecs" because I hate doing them so much. Lower levels are no big deal, but anything in the mid-20s on up is just a serious pain in the glutes. I have a level 50 Blaster that I haven't respecced since 2005 because I just can't face doing so, even though replacing all his standard SOs with the new IOs would make him at least 150% better. -
Quote:I agree with Moo that it's bad writing in the sense of "open gameplay." However, I wonder if the writers were hamstrung by the game engine -- even when three choices are presented in other parts of the game, it's really just two choices.There we go. That's the problem with the writing.
This tactic would be okay if you writing for a predefined set of characters. Their lack of ability to see or pursue anything but a 'grey' answer would be part of what defines those characters. That'd be a great way to define a character in non-interactive fiction.
However, in this case, they're not writing for a predefined set of characters. They're writing scenarios for other people's characters to interact with. Then a choice is presented, but it's not a choice that allows the character to define themself. It's a choice that furthers the story in the way the writers want it to go.
The really important part is that the expansion explicitly offers the player the chance to make moral choices... but then the writers take that choice away in situations like this.
In a pen-and-paper analogue, it'd be the same thing as a GM putting a player in a room with two enemies, telling him he has to choose one or the other to die, and then refusing to let the player roleplay his way through steering the scenario in a way he didn't expect.
Some players could reasonably kill BOTH parties. They'd certainly have reason.
Some players would indeed walk away and let what happens happen.
Some players would take the Obi-wan Kenobi 'I choose to die instead' route.
Some players would take the 'Batman' route and outthink both enemies, maybe even leaving them both thinking they'd won.
Either way, the player hoping to make the choices their character would end up locked out of those choices. Even if it's good writing for non-interactive fiction, it's bad writing here.
The other problem, which is apparent even if you haven't played other RPGs before, is that every decision you offer the player will result in things potentially spinning out of control later in the game. Eventually the story comes back to the predetermined aftermath, or the writers have to spend months taking into account every conceivable outcome.
Personally, I'd love to have many choices leading to different outcomes, but practically speaking that's something which isn't going to happen. So we have to go the rationalization route by saying, "Well, it's Praetoria, it's harsh, you gotta kill." -
Quote:I think the set needs a bit more than these minor tweaks. It's not right that my Electric Controller is 10 times easier to play than my DP Blaster. Blasters shouldn't need this much help, frankly.Seeing as how DP isn't a damage monster...I really think that at least "three" changes should be made to the DP set to make it a little better:
1.) Add the fire DoT to the tier1 pistol attack
2.) Either slightly reduce the animation time of Executioner's Shot or increase it's range to either 60 or 80 ft.
3.) Allow the -res from Piercing Rounds to work even when "not" using standard rounds.
If they did just these minor changes...I think the set would be pretty good...
I just started my DP Blaster a few days ago and were I a new player I would be constantly and immensely frustrated. Not to mention in perma-debt. Debt doesn't bother me at all, but I know it does for new players. If I didn't have my Vet powers (Sands of Mu, Blackwand, Nemesis Staff and Power Drone), my trips to the hospital would be a lot more frequent.
Empty Clips being such a short range power has been really frustrating in particular. With the far more aggressive behavior of most of the mobs in GR, they close quickly and start wailing on you, so the only thing to do in lower levels is run-and-gun. It's too easy to run out of range of your abilities, but Empty Clips is by far the largest offender in this area. It also has such low damage that it's fairly close to useless in the early levels. Were I to roll a second DP Blaster (unlikely), I'd skip EC until I'd taken every other power I wanted first.
3 of my 4 50s are Blasters. My DP Blaster isn't likely to join them. It looks cool, but it's just not fun. -
Quote:"I used to have to pay for French Toast, but now it comes free with my breakfast. I just don't love eggs, bacon, pancakes and waffles quite as much, so what will I eat?"Along with stamina inherent would be cool to have access to travel powers at lvl 6, previously lvl 14, with no pool requeriment. (They would need to change that vet reward, I know).
I got the feeling I will be a bit lost after stamina is inherent.
I hate most of the power pools. If we could only have customization...
Hasten and the FX is awful, same for super speed or the medicine pool.
With no new APP or PPP coming, I will end with no idea of what power take.
Sad again. -
Quote:In Serenity's case, one huge strike against it was that most people had never heard of the TV show. When they found out, the reaction seemed to be, "They're making a movie based on a failed TV show?!" nevermind that the failure of the show had nothing to do with the quality of the product -- it was enough that it was labeled a failure.As for Serenity, I still say Joss shot himself in the foot on that one. In the months leading up to its (again, LATE SUMMER) release, he went around the country and showed the movie to like 2/3rds of the people who were breathlessly anticipating it's release. Dummy.
The other big thing was the bad luck of timing of the release. After a summer that was jam-packed with sci-fi and similar genre pictures, people were fatigued by the genre and going to the movies in general. The year Serenity came out saw the release of Star Wars III, Fantastic Four, Wallace & Gromit, The 40-Year-Old Virgin, War of the Worlds, Batman Begins, Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Sin City and Mr. & Mrs. Smith. On top of that, school had started, always a slow-down time for movies.
And in the month prior, America suffered the one-two punch of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the number one and number four most-powerful hurricanes in recorded history. Katrina killed nearly 2,000 people in America and effectively tied up 1/3 of the US population dealing with the aftermath. Rita had only dissipated the DAY BEFORE Serenity's release. Those two hurricanes alone caused more than $100 billion in damage across the entirety of the Southern US.
I think if Serenity had been released in late January or early February '06 instead of September '05, it would've done significantly better business. Against a weaker schedule and in the lull when most holiday releases are winding down, it would've stood out more. But hindsight is 20/20. -
Quote:Well, I'm certainly not disputing that. In this instance about this particular film, however, I think one of the primary reasons there's no after-buzz and lack of good word-of-mouth about Scott Pilgrim is because there's no heart to it. As I've said, there are no reasons for why anything happens.I will try to explain this as simply as I can for the trolls in the audience.
I actually am aware of the fact that writers use character motivations and settings as a basis of plot points. However, all of those aspects of the story are coming from the writer because, for whatever reason, they decided to make it that way. That's why they are called the creator or part of a creative team, because, as creator/part of a creative team, they get to decide which aspects of the story to include or not. It is true that they can work off a basic setting, time period, or established character, but they always have the choice of going with the expected element (such as a character action) or something unexpected.
That is the only thing I am saying: the people that make something are ultimately the ones that decide how it is made.
I really have no ******* clue how people can disagree with that.
There's been the cliche of the actor asking, "But what is my character's motivation?" for ages, but it's a good question to ask of any movie. The primary villain in Coraline (Other Mother) suffers from the same lack of motivation, but it's easy to gloss over because everyone else in that movie has a very clearly delineated motivation. That shows even a key component can be missing so long as you have enough supporting elements to disguise the lack. The problem with Scott Pilgrim is that *none* of the characters have a motivation to do what they do.
It's incumbent upon the creators of a film to throw the audience a bone when it comes to motivation. Even the barest one-liner suffices for most characters in an action flick. As I mentioned earlier about Groundhog Day, you don't even have to *say* it aloud, just indicate it through the actions of the character. Scott Pilgrim doesn't do any of this; it just says, "This is what they're doing because I said so." -
Quote:That's categorically untrue. The reason he kept reliving that day was so he could learn to be a better person. He went from being self-absorbed and selfish to thoughtful and caring about others.Why things happen isn't always important. It didn't matter why Bill Murray kept re-living Groundhog Day, for example.
Groundhog Day is actually an excellent example of "show, don't tell." Never is it explicitly stated that he must improve as a person in order to get out of the loop, but as the film goes along, he gets rewarded for doing good deeds and punished for doing bad ones. When he finally gets the message, he wakes up and it's tomorrow.
By contrast, Scott Pilgrim doesn't even have that. There's no undercurrent to the film: it's all surface, no depth. Scott has to defeat Ramona's evil exxes in order to date her. There's nothing to be learned from that for Scott or for the audience. That's just how it is. There's no reason given for anything else that happens, either. Why is Scott in love with Ramona? One can see why he's attracted to her, but *love*? Why is Ramona willing to date Scott? Why are all the other girls so hung up on him? There's nothing intrinsically interesting or compelling about him, because the story doesn't offer any reasons.
Scott Pilgrim vs. The World may just be the ultimate brainless entertainment, a Nintendo video game brought to life just because it's based on a graphic novel and for no other reason. -
Scott Pilgrim suffers from one main issue: It doesn't answer "Why?"
That's what I keep hearing from people who've seen it, even from people who liked it. (My 73-year-old mom went with us to see it even though I warned her repeatedly that it definitely wasn't her kind of movie and she would hate it. It wasn't and she did. So she was asking, "Why did I go to that?" And I replied, "Why *did* you go to that?")
But seriously... people are asking, "WHY does he have to defeat her seven evil exxes?" The answer, of course, is, "Because he does." Most movies at least offer up a reason for the goings-on, no matter how slim that reason might be. Scott Pilgrim doesn't bother. It's meta-commentary on stories: things happen because things have to happen to get from point A to point B.
The secondary question does come back to Michael Cera and the character he plays: WHY are these girls so hung up on him? Again, there's no reason given; you're just supposed to accept that they are. The movie pushes minimalist storytelling beyond where it should be, jettisoning *reasons* for plot and character. Turns out you still need those things, no matter how sketchily drawn. Without that emotional hook, it becomes an exercise in the Rule of Cool and nothing else. The Rule of Cool will get you through the scene you're watching, but it's the emotional impact that'll keep you talking about the movie later... and generate buzz about the film. Scott Pilgrim doesn't have that. It's all flash and no substance. Sure, the flick is enjoyable on a superficial level, but it's no Three O'Clock High. -
Quote:It must have been "unpublished" in last month's purge of the CHVC forum. You can always petition the mods for its restoration. Here's its Google cache meantime.
You, sir, are a true gentleman and scholar.
So, reprinting the earlier review, now with a graphic!
I started reading Peter Clines' superheroes+zombies novel Ex-Heroes two days ago and couldn't put it down. I consumed it as if I were a fire and it were a book.
It has marvelous characters, nifty plot twists and superb action pieces. It's about superheroes surviving the zombie apocalypse, retreating to Paramount Studios to make their last stand, trying to save as many ordinary people as they can. The only problem is, some superheroes have been turned into zombies, too, and the last of L.A.'s street gangs has not only survived but ruthlessly expanded. The story is so much better than that description makes it sound, believe me.
Clines is a lifelong sci-fi/superhero/fantasy fan who has been a professional screenwriter and currently writes for Creative Screenwriting magazine. Throughout the book there are references to a number of genre staples, from Aliens to Doctor Who to Star Trek and more, dropped in like fun little asides. It's smart and smartly written, wonderfully constructed with flashbacks and a solid sense of humor at times. Here's a sample quote from early in the book: People could say a lot of negative things about the apocalypse, but there was no arguing the air quality in Los Angeles had really improved.
What this book reads as is a terrific City of Heroes novel. Besides zombies, there are giant monsters, there's a character who is very much in the Healer mode named Regenerator, a Super Strength/Fire Tank named The Mighty Dragon (who later becomes known as St. George), a Dual Pistols/Dual Blades/Super Reflexes Scrapper named Stealth, a powersuited inventor named Cerberus, a Mind Controller, an Electric Blaster and on and on.
Very highly recommended, easily the best superhero novel I've ever read. -
True popularity is when something appeals to the general public long after the original audience is dead. So "getting it" now depends on its universality and subsequent staying power.
I think shows like M*A*S*H and Batman will probably appeal in 50 years' time, whereas shows that surf the zeitgeist (Mary Tyler Moore, Who's The Boss, Diff'rent Strokes) can only be enjoyed by keeping in mind the era in which they were created. -
Quote:$30 million barely gets you in the door when it comes to ads. TV is the easiest way to mass-market, but to get the commercial in front of the audience costs a metric booty-load of moolah. Name any top TV series of the past decade, like Seinfeld, Survivor or American Idol... that's an easy $1 or $2 million per 30 second spot. Doesn't take many of those to blow $30 million. On shows which are highly-rated but not juggernauts (CSI, NCIS, Grey's Anatomy, Desperate Housewives), it's still going to cost an easy $250,000 to $500,000 for 30 seconds.Wow, $30 million on advertising. See that's also a bad sign.
Since repetition aids product awareness, you can't count on any single ad causing a big enough ripple. There have been some examples where one ad causes tongues to wag (the famous Superbowl ad for Independence Day, for example) to the point where you could eschew the rest of the ad campaign, but for the most part you need to repeat, repeat, repeat in order to get through to people.