If you have enough recharge to stack it would go follow up over build up. Otherwise build up will benefit you more.
I have 4 macos, one chance for BU and 1 recharge in mine on my claws
"Well, they found my diary today.
They were appropriately appalled
at the discovery of the eight victims
They're now putting it all together.
Women wrapped in silk
with one leg missing
Eight legs, one body, silk,
spider, brilliant!"
Personally, I'd go with 5 Mako's Bite + BU proc, but whichever you decide I think you should definately include the proc. I don't think you should mix and match the damage and to-hit sets with frankenslotting though, you'll end up not doing justice to either aspect of the power.
"If there's anything worse than being sacrificed, it's being sacrificed incompetantly."
Focus on accuracy and recharge first, and get Gaussian's Build Up proc for it. Any slots left you can use for damage.
Thanks for the replies all. Looks like Mako's and the build up proc is the way to go then. Now I just need to save up the kajillion or so inf for the proc =P.
I recently got my first redside toon to lvl 50 and have begun playing a Widow, which I'm going to dual build into Night Widow/Fortuna.
For one reason or another I've decided to take Follow-up over Build Up on the Night Widow side, however I have a quick question that I hope those with more experience in the Claw's set can answer.
Is it more advisable to slot Follow-up as an attack power (i.e. to slot a full melee IO set into it) or to franken-slot it with a mix of melee, standard IO's and to-hit sets?
Currently I was thinking something along the lines of either 1-2 Acc IO's then 4-5 from Adj Targeting, or 4-5 Crushing Impact followed by either a standard to-hit IO or the build-up proc from Gaussian's.
Thought's or advice?
edited for spelling corrections