Are you a digital genius?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I did rather embarrassedly muck up the HTML error one (it was a 500 error, not a 404... I think).

[/ QUOTE ]

There wasn't an option for 404 or 500. None of the options I had were real HTTP codes. They were something like 414, 454, and 483. Hence the WTF reaction.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm actually geeky enough to have actually *heard* of that one - but not so much that i knew it was a 418

http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2324.html

(yes, it is apparently a genuine RFC! - although rather a !&$# of a question imho)

First try: 108
Second try: 140

I have tried numerous times with an overall high score of 122. I regularly fail on the game systems since I never played consol games, but also on the "3 Attempts" which I still don't understand, and the weights on the seesaw, which I likewise don't understand. I have tried balancing the seesaw, tipping it to the opposite side and keeping it where it is, and on none of my five or so attempts at the game have I figured out the goal of that game.

The scale is relatively basic. The weights at the ends of the arms are worth double those closer to the fulcrum, since they are twice the distance from it. So if its something like 2:1:Fulcrum:X:0, you need to put 5 in at the X.

This last time through the seesaw had a single 2 lb weight on one side and no 2 lb weights above, and that's when I noticed the unequal sides. I think they took pity on me. Still only got 122 again.

I caught the Fulcrum thing only after I lost my one shot at it. :/ Really would've liked at least a second attempt on some of those..

The age group seems to affect only a single question, the calendar-meme question. Oddly, after doing it a number of times, since I can complete it in less than seven minutes, my scores as a male/female/other or <18, 18-24, or 24+ all seem fairly similar.

Although I can now beat the mathstroids game before running out of time. It's fun.

Where's my dang pop up pictures and coloring pages dammit!