Talen Lee

Forum Cartel
  • Posts

    2499
  • Joined

  1. Just as a heads-up, in the way I understand the game, things that taunt that can't be attacked direct the aggro towards their owner. People aren't going to stand there trying to shoot a pseudopet that can't be killed, and if it can be killed, it will be.
  2. I thought my stance is that most people are lazy and ignoramuses.
  3. Talen Lee

    Best solo AT COV

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Tweeks View Post
    whats the best solo AT for red side, played many brutes and wanting something different just not enjoying running out of the blue bar with all the other ATs.
    Superstrength/Willpower brute. You don't even have to make complicated power selection choices.
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by GavinRuneblade View Post
    This gets at what was brought up earlier in the thread: Expectations. Post an SO-only build or a frankenslotted build on the forums asking for advice and you'll get a purpled response. Result is people think they need such builds on every character. The expectation bar is set way too high.
    That's not what I've found. If you state you're using SOs or frankenslotting, people are more than happy to answer in kind.
  5. Furthermore, that -regen is going to be useless in 99% of content. Against AVs, yes, it'll be useful, but it's not like minions and LTs meaningfully regenerate.

    Edit: By the way, I want to specify, I don't agree that giving -regen to PBs and WSes would be overpowered. I actually think it would be useless. It wouldn't address any of the real problems the archetypes face - and I'd need someone to tell me exactly what they think those problems are. It's a fine matter of opinion at this point. 'Contributes Less Than X' is not a meaningful problem in my mind. Back to the main thread of the post:

    I don't like these suggestions because they don't seem to address anything that, say, increasing the scalars overall wouldn't do. Why tie buffs to specific powers that people would take anyway?
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Talen_Lee View Post
    • Widows only have Elude because there are SO-built widows out there.
    Pretty much. Myself, I've given up on soft-capping because I noticed that 32.5 def is the same thing, if you're not too proud to chew an occasional purple inspiration.
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by eryq2 View Post
    Just think tho, if everyone was "lazy and smart", there'd be nothing for sell to just log into WW for.
    Not true. When dealin with actual scarcity, multiple lazy-smarts tend to just make exchanges. If everyone was Lazy and Smart, I'd wager most prices would be very low and people would just be patient about getting the stuff off the market.
  8. This reminds me of something.

    Recently, I've been seeing a lot of complaining on the forums about the price of particular IOs, and how this is a huge balance issue, and how the devs need to fix the markets, and how the individuals in question speak for a giant mass of people who are 'too poor' to afford any IOs they really want. This was met, in my mind, by a simple little truism that was trotted out once by a famous general, who spoke of how people operate; he noted that people were either ambitious/lazy, or smart/stupid.

    To my eye, there's an awful lot of lazy/stupid going around right now, and the notion that there are two fundamental axes on which people can be predicted struck me as an interesting thing to analyse. Upon a bit of reflection, I felt it was true, really. Let's take this little cross-section to task here:

    Ambitious and Stupid
    You keep a Luck Charm because you heard it improves your drops. You prefer to be sidekicked, because you hear that gives you better drops. You hit arcane mobs en masse, pick your way through hellions and skulls, before moving on to other mobs like them that offer those tasty arcane drops you desire. You know that you want millions of inf, to buy those expensive enhancement sets you want like Crushing Impact and Thunderstrike, and you do it with the full knowledge that you're good at playing the market. You run to your friends and tell them that luck charms are going for 30,000 inf and buy level 50 recipes to sell to the vendor for a tidy profit.

    You're a good guy. You're not as informed as you think, but you don't tend to remain that way. That ambition - that desire to work the system - will in time alter itself. You'll laugh about the Luck Charms in time, seriously, and boggle that you ever had the time to waste carting recipes to the vendor. You are, in the sense of the market, the vulture that picks clean the dying and the straggling: Helping people get badges, helping clear out cruft and crap, and making a small, if not insignificant, profit while you were at it.

    The best part about this stage is that it's rarely endemic. You will change, over time, into one of these other three categories. The path you take from here is determined by which rules out: Your stupidity, or your ambition. If you're very ambitious, you'll eventually start reading guides and putting the work in. You will, eventually, turn up as Ambitious and Smart. Alternatively, there are two other paths you can follow...

    Ambitious and Smart
    You want it all. You want it, and you know how to get it. Other people have posted how-to on the forums, have put together guides, and you've read them. You don't do anything that can be seen as wasting money; you tough out the period before SOs by using TOs and DOs as they drop, and never let a single drop of influence through your fingers. You pick your enemy groups based on how they drop salvage, picking those delicious foes with stunted pools. You farm missions endlessly rather than complete the content, because it's wasted infamy/hour. You maintain a high ZPM (and know what that means). You watch the market like a hawk and maintain stock options based on the latest rumours out of the devs' mouths. You hoover up information, seive it out and spend so much time on the market you can quote prices on the sub-30 knockback sets off the top of your head (I know I can, har har).

    For all the time you spend belting away at the game, you're just making this enormous pile of money and you're not actually doing anything with it. Any new content that comes out goes right over your head because, hey, you're just going to farm behemoths anyway. You have four characters totally purpled out, farm endlessly, play the market, and do nothing else, because that's all that fun for you; the acquisition of money and the eventual squandering of that same money.

    I'm tempted to call you an idiot, but the thing is, you're being goal-oriented. You want to watch a little number ping upward, which is pretty silly of me to criticize, since that's entirely what levelling up means, and I've done that enough times with my zany altitis and vicious character-pruning.

    However, this guy, this guy, the ambitious and smart marketeer? He is your best pal on the market. He's the guy who has so much money to spare that he will happily splurge on buying a tech common for a million. He's the guy who buys lowbie globals and procs for ludicrous sums to finance his own lowbies, because he can afford it. The irony that this guy is sluicing money out of the economy just to sluice it back in should not be lost on any of you. What else are they going to do with the money? It's not like the ambitious and smart roll around naked in giant piles of inf.

    Lazy and Stupid
    You can't buy a miracle global for 500,000 inf, and you think this is somehow the dev's fault. You think that Acrobatics getting nerfed was a trick by the devs so they could laugh at you as you failed to buy knockback enhancements for your characters who didn't need them. You're poor, and so you think the solution is to ***** about it on the forums. You see all the people who have money as evil, and believe that flipping, or abitrage, or willy wonka, or whatever the current buzz term is, is the exploit that currently harbours all failings of the market. You're convinced the pool C table is skewed, since you never get anything but Craps of the Hunter. You can't have what you want, so you complain. You put up salvage for 1 inf, then ***** and bellyache when it doesn't sell for as much as you wanted it to sell for.

    You are, not to put too fine a point on it, an idiot.

    The Lazy and Stupid are those people who own a unique kind of sense of entitlement. They believe that, for some reason, the market is both utterly impenetrable, and that there is no way to make money on it, and that the market is a massive money sink, in which every single thing you could buy goes for literally millions of inf. Were I making this up, I would rib more on this metaphorical person, making him more cartoonish and ridiculous, but the sad fact is, I am quoting from real arguments.

    These people think of the behaviours of other marketeers in moral terms, or they proscribe, clearly, some kind of other sub-incentive to justify their lack of involvement. Some people will claim it's immoral to make lots of money on the market, as if influence bought food and paid for rent checks. Some will claim it's only possible to do this by investing vast slabs of time and effort, and that they have better things to do than spend the required amount of time to both understand the market, and to then make money using it. These people are the inevitable outcome of introducing anything to a population: The people who don't get it, don't wanna get it, and won't try to get it.

    There is nothing you can do for these people, in my experience. I have tried to teach, tried to offer aid, even offered direct financial start-up, without strings attached, and every time, the money just falls down a giant invisible hole of I Don't Know What I'm Doing But Don't You Dare Tell Me How To Do It. The thing is, the Lazy and Stupid are the grist for the mill. For the most part, these are the people who get 'hurt' by flippers, who buy things above the lowest and sell them below the highest - ie, price normalisers. By 'hurt', we mean 'treated exactly as they deserve'.

    The good news is, the tears of the Lazy and Stupid? They're delicious.

    Lazy and Smart
    And we save the best till last. You do small fiddling schemes to keep yourself in money. You don't fret about how much inf you have, you just make sure you have enough to do what you wanted. You know how to get money when you want it, and don't bother with it when you don't. Acquiring money en masse is more like a game of pinball, trying to see how quickly you can manage it. You maintain a high ZPM, but more because it makes you giggle. When one scheme stops being fun, you stop doing it. You read guides and consider options, but don't bother with widescale manipulation because, well, all it would do is give you more money you don't need. Your characters are comfortably outfitted, your needs met, and whenever you want to try anything really cute, you know you can do it.

    The Lazy and Smart are the laconic, laid back types. Speaking as one, I started with a character, a level 32 Super Strength/Fire brute, on the infamously poor redside. He was made before IOs, and had to be reinvigorated after a long server change and pause. In order to outfit this character, he sat down and planned. After my initial plan, I went to the black market in Sharkhead, and logged him in for one minute ever day. If I did not get everything I wanted done done in that minute, it did not get done. That was my rule.

    Within a week, this character had 4 sets of Crushing Impact, and 9 million inf in change.

    This is just one little anecdote. This was not a major scheme, not some dread robber baronage. I didn't grind or farm or finagle. I didn't cheat or extort or rort or fuss. I simply did something that milked money out of the market at a reasonable but not extortionate margin: Because I couldn't be bothered going for that wider margin. I just needed enough to get by, not enough to buy the moon.

    Why don't I try to buy the moon? Why not keep the scheme going? Why not continue crafting, flipping, managing funds, anticipating trends or spreading vicious rumours about upcoming nerfs to sack the market out on a commodity that I can then capitalise on?

    ... It's too much effort.
  9. Talen Lee

    :'D

    I'm not a man to say no to candy just because there used to be cake.
  10. Talen Lee

    :'D

    Just hit 38. Just got PSW. And you were there. And you were there! And you!

    PSWPSWPSWPSWPSWPSWPSWPSWPSWPSW-
  11. Talen Lee

    From Old To New

    Giving it a try now. Is it going to care much about coh.patch file?

    Edit: Seems not to have. Thanks a bunch, man!
  12. Quite frankly, I'm at the point where I think a set could have 8 taunts and Cosmic Burst and I'd be happy. >.>
  13. My fire/fire blaster's question is in the other direction: What's this 'range' stuff?
  14. Talen Lee

    From Old To New

    A friend of mine had City of Heroes installed on his old, pre-Vista computer. When he upgraded his computer, he moved on to Windows 7. What we have now is an Issue-16 viable copy of CoX, sitting on his slave hard drive, but won't run.

    So; guidance, oh gurus. I thought the plan was that you run cohupdater.exe, then, after it's created the correct directory, you close cohupdater.exe, go back through the old copy of the game, copy all those files to the new directory, and then startup cohupdater.exe again.

    However, it seems it doesn't work. So, is there some trick to this? Or is the only solution to simply let it re-download? I'm not so familiar with Windows 7 that I would try tooling around and getting it to work on my own.
  15. -def, like archery's +acc, is a bit meh.

    On the other hand, rad blast seems great without caring about the -def, so hey.
  16. Living memory. I didn't say it'd never happened. But your expertly picked nit of a single power in a powerset that still needs help that I've commented on at length is well-observed. What was that, five years ago? Almost six?
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by HacknSlash View Post
    Eh?
    The bane can pick up to five damaging aoe's, if it wants to.
    It also has a "can fight at range" advantage.
    Bad AOEs is not the same as good AOEs, though.
  18. The core problem I have is that, looking at a bane in comparison to a stalker, the stalker tends to come out of it with better ST damage, and almost as good AOE. It leaves me feeling like the Bane needs just a shade more of an edge.
  19. Talen Lee

    I'm NOT a dev!!!

    You could ask Deebs. I hear she's a dev.
  20. You think that, but you're wrong. Please expound. Where is this 'momentum'? Where is this 'death incarnate'? What mechanic represents the death that falls upon the bane spider - an archetype with a number of combat-impacting long-recharge powers - when they 'slow down' and get 'bogged down.'
  21. So you're saying that Banes do less damage than stalkers, and are less tough than stalkers, and this is their selling point?
  22. I've found routinely that the actual star system is pretty much useless for the promotion of arcs. If you want people to play your arc, talk about it in a community like, say, this forum.
  23. Quote:
    Which why I say game companies cant do it because people would complain about balance and the game wouldn't sell or at least last.
    It also wouldn't be a good game. Fundamentally unfair exchanges aren't fun. Just as waitresses in Hollywood.