-
Posts
710 -
Joined
-
Overall, I agree with the OP. While there have been announcements a-plenty, and David (Noble Savage) seems to be trying to cover the same amount of dev posts we used to get in total all by himself, there has been a serious downward trend in the quality of communication on the boards, particularly as it relates to reacting to community response to official threads. This concerns me greatly.
Quote:Very interesting, and very disappointing.I may be able to offer an insight here. During the Party Pack debut debacle, a PM from one of the OCR (who shall remain nameless) stated that the community team "anticipated this response" but "must present a united front."
The OCR saw this coming but couldn't (and probably can't) say anything about it because of the "team." I suspect marketing's dark hand in this.
Looks like the example set by what happened to LH has had the effect NCSoft wanted.
Not that this is a good thing... -
Quote:Yes, since GR, I have more lag (though only a few temporary map servers and one full disconnect). However, there are a ton more people playing now than have been for quite some time, and I rather suspect that's the reason.OK, I keep hearing about it on the Globals and Broadcast chat in the game. I know it is giving me problems and I have a new computer built to run this game. So how many other people here in the forums are experiencing a LOT more lag then usual and mapserver disconnects too?
-
Quote:
And if they are going that route, they may as well make powers Le Carte like in MA when making enemy groups. That would at least give us blaster tanks!Quote:OK, none of this makes sense.
[lots of things of substance... well phrased as always]
I don't mind if you want to go off ranting - and in some cases, I have sympathy for it - but at least try and have your rants make some sense.
I think the term you're looking for is "a la carte", AA.
All kidding aside, if nothing else, it would be nice for every issue to include at least 1-5 new items for base-builders. Of course, I'd want every issue to have at least that many (ok... if I'm really honest, double that) of costume pieces first. -
Quote:The perceived value of the wedding pack really depends on your ability/desire to integrate the costume parts there with other parts, not simply use them by themselves. If you only make "wedding outfits", then their value is certainly debatable.Someone else said the Wedding Pack was worth it for costume parts. Do others agree? I could afford it, but felt it was a rather limited dealy-o. I do some RP, but how many times can one do a Reed & Sue type wedding? ; )
However, for me just the "with lace" patterns for some of the female costume pieces are almost worth the entire pack. I also find myself using some of the suit options for males. Ironically, i did just use the bridal veil piece to make The Jade Bride the other day, but I feel pretty comfortable in saying she's in anything but your typical wedding-themed costume. -
Quote:In certain instances, I would, as would any number of people here. There is a beauty in simplicity, especially when used as a bridging piece between more complex costume parts.
Honestly, if all your doing is giving higher res textures to the old stuff, there is no reason to keep the low res items still there. Who would use it? As long as your not changing the texture or look, as people already discussed with the metallic pieces.
Quote:IMO the tights in this game, all need a drastic update. They were good in2004 but now, compared to all the new stuff in the game, they just don't stack up. They dont color right, they don't look like fabric, they look like colored skin.
Well, you got one thing right.
Quote:And honestly, they don't look good. If the game is going to stay up to date, some of the old stuff needs to be purged. Some people won't like it, but it's better that the game as a whole looks good.
I will never support the removal of any costume options, even if I personally may never use a piece, or think it's ugly. No matter what the devs do, or how pretty the individual parts are, you will still have ugly-looking costumes. There is an art to making a good costume (and some of the best I've seen are very simple). Some people just don't have the talent to do so on their own.
P.S. Yes, I realize that David has already decided what his recommendation is, and that to some extent the discussion at this point is moot, but the above post is almost completely counter to my thinking. -
Now I'm torn.
On the one hand, I finally have a M&G on my coast, that I can get to w/o flying (though it's still a moderately long trip).
On the other hand, I'm extremely disappointed with the complete lack of "official/red-name" communication regarding the overwhelmingly negative response to the Party Pack, and its poor value as compared to previous packs/boosters. There were some very valid concerns voiced in the official threads, including demonstrable, documented mis-communication by Positron regarding dance emotes in GR, and the direction CoX is taking towards micro-transactions. There was a slew of requests for some kind of response/clarification/assurances and we got absolutely nothing.
Hmmmm...
Soooo... if I go to the M&G will you actually respond to the community's concerns regarding the Party Pack? Or will you ignore people looking for answers there, as you have in the 2 official threads on the topic? -
Quote:Ditto. I've had to completely re-do characters because certain shoulder options (especially Resistance single shoulder) don't work with Robotic arms.Does it count as a "missing" costume piece that the Resistance shoulders are not usable with any of the Robotic Arms torsos?
-
Quote:Uhm... good for you?Transaction History (Last 180 Days)
Date Order Number Item Total Status
Sep 14, 2010 20882178 City of Heroes® Party Pack $7.99 (USD) Paid
Transaction History (Last 180 Days)
Date Order Number Item Total Status
Sep 16, 2010 20912838 City of Heroes® Party Pack $7.99 (USD) Paid
Transaction History (Last 180 Days)
Date Order Number Item Total Status
Sep 16, 2010 20912896 City of Heroes® Party Pack $7.99 (USD) Paid
<shrug> -
Quote:That's completely asinine. Anyone I see doing that will get a nice lil note, one star, and never invited to any team I'm a part of again. Heck, i'll probably report them (which is something I rarely do), as it's a clear form of harassment.I've seen it taken a step further. I've seen a couple people kicked from teams for doing the party pack emotes.
Anyone who likes the pack as is, and thinks it's worth the $8 bucks to them, should be allowed to do so with no repercussions. -
Quote:Actually, I'm really enjoying the game again after a period of a few months where I played minimally. Not only that, but I purchased the GR boxed set for 4 of my friends and am re-organizing my SGs regular gaming night. So... wrong.All that says to me is you're tired of the game and will probably leave anyway.
Quote:The idea that a purely optional pack of extras being made available would actively encourage you to leave just proves you're not rational.
Quote:NCsoft is a business, they want to make money. They'll see people voting with their wallets and change their behavior to maximize revenue. This is an experiment. If this sells poorly they won't do another pure emote pack, or they'll make sure the emotes are way more compelling for a larger group of people. If it sells well, they'll do more.
Quote:Either way, nothing to get worked up over.
Quote:Oh, and as for me, I'll be passing on this. It was hard for me to imagine a pack that would appeal to me even less than the Wedding Pack, but this is it. I've bought all the others though, and I have faith more cool stuff is in the works.
-
Quote:Given that I am one of those people who will consider leaving if we see another pack like this (by which I mean too few items at a high price-point), your statement is blatantly false.Let's be realistic here- they aren't "considering leaving" any more than anyone else that flips out over some insignificant change or minor perceived slight.
Some folk will just seize any excuse for empty forum grandstanding.
Don't assume you know anything about people's motivations and willingness to act upon their convictions. -
Quote:While people are unlikely to quit over one bad pack (I know I won't), the pack, and Paragon/NCSoft's handling thereof, have already made some long-time players consider leaving (in the future if things like this continue, if nothing else). In some cases, it's the last straw, in others it's the beginning of a bad trend. For every player they lose now, or in the immediate future, as competitor's games launch, they will have to sell roughly 2 Party Packs per month to break even.My guess at this point is that the cost to create this pack was so minimal, that even if it is a bad seller it will still turn a profit. People will not quit over this issue of a bad pack they can choose not to buy. So in turn it may be a good business decision. I will say a lot of people are dissapointed obviously by the threads, but maybe that is a price they are willing to pay and try to wow us on the next one.
Trying to stay positive ...
Just the fact that this release is making loyal/long-term players even think about leaving, within a month of their first paid expansion in 4 years is anything but a "good business decision". In fact, that alone puts it into the category of "marketing disaster".
Vega, thank you for the link (and the translation for those that need it). I have to ask Avatea however, why the [WARNING EXPLICIT LYRICS] was this not communicated to the entire player-base?!?
Also, quite frankly, that's simply a "we're making people aware of it" comment. Not for one moment did I (and probably most of us) think that Paragon/NCSoft was not aware of the problem. -
How about something as simple as "We have read your concerns regarding this pack, both for its content and pricing, and will take it into consideration when making future packs."
I think that's the bare minimum acceptable standard. I'd obviously prefer a "We made an error in judgment in making/pricing the pack" and a promise that they will add things to it (when time permits), but I understand that's unlikely.
Also, it's not just about what I (and many others) want them to say now, but the fact that this should have been addressed a while ago. -
Quote:The Devs/Marketing/Community team had ca 2 weeks and over 50 pages of overwhelmingly negative posting in the initial announcement thread that they never responded to either. PMs too.I, also, will not be buying this pack.
[...]
I'm amazed that the Devs still haven't said anything about 10 pages worth of much negative feedback.. Usually they're better about addressing issues like this.
At this point I will be (pleasantly) surprised if we get any red-name response, which is a damn shame, because Pragon has usually been very good about communicating with the player base. -
Quote:Michelle, you and I usually see eye-to-eye on things, but not this time. I think the first 2 reasons are perfectly valid reasons for you purchasing. Makes complete sense to me. However, the last few?Will I be buying it? Probably - videographer, demofiles, wanting everything, support the game, stupidly loyal dev fangirl, etc etc etc.
Do I want this trend to continue? Not particularly, no.
If you don't want to see this trend continue, don't buy it. Every person who buys it endorses the decision Paragon/NCSoft made to sell us a pack for $1/emote.
Quote:And whoever said this smacks of a bet b/w the devs and the marketing team, I think you're right. Let this be a one-time failure of an experiment, and let the Powers That Be learn from it.
Quote:This last bit is directed at marketing, as I see the hand of Executive Meddling at work here:
We will happily throw money at you from now until you turn off the servers. There are a lot of things above and beyond the $14.99 we spend each month we are willing to pay for, to maximize our enjoyment of this game. But please continue to respect us by providing a good quality-to-cost ratio.
I've bought everything else one can possibly buy for this game. I will not buy this, because it's a bad value and leaves a bad taste of "let's see what we can make the suckers pay" in my mouth. Reinforce that feeling in the future, and I will go elsewhere. I vote with my wallet. The decison not to buy was the first vote. The second will be the loss of a 75+mo vet, who has sunk thousands of dollars into this game. Think about what you stand to lose when you make a money grab. -
Quote:I'm sorry, but this is completely failed logic. If you liked it and thought it was a good value, I'd have no issue with you buying it, however, our justification is just... silly.I will confess, I will be buying this pack.
Personally, I'd rather not.
No, no one is putting a gun to my head, BAB (the character) did not bust into my room and start pounding my head on the keyboard, nor had maelstrom threatened to read his and scirocco's collaborated poetry from their Hot Topic nights.
I am buying it because marketing and/or the devs had apparently heard some of use commenting "I would buy a booster with just X!" which... included emotes, and decided see me put my money where my mouth was.
But you know... When I said I'd buy a booster with emotes only I had kind of expected more than eight.
Also, I really would like to see what marketing or the Devs have to say about all the negative feedback they've been facing so far.
No booster has EVER met this poor feedback. Not even Mutant. (A thread which Devs did respond to) So why the silence.
Not even going to try to tell us what experiment you are trying to perform?
Did you say "I will buy any emote-only booster pack Paragon puts out, regardless of how many emotes are in it, or what the price is?"
No?
Then what the heck are you talking about?!?
Conceptually, there is nothing wrong with an emote-only pack. If it had "enough" emotes, and ones that largely appealed to me, I might even buy it (even if I don't use emotes too much... costume parts are far more useful to me).
But releasing a pack with 8 emotes for 8 dollars is not Paragon listening to their customers. It's a bad value, and at least gives the appearance of price-gouging, which is something to be avoided at all costs.
It's commendable to want to honor your "word" and to put your money where your mouth is. But saying you would pay for something similar, does not obligate you to buying something that you yourself perceive to be a poor value. -
To recap my thoughts from the official announcement thread:
a) I find the Party Pack to be sub-par, even though I like a few of the emotes.
b) As an emote-only pack it is already of somewhat questionable value, and a $1/emote price-point is simply too high.
c) I find the complete lack of any red-name response to the overwhelmingly poor reception in the official announcement thread, which reached over 1000 posts, very disappointing.
d) I will not question anyone who buys this pack because they actually like the contents and find it to ba a good value to them.
e) I think anyone buying the pack for any other reason is potentially harming the future of this game, by encouraging Paragon Studios to release similarly sub-par/overpriced boosters in the future.
f) This will be the first in-game add-on (be it a boxed item or electronic add-on/booster) that the CoX team has ever put out, that I will not buy as a 75+mo vet.
g) If I see another similarly sub-par/over-priced pack in the future, I will seriously re-evaluate if this game still merits my continued loyalty. At that point, we go from a poor decision (and response) to a trend.
Essentially, the composition/price of the pack was strike one. Lack of a red-name response was strike two. Another pack similar to this will be strike three. At that point, I'll have to decide if I'm coming out for another inning. -
Castle, is it possible that debuffs may be generating too much morale loss? Perhaps someone moved the decimal (would not be the first time somehting like this happened, after all). Debuffs, especially -res and -regen debuffs seem to cause highly disproportionate running in mobs, even if the debuff values are minimal (such as a widow's/fort's dart attacks).
-
I vote for option 2.
As much as I generally prefer newer, higher detailed pieces, many of my existing costumes are meticulously crafter/colored to work together as they are (often in very unusual ways). When pieces are updated, these pieces no longer match up to the other parts that compose the entirety of the costume.
While I realize that I can choose to never alter that costume again and keep it as is, that's not really a good solution as it locks me out of newer pieces down the road.
To keep menus less cluttered, rather than putting the new parts below the legacy parts in the main menu, the part should have a sub-menu (e.g. Warrior & Tai boots, amongst many others), with the legacy part as an option, and the updated part as the default. -
Quote:This has already been discussed and disproved by concrete examples earlier in this thread. Stop being paranoid.ok,just one question, if they are being so nice to us, I wonder when the other shoe will drop?
In the past when they were nice to us they were off setting some nerf or neg 'adjustment" -
Quote:Since you seem to think that you have a point here, show me the math.Really? I thought it was very relevant. You didn't make the exact same error as he did, but you conclusion was in the same realm of obscurity.
Show me how spending 4 slots on Fitness Pool powers now leaves you with a different amount of available slots than spending 4 slots on the some powers once they become inherent powers. -
Quote:I actually really enjoyed that clip.Flawed math...why isn't it as funny as it used to be?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo4NC...eature=related
Not relevant to the discussion, but definitely amusing. -
Quote:Flawed argument. If I counter with choosing Stealth, Grant Invis and Phase Shift, you now (arguably) have no reason to add more slots.No, he's actaully right on this one.
Think about it, at current, say my DP/Psi blaster has all her powers and the fitness trio. That works just fine.
Now Fitness is made Inherent powers. So I have the exact same powers, and as you said the three new ones. Say I take boxing, tough and weave.
I now need to find the slots to put in tough and weave (boxing I'll leave at one) to make them actually worth having. And thats if I dont want to keep Health and Stamina 3 slotted.
So, there will indeed be a slot 'shortage' as it were. It won't affect every AT or every set the same way, but some may find it trickier to balance than others.
Still in full support of it, but it may lead to some radical build re-shufflings across the board.
Also, come on guys. No feeding the troll
The argument/statement is that he will have less slots to spend, not a harder time making his decisions. Of course being able to add 3 more powers has the potential to make slotting decisions more difficult.
But if he spends 4 out of his 67 earned slots on powers from the stamina pool now, he has 63 slots to use amongst his Primary, Secondary, Pools and Ancillary/PPPs. And when the Fitness pool becomes an inherent, and he decides to add 4 slots to the same Fitness powers, he still has 63 spots to spend, exactly like before.
P.S. Munki, "tight build" has always had a negative connotation on these boards (e.g. "My build is so tight I have to skip this power"). Thus the change making builds "tighter" will be interpreted as a negative statement. Now, you have been very specific in clarifying that you were talking about the slots to powers ratio, but that's not the argument that was presented by others. Of course, effectively adding 3 (or 4, depending on how you look at it) more powers to every build will naturally lower that ratio, so I'm not really sure what point you are trying to make with that clarification. -
Quote:Actually it is the games fault. I have an up to date system as well. And my card is a gtx 260, so I failed to see your point. I specifically built this system to compensate for the graphical lag that they refused to fix. Thats why I say moving to another API might have better performance than open gl.
I too am running a 260, and have most graphics turned up from very high to max with no problems whatsoever (other than an odd flickering in Nova Praetoria). How much memory are you running? -
Quote:Yes. We all get (after respec for existing characters) free Swift, Hurdle, Health and Stamina.So wait... does this mean we all now get inherent Swift and Hurdle, instead of having to choose one or the other?
All will be slot-able just like now, and this will free up another pool power set choice (as the Fitness pool no longer counts towards your limit of pool power sets). You will gain free access to these powers at lvl 1 or 2 (Castle can't remember which... but does it really matter?).