Expanded enhancement tray


Adeon Hawkwood

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
Personally, I don't believe respecs should leave any enhancements behind in your tray at all. It's not a popular position, but understand that I'm not really in favour of making it even easier to salvage slotted enhancements.
Is this some sort of opinion held out of spite against IOs or players that use them? I don't understand why anyone would make such a statement without some sort of troubled past with regard to the subject.

IMO, it's a system that is just poorly designed. It makes buying enhancements a pain. It makes respec'ing a pain. It makes normal teaming when you're accumulating drops a pain. And yet, you want to make it more painful? Because you're jaded? Is it so wrong to want to save your work in an RPG? Do other MMOs cause your gear to dissolve when you want to take it off? I just don't understand.

I would at least like to be able to store enhancements in that same salvage storage place. Or giving some kind of option to send respec'ed enhancements to the market.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeverDark View Post
The devs never came to the forums and said, "You'll never have SSK. In fact, you're lucky to have SKing at all." They have done so on allowing you to keep more than 10 enhancements during a respec.
Really? I thought their statement about enhancement slots involved accumulating drops, not respecs.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordan_Yen View Post
I searched, I really did, but in 5 years they haven't really improved the search function that much so if its there, I couldn't find it. I suppose my first suggestion is to allow keyword search using booleans along with tags. Maybe live results would be good too.
This board's search function is much, much easier to use than the old one, and more effective.

This concept comes up extremely regularly and there are multiple ongoing threads discussing ideas (unfortunately searching for them can be tricky as many threads in this community are poorly titled), which as previously said, all go against prior dev commentary.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordan_Yen View Post

So we're imbalanced somehow. The 50s have an extraordinary amount of money for some reason and it's pushing purple and pvp IOs to ridiculous values, but that shields the rest of the market from their ridiculous purchasing power. Does that sound right?
To a degree. Ignoring for a second the mess that merits made with the mid level market, the glut of money created in large part by changes in the last few years does indeed provide a degree of protection for the most commonly sought after goods.

Those people with a ton of money just throw it around. It is extremely easy for a new character to make money now simply because common and uncommon salvage fluctuates a great deal. The people who have at ton of money don't want to spend time to save a few bucks so they freely spend far more than necessary on things that don't command high dollar amounts, and freely place goods on the market well below market value. This allows the poorer player to generate a lot of easy wealth by playing the market.

Sure, the poorer player can't dip into the 500 million purple pool, but most recipes and common/uncommon salvage (at least heroside at the levels available) is extremely cheap in relation to the amount of influence attainable.

The biggest reason purples and PVP recipes are so expensive is availability. The drop rates are rather low in relation to the number of people actively seeking to attain them. Much of this (in purples) is still an effect from the AE craze that created much of the situation the game economy is in today.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordan_Yen View Post
Wa ha ha. Yeah... that was mine.
You know, I completely missed that when writing the post, D2 has just become the standard example I use of a player determined currency .


Quote:
So we're imbalanced somehow. The 50s have an extrodinary ammount of money for some reason and it's pushing purple and pvp IOs to ridiculous values, but that shields the rest of the market from their ridiculous purchasing power. Does that sound right?
brophog02 covered this somewhat, but yeah the earning power of a level 50 is SIGNIFICANTLY higher than over characters. This is for a couple of reasons. First off is the obvious they do get more per kill. In addition level 50s still earn experience but this XP is converted into additional inf which almost doubles the inf they get per kill. Finally level 50 common recipes sell for about 100K each. So the earning power of level 50s is extremely high. Additionally people who play their 50s a lot (especially if they farm) are generally going to use that income to purchase high end recipes (purples and PvPs). This means that a portion of their income is effectively removed from the economy shielding prices on lower items a bit.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roderick View Post
Taking this stance and claiming that we should be able to keep IOs after a respec makes no sense.

In the other games, when you have Bind on Pickup or Bind on Equip equipment, it doesn't magically unbind, allowing it to be passed on to others when you respec. It stays bound, leaving you with the option of banking it for personal use, not to trade, deleting it, or vendoring it.

We can always delete an enhancement, we can't always vendor an enhancement, but we can during a respec, and when we pull it out to bank it, we can pass it on to others.

I think we have the more lenient system here.
The problem with choosing a power and slotting it is that it is baked in, you're committed to it even though you may not be happy with it. In CO they allow you to backtrack to a large degree and test out your choices before committing.

The original system of respec automatically cashes in your excess SOs/DOs/TOs at fair market value, which is fine. But it gives nothing for Hamis or other special enhancements because they cannot be purchased, which strikes me as a pretty big kick in the pants. The original respec system hasn't kept up with the times...


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by PumBumbler View Post
The original system of respec automatically cashes in your excess SOs/DOs/TOs at fair market value, which is fine. But it gives nothing for Hamis or other special enhancements because they cannot be purchased, which strikes me as a pretty big kick in the pants. The original respec system hasn't kept up with the times...
No, it redeemed them at VENDOR value which is also what IOs and HOs are redeemed at. Obviously for IOs and HOS vendor value is significantly lower than market value but personally I think that's a good thing. Allowing them to be sold at the current market value would add an additional inflationary pressure to inf and it already seems to be rather inflationary.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adeon Hawkwood View Post
No, it redeemed them at VENDOR value which is also what IOs and HOs are redeemed at. Obviously for IOs and HOS vendor value is significantly lower than market value but personally I think that's a good thing. Allowing them to be sold at the current market value would add an additional inflationary pressure to inf and it already seems to be rather inflationary.
Name a vendor that will sell/buy Hamis and you'd have an argument. This is what I am talking about:



See the unassigned where it says ZERO? I suppose you are right when the vendor value is significantly lower than market value...


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by PumBumbler View Post
Name a vendor that will sell/buy Hamis and you'd have an argument. This is what I am talking about:

See the unassigned where it says ZERO? I suppose you are right when the vendor value is significantly lower than market value...
My mistake, IOs are resold at the crafting (i.e. vendor) price I assumed HOs were the same. In any case the point still stands. Reselling them at the actual market rpice would be worse for the economy than allowing the player to keep every enhancement. Keeping all enhancements is a deflationary pressure that makes low value IOs vendor trash and selling them at market price is horribly inflationary.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adeon Hawkwood View Post
My mistake, IOs are resold at the crafting (i.e. vendor) price I assumed HOs were the same. In any case the point still stands. Reselling them at the actual market rpice would be worse for the economy than allowing the player to keep every enhancement. Keeping all enhancements is a deflationary pressure that makes low value IOs vendor trash and selling them at market price is horribly inflationary.
I sure won't argue with these people who seem to understand economics way better than me, but Oh man do I sympathize when I see that picture with all the HOs! Other than the fact that I've never been able to figure out why someone would slot HOs. They don't give bonuses like IOs so are they really any good?


 

Posted

That toon has been stuck since i4 with HOs. Took a 16 month 'break' before the troller nerf went live and then ED, which meant there were no recipes and set bonuses like we have today. I've had to 'make do' with slotting over SOs, combining HOs in order to shim in a few procs and uniques along the way since doing 5 respecs in a row to pull out all the Hamis was laborious and frankly ridiculous. No 2nd builds and no respec recipes then too.

I've got a couple of more toons like that.

HOs used to give a bonus that was +50% (L50) as opposed to +38.3% (L53) on a single aspect (schedule A?) so they were more powerful than SOs. With no ED capping, HOs were way more powerful and multiaspect as well.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordan_Yen View Post
I'm confused. Why is an influence sink a good thing?
Influence sinks can be a good thing if they cause players to stay around long enough to get vested in a game for reasons other than just leveling up and getting cool new powers. Influence sinks are essentially time sinks, and time sinks are required to create loyal long-term subscribers.

If players get everything they want in one go, they may still miss seeing the vast majority of the game, and may not develop into long-term players.

For example, if you can buy everything you could possibly want immediately, you may well decide that the game is trivial and offers little variety. Depending on when that is, you may completely miss things such as the Rikti invasion, the Zombie Apocalypse and the holiday events. You may never go to zones such as Firebase Zulu (a zone that looks really cool, but whose potential has never been realized). You may never try out villains (or heroes). You may also not be around long enough to try more than one kind of character, and I think the wide variety of ATs and power sets is the primary draw of the game.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodion View Post
Influence sinks can be a good thing if they cause players to stay around long enough to get vested in a game for reasons other than just leveling up and getting cool new powers. Influence sinks are essentially time sinks, and time sinks are required to create loyal long-term subscribers.
While this is kinda true (especially in games like WoW where there are gold sinks that offer things players actually want), the primary purpose of any currency sink is to remove currency from the economy and therefore maintain it's value. In CoH Inf has no inherent value, you can use it to buy SOs and it's needed for crafting IOs but those represent a very small portion of the things people want to buy. If you want to acquire set IOs or HOs the only way you can exchange Inf for them is to buy them from another player. Now consider that other player, what does he need the Inf for? Sure, he might use some of it to buy SOs or common IOs but the chances are that he is going to turn around and use it to buy a Set IO or an HO from a third player. Essentially Inf is only exchangeable for set IOs and HOs because the majority of the player base has decided that it is so meaning that players feel confident that if they sell something for Inf they can use that Inf to buy a different item that is of greater value to them.

Now what would happen if there were no Inf sinks in the game (in particular the transaction fee for the auction house since that is the primary one)? People would keep killing NPCs and so Inf would keep entering the economy. BUT very little Inf would leave circulation, obviously some would due to the remaining sinks or players quitting but in general it would keep on piling up. however, the rate at which players were generating usful items (set IOs and HOs) would remain the same. This would cause inflationary pressure since there is more Inf available and the same number of items to purchase with it. Eventually Inf would become useless as a medium of exchange between players simply because there was so much of it available that trying to use it to trade is pointless.


 

Posted

There are very few suggestions that the devs have flat out said, "No. This will never happen." to, and this is one of those suggestions.

I also agree with Thirty-Seven that we'd be better off if the devs removed the ability to pull any enhamcements off of a build.