HoF requires ratings average of 4.0 or 4.5?


Blood_Beret

 

Posted

There's been some debate around about the ratings requirements for HoF. My search fu is weak, and I can't find a clear answer as to how many ratings are needed and what they are supposed to be.

Can anyone point me to the last direct quote from a dev on the subject?

Eco.


MArcs:

The Echo, Arc ID 1688 (5mish, easy, drama)
The Audition, Arc ID 221240 (6 mish, complex mech, comedy)
Storming Citadel, Arc ID 379488 (lowbie, 1mish, 10-min timed)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
[The Incarnate System is] Jack Emmert all over again, only this time it's not "1 hero = 3 white minions" it's "1 hero = 3 white rocks."

 

Posted

I can't point you to a quote, but I know the answer by experiment. "The Footsteps Initiative" was HoF and 5 stars when I saw it yesterday morning. A few minutes later, it was 4 stars, and not. An hour later, it was 5 stars, and was. Since then it hasn't been. The only way that makes sense, given that it already had 999+ ratings, was if the threshold is 4.5, and it was wobbling just barely back and forth across the round-off point.


 

Posted

I have a 999+ arc that has 4 stars(not sure if it is 3.5-4.5) but it is not HoF.


@Blood Beret(2)Twitter
I am a bad speeler, use poorer grammar, and am a frequent typoist.
MA ArcID: 1197
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. Winston Churchill

 

Posted

The visual display rounds itself to the nearest star amount. If it's 4.4, it's 4 stars displayed. If it's 4.6, it's 5 stars displayed. Since the display was wobbling, that means it was wobbling around 4.5, not around 4.0.

4.5 is not a feasible rating due to various factors I pointed out in the other thread. 4.0 I could see; it's more practical under real-world voting conditions and still ensures a pretty damn good arc.


Global @Twoflower / MA Creator & Pro Indie Game Developer.
Mission Architect Works: DIY Laser Moonbase (Dev Choice!), An Internship in the Fine Art of Revenge (2009 MA Award Winner!) and many more! Plus Brand New Arcs for Issue 21!

 

Posted

Is there somewhere where we can actually see the .x of an arc? I KNOW how regular math rounding works, but there are people who are asserting both that it's 4.1 and 4.5. Some people don't use the standard method of "rounding". The question here is, where is the official word on this? Sorry if you've already answered this, Two, I'm not disputing your theory or your math. I, like Cap'n Tigger up there, am just looking for source info.


Dec out.

 

Posted

Unfortunately no, there's no display of the exact rating -- but if it's visually **** and then ***** and back again, that logically means that it's average is wobbling between 4 and 5 when rounded, IE 4.4 and 4.6. If it was wobbling around 4.0 it'd be a solid four displayed stars without ever jumping as high as five.


Global @Twoflower / MA Creator & Pro Indie Game Developer.
Mission Architect Works: DIY Laser Moonbase (Dev Choice!), An Internship in the Fine Art of Revenge (2009 MA Award Winner!) and many more! Plus Brand New Arcs for Issue 21!

 

Posted

Logically, yes. But I've seen so many people stating so surely that the devs were using 4.1 that I want some verification. Are you positive that that's the way the display works or are you assuming? Again, not questioning you, just wanting to be sure since information is mixed (nothing new, of course...)

Maybe I've been living with lawyers too many years.


Dec out.

 

Posted

And it definitely rounds itself to the enarest star amount?

Pff, I wish we could get an official explanation of how the HoF is supposed to work

Eco.


MArcs:

The Echo, Arc ID 1688 (5mish, easy, drama)
The Audition, Arc ID 221240 (6 mish, complex mech, comedy)
Storming Citadel, Arc ID 379488 (lowbie, 1mish, 10-min timed)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel_Tow View Post
[The Incarnate System is] Jack Emmert all over again, only this time it's not "1 hero = 3 white minions" it's "1 hero = 3 white rocks."

 

Posted

[ QUOTE ]
And it definitely rounds itself to the enarest star amount?

Pff, I wish we could get an official explanation of how the HoF is supposed to work

[/ QUOTE ]

Seconded. A lot of the confusion and debate would be instantly cleared up if a dev was to just lay it out and say "Here's how it works." Then we could at least all be talking about the same thing and could form an informed opinion.

All we can go by is the evidence from the one HOF arc that's up there as it wobbles on and off the HOF, between 4 and 5 stars.


Global @Twoflower / MA Creator & Pro Indie Game Developer.
Mission Architect Works: DIY Laser Moonbase (Dev Choice!), An Internship in the Fine Art of Revenge (2009 MA Award Winner!) and many more! Plus Brand New Arcs for Issue 21!

 

Posted

Based on addmitedly very old programming knowledge, it used to be much simpler to trunctuate a decimal than to actually round it accurately for display purposes.

So even based on the number switching from 4 to 5 and back it could still either be 4.1 or 4.5 as the threshold.

I lean toward 4.5 myself, cause the workaround was rather simple back then and should be no harder today.


 

Posted

Yeah, but if we were truncating the float, we'd NEVER see a 5 star rating. It's be impossible; every single vote an arc ever got would have to be a 5, because even a 4.99999 would display as 4 stars. And we do have confirmation of stories with 5's, including this one when it managed to keep its HOF, that are certainly not unanimously voted on.


Global @Twoflower / MA Creator & Pro Indie Game Developer.
Mission Architect Works: DIY Laser Moonbase (Dev Choice!), An Internship in the Fine Art of Revenge (2009 MA Award Winner!) and many more! Plus Brand New Arcs for Issue 21!

 

Posted

Good point. I stand corrected (Well, sit, but you get the point.)


 

Posted

Wait, an arc can lose HOF status due to voting? What happens to the player's publishing slots then? What if they filled their three normal ones as soon as the fourth hit HOF? O_O

N/M, I just went and read the other thread.

Though I swear the other thread had in it posts that were in this thread.

I'm pretty confused and can only assume that i've been trying too hard to block out some people's insipid whining. ^_^


"I think you're confused. This is /b, not /b/."