Not_Rhino

Instead of Unresistable Damage, have it deal additional unresistable damage versus each higher rank. There's really no reason to use AS on minions, but if you want to you'd get a small amount of extra damage added (enough to kill most minions, so the change between current version would be slim to none). The damage scales up with Rank, making AS fare better against higher ranked enemies and thus a very viable option for use against AVs or GMs. Considering the effort that goes in to ASing against these high-HP targets like GMs and AVs, the prep time of using Placate and inherent risk of using an interruptable, slow-animating attack, I believe it would be balanced for AS to deal more damage to AVs and GMs then it currently does. Trade-off being, it might deal a bit less to Lts, and about the same or a tiny bit less to Bosses. I wager a lot of Stalkers would actually prefer it doing a bit less to Lts, however, if only to leave them with a tiny bit of health so that the fear effect can be set off.

This also, in theory, allows you to bypass any problems that would be had involving killing civilians or Hamidon enemies, since they do not follow the traditional ranking structure. As such, the unresistable damage could be entirely limited to the standard Minion, Lt, Boss, EB, AV, Monster, GM ranks, and not apply at all to other ranks. As far as I'm aware, this addresses the primary issues with giving it unresistable damage. It would also make Stalkers very valuable on end game content like attempting to take down an enraged Marauder or Honoree in the LGTF once he pops Unstoppable.

I also support an increase in damage scale to at least 1.1 and an HP cap increase to at least 1800. Would also support adding to the Stalker inherent a "bleed" effect that applies to the Stalker's first two attacks, similar to Tanker bruising except it would deal very minor DoT.

Seriously? Tankers? Tankers are an absolute blast. If they got rid of them I'd quit the game. If you're going to troll about "inferior ATs" can't you actually pick one that's substantially inferior? Like Stalkers?

Wouldn't work due to clipping issues.

I like the concept but I can't see it working very well for team play. "Don't heal me, I'm berserking!"? Needs some definite work and refining before moving forward. PBAoE Knockback (which everyone hates) that gives regen (which makes it a necessary part of the set)? And you can get it at level 2? The tier 9 leaves you -dead- at the end? Not particularly appealing for a Tanker. But of course, the entire crash is mitigated by the fact that you get a self rez... and with a short recharge, to boot. How would this set operate with extra defense buffs? Anyone who wants to IO for defense will find their Frenzy has basically been rendered obsolete. The ultimate goal of the set, as is, seems to be to sit at around 20% health as often as possible. It looks as if it was designed from a total min/max perspective on damage dealing as a melee class. Extra recharge, extra recovery, heaps of extra damage, but the sacrifice is that your survivability sucks. I can understand the appeal for a Brute or Scrapper, and for them I would even go so far as to say it may be quite overpowered in that regard, but anyone who rolls this as a Tanker would find themselves wholly unable to do what their archetype is designed to do. 15% resistance at 75% health isn't enough to protect you from being one-shotted by an Arch-Villain, and the ramping resistance won't help you much with taking alphas.

Hate to rain on your parade, but these all seem like serious issues to me. You might reply by saying "but that's part of the whole idea," in which case I can only conclude that the idea is flawed. Brutes, Scrappers, and especially Tankers are not Blasters.

It exceeded my low expectations. Thought it was a decent flick. Nothing groundbreaking, but I can understand why the mainstream reviews have been bad. It's steeped pretty heavily in Geoff Johnsian lore and he even co-produced it. Very comic booky and definitely flawed, but still thought it was okay and none of the CGI or costume effects were as bad as I thought they were going to be based on stills and trailers.

It isn't necessarily robotic. Looks more like some type of organic bone-like structure to me. Maybe his flesh is being assembled onto his bones or something.

This web page was made by a marketing firm? * Snorts. *

It says he's still just a clone. I think that thing is supposed to be some sort of genetics machine thing, similar to the machines that grew the humans in The Matrix.

I am ashamed to admit that when I was younger I didn't know Les Paul was a person and even pronounced it as "Leh Paul" like I thought it was French like "Les Miserables" or something...

Star Trek was great (though the lens flares drove me nuts) and Lost is amazing (though I don't think he was terribly involved in it). Other than that, I haven't liked anything he's done. Super 8 looks like it's going to be a spiritual successor to Cloverfield, which I was super excited for and incredibly disappointed by.

I thought devs confirmed that as long as you qualified for a component, you qualified for ALL of the component rarities, and that there is no way to "work really hard" to have a better chance at earning a rare. In other words, if you barely participated and still got a Common piece, you had as good of a chance of getting a Rare/Very Rare as a guy who worked his butt off doing tons of damage. It's either you qualified, or you didn't. Is this not true?

Superman does not have powers under red sunlight. He has different powers under -other- suns, but not a red sun. Why? Because this is the type of sun Kryptonians evolved under, and under it, they are pretty much just like humans. I believe, however, that their bones and musculature are a bit more dense than humans, meaning they are, even without powers, still stronger and more durable than the average human. This is not because of solar radiation, but becase Krypton has(had) a stronger gravitational pull than Earth.