-
Posts
2357 -
Joined
-
Quote:Which is ridiculous. That makes them people with the same name, not "parallels".
We already know that Primal and Praetorian counterparts can be of different age. -
Quote:It's not evidence at all. It's conjecture.
Like I've said, like, twice already, I'm not saying he is. But if he were, there's plenty of evidence supporting it. -
Quote:I expect in any case of claim of parallel status for the developers to confirm it, or it's no sale.
I honestly don't know what more you expect.
I also expect that if the Center even existed in Praetoria neither Tyrant nor Mother "Did It Need To Be So High" Mayhem would allow him to survive. -
Quote:We need that NPC announcer to say "I'd buy that for a denarius!" during Time Gladiator....
I'd buy that for a dollar -
Quote:Contrived in the sense that such situations are usually not so cut and dried.
The real world is full of scenarios that you would probably consider 'contrived', but none the less viable for making this sort of argument.
Quote:But for the sake of this, lets go with the fictional scenario that occurred in First Ward when the Devouring Earth ended up destroying the majority of the place, and many people in it.
Quote:As for the second part of your comment... I find it ironic (and naively foolish) to say that all research should be destroyed in such a scenario. Because, regardless of the questionable ethics involved, many advances in the field of medicine were built off of the research that Nazi's did. How many lives do you suppose were saved because of that? -
Quote:She did not just "sell fixadine". She literally empowered a terrorist organization whose purpose was to attack her own people just so the state would have a tangible enemy to fight for PR purposes. This is a war crime and she is guilty as sin. She was also personally involved in the capture and torture of both Statesman and Positron, though that's just throwing another shrimp on the barbie given the number of people she's doubtlessly done that to.
Was Dominatrix found guilty of any "irredeemable" crime that crossed your alledged moral event-horizon? What exactly are you accusing her off, selling fixadine? Making her mommy look bad in front of grampa? Wearing skimpy clothes?
Quote:Venture, at some point you've got to start judging the praetorian antagonists for crimes we can actually prove they committed, which means listening to their defense before reaching a veredict.
Quote:And yes, only utterly defeated armies who oppress powerful people ever get to see their officers tried for crimes against humanity.
Quote:You say none of the Praetors would walk if it were up to you, and that no reasonable jury would see past their guilt - I say that upon reviewing the evidence presented, I'd be forced to release Cole, Duncan and Keyes (regrettably, this one, but I can't prove he murdered Rusty).
Quote:Well, I've written some fan fiction on the redemption of Tom Riddle
Quote:In our own world, there are those who have created horrible crimes and found a change of life in prison.
Quote:And it's too easy to say "they're a sociopath, might as well throw them against the wall and shoot them."
Quote:If they are truly redeemed in their hearts then they would be willing to stand trial and accept the just punishment decided by the court (up to and including a death sentence for their crimes). Anything less and they're not REALLY repentant or redeemed, they're just looking for a way to get out of their just punishment.
Quote:Why would anyone take a conversation here seriously is beyond me
Quote:If a man had to sacrifice 50,000 people in order to save 5,000,000, does that make him an irredeemable murderer?
If, to spin a contrived scenario, you have a flood or other imminent natural disaster heading for a city and your choices are to deploy resources to point A which will result in an estimated 50,000 casualties or point B which will result in an estimated 5,000,000 casualties, with no third option, your choice shouldn't be very hard.
If, on the other hand, you have decided to murder 50,000 people in the hopes of finding the cure for a disease that might kill 5,000,000, you're a war criminal and your research, if any, should be destroyed after your trial with no dissemination. (Yes, I know this wasn't done with research from Japanese and Nazi concentration camps. It should have been.)
Quote:There are questions of jurisdiction of punishing the Tyrant and Praetors for acts against Praetorians in Praetoria.
Quote:[Praetorian redemptions] provide events to weave into arcs. -
Quote:I. DON'T. CARE. What their "internal mental state" is. Once someone has committed these kinds of atrocities they are way, way beyond the point of atonement. This gets us back to the "morality is not fungible" thing. If you murder 5,000 people but then save 5,000,000 guess what, you're still a monster. It doesn't matter how "sorry" you are for what you've done, and frankly, the idea that someone could systematically commit crimes against humanity and then one day suddenly "see the light" is ridiculous. No one with a functioning conscience could do these things in the first place. These people are sociopaths at best.
In fiction, however, thanks to things such as "omniscient third-person narrators" and "Word of God", we can know exactly whether these fictional characters truly regret what they've done, and whether they really want to try to make amends. -
Quote:No, they're not. Bombing a legitimate military target in a declared war is not an act of murder.
Absolutely. Harry Truman and the crew of the Enola Gay are over that horizon.
Quote:Is Jean Gray over the horizon, or is not being in your right mind an out?
Quote:The cold hard truth is that, with remarkably few exceptions, war criminals are the guys that lost the war.
Quote:How many Praetorians have we slaughtered in the intro to the trials? I hear there are even criminals who do nothing but continually go to the Magesterium, slaughter the defense forces, and withdraw.
Quote:I'm not denying that there are acts while are inherently evil, and the Praetorians have committed them.
Quote:But as much as we'd like to pretend otherwise, there's a line between waging war and committing war crimes but it's not as wide as you're implying or always so clear when you're in the middle of the war.
Quote:But when put in the hands of more competent writers, [Magneto] lived through an experience of seeing a vile out of control government try to wipe a race of people out of existence.
Quote:Also, when it comes to the Praetorians, no one is talking about Going Rogue "do the right 22 missions and you're a squeaky clean hero" redemption.
Quote:It's more an internal redemption, a change of heart, a sense of remorse. -
Quote:Sorry, but it's necessary. Philosophy as a field has more than its fair share of crackpots since anyone who can write even semi-coherently can call himself a philosopher. Just to toss out a high-profile example, Ayn Rand may have a great following amongst the lay people but if you seriously try to advocate her work in a university philosophy department you'll get laughed off the campus.
Nice caveat B) there; anything you can find, I can gainsay by espousing a universal truth that no one else agrees.
Quote:What does that even mean?
Quote:(It is, however, nice to see Godwin's Law is still in full effect)
Quote:You believe that the idea of a villain working to redeem himself is "ridiculous", and your idea of "something better" in fiction (in fiction, mind you) is that good people are forever good, bad people are forever bad, and nobody can ever change or grow as a character? -
Quote:How many star athletes are mass murderers?
If Nazis offend, would you rather discuss how star athletes are always held to the highest standards of academic excellence and/or personal conduct? -
Quote:Because, as I've said before, repeating a mistake doesn't magically make it not a mistake.
... and, again, you're comparing these fictional supervillains to Nazis and other real-world situations rather than to other fictional supervillains.
Quote:I point again to Magneto, who was a terrorist, a murderer, and a convicted criminal... and who is now a hero, leading a team of superheroes. -
Quote:No one would buy a story like that for any of the Praetors. It would be as if Himmler or Goering got the deals they wanted at the end of WWII.
I think the point is that they wouldn't even be charged if they were useful - a convenient cover story about them not really knowing what was going on, or that they were working under duress, would suit everyone involved.
Quote:For example, a rocket scientist working on weapons to cause mass destrution
Quote:Something similar could be done with Anti-matter, if some governments on Primal Earth thought that he could be useful - even though he came up with the plan to use the sonic fences to wipe out everything in First Ward, and constructed and maintained the reactors that powered the loyalist war machine and invaison portals - his status as an ex-Praetor could be played up, presenting him as someone out of the loop and not really aware of the full horror of the loyalist dictatorship he was serving. -
Quote:Actually, I would defy you to find a philosopher who a) argues that morality is fungible and b) is taken seriously. I can't think of even one.
Generations of philosophical arguments would suggest your conclusion is not foregone.
Quote:Depends. Will they help us beat the Russians to the moon? -
Quote:...the invaders still could have been nuked.
If the Avengers had lost the battle, however, then -
Quote:And I've said before that not all of them deserve to be shoved up against the wall when the revolution comes. But none of them are ever going to get the blood off their hands, either. Morality is not fungible.
Absolutely, they're not supposed to be. But there's a difference between "heroic" and "irredeemably evil and can only be treated as mad dogs and put down".
Quote:Is the only possible next bit in their story a trip to the zig (where they'll eventually escape, twirling their mustaches) or being on the wrong end of a blaster with their medtransport disabled?
Quote:It's worth remembering that Marcus Cole started in Praetoria as a hero, like our Marcus Cole.
Quote:Given time to think about "man I screwed up" and how Primal Marcus Cole got it right, he could be inspired. -
Quote:By "vaulted" I mean "moved to Ouroboros", which does pertain to the story. We were explicitly told those arcs are still in continuity, and they are referenced by their replacements.
Neither of those retorts hold water. Devs have final say; it's THEIR GAME. Old arcs are vaulted an no longer pertain to the story. Redname confirmation is literally the end-all be-all.
Quote:and claims there is not one good person from Praetoria (nevermind all heroic PCs who come from there) -
Quote:Saying it != doing it
The Devs themselves have stated (as recently as the Pummit) that Primal fired first, so presumably something is going to come of it at some point.
Quote:AFAIK, the most recent word in-game on the matter is Maelstrom finding out that his Maelstrom device came from Praetoria, and that mean that the Primals knew about Praetoria first. Don't know of anything else that trumps that. -
Quote:No reasonable person could possibly find Tyrant and his stooges not guilty of war crimes. Lesser officials like Kang might get off the hook but they'd never get so much as the time of day from me.
Isn't that for a tribunal to decide? Particularly when it was Primal Earth who fired the first shot over the bow.
As for the "Primal fired first" theory as far as I'm concerned it's null and void until it actually makes its way into the game. The material in the game maintains that Praetoria had bases on Primal before Primal even knew Praetoria existed. If the devs are smart they'll leave it that way. Making Primal the instigator just turns the whole thing into a rehash of the Rikti War.
Quote:Well, we are talking about a genre where murderers and terrorists like Magneto can eventually become one of the good guys, Namor has jumped back and forth over the line ever since he was created, and even Penguin and Riddler have gone straight.
And we're talking about a game where Frostfire and Miss Thystle were both outright villains in early story arcs and full-on heroes in later ones. Nothing, not even morality, is fixed. (Especially in this post-Going Rogue age)
Quote:It also gives us a glimpse of just how conscious he was of his own failures, and how he recognizes the enormity of his mistakes. -
Quote:
So - and I want to make sure I'm not misunderstanding you - you aren't interested in the SuperPack mechanism per se, just what's in the packs. You'd be just as happy with the merchandise if it was offered as a bundle or as a SuperPack, yes?
...I would rather be able to buy what I want directly instead of having to fish through "super packs" to get it. Like, duh. I just don't equate selling costume parts through packs with, oh, annexing the Sudetenland.
Likewise, if PS were to suddenly release the EO set separately from the packs I wouldn't start nerdraging about slaps in the face. I just wouldn't buy the next set, knowing that if I sit tight whatever the draw is will become available on its own. -
Quote:It's a cushy job, but someone's got to do it.
"Everyone in Praetoria, and the Praetorian story itself, is irredeemably bad, because I say so, and I'm the arbiter of what makes a good story around here.
Oh, and the story itself varies from bad to mediocre. -
Quote:Would I be unhappy about it? No, but....
May I ask, directly: if you bought the Super Packs, would you be unhappy about the EO pieces being released as a bundle at some point?
Quote:As a corollary, would you be less enthusiastic about buying the next round of Super Packs if you knew the costume set would not remain exclusive to it forever? -
Quote:No, you can't. They hit harder and have better defenses. End of story.
I can out perform or at least match up with all scrappers and most brutes.
Quote:(I am not aoe heavy)
Quote:You just need to know how to run the AT correctly. It really matters. -
Quote:Not one of them is the slightest bit redeemable. They're all war criminals with blood on their hands.
I'm not saying he's not evil. But out of them all, he's probably the most likely to be redeemable. -
Quote:As seen above, by the time of the Keyes Island Trial he's a frothing-at-the-mouth lunatic. He's drawn the last card in his Sanity Deck...and it's a joker.
Granted, I don't know what he's like in the Quays Island Trial, but he can't be that bad. -
Quote:I have never once, in all the years I've played, seen any Kheldian of either type do anything on any team that was the slightest bit exceptional. And I've been complimented on my own play many, many times so I have no reason to believe my own skills are somehow deficient.
"Very nicely slotted" doesn't equal "well played". I've seen them tear through @#$% like there's no tomorrow.