Valerika

Mentor
  • Posts

    321
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Sailboat View Post
    The point of my link suggestion is not to disallow long bios, but specifically to "ghettoize" them -- to keep the long ones out of the prime real estate. If you don't want to bother to click the link yourself, don't argue for long bios -- if a click deters you, a wall of text will, too.
    I'm sorry, but just because you don't like long bios doesn't mean you get to "ghettoize" them. That's pretty condescending and unnecessary. Prime real estate? Give me a break--there isn't a shortage of land in this game. And no, a wall of text won't deter me, it would deter YOU. But instead of dealing with it by not looking at it, you think the best way to deal with it is to erradicate it. That's sad. If people want to make longer bios, they should be able to. Your desire to "ghettoize" it is small minded and ridiculous.

    Honestly, if you think longer bio space should be prohibited because you aren't willing to even LOOK AT IT, then you have issues.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Sailboat View Post
    So if we KEPT the short bio space but had a LINK to more pages that people could fill out, but you'd only see them by drilling down another level deliberately, that wouldn't bother me too much.
    I'd much rather they expanded the existing bio space and fixed the bio bug than add a LINK feature. I often see people add links on their own, for example "Blah, blah, here's my bio, blah. For more information on this character, visit www.somekindawebsite.blah" I never visit those links, because: 1. I don't want to jump through hoops just to read a bio, 2. I don't want to be rickrolled.

    I understand that you don't like long bios, but there's a simple solution for you: don't read them. You can tell how long someone's bio is just at a glance. "Hey look, that bio takes up a whole page! Maybe, since I value brevity, I won't bother reading it!" Instead, you're saying "Short bios are better, so longer bios SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED." That's pretty draconian, and shows a remarkable lack of tolerance for writing styles different from your own.

    I prefer a degree of brevity for most of my characters, but sometimes a bio just needs to be a little longer than the current limits of the bio space. I can understand if you argue that the standard code rant applies, but don't let your grammatical and composition preferences limit player options.
  3. Valerika

    Worst Miss Tells

    I was once playing on full PUG with several friends, one of which lived in my old apartment complex. There is a lady across from me who must be a fantastic cook, because the most amazing food aromas waft down the hallways sometimes. So my friend sends me a private tell:

    Friend (in private tell): I'm absolutely starving, and the lady chef is making some stew. It smells so good that I can't concentrate! Argh!

    Me (in TEAMCHAT): Don't worry, I'm going to break down her door and steal her soup.
  4. Valerika

    The Boot Myth

    One of my blasters (Fire/Energy) was once kicked from an ITF before it even started. When I asked for an explanation, I was told that I didn't have enough AoEs. The leader didn't like the fact that I hadn't taken Rain of Fire or Fire Breath. What he didn't know was that I had so much global recharge that I could spam Fire Ball, but I didn't want to explain that to him. I just one-starred him and put him on ignore...
  5. Sorry to hear about your cat. She did live to a good, long old age though in cat years.
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Vitality View Post
    Alright, I get your reasoning...I screwed up...but that doesn't take anything away from what I'm suggesting.
    Yes it does. You've lost credibility, which is a shame, because your ideas kinda, sorta, somewhat had merit before.
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Vitality View Post
    What makes my posts trolling?

    Please tell me...because trolling was not my intention at all.
    Okay--I'll humor you. First you said:
    Quote:
    Why should I pay for GR then?

    I'm probably not going to buy GR.

    If they added AT proliferation, I would most definitely buy GR.

    As of right now, I have no use for GR.
    Then you said:
    Quote:
    Your right, it does seem childish...but I'm just trying to prove a point. (I already purchased GR haha)
    So, you:

    1. Are a liar who doesn't think people know how to read
    2. Think that admitting that you are a liar proves a point (other than that you suck at lying and making points)
    3. Defeated the purpose of your point by admitting you already bought GR
    4. Enjoy jerking people around "haha"

    This is why he thought you were trolling. I have to agree with him. You lost your point when you said that, sorry. You had a semi-legitimate point up until then, reposting in several threads aside.
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by PuceNonagon View Post
    For what it's worth...

    Because of free transfers, a guy I play with frequently moved over to another server temporarily to participate in an event. A well-known griefer on Justice immediately took his now-available name on Justice. He is charging two billion influence to give it back.
    The problem with this story isn't that we don't have globals tied to our names--it's the use of extortion. I would log all conversations related to this exchange and report it as a form of harassment. It's not a call for a naming convention change, though. That's like recalling everyone's cars and making them walk because your car was stolen and that shouldn't happen to anyone ever again.
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Joe_Blow View Post
    The current system is unfair. Let's say you created 'Super Duper Man' back when the game started, and want to transfer to a busier server, like Virtue or Freedom, but some temporary account used your name four months ago and never signed back on. It is now unavailable to anyone forever, and you are forced to either re-name your character, or keep them on their original, dead, server. Great choice, eh?
    No, that isn't unfair. You have the option of reserving whatever names you want on multiple servers right now. If you're afraid that someone on some server somewhere will take the name Super Duper Man, you can log on to every server, make a dummy character named 'Super Duper Man', and use him as a placeholder until you switch to that server. But if you start on a lightly populated server, and get upset that you can't take your name with you to a much more heavily populated server? Sorry, that's part of life in the big city. You have to try that much harder to stand out--that's not unfair, especially since the other guy did come up with it first on that server.

    Quote:
    I don't buy the argument that it forces originality either. How many people just add a number or an extra letter, or use a capital 'I' in place of a small L to get the name they need, or even just butcher a name altogether to get the name they want. I see dozens of them every day. But you know what I see even more of? People not even trying anymore, because all of the REALLY catchy names are taken, both by actual comic book writers or by other players, many of which have quit.
    Like I said, it doesn't force originality, it encourages it. But you're welcome to add extra numbers or letters...or @Joe_Blow to the end of them if you so please. The problem is, you know that adding @Joe_Blow to the end of them is ugly, and you don't want to be the only one forced to carry this ugly burden. You want to inflict it on EVERYONE. That way, your ridiculous naming convention wouldn't look so bad by comparison.

    Quote:
    Personal story: I created Joe Blow years ago over on Liberty. Joe Blow was a normal looking, small framed person who just happened to be a SS/WP brute. I typed in the lame and lo and behold, it accepted it! I was thrilled! I played until a little less than a year ago and quit, only to come back a month ago and reactivate. I decided moving to a new server might be the cure for what ailed me, so I came to Virtue via the free character transfer month. Joe Bow was already taken, so initially I was going to leave him on Liberty to collect dust, but a number of my old friends encouraged me to transfer him, so I did. He's now named Joe Blow v1.0. Yep, stupid, but it is as close as I could get to the original name without doing something dumb like eliminating the space between Joe and Blow, or by calling him Joe Blow with a period at the end, or by misspelling his name intentionally (Jo Blo, Joh Bloh...gimme a break.)
    I really don't feel sorry for you. You didn't reserve the name on Virtue early on as you should if you absolutely, positively had to keep that name if you ever transfered there. This story isn't one of someone who's originality was denied--it's one of someone who turned out to be much more inflexible and unoriginal than he originally thought.

    I've transfered to higher population servers and lost my names, but you know what? We get a free rename for that. Suck it up and rename your character--and if you absolutely can't have that character by any other name, then call it Joe_Blow@Joe_Blow. Don't make everyone else follow suit because you're uncomfortable with that.
  10. No. We don't need to tack our global names to our character names. I *like* the fact that originality is required in naming our characters, and each name is unique. But...if you want to add your global in order to be unoriginal, you *already* have that option. My character name Solicio is already obviously taken, but you could name one of your characters Solicio@Joe_Blow or something similarly hideous. It's already an option. Making it mandatory as they did in CO? No. Freaking. Thanks.
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by IanTheM1 View Post
    Of course, something that I continue to suggest whenever this topic comes up: Give Tankers Vigilance. It actually suits them quite well, when you think about it.
    I couldn't think of anything more useless on my WP/SS. No thanks. I like Gauntlet exactly as it is. I would only change the AT by buffing the defense/resist caps, and that's only after seeing what happens with GR. I'm guessing that brutes will look preferable to tanks in the late game due to similar defense/resist caps, with the added bonus of fury.
  12. Valerika

    Generic Rant

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Basilisk View Post
    Nonsequitur comment about how my post count has finally reached 1,500, after only 5 years and 4 months!
    Kneejerk response referencing anime cartoon and the phrase "over nine THOUSAND!!!!!"
  13. Remaugen, did you seriously just quote yourself? Unbelievable. And no, you haven't answered his question--you essentially said, "I don't know, and I don't want to pick a number." You haven't responded to any of the reasons why people are opposed to the idea, instead you pretend that the responses you've recieved thus far were personal attacks.

    We are crystal clear on what it is you want--that's not the problem. The problem is that in order to get what you want, you'd cause a lot of other problems in the process. Adding ten more levels comes with a heck of a price tag: character/powerset rebalancing, invalidation of Hami-O enhancements, market fluctuations and frustration over level 50 purple sets becoming obsolete, leveling curve resmoothing, PvP reconfiguration, etc. Not to mention the intense development effort required would significantly slow new content that could be available for all levels, new taskforces, new enemies, new zones, new powersets, etc--basically everything else would get put on hold so that you can tack 50-60 on a game designed around 1-50.

    Stop pretending that people are out to get you, and respond to these concerns. If you don't take them seriously and propose workarounds or solutions, then why should we take you seriously?
  14. Valerika

    Generic Rant

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ad Astra View Post
    One word reply preceded by a slash, harkening back to a departed poster, which became a much-abused term for "no".
    Pedantic reference to the EULA, complete with quote regarding dismissive term. Then poster actually VIOLATES the same EULA he just quoted by threatening to "ban" individual. All of this despite the fact that the individual has already placed him on the ignore list, and can see none of this text.
  15. Valerika

    Generic Rant

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Bright Shadow View Post


    Three-letter acronym that clarifies the trivial, redundant reason behind this post, and stating the trivial state of validity of the quoted text, or a one-word statement that simply points to the quoted text to express the trivial state of validity of it.
    This.
  16. Valerika

    Generic Rant

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Schismatrix View Post
    Offers cupcakes in response to post and then reneges on offer.
    Offers cake instead and fails to present cake.
    Posts obligatory notification that the cake does not, in fact, bear any resemblance to the truth.
  17. Valerika

    Generic Rant

    Attempts to sum up all arguments made so far, but only accurately sums up arguments that agree with his bias. Only presents straw-man arguments for the opposition, which he summarily dismisses as pathetic and unworthy of discussion. Declares that his side has "won", and anyone holding an opposing viewpoint either doesn't understand him completely, or is mentally defective. Makes gratuitious use profanity, but does so by working around the profanity filter using common abbreviations such as "WTF", "GTFO", and "STFU".
  18. Valerika

    Generic Rant

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ad Astra View Post
    Assertion that I also played that game and found it severely lacking.
    Rude, possibly petitionable personal attack with no attempt to address Ad Astra's experiences in other game.

    Quote:
    Long paragraphs dissecting every flaw in Night Elf Mohawk game, pointing out clear superiority of City franchise.
    Accusation that player did not really play other game, or wasn't playing correctly. References to carebears and inference that player has weak skin. Reference to massive popluarity of other game.

    Quote:
    Repeating suggestion that poster should go back to it if he finds it so superior, why is he "wasting" money/time here?
    Poster asserts that the reason he plays this game is because of the similarities it has with other game, but only lists the attributes that actually make it DIFFERENT. Completely fails to see the irony.
  19. Valerika

    Generic Rant

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ad Astra View Post
    Snarky superior-sounding comment, correcting bad grammar & spelling of entire post.

    Suggestion that this quoted poster should go back to that game with the Night Elf Mohawks.
    Admission that poster actually prefers that game, and thinks it is far superior to this one. Suggests that for this game to succeed, it obviously needs to become more like other game. Poster is not suggesting that CoH should learn from that game, because that would imply that the other game had both positive and negative attributes--he assumes all attributes of the other game are positive. He simply wants to turn this game into a smaller, carbon copy of the other game, warts and all. Or this game will die.
  20. Valerika

    Generic Rant

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ad Astra View Post
    Accusation that Solicio is obviously a sock puppet of OP.

    Is that you, Jack?
    Rude, obscene suggestion about what Ad Astra can do wif hiz sok pupet. Pur grammr continues, but it becomz clear taht poster doesn't konw who Jack Emmert iz. makes reference to all the ppl who arnt posting but must agree wif him.
  21. Valerika

    Generic Rant

    LOTS OF CAPITAL LETTERS AND EXCLAMATION POINTS!!! INSISTANCE THAT IF THIS RANT ISN'T TAKEN SERIOUSLY, POSTER WILL QUIT THE GAME!!!! rest of post has no punctuation or page breaks wif okaszional mispehlingz. poster actually takes the time to admit this but not actually fix it. because fixing it would compromize his odd principles wich somehow insist that using or requesting prohper english iz a sign of elitism rather tahn commun courtesi and basik communication skilz. posters point iz mainly lost becauz ppl haf to balance the fact that in additon to his views, teh poster also bileeves stoopidity and ignoranc iz virtues. poster reiterates teh need for hiz point to be takken seriouzly.
  22. Valerika

    Generic Rant

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Coyote_Seven View Post
    Reply that goes over many points already gone over since the original post was made, but which this poster has decided to not bother with and read, and which inevitably brings up sub-issues that have already been put to rest.
    Angry, semi-literate arguement which isn't even applicable to the referenced quote. References to carebears and also the silent majority. Poster is sure he's right, because he's been playing this game for *insert random amount of time* and has *insert random amount of level 50 characters*
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Remaugen View Post
    And yet you still feel the need to slam me for it.
    No one is "slamming" you for anything, Remaugen. You know the level cap isn't going to be increased, you know this thread is pointless as a result. You've been given ample reasons why increasing the level cap is both unnecessary and even undesired--instead of addressing them, you just restated your original reasons for wanting them, which sounds a lot like "But you don't understand, I waaaaaant it!". I'm sorry, but that's why you're getting the responses you're getting at this point.
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Remaugen View Post
    But then going to level 60 will take me much longer to get there!
    LOL

    I know you probably didn't mean for that to be funny, but it really is. You're literally advocating to add grind just for the sake of grind at this point.