What would you like to see?
Erm, aren't posts like that what this entire forum's for?
See numerous "Dark Control", "Kickboxing", etc... powerset suggestion threads...
I dunno, it seems that these days people are just suggesting anything that comes into thier heads, regardless of wether it is really wanted/needed.
I really should do something about this signature.
Yes, there is an element of that, I admit. Even so, adding a "post your suggestions here" thread to the Suggestions forum itself is probably a bit redundant.
[ QUOTE ]
I dunno, it seems that these days people are just suggesting anything that comes into thier heads, regardless of wether it is really wanted/needed.
[/ QUOTE ]Would you prefer people suggesting power customization every day?
New posters posting a new thread and stirring up some interest? How dare they! Such impudence! Put them in their place, old timers!
Mak tal shree! Lok tak. Mekta satak Oz! Mok tal Oz kree!
[ QUOTE ]
Mak tal shree! Lok tak. Mekta satak Oz! Mok tal Oz kree!
[/ QUOTE ]...I like you. A lot.
[ QUOTE ]
New posters posting a new thread and stirring up some interest? How dare they! Such impudence! Put them in their place, old timers!
[/ QUOTE ]
Suggest they put their posts in the right place, sure.
[ QUOTE ]
Mak tal shree! Lok tak. Mekta satak Oz! Mok tal Oz kree!
[/ QUOTE ]
Cheers! I'll have a Fosters!
What I would like to see:
More high quality suggestions, thoroughly researched, using the search function, completly developed, all implications weighed up, amount of workload estimated, and trade off value calculated (i.e. what would you be prepared to not have while the developers are working on your suggestion).
I really should do something about this signature.
[ QUOTE ]
What I would like to see:
More high quality suggestions, thoroughly researched, using the search function, completly developed, all implications weighed up, amount of workload estimated, and trade off value calculated (i.e. what would you be prepared to not have while the developers are working on your suggestion).
[/ QUOTE ]
That sounds like way to much work to be honest. People are suggesting what they think would be fun / good ingame, not applying for a business loan.
Why suck all the fun out of someones idea? As for working out implications, if people worked all that out beforehand what would we have to argue about in the thread?
Fair points, Praf and Carnifex both. What I would like to see less of is one-line (or one-word *) dismissive responses to suggestions.
Not everyone comes from a project management and/or software development background - sometimes a flight of fantasy can make great reading, or at least be a laugh. Inspiration can leap from the daftest of places.
That said, whilst I have anyone's attention at all, I would ask them to have a look at the sticky in this forum. If nothing else it's interesting reading.
(* B5 is an acceptable reason, if only because the truth is a three-edged sword.)
Once the avalanche has started, it is to late for the pebbles to vote.
I really should do something about this signature.
[ QUOTE ]
Once the avalanche has started, it is to late for the pebbles to vote.
[/ QUOTE ]
What's that from?
Disclaimer: The above may be humerous, or at least may be an attempt at humour. Try reading it that way.
Posts are OOC unless noted to be IC, or in an IC thread.
[ QUOTE ]
Once the avalanche has started, it is to late for the pebbles to vote.
[/ QUOTE ]
Who are you? What do you want? Where are my pants?
[ QUOTE ]
I dunno, it seems that these days people are just suggesting anything that comes into thier heads, regardless of wether it is really wanted/needed.
[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, but JDBarker is new around here so we should probably cut him a little slack - it's not like he's one of the usual suspects who scattergun this forum with poorly thought out ideas that have either been suggested a thousand times before, or would never work.
[ QUOTE ]
What I would like to see:
More high quality suggestions, thoroughly researched, using the search function, completly developed, all implications weighed up, amount of workload estimated, and trade off value calculated (i.e. what would you be prepared to not have while the developers are working on your suggestion).
[/ QUOTE ]
I agree with you 100% here though. Tbh this forum category is getting so hard to keep up with that I can barely be bothered anymore - I'm on the verge of excising it from the handful of categories I bother to read and post in anymore.
[ QUOTE ]
Once the avalanche has started, it is to late for the pebbles to vote.
[/ QUOTE ]
Best Babylon 5 quote ever. /hugs Kosh. Vorlons ftw!
Vorlons are duplicitous, sneaky and not what they seem... if I remember my B5 correctly that is.
Rabbits & Hares:Blue (Mind/Emp Controller)Maroon (Rad/Thermal Corruptor)and one of each AT all at 50
MA Arcs: Apples of Contention - 3184; Zen & Relaxation - 35392; Tears of Leviathan - 121733 | All posts are rated "R" for "R-r-rrrrr, baby!"|Now, and this is very important... do you want a hug? COH Faces @Blue Rabbit
And they smell funny
Only for those lucky enough to possess scratch'n'sniff TV's.
DON'T eat muffins while I'm developing you.
Pants! Turkey Magnates! A man in a box! Rogue AI! Come one, come all, to arc ID 10107 - It's [i]'Not as long as some other arcs'[/i]!
I'd be very suprised if there hasn't been a post like this before but an updated one wouldn't hurt so here it goes, what power set do you think is missing or should be altered. I gotta say there isnt much that they havent included thats in the realms of feasability eg clones/multiplication (Jamie Madrox from xmen) or maybe a sponge/copycat (Peter Petrelli,Sylar or Monica Dawson from heroes) Or maybe an animal shapeshifter. What do you guys think we are missing out on?