PC_guy

Legend
  • Posts

    1308
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    The whole point of these endless "buff Peacebringer" threads is to move them closer to their brothers the Warshades and make them more valuable and desired for teaming.
    I was under the impression that the goal was to get both buffed (obviously not the point of this specific thread, but generally speaking) so that it moves them closer to everyone else, namely VEATs since the two ATs fill the same role as "we do some of everything" role. I mean just because the WS is better than the PB doesn't mean they both don't have serious flaws in design that need to be addressed.

    while I can agree that khelds don't need much to be balanced, they do need alot of little things rather than one big thing, if that hasn't been made blatantly obvious by everyone who has made a suggestion in this thread thus far. but simplying changing SF from KB to KD/KU and thats it would just be too little.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Zenlon View Post
    Feedback?
    pvp is dead in this game
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Airhammer View Post
    Your controller with IW has chosen a secondary which will give him that.. which is exactly my point.. Controllers dont GET mez protection. That is a function of certain secondaries (Sonic and FF being the others I recall off he top of my head) certain secondaries do.
    an APP is much different than a secondary.

    Quote:
    The Controller AT doesnt get Mez Protection and you cannot get that until at least level 41. AND not every person who plays a controller will pick that secondary. I have numerous cotrollers @ leve 50.. none of them have that as a secondary... and they STULL function just fine.. and two of my Ice controllers are very melee centric...
    if you don't pick it thats your own fault. or you understand the consequences of not taking it. it's still there for everyone. and everyone playing the AT has the opportunity to have it. not people with certain secondaries, not people who know more about the game than others. everyone can take it. period.

    Quote:
    Mez does happen at range.. and it happens a lot.. Matla grenads throwers.. Freakshow sleeps and holds.. Carnies... yeeesh... Arachnos.. too... It happens...
    yea it does. but my point was that there was less mezzes that happen at range than melee. and of those, there are afew that have a 40" range. so something like a blaster could still be optimum while still simply outranging alot of mez, which was my entire point. something that is less optimum at range, like a human kheld, doesn't get that luxury.

    Quote:
    Mez is a part of the game.. the reality is that it CAN be managed.. and there are tools to manage it... there are break free's... there are IO's.. There is intelligence.. knowing what foes mez and how.. and taking them out first.
    true, but asking for human mez prot isn't an issue of simply learning the game or game management. It's about the fact that khelds are underperfoming every other AT in game and this would help close that gap. Every AT has it holes in it's own design, khelds simply have more of them than other ATs and this would fill one gap that is simply outdated.

    Quote:
    Your dominator and stalker point makes no sense in the mex protection discussion to me..
    your entire argument is that khelds don't need mez prot since they've done without it since i3. by that same logic, doms and stalkers were functioning before their changes so they must not have needed the changes they got.

    Quote:
    Although I dont use the forms I would LOVE To see them fix the form changing issue that has plagued so many for so long..
    which is interesting because if they did it the fasion that most are suggesting it would also prove to be a suitable fix for the mez problem.

    Quote:
    However I dont see the need necessarily for the AT To get Mez protection. You have a blend of both ranged and melee attacks in human form. I use both.. And I do get mezzed.. and my blasters get mezzed.. and my controllers get mezzed.. and so do my defenders.. and my corruptors...

    But you have tools in the game to help you deal with it.. USE THEM... thats what they are there for.. now if you refuse to use the tools.. well...
    its not about people not using BFs. its about the mez issue being a hole in the AT design that A doesn't need to be there since the AT has multiple other holes on top of that and B would be a nice change in closing the performance gap.

    Quote:
    Would I happily take mez protection in the toggles? Hell yea.
    Would I happily take the inherent getting nerfed so that our base damage and mitigation scalers can be buffed? Hell yea.
    Would I take a reduction on form shifting animation times? Yes, 1000 times, yes please.

    I'm not holding my breath for any of it.
    pretty much
  4. Quote:
    I'll agree that changing the KB in Solar Flare to KD is a good idea. But I disagree with a blanket conversion of all KB.
    i agree with this

    Quote:
    Reassess damage scales to reflect a melee modifier of 0.900 and a ranged modifier of 0.850.
    and this.
  5. Quote:
    Castle got it into his head that if you dumb it down - they will come. No one came
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Airhammer View Post
    Controllers do not get Mez protection. A controller with certain secondaries can.. but by and large they do not..
    interesting. my troller with indomitable will will be interested in hearing this

    Quote:
    and the reality is that there is a simple little thing called a break free which will get you out of mez... use them.. I stock them on my toons that are susceptible to being mezzed. And they are pretty cheap.. seriously.. Mez isnt THAT big an issue anymore.. I remember when there was no BreaK Free.. you just had to stand there and take it...
    cool story bro

    why don't we just get rid of mez prot all together then? hell no one needs it, everyone just needs to get some more BFs

    Quote:
    Blasters CAN function at range.. and guess what. you CAN be mezzed at range you know.. holds, immobilizes, fears and even stuns DO happen at range as well. Melee is NOT The only place where mez happens..
    true but melee has a larger variety of mezzes that can hit you. generally speaking blasters simply out range alot of mezzes in game. or in the current game, simply kill whatever is causing the mez. with a blasters high damage and attacking through mez, it's not a hard to avoid mez on a blaster.

    Quote:
    I play an all human PB.. no forms.. didnt want them.. does he get mezzed sometimes.. yup.. pop a break free.. keep going.. problem solved..
    this is an even cooler story than before

    Quote:
    I can see a slight damage buff.. I can see the need to fix the issue switching forms.. Maybe im too old school and remember the original blaster that NEVER had defiance.. NEVER had shields.. and NEVER had break free's. And I learned to manage that.. so for me a Kheldian was like wow.. shields AND heals ???!!! So I can see my point of view is somewhat skewed..
    this really seems to be your only argument against mez prot. the fact that simply because they haven't had it means they don't need it. which is complete bulsh. I guess stalkers or doms didn't need the overhauls they got either.


    Quote:
    I also know that a lot of my toons have no mez protection whatsoever and they function perfectly fine... I just have had to adopt survival skills and coping mechanisms for different circumstances.
    As do I. however of those toons, none are melee oriented toons, and they all do what they're suppose to do better than kheld.
  7. PC_guy

    KM/? pvp build

    WP

    but pvp is dead in this game
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Airhammer View Post
    Why should Kheldians get mez protection? They have a form that protects them from mez should they chose to use it ( and I have an all human one ).
    that takes 3 seconds to activate, is interruptible, and if you do it preemptively you're limiting your attack chain.

    yup, sounds good to me

    Quote:
    Blasters dont get Mez protection. Most defenders and corruptors do not. Controllers do not. Most MM's do not either. All you need is some break free's and Mez is no longer an issue.
    actually controllers do. and blasters have something semi-close that is at the very least reliable.

    and besides that, blasters, defenders, corrupters, and controllers, all have the ability and (while debatable) were designed to function at range and out of melee. human khelds really limit themselves by just sticking to range.

    Quote:
    They can only use their tier 1 and 2 when mezzed.. they cannot use their most powerful melee attacks while mezzed. They also dont come with two self heals and cannot get shields until level 41.
    a t1 and t2 attack chain is enough to outlast most mezzes. or at the very least keep DPSing while popping a BF.
    and for the latter
    Quote:
    And khelds cant use either of those self heals and the shields suppress while mezzed...
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Dechs Kaison View Post
    Agreed, they suffer from some serious balance issues. Which is why I tried to direct the OP to the threads with mathematical analysis that could lead to a change.

    Opinions and feelings will get nothing accomplished. To get something changed, you must demonstrate how it is underperforming.

    Unless it has anything to do with pvp
    Off topic fix
  10. Personally I'd pike to see some animation times tweaked specifically for human powers. Every attack chain I come up with just feels very slow and clunky. A lightform change to a more sow like power. And assuming the inherent stays the same, all shields given a defense component. And mez prot

    But in the bigger scheme Of things, I'd like to see an overhaul of how forms are handled. Either the activations brought way down and preferably made uninterruptible. And have all toggles supress while in forms.

    That's just some stuff off the top of my head during a lunch break so I'll probably edit and add some stuff later

    EDIT: like right now . I know this is a pb thread but I'd really like to see fluffehs changed so that they functions like volt sentinel in that it can't be targeted and all aggro comes to you.
  11. Quote:
    Cold, by the way, I don't consider nearly as powerful as Storm, Rad, or Dark (the latter two of which were available to Corruptors from the beginning).
    yea it's not like cold has the potential to have double the -res of all those sets, deletes any issue of end problems, makes -recover from nukes a nonissue, has the only power in game that makes powers like unstoppable, elude, ect. as effective as fortune buffs, and the ability to give every teammate 30% defense

    you lost all credibility here dude
  12. Quote:
    I've always been in the "Pb's suck" camp. I frequently, however, get the urge to play them, partially because their version of the inherent is so much better than the warshade's, and partly because I like the theme of the powers. Every time I make a build, though, I see the things that turned me off of them in the first place.

    This time, I've a human/dwarf build that looks ok (gave up on Bright Nova). There are several powers that I wish I could pick, like glowing touch and qfly, but I actually find this tighter than my warshade builds. It still has weak damage, which annoys me, and too much knockback. Survival looks very good though.
    i'm basically in the same camp. i always get the itch to play one because i like the idea of the PB and i like the powers. but every time i slot it (which after i just recently stripped was the 3rd time) i always get dissapointed. i've purpled it out multiple times trying all human then triform and came to the conclusion that the sets suck and need a buff. EDIT: i know i'll get flamed for that by hardcore pber's so i'll just say that the PB isn't for me.

    The thing about it was every time i made a mids build, on paper it looked really good. 2400ish hp, high resistance, 2, at one time 3, heals but the damage was so lack luster that it just didn't play well.

    tl;dr I basically had the same should I shouldn't I idea that you have but released that the sets suck and that any time/inf/sets that i invest in it would be better invested in literally any/every other AT and I would get higher production out of said toon.

    took all the purps out of the pb, put em in the WS and never looked back since atleast the WS has the higher potential of the two, albeit both still need buffs.

    double EDIT
    Quote:
    are you planning to PVP?
    pvp is dead in this game so i feel safe answering this question for him,

    No.
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Thirty-Seven View Post
    To my knowledge, the only thing that impacts Incarnate powers... are other Incarnate powers.
    Quote:
    You are not incorrect, see above.
    lolwut?
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by GavinRuneblade View Post
    wOOt, first one to say it:

    This isn't the suggestions forum. Please post in the right place.

    Aaah, it feels good to be a jerk. Heh. =)
    that forums is a complete joke also.

    it's more for forum pvp than an actual ideas forum. the bad ideas get rejected hard and gives people an excuse to argue while the good ones fall down uncommented and unnoticed.
  15. brute might hit a little bit harder. tank is way better overall
  16. PC_guy

    Is Triumph dead?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Kirsten View Post
    Yes I am on Triumph Watch 2.0, and although I am aware of the mid issue drop, this seems... much greater.
    Quote:
    I'm not noticing a difference at all.
    >implying that she's actually using 2.0

    try forming your own stuff. if its not something obscure it'll probably form



    also the server is dead as s**t
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by UltraTroll View Post
    Sorry I think it is a duo here. It is not just one person here.

    Greev and Caim, Triumph's Most Famous Couple.
    fixt
  18. 1. pvp is dead so this is all moot

    2. bane's do better damage than forts because they can crit harder out of hide. shatter does good damage and shatter armor are your bread and butter. you have a higher perception than any other AT so playing stalker hunter is your most useful role.

    but thats for zone, for arena, you'll rarely see stalkers and your damage is fairly weak(along with your self mitigation) to be considered a strong choice. arena teams want damage damage damage and SoAs aren't the best for that.
  19. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Timeshadow View Post
    I've read the stickied threads and there's plenty of good stuff in there. I asked because I wanted to get the most current input possible so I wouldn't just be trowing the same old argument if parts of it were no longer valid.
    thats the thing. those arguements used then are still valid because there have been literally 0 changes. none. zip. zilch. nada. they put the thing in and haven't made one change.

    although i'd also advise that you take a look at Z's threads that he made since most of what you're asking for can be found in them and is very recent

    1st

    2nd

    3rd

    Quote:
    I understand the frustration at the lack of attention and, in some cases, downright dismissal by the Devs. If you really wanna give up then what's the point in continuing to drudge along with PvP the way it is?
    there is very little hence why everyone left. but the game has so much potential to have the best pvp in any mmo that arena play can still be enjoyed by those pvpers who are still here for pve stuff if you turn off everything i13 you can and cope with the other stuff.

    Quote:
    As someone said in one of those threads, if everyone stops complaining nothing's gonna get done.
    i think its pretty obvious that if everyone keeps complaining nothing is going to get done. its very lose lose for pvp in this game. the devs actions have made it pretty obvious that they really don't care about pvp. most other sub communities joke about it (devs hate vills, devs hate fire tanks, devs hate everyone ect.) but they've made it pretty clear that they really don't care about the pvp community. if they did they would have atleast put forth the minimal effort to fix the long list of bugs that have been in game since i13.

    there really is no point in trying anymore. it's not right, it's not fair but dats the way baseball go.
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Timeshadow View Post
    Hey PvPers

    I'm here to get your opinions on the current state of the PvP game because I wanna bring it up to the Dev team at the next available opportunity. I love PvP, especially in superhero games, and I was really sad to see the mass exodus that came with I13's changes. So I've got a few questions for you all.

    First off, what's wrong with PvP in relation to the old system? From what I can tell the current PvP game bears no mechanical resemblance to the PvE game. Nothing seems to make sense so it's really difficult for the new PvPers the Devs tried to accommodate to get into the swing of things. So what aspects of pre-I13 PvP do you think need to be reinstated?

    Second, what additions/changes are really needed to make PvP more accessible to new people? Anyone who's PvPed in any game knows that breaking into it is tough. You're bound to get beaten a lot before you start to get the hang of things and rack up victories. That's all well and good but those early strings of loses do make players shy away from the PvP scene. So what do you think should be done to help new players get acclimated without penalizing those who PvP frequently and have already honed their skills (And IO'd out)?

    Finally, how can PvP be made more appealing overall? The Devs have done a little work in this department by putting in PvP temp powers and IOs but more needs to be done. Aside from the fun factor, what else should be implemented to attract players to PvP?

    Thanks for any input you guys can provide. I know a lot of people say PvP is dead and that the Devs don't care about it but I really wanna try to do something here.
    did you miss were Z, about 3 months ago, made 3 threads that asked these exact same questions that were multiple pages long?
    they ended up being very productive since it was just rehashing everything in stickies.

    Psy is right, horse is dead, devs could give 2 s**ts
    Bring it up all you like, you'll get the same dodge that we've gotten since i13 glhf though.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by konrad knox View Post

    I'd think my post was lengthy enough to clearly state what I'm proposing. I was not around when base raids were still active, but from my understanding, base raids were simply competitions over items of power, who most people had no clue or care about.

    With what I am proposing, anyone at anytime is reminded who owns the district you're entering. Your victory trophey gives you concrete fame, not just an item in a hidden base you have to invite people to go look.
    Also, economic advantages, I believe were not present in base raids, but if I am wrong, please correct me, as, once again, I did not come around early enough to witness raids.

    I am basically proposing a siege system.
    they sound very similar. IoP had tangible rewards, more xp, more dam ect. it wasn't just cosmetic. it also gave bases and prestige more of a point than storage/porters and made you think about how to build your base. they weren't as in depth as your proposal from what i can tell, but mechanically they function the same way.

    honestly though pvp has much bigger issues than stuff to do. the massive mechanical changes that everyone has described and asked for need to take place before the devs even think about adding different types of pvp. and even then, i'd like to see objective based stuff added to arenas before something as in depth as this is added.

    Quote:
    @Computer: you really would never use such a system? Wouldn't be tempted to get an SG to conquer a district and collect free money every day? The miniscule fees, even if it's 100 inf. per ferry ride, would build up to large sums just because how many people use it. Well, ferries can be split between districts, one ferry can belong to one, another to another. It would really earn good profit if you owned a district with a ferry. You could spec out your SG's toons with the money from taxes, it would heal the game's ruined inflated economy back up quite a bit as well!

    I'm guessing you are not a PvPer at heart, and PvPRPers are the target audience for this proposal's draw. I'd like to hear opinions of some hardcore CoH PvPers if such are present in the house.
    such a system seems like it would require a large amount of people. or atleast multiple sgs worth of people spread out around the servers to work. obviously that is the complete opposite of what we have in the pvp community. such a system wouldn't flourish unless a pvp community already existed and was strong. coh has no such community.

    also if i13 taught us anything, it was the idea of trying to get pver's, whether they be carebears, RPers, badgers, whatever, to engage in pvp is a really really really bad idea.