Where did the game go wrong?


Agonus

 

Posted

I need the blue king, Dark horse and top cow ones. EDITED.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by mercykilling View Post
It weathered EIGHT YEARS of ups and downs.
I can't argue with that...


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thessalia View Post
Sort of: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of...s#City_of_Hero

It actually had an offline character creator, which would be so awesome to have again.

Edit; so beaten.
Love what Computer Gaming World said about about CoH. "City of Heroes blows a super powered gust of fresh air into an increasingly stale sword-and-sorcery MMO world"

And that was in 2004. Gee, how much the MMO landscape has changed since then... *rolleyes*


 

Posted

Lack of any consistent form of advertising. That I can think of off the top of my head, they released blurbs for major releases like CoV, and GR had ads in Marvel and DC comics for a week or two. Freedom might of had something, but I can't even remember at this point. But there wasn't much of anything else in between those to let people know the game was still there.

The other thing would be two of those major releases. Mission Architect was touted as this awesome tool that would allow players to create endless content. It was released, and then the exploits started popping up. And they Dev response indicated that they draaaaaaaaaassssstttically underestimated the "farmer" mindset. So MA got nerfed. Then another exploit popped up. Then MA got nerfed again. Lather, rinse, and repeat until the Fire Farms apparently created such specialized farming characters that Devs didn't care anymore. So what happened to the tool that would allow for endless content? The rewards system was reworked to the point that the MA buildings became ghost towns. Sure hardcore story oriented gamers still made some great stuff, but on the whole, MA ended up being ignored by the bulk of the playerbase.

And then there's GR. I still think it's some of the best writing and story-mechanics I've ever seen in a video game. But the problem with Praetoria proper is...was...whatever, that it's basically a glorified tutorial. It wasn't designed to rush through, and while it made leveling 1-20 enjoyable solo, veeeeeery few players want to do that in a MMO.


Tales of Judgment. Also here, instead of that other place.

good luck D.B.B.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agonus View Post
And then there's GR. I still think it's some of the best writing and story-mechanics I've ever seen in a video game. But the problem with Praetoria proper is...was...whatever, that it's basically a glorified tutorial. It wasn't designed to rush through, and while it made leveling 1-20 enjoyable solo, veeeeeery few players want to do that in a MMO.
My theory has always been that Going Rogue was one of the worst things to happen to the subscriber numbers for the game. (Which is terrible because it gave me, personally, something that I truly longed for; a city that looked good and made sense.) Ealier in this thread someone posted revenue numbers that have, in the past, been put in a table. I remember when I saw that table that the steepest decline was roughly the period between the (too eairly) announcment of GR, and the quater before it's release. Then, after the release, the numbers there was no significant pickup. (Which is why I think Freedom was plan B.)

I think several factors were involved; firstly there was somthing of a content/stuff drought between the annoucment and the release, combined with the fact that people knew somthing big and cool was comming, I think a lot of players decided to leave the game, many planing to retun when GR hit. That was bad, it put pressure on GR to be realesed sooner, and that downtime period was ample opportunity for other games, (or IRL) to steal players attention away.

The, when realesed, GR was, perhapes, not what it needed to be to reinvigorate the game, the boxed sales were a temporary boost, but had no real long term, super positive effect on the subscriptions.

I am I saying that GR led us here? No. But perhapes if it had been handled differnetly the game would have been more sustainable.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pendix View Post
But perhaps if it(GR) had been handled differently the game would have been more sustainable.
I agree with this point. I think they should of made Praetoria a full faction, told a story about the incarnate game(long-view) and not so secretive so players would sub and allow them to build a powerful archetype incarnate system. The system felt rushed. I left temporarily because the bugs in the trial were so bad I couldn't even play the game.

The tips systems(rogue/vigilante) did you guys play it heavily? I was never a big fan of it.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by mercykilling View Post
The game was a steady source of income. Just not how much NCSoft wanted. It was profitable, but not profitable ENOUGH. So, instead of cutting another more recent game that bled way more money that CoX EVER did....they ax this one because it's older. .
Take a closer look at that revenue chart upthread - the game's been losing Revenue since 2009, and the last two quarters were the worst and second worst yet. Seeing that I actually understand why NCSoft pulled the plug - Freedom wasn't successful in the long run.

Oh, and I'm changing my answer - Releasing Beast Mastery before Staff Fighting and leaving MMs broken for 2 months in iTrials was a BIG no-no for me, it was the last time I bought points in the store.


Deamus the Fallen - 50 DM/EA Brute - Lib
Dragos Bahtiam - 50 Fire/Ice Blaster - Lib
/facepalm - Apply Directly to the Forehead!
Formally Dragos_Bahtiam - Abbreviate to DSL - Warning, may contain sarcasm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shubbie View Post
Im very good at taking a problem and making it worse.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Combat View Post
The game didn't wrong; the marketing did. And this started even before the game was released. The real problem of the game is that it was a well-kept secret, which is a hard way to run an MMO. The only reason it stayed around for so long was because of the loyalty of the fanbase, because it did too little to get itself in the hands of new players.
I mentioned this on another message board. As a longtime Mac user, I think I can speak for the Mac gaming community when I say that I just automatically assume every non-Blizzard PC game that comes out is "Windows-only". I had heard of CoH (even had the first few issues of the comic), but I didn't investigate the game because, at the time, I didn't have a computer powerful enough to run this kind of game. I didn't get one until 2008, and by that time I had completely forgotten about CoH. I signed up for WoW instead (because I knew it was Mac-compatible), and played that steadily for 3+ years. It wasn't until a year ago, when I got burned out on WoW and was moaning on another forum that there was nothing else for Mac users, that somebody said "City of Heroes has a Mac version". Whoa, really? I had no idea because the company didn't advertise nearly enough.

With the right marketing, CoH could have had a good, loyal, Mac playbase.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
If you have to start a campaign against corporate greed, at least wait until the deal with City of Heroes has been settled, one way or another. To go to war now will just burn what's left of the game.
Actually, my suggestion was going to be "Don't start your argument by getting people upset over one issue ("I hate anime!"), then switching to your real topic and pretending that's what everybody's mad at you about." There's got to be some logical fallacy that covers that type of argument.


 

Posted

Going Rogue mission structure is interesting if you also look at the mission structure of City of Heroes and City of Villains. There is a definite evolutionary feel.

City of Heroes was designed back in early 2000s and it's mission structure was influenced by the popular MMOs before it (Evercrack). Missions had a large time sink component to them. Talk to contact, go to other zone, return to contact, go back to other zone. A number of these time sink missions fall into the "Kill 10 rats" trope and until you became familiar to where these "rats" lived, it was a lot of exploration on foot. I will also assume that the Level 14 minimum for our travel powers were an extension of the "mount" trope that only higher level players get to cut down on travel time. Contacts had miscellaneous missions and occasional story arcs. When you out leveled them they refer you to the next contact up the chain.

City of Villains had a different mission structure. While it still retained the "Kill 10 rats" trope, at least the 10 rats were in the same zone as your contact. Also going to one zone per level range rather than two concentrated the population, which they needed to do after they made instanced missions the preferred way to get XP. Also once you got out of the beginner's zone, the way contacts and missions worked was very different. The Newspaper/Heist mechanism would unlock a contact that only had story arc missions. These contacts may introduce you to other contacts when you outleveled them or you may have to use the Newspaper/Heist method again.

Going Rogue decided to emphasize the story arcs. Had one of four paths you could follow, based on decision points in key stories. Besides altering which missions were available to you it also altered what you saw in the world around you. It was a way to engage the player in the story, however for the kill all/earn XP/level crowd who never cared about story per se, it forced them to pay attention if they wanted to do certain content. We saw elements of this mission/contact structure moved over into CoH and CoV when Freedom came out.

Now the problems I saw with the Going Rogue edition. First, your first character had to be made in Praetoria. I can understand why the devs made that decision. You had access to all of the powersets, all the zones were designed with the new spiffier graphics upgrade and the previously mentioned mission structure. Each of those had a downside once you left Praetoria for Paragon or the Rogue Isles.

The obvious being the graphical quality of the zones dropped off noticeably. It's like buying an attractive old house with a renovated modern first floor only to discover the upper floors haven't been.

Then there's the flip side about upgraded graphics, you needed some reasonably modern hardware to enjoy those enhanced visual settings. Not a problem for a dedicated FPSer or massive solo RPG player but the casual gamer with a $500 laptop with Intel graphics or a desktop with a Dx9 class card couldn't enjoy them. By 2010 it was tougher and tougher to convince someone to pay $15 a month to access a game, the notion that they needed to upgrade their hardware to properly enjoy the new look was out of reach for some people and could discourage them from staying around. No one wants to be left behind.

Of course the other major problem with being kicked out of Praetoria at Level 20 was the very different mission/contact mechanisms. Someone who started out with CoH or CoV, by Level 20 they grok want they needed to do, where to go, what zone was next but a newly minted players fresh from Praetoria, it, like the graphics, was a major change. At least the devs got the bewildering feel of being dropped into a familiar but different parallel world right.

The very different mission mechanism and look between Going Rogue and Paragon/Rogue Isles caused players who have been conditioned how the game works to relearn. Everyone became newbs again. Nobody likes being a newb.

And I still haven't talked about the critter groups between the parallel worlds. Learning how to fight in Praetoria made groups in CoH/CoV seem easy and players use to fighting at increased difficulty in CoH/CoV got their head handed to them repeatedly if they weren't careful in GR.

So for new players, GR had a bit of a bait and switch feel while experienced CoH/CoV players had to adjust to more difficult enemy groups and different mission mechanism. While the technology was a step forward and the missions became more interesting for those who like story content, it felt like a different game that was trying to mimic the original.


Father Xmas - Level 50 Ice/Ice Tanker - Victory
$725 and $1350 parts lists --- My guide to computer components

Tempus unum hominem manet