Starjammer

Cohort
  • Posts

    233
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Fleeting Whisper View Post
    CLUE!
    You heard some other heroes asking around for people to help with a task Statesman assigned to them. You followed the heroes to Independence Port, only to find Statesman standing there, unharmed! Mystery solved!
    Here's how States explained it to me:

    "Look, Maria, she was a great gal back in the day and all. But let's face it, the years have not been kind to her. I'm the greatest superhero in the world, y'know, and I have a certain image to uphold. I look like I'm perpetually 29 and she looks like my grandma.

    "So, look, here's what I need you to do. Don't let on that I'm over here in Independence Port. Just pop through a few portals and tell her that you're looking for me. Play it out for as long as you can. Then when she finally sees me on the news or something, just tell her that you rescued me but I'm too busy to come and see her.

    "C'mon, do it for me and we'll be pals."

    And that's how I became Statesman's Pal.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Grey Pilgrim View Post
    I don't like it either, mind, but I don't want people being more upset than they need to be.
    Please, using your extensive knowledge of me, my life and my circumstances, lay out for me exactly how upset I need to be. In your estimation of my upsetness.
  3. Well, just bought my online GR, to add to the 5 slots I paid $20 for yesterday...

    aaand nothing!

    But the money's already gone from my account.

    Isn't it funny how "issues" with the online store never stop NCSoft from taking my money. Only from delivering the service I paid for.

    Taking money and giving nothing of value in return. There's a word for that.
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Castle View Post
    Sick of beating your chest like Tarzan?
    QR

    This. I know I'm not the first or only one to say it, even without reading the thread, but please for the love of <insert anthropic conception of the Absolute here> kill this d@mned animation dead.

    Even if the only alternative to this animation, for the manliest of my manly-man toons, was to twirl in a circle while a fairy wand rained sparkly dust down upon my head, I would still prefer it to that asinine Tarzan animation.

    Thanks.

    But didn't David already do this thread? Why not just use his?
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by CactusBrawler View Post
    It's not quite the same thing, because the Joker has told Batman why he's doing it.

    In your situation it would be like your stalker telling you "Every time you wear a pony tail, I'll kill people" and you then saying "Well **** that I like wearing a pony tail".

    You could wear your hair a different way, Batman could help people another way, he chooses to be Batman, people die because of it, every kill the Joker has made since telling Batman that he'll kill because of him have been Batman's responsibility.
    A stalker's target knows why the stalker is doing what they're doing. Doesn't give the stalker the right to control the target's actions in even the slightest way. Doesn't make the stalker's actions the target's responsibility.

    But let's turn it around: Let's say (and I'm not really saying this, forumites) that I'm tired of this argument and you had better say you are wrong and I'm right, or I'll go kill somebody.

    Now you know. I've warned you. What say you? Are you willing to take responsibility for another person's death because you can't admit you're wrong?
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by CactusBrawler View Post
    Batman could just stop being Batman.

    He could of become a policeman, officer Wayne of the GCPD.

    He could use the vast resources of Wayne tech to build asylums and jails that can't be escaped from. He funded the Watchtower after all in several continuitys.

    But instead, he dresses up as a bat and goes around kicking criminals in the face, despite a mass murderer telling him that he'll keep on killing while he does it.

    Why because some one has to be Batman? No because Bruce Wayne enjoys it, and when you get down to it he considers himself more important than any other person in the world, just because he lost his parents.
    Well, I've already said that Bruce Wayne choosing to become Batman is a selfish way of acting out his own emotional issues. That's one thing.

    But as for "I'll keep killing until you stop," that's still not Batman's responsibility. Again, it's like saying that the object of a stalker's obsession is responsible for what the stalker does. If they'd just gone out on the date and loved the stalker and married them and let the stalker control their life, then their cat would still be alive. It's all the person's fault, see?
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by CactusBrawler View Post
    Batman stopped during the Dark Knigt Returns comic, Joker spent several decades in a more or less catatonic state. Batman returns? Joker kills an entire audience of people during a televised appearance.

    Batman 'dies' during the current DC run, Joker becomes Saxon Hale, a fairly nice gravedigger and possibly a crime fighter.
    Those are all symptoms of the Joker's obsession with Batman. Absolutely none of it invests Batman with moral culpability for the Joker's actions.
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by CactusBrawler View Post
    Actually he is.

    The Joker is only the Joker because Batman is Batman, he's told him this several times, and it's been shown several other times that when Bruce Wayne stops being Batman, the Joker stops.
    Lots of criminals blame their actions on others. Momma hit me. Daddy abused me. I was bullied in school. My boss is mean to me. Society is cruel. Life is unfair. The world is hard.

    All these things may contribute to an individual's problems. But none of them excuse or override the individual's responsibility. Everybody has their own stuff to deal with and most people do so without becoming criminals.

    Now, the Joker is insane, which is somewhat different. But it still doesn't make him Batman's responsibility. It's like telling the target of a stalker that they shouldn't be so damned interesting.
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by AzureSkyCiel View Post
    Decorum seems to have it right.
    Worse, Hitler was pretty incompetent overall as a leader in the end, and the Allies actually STOPPED TRYING TO ASSASSINATE HIM DIRECTLY when they realized Hitler was the greatest detriment to preserving his own empire.
    So, unless I could make the Treaty of Versailles go differently and manage to stop the Great Depression... I would leave Hitler alone on that battlefield.
    Actually, in the other scenario I would still leave him alone since it would theoretically mean he would end up rather voiceless and powerless.
    Seriously, if you want to put the biggest crimp in the rise of Nazism, short of rewriting the Treaty of Versaille as suggested, the assassination most likely to do any real good would be Neville Chamberlain.

    Not that it would have immediately catapulted Churchill into power or given his views respect. But at the very least you wouldn't have Chamberlain trying to buy off Hitler by giving him approval to annex other countries' lands. That was a major signal of weakness to the Nazis.
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Agonus View Post
    He does do that, last I knew anyway. But there's some goofy explanation, don't remember if it's been implied or outright stated, for Gotham being so thoroughly corrupted that it doesn't seem like he gets an edge.
    He may go through the motions. But he does not bring his full mind and will to bear on the problems from that perspective, the way he does as Batman.

    One reason, as stated above, is because public action would distract from his personal crusade as Batman.

    Another is that Bruce Wayne is not to be taken too seriously, so people will ignore him. Again in service to Batman's existence.

    Bruce's rationalization is that Batman is the optimum solution. But in truth it's his chosen solution. And on some level, it's a selfish choice.

    And Bruce will not kill in pursuit of his own selfish ends. And he knows better than to try justifying it.
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Agonus View Post
    BS. Someone with Batman's iron, hell, adamantium will is stronger than that. I find it hard to believe that a guy with the willpower and determination that Bruce has been repeatedly shown to have would crack under that scenario.
    You're kidding, right? Bruce Wayne has billions of dollars and the most influential name in Gotham. If his goal was to clean up the city, he could do so with endowments and bought elections.

    No, the reason that Bruce Wayne puts on the suit and takes matters into his own hands is because it's an outlet for his own rage, frustration and survivor's guilt. He didn't create Batman to be a symbol so much as a means by which to not get killed doing it. He is not an emotionally healthy person and he's the first to admit that. Which is the whole reason for Batman's code in the first place. Bruce knows that taking the power of life and death is the line he can't cross for the sake of his own sanity.

    On the subject of guilt... Batman may feel guilty for what the Joker does but guilty feelings do not equal responsibility. Lots of people feel guilty for things that they are not responsible for. Batman is also smart enough to know that, which is why he'll never allow himself to use it as an excuse.
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Lady Arete View Post
    @GG
    Going to make an absurd example. Its a for the greater good question and as i'm writing i'm not quite sure if I would. But here is the question.
    Think of a world without Hitler. Suppose you or your character GG (I do remember that you have stated that your avatar GG is pretty much yourself, but i'll give the possibility of separate)...
    Suppose you or your character was able to go back in time, maybe even to the first world war when Hitler was just a corporal, you had a chance to take down Hitler... would you have done so. Even if you took the guise of a soldier for the other side, would you have taken a rifle or anything.. aimed it at Hitler for a killing shot and pulled the trigger?
    In the hope that the Nazi movement would be halted and maybe the second world war and Holocaust might never have happened.
    Would you have pulled the trigger for this greater good to save 6 million from the death-camps and countless more who died on the battlefield?

    (Ok, it may not have worked out, due to another major player... Stalin, but lets just think of Hitler? And Europe as we know it today would most likely have been different.)
    It is a What If scenario, but thought I'd ask.
    Not addressed to me, but it does remind me of a movie I saw once: The Last Supper.

    A bunch of intellectual liberals ask themselves the same question and decide that killing Hitler is a moral imperative. They then go on to start identifying potential Hitlers (mostly right-wing conservatives) and murdering them, reasoning that it was their moral duty to do so. Finally, through sheer luck they manage to lure in their white whale, an arch-conservative radio commentator.

    Wanting to relish the act, they put the question to him: Would he kill Hitler? Expecting, of course, that he would say yes and justify them. Instead, he says no, that he'd try talking Hitler out of his bad attitudes and actions first, preferring reason to violence. Hearing this from their arch-enemy shakes the murder circle to the core and they decide they have to stop.

    Unfortunately for them, by this point the commentator starts putting together all the little clues and realizes what he's into. He promptly decides to self-defense them out of existence.

    I found it to be a very entertaining examination of the philosophy of ends and means.
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Agonus View Post
    Since then, they've kept turning the Joker's murderous tendencies up and up and up to the point that it makes Batman look bad for not killing the guy.
    That assumes that Batman is morally responsible for the Joker's actions. He's not, no matter how many times they do their dance. If you're going to go that route, Batman could equally well kill the staff at Arkham for not tranking the Joker into a coma when he is put away. They bear equal responsibility, no?

    Personal morality aside, the real reason that Batman doesn't start by killing the Joker is because it would not stop there. That's a road that Bats knows that he can't ever take even one step down. And the Joker knows it too, which is why he keeps trying to get Bats to take that step.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Agonus View Post
    The ends justify the means.

    I think you have it a little backwards. It's supposed to be Joker's unpredictability that makes him so dangerous and hard to catch. Still, if it comes down to it, Black Adam, or Deathstroke, or freaking Catman, or just some random officer or gang member with a gun should be able to take out the Joker.
    The ends never justify the means. They sometimes necessitate the means, which is a whole different ball of wax. Way too few people see or understand the distinction. It all comes down to the prices you're willing to pay versus those that are too high.

    Also, see Joker Immunity.
  15. Starjammer

    Lag lag lag

    The program is called IObit SmartRAM. I picked it up as an add-on to their Advanced SystemCare tool suite.

    It runs in the background and when CPU utilization is low it reclaims memory and swap space. You can also manually force it.

    When CoH is spiking memory usage and it's not on, I can watch the client shoot up to hundreds of megs of memory utilization in the span of a minute or two. When it's running, the client will usually fluctuate between 60 to 80 megs, climbing and then getting reset.

    The only problem I've noticed in using it is that when CoH is performing this behavior, SmartRAM itself starts swelling the swap utilization. I have to periodically exit and restart the tool to reduce it. SmartRAM only displays this behavior in conjunction with CoH while memory-hogging that I've noticed. EDIT--I run SmartRAM in the background all the time and it does not misbehave at all when CoH is not running, that I've noticed.

    It's also only a delaying tactic, not a total solution. Eventually my graphics will start chopping and my framerate will drop into the single digits. Then an exit and restart or even a reboot may be called for. However, it's the difference between seeing this behavior 15-30 minutes after marketing and a few hours with intense marketing.
  16. Starjammer

    Lag lag lag

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Blunt_Trauma View Post
    Hi, it's 2am on a Thursday morning and the market is laggy as hell and won't process any transactions. Wait a few minutes it says. I do so. Still foo-bar, with the very occasional success in actually transacting something.
    This is not an uncommon thing for me, or for lots of other people. It happens a lot and seems quite random in relation to population and activity.

    Why is that?

    Is this working as intended?

    If not, what's the plan?

    Will we ever go back to the simpler and vastly more stable market?

    Annoying, market is frequently annoying.
    I have read reports that the new market interface caused memory leaks for some peoples' clients. I'm not sure if this was ever identified or fixed.

    Subjectively and anecdotally, I have seen evidence of this behavior in my own client. However, I run a RAM optimizer in the background that seems to work in reclaiming the memory space.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by SuperOz View Post
    It's really great to come back to this thread I started and see such robust discussion going on. Thank you to all those who have posted so far!

    The main thing I seem to be getting from the responses though is that it's not so much time to move on from Recluse and Statesman so much as it is to grow them up a bit and give them some moral complexity, which is interesting given both the T for Teen rating for the game and the upcoming release of Going Rogue.

    Is it just that this playerbase in particular or the broader audience have started to see beyond the black and white perception that used to linger about superhero themed stories? If so, I'd probably be pointing at Dark Knight as one of the major tipping points. Not only did it financially succeed, but it also scored an Oscar for the late Heath Ledger. And it was genuinely morally complex. A true grown up comic book story.
    I'm going to disagree with the basic premise. It reflects upon a couple of problems I've always had with analysis of heroic fiction of all stripes, though comics are simply the most obvious.

    The fiction that good is simple, evil is complex and the "real world" is rendered in shades of gray.

    I tend to find that the opposite has more heft to it. Evil is, in fact, extraordinarily simple: It is simply selfishness writ large. I do what I do for my own ends, damn the world. The reason that villains often seem complex is that their rationalizations are often complex; as are most peoples' reasons for choosing to be selfish when they know they shouldn't.

    Good, on the other hand, is complicated. It's why the world has many scoundrels and few saints, instead of the other way around. It's about choosing to pay a price to do something that you don't directly benefit from. When writers ignore this fact, the heroes are two-dimensional. When good writers explain it well, the heroes come alive.

    Shades of gray are often writers' attempts to construct the plot in such a way as to preclude the heroes from making a clearly "good" choice so that they can create drama through conflicted morals. Will a good man steal to save his family is such a story. But IMO a better story is the lengths a good man will go to avoid stealing and still feed his family.

    The very best Superman story I ever read was Elliot S! Maggin's novel Miracle Monday. Basic idea: A demon tries to tempt Superman into choosing the lesser of two evils by wrecking both Metropolis and his life as Clark Kent. All Superman has to do to stop it is to kill the innocent woman the demon possessed; one life for millions against his personal morality, the classic greater good choice. Superman chooses instead to sacrifice everything in his life to avoid choosing either evil. And Maggin makes it make sense. Epic.

    EDIT -- Props to Eva for beating me to the "evil is selfish" premise.
  18. If a 50-foot robot can transform into an actual-scale handgun or tape recorder just by refolding its body parts, a Toxic Tarantula can get through a door.
  19. Keep an eye out for something inside the case possibly shorting the motherboard.

    If you have a Friday deadline to RMA it, it might not be worth the risk if your CPU or motherboard is inching its way towards self-immolation.
  20. Force of Nature means never having to say you're sorry... for grabbing all the aggro with your Aimed, Built-up, Power-Boosted AoE.
  21. The main problem I see with it would be if it allowed build switching within a mission instance.

    If nothing else, it would be a problem by allowing the insta-recharge of long-recharging powers. Pop the trainer and switch builds and everybody's got another shot of Eye of the Magus, Geas of the Kind Ones, tank god-modes, etc.
  22. I like /db on tanks because unlike most tank secondaries, DB is fast. Most tank secondaries have kind of a ponderous feel to them, at least until you get some global recharge going, and even then they tend to have longer animation times. DB does not suffer from that.

    The speed of the set does lend itself to higher EPS, despite the lower end costs of the individual powers. I'd recommend pairing it with one of the sets that provides for END recovery early on.
  23. I think the real flaw in the concept design for Arachnos is that it's set up like it's a super-mafia without the back story that makes actual organized crime syndicates work.

    Recluse is the don/capo/godfather/whatever. He's got these four lieutenants who are each jockeying for position and they each have hundreds or thousands of soldiers working for them in a hierarchy of power. Your character is a soldier trying to work his or her way up the ranks of the organization while paying respect to those above you, until you can theoretically take their place one day.

    Through it all, there's this idea that for better or worse, you're locked in to the organization and it's your first, best chance for fulfilling your personal ambitions.

    The flaw is that the Arachnos concept does not imbue or even imply a common connection between you and all these other crooks. There's no real reason for all of you to be in the same boat together, unlike for example, a bunch of immigrants or low-caste people who have a common culture, a need for protection and few choices. It's just sort of expected that you'll go along with it for no particular reason.

    I kind of like the four-factions approach to Arachnos mentioned earlier. If I could wave my wand and re-design CoV from scratch, I'd have four primary contacts in each level range, one for each faction. You initially choose which faction you want to join coming out of the training scenario, which would be redone as a "demonstration" of your power and will to get things done. Whichever faction your character has greatest standing with when they hit that range, that's the contact who offers you a primary story arc for those levels. BUT... I'd design each stage of each arc so that you can talk with EACH contact from each faction, who will each offer you different incentives to either complete the mission for the original faction or sell out in some fashion to one of the rivals. Standing with the faction would influence the offers/threats made or received.
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Dr_Mechano View Post
    According to the thermometer it actually hits 40 degress C inside the shop, it's a literal sweat shop!*

    Keep in mind that we Brits rarely ever see temperatures that high...like..ever...though oddly am getting use to it slowly.
    LOL Here in Atlanta that's just July, except with 95% humidity.