Star Treks warp drive might be possible
So arrive just above or below the planetary disk and use sub-light to approach the planet.
Father Xmas - Level 50 Ice/Ice Tanker - Victory
$725 and $1350 parts lists --- My guide to computer components
Tempus unum hominem manet
Why? It seems more dependent on how far you travel than on the energy expended to get there.
Elsegame: Champions Online: @BellaStrega ||| Battle.net: Ashleigh#1834 ||| Bioware Social Network: BellaStrega ||| EA Origin: Bella_Strega ||| Steam: BellaStrega ||| The first Guild Wars: Kali Magdalene ||| The Secret World: BelleStarr (Arcadia)
Quote:
Or to quote Larry Niven:
Honestly, as much as I would love the idea, the human race as it is (socio-economic) would frighten me to have this kind of power.
|
"Any interesting space drive is a weapon of mass destruction. It only matters how long you want to wait for maximum damage."
Space Battleship Yamoto?
Quote:
Because what's always bothered me about that calculation is the apparent presumption Alcubierre warps bypass the law of conservation of energy. I presume the energy that accelerates those particles comes from the gravitational energy of the warp, but there's no reason to presume that's unlimited.
[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]
In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)
According to the Wikipedia page, at least, there is also the problem that everything inside the bubble would be obliterated by high-energy Hawking radiation.
"Samual_Tow - Be disappointed all you want, people. You just don't appreciate the miracles that are taking place here."