Lothic

Forum Cartel
  • Posts

    6294
  • Joined

  1. I having nothing against the idea of a TP power to get back to your appropriate alignment base.
    But you'd actually waste an alignment merit to potentially pay for a TEMPOARY version of this power?

    All I can say is that you're a weirder person than I am, Gunga Din.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Beef_Cake View Post
    I'd much rather see this in a Booster Pack.

    Giving it as a Vet Reward is nice, I'm only 3-4 months away from it, but seriously, this has been something the community suggested a few times, and has been talked about by many people. Excluding it from members that don't have the 84 month Vet Reward is a bad idea.

    Why not put it in a Booster Pack and sell it for 9.99 and make some money for NcSoft. I'd buy it on all my accounts, just for the mere purpose of having it.
    I have the feeling that virtually every new top-end Vet award that comes out from now on is going to have to run this gauntlet of constructive criticism to "justify itself" as a Vet award instead of some other kind of power.

    When there are a growing number of newer people playing today who have no realistic chance to expect that the game will be around for ANOTHER seven years for them to get these newest awards I tend to think the current Vet system will only become more of a DIS-incentive for the general player base than something positive for the game.
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by peterpeter View Post
    The key difference here is that the market TP powers take you to the market, but don't bring you back. The / command will let you use the market and end up in the same place where you started. That may be good or bad, but it's definitely different. I sometimes use the market TP as a way to travel, without even visiting the market. But oftentimes, like in the Shard, coming back from the market to the mission is a big pain in the rear. This / command will be a huge benefit in the unlikely event that I ever try to run another Shard TF.
    Yes, I actually realized the fundamental difference. I just didn't bother to emphasize it. Like you I've only been playing this game for 81 months so forgive me if I don't FORGET too many things like this.

    Still (as I mentioned in the Suggestions thread SwellGuy started on this) I don't really accept that the "value added" this Vet award is going to provide beyond the current Market TP powers is really unique/special/huge enough to justify it taking a spot of one of our post 7 year Vet awards. *shrugs*
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by seebs View Post
    I don't have much expectation that this game will run long enough for me to ever see it.
    This is actually why some "weird" people like me have always favored Vet award system reform in this game to address people in your situation. I honestly doubt much if anything will actually change, but it's always worth letting people know that there are some old-timers like me who understand and sympathize with the basic "unfairness" of the current system.
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Rylas View Post
    True, I was using hyperbole. But trying to equate the vet reward to the TP powers is as grand a statement as mine was.

    My question is, how does a low level toon know he's about to get a respec recipe that he needs to make room for? What if he already had a KB IO? The thing is, this power does bring a great advantage to those who use the market and who make the most of the drops they get. Unless you're selling/going-to-the-market between every mission, it's not entirely unheard of when your inventory gets full. Many people can fill up on one mission.
    Just to be clear I don't deny that this Vet power has the potential be more useful than the current Market TP powers. I just contend that it will not be THAT MUCH MORE useful or unique to justify it being a post 7 year Vet award. Nothing about it screams "this would make a better high-end Vet award than an Accolade award" to me. *shrugs*

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Rylas View Post
    Some might say that the devs haven't made alt-versions of Vet Rewards before, but I consider Ninja Run to be a nice alternative to having a travel power at level 6.
    Trying to define Ninja Run as an "alternative" to the 60th month Vet award is one of the biggest stretches of logic I've seen in these forums in a while. I think you shot past "that's ridiculous" all the way into "that's so ridiculous that's actually pretty impressive for its audacity" territory. Congrats to you.
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
    In the wake of a departing studio executive, Warner Brothers has decided to move forward on a number of remakes, including one of the 1973 "classic" Michael Crichton sci-fi movie "Westworld". Since that amusement-park-robots-run-amok flick was notable mainly for Yul Brenner transforming his Magnificent Seven character into an ur-Terminator, casting that part is going to be the proverbial tough act to follow.
    I would think that an updated Westworld, in the context of 2011, would have a strong Matrix-like "online gaming/fantasy" vibe to it. They might even take it in a dystopian "Blade Runner / I, Robot" direction exploring the idea that it's becoming a "man versus AI" scenario. It'll be interesting to see how it's handled.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
    Oh, yes, and they're remaking/rebooting Lethal Weapon, Tarzan, The Wild Bunch, and Oh, God.
    As for these I think my only response would be is "Oh, God".
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    There are those that think Superman should have turned Batman into paste in that fight. Granted Superman has that power, but he's not a killer. Batman knows that.

    Plus the nuclear winter blotting out the sunlight substantially reduced Superman's power levels. He was still strong, but those missiles that Batman had rigged gave him a far harder time then they should have.

    Plus Bruce had the exo armor, and of course he had Green Arrow ready with a kryptonite arrow.

    Prep time and knowing your foe are beautiful things.
    Batman truly is the Sun Tzu of superheroes.
  8. Congrats and thanks for sharing... *smiles knowingly why you know this Vet Award info today*
  9. Lothic

    Children

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nalrok_AthZim View Post
    Before they add Children to the game they need to fix the guy in Grandville with the huge erection. I'm not even kidding, I'll post a screenshot on my first break.
    And people wonder why we can't have nice things...
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Rylas View Post
    I think equating a "remote access" ability to a "teleport power" is pretty darn flawed. Let's say your in a mission, and your salvage and recipes has filled. You have to keep deleting things if you want to stay in the mission, or zone (TWICE) and go to the market to unload/post/get (if you don't want potential drops to go to waste). Not leaving your mission and opening up your storage allows for a much faster gaming experience. It's not just QOL, it actually does allow for faster leveling (in real world time) if used to its advantage.

    But I digress. It can remain a unique QOL feature as a Vet Reward while offering slightly watered-down versions as purchasable items (like the suggestion I made above).
    Likewise one could easily counter the idea that this award's advantage of letting you access the market mid-mission would be such an extraordinarily wonderful benefit that it blows the simple "market TF" powers out of the water. I think since the markets were introduced I can count on one hand the number of times I really, really wanted/needed to have market access mid-mission. Trying to make the case that this feature will allow for significant improvements in leveling speeds is definitely hyping up a mountain out of a molehill.

    And as for the idea of making two versions of this thing (a Vet version and a non-Vet version) I just can't see the Devs ever putting that much effort into it. We don't have Vet and non-Vet versions of what Field Crafter and Mission Engineer provide - why would we get two versions of this new power?
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by shaggy5 View Post
    I certainly won't be unhappy if others gain it through payment or something, but I actually like it being something hard to attain. I think CoX has made things too easy to get (like the Vanguard loyalty pack, the Epic ATs unlocked at 20, and items like that). I actually like seeing some rare things in the game that take time to get.
    I'm not against the idea of Vet awards being considered "unique" or even "exclusive" but the idea of them being "hard to get" is a bit misleading because as StormDevil implied you just have to be patient enough to pay a monthly bill for a certain number of months. Nothing really "hard" about it.

    But a serious problem with this market thing being a Vet award is that it breaks the precedent already set with two other Accolade awards. The Field Crafter badge gives us remote access to a crafting table and the Mission Engineer badge gives us remote access to the AE system. It actually makes relatively little sense that something new that gives us "remote access" to the marekts would not also be an Accolade award. Why would I have to earn a bunch of badges for those other powers and just have to be an old-timer for this new one?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by PennyPA View Post
    Well for my 2 inf, I am in the /unsigned camp.

    The market is optional, and there is a temp power via day job or buy that brings you right to a market. I also feel it will open discussion on buying other vet rewards early. I still feel vet rewards are a thank you from the devs and that money has nothing to do with it, as much as people claim it does. Allowing it to come early goes against that thank you mentality.
    This is the main reason why I don't think this makes for a good Vet award. It's simply not "unique/special" enough to be worthy of something I had to play/pay over 7 years to get. *shrugs*
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by MunkiLord View Post
    I fully support this suggestion. Hell I want this bad enough that I would pay twenty dollars for it(though I don't expect many others to feel the same way).
    Eh, I don't think this would reach my "$20 just for this one thing" threshold but I'd probably pay for it if it were part of a $9.99 Booster Pack that came along with other stuff too. I'd reserve my "I'd pay $20 just for that" offer for additional costume slots for characters, but of course that's a topic for another suggestions thread.
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by StormDevil View Post
    I just wanted to add my voice to the, "cool feature, but not as a Vet reward" crowd. Something like this would be better off as either part of a Booster Pack, or even better, as a sort of second tier Accolade (the workbench being the first). As a Booster, anyone for whom this feature has value could get it whenever they chose (and conversely be ignored by those for whom it has no value; think of it as the Praetorian Party Pack). As an Accolade, it could again be earned by anyone who puts in the time.

    I know many, many 5 and 6 year vets who have no idea how to use Wents, or how the market works in general; I don't know very many people with the Field Crafter badge about whom I can say the same.
    You've got a pretty good point here about why something like this should be a Booster/Accolade power instead of a Vet power.

    As a Booster power anyone who directly wants it can buy it at any time.
    As an Accolade power the marketeers can earn it (regardless if the badgers use it or not).
    But as a Vet power old-timers are going to get it whether they want it or not.

    My personal reason for thinking this was a "less than optimal" choice for a Vet award is that to me Vet awards should provide things that are clearly not possible to get/obtain any other way. Things like the Reveal power is a good example: it's a good Vet award because it gives us something that has no equivalent in the rest of the game. On the other hand this Market power basically duplicates what the Market TP powers provide - a shortcut way to get to the market. I don't see this as being "unique" enough to qualify as a good Vet power.

    Oh well, I'll probably make pretty good use out of it when I do get it. But for me I'll always wonder what better thing we could of gotten instead what amounts to a permanent Market TP power. *shrugs*
  14. Lothic

    Day Jobs Over.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by TheUnnamedOne View Post
    Congrats to the OP on all the badges!!! Not sure how far I am away, I never kept that close of tabs on this but it shouldn't be much more than a month.
    This is slightly off-topic but I just noticed the pic you have in your sig line. For your sake I hope the guy who's always wanted to name their character CyberRadical never sees it. It's impressive that you've managed to have a character made in this game roughly 4 years longer than the game's actually existed.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by MentalMaden View Post
    Although she's mostly known for lighter-fare type movies, she has had some pretty beefy serious type roles and gotten quite a bit of critical praise (yeah, she can act). I think it was very wise casting and I think she'll do great. Given that it's traditionally been a campy role it's going to be interesting to see what direction Nolan wants to take the part.
    I think Anne Hathaway's a workable pick for Selina Kyle. I might not have thought of her if you'd asked me to make a list of possible actresses for the role myself, but after thinking about it for a bit I think she'll be fine for it.

    Her performance as the White Queen in the recent Alice in Wonderland makes me think she can handle a slightly mercurial/quirky over-the-top character like Catwoman can be. Besides in this still photo from that movie it looks like they were already grooming her for a role involving being fascinated by small furry rodents.

  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    Indeed, back in the days of Xena I could easily have seen her was Wonder Woman, but I think now that too much time has passed.

    Unless they want to dip her into the CGI fountain of youth ala Kevin Flynn from TRON Legacy.
    I think there will come a time when movie producers will be able to apply the "Kevin Flynn from TRON Legacy" CGI treatment to older actors as easily and cheaply as they use simple makeup today. But as interesting as it would be to see Lucy Lawless finally make an appearance as Wonder Woman I think for the conceivable future any new Wonder Woman show would be better off saving that CGI expense by featuring another (preferably) unknown younger actress who could be discovered to make the role her own.

    Now if they were to finally start making a new Wonder Woman TV show today I think it would definitely be cool to have Lucy Lawless involved in it in at least some capacity. Maybe make her another Amazon (Hippolyta even?) or a villain the new Wonder Woman could face. That would be a sight to see.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
    The important thing is to remember that the camp was a reflection of the period, and not a critical aspect of the show. There was otherwise nothing specifically "wrong" with the interpretation of WW in that show.

    I look at it like I look at the Bill Bixby/Lou Ferrigno tv Hulk. In many ways it was nothing like the comic book at the time, but in some ways it was also better than the comic book: the comic book took years to catch up to the show in terms of being taken seriously. Do I care that Banner's name was changed to David? Nope: could care less. It was also late-70s melodrama, and just like late 70s camp wouldn't play today, late-70s melodrama wouldn't play today either. But that doesn't mean there isn't something to trying to capture some of the essence of that show for the benefit of the many people for whom that is their first and last iconic contact with that character.

    Its a question of knowing what to pay respects to.
    The 70s era Hulk and Wonder Woman shows were products of their time. Sure there were what we would consider now to be "cheesy" elements to them but that doesn't mean they were intrinsically bad shows. Consider this: we are still talking about these 35+ year old shows as relevant to an Internet forum thread in 2011 - there must be something about them that was lasting and significant. Even though Wonder Woman seems to have suffered from some kind of "media limbo" effect more than the other superheroes I think there are some good recent examples of other genre shows from that rough time period being re-imagined to work well for today's audiences.

    For example the Abrams reboot of Star Trek was an obvious box office success. I thought the time travel plot of the movie was an utter mess but I think the new actors worked well in the roles and their interactions caught the spirit of the original show. Another example was the good reboot of Battlestar Galactica. It wasn't bad to take a show that only managed one season back in the late 70s (I pretend BSG 1980 doesn't exist) and turn it into a new multi-season franchise with spin-offs. I hope the "suits" in Hollywood will pay attention to shows like this (as well as the general success other superhero movies are having in the last few years) to encourage them to consider a "modernized" Wonder Woman movie or TV show for today. Hopefully her stint as a "makeup queen" won't hurt her chances for that too much.
  18. Lothic

    respec Badges

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Beef_Cake View Post
    I have word that it will be corrected in a future patch. Can't say how or exactly when, but its coming. So no need to burn your respecs if you don't want to.
    This is good news Beef_Cake. I had hoped the Devs would realize (sooner or later) that this was something that needed to be fixed.
    Of course I suppose we might still have to wait literally months for this, but hopefully it won't come to that.
  19. Lothic

    respec Badges

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ms. Mesmer View Post
    It may not have been just to toy around with badge text, or any RP reason. I suspect that it was done that way because, at the time, it was the only way for the game to keep track of whether you had a respec banked, and whether you could earn another. The game still does check for a specific badge every time you log on or zone to see if you are allowed to have Fly, Super Speed, Super Jump or Teleport without having the prerequisites, for example.
    Well obviously my implication that the respec badges were made problematic in this case just so that the Devs could "toy" around with badge text was a bit of a jabbing simplification on my part.

    I was actually aware that what made this situation non-straightforward was the idea that the respec tokens are linked into the current badges themselves. We do know that the badge text actually changes when you've used a particular respec token so clearly the tokens, badges and text are all uniquely mingled together in a non-trivial way. When I implied "badge text" was to blame I was intentionally being a bit dismissive because this was a relatively silly mess that I think the Devs might have managed to avoid with a bit more foresight. I mean after all they've only been working towards side-switching for about 5 or 6 years now. Handling respec badges a bit better never came up in all that time?
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
    Lucy Lawless would have been awesome as Wonder woman.
    Many people talked about the possibility of that happening back in the "horse and buggy" days of the Interwebs 15 years ago.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    No puns intended but I think a Wonder Woman/Baywatch comparison is an apples vs. oranges comparison.
    My last post applies here too.
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by warden_de_dios View Post
    You don't think Wonder Woman and Make up are a good match and you want to use Baywatch as the template for a Wonder Woman television show?

    DO you realize how much casual sex those girls on that show had? You don't think WW acting like a woman of questionable morals is going against the "70 years" of history she's built up as some sort of role model?
    Obviously detecting Devil's Advocacy is not your strong suit.
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    Also yes I liked both series, but I am honest as to why
    That's actually one of the more mysterious aspects behind the multi-decade saga of "why hasn't there been a new Wonder Woman TV show since the 70s". When you think about it a show about a curvy woman running around in a star-spangled bathing suit should pretty much sell itself to US TV audiences regardless if there's a good plot to it or not. How many years did Baywatch stay on TV translated into like 100 languages for audiences around the world?
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Arcanaville View Post
    Well, its more "inspired by" as opposed to the character actually shilling for the products. And this is MAC we're talking about: they are kind of upscale and a bit avant-garde with their marketing. Its actually almost like a french restaurant offering an appetizer platter "inspired by" Wonder Woman. Its not going to be gingerbread cookies shaped like her silhouette. Its going to be her colors, an occasional star or stripe, and maybe a golden pretzel evoking rope.

    This is definitely not going to be My First Makeup Kit sold at Walmart next to Wonder Woman lunchboxes.

    Actually, the match is a subtle mismatch, but not because of appearance vanity. MAC doesn't focus on that exclusively in their marketing. They tend to focus on celebrity and that's also slightly tangential to Wonder Woman. But not in a jarring way: in the DCU she *is* a celebrity, if an often reluctant one.
    Yes I'm aware that this is a MAC campaign and I agree that does make the whole thing a notch classier than it being for "My First Makeup Kit sold at Walmart". You also have a good point that the involvement of Wonder Woman's character with this could be seen more as a connection to "celebrity" rather than to simple "vanity".

    Who knows, I could be totally wrong about this and history may show that the starting point of the big summer blockbuster Wonder Woman movie (released let's say in 2012 or 2013) rested firmly on the overwhelming popularity of this makeup campaign. Perhaps 30+ years of waiting for some positive news towards an actual Wonder Woman movie/TV show has made me somewhat cynical about the whole thing.
  25. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nericus View Post
    I don't think the Xena series helped much either. Fun show, but at times the camp level was rather high.

    The Xena series also deserves the same question I have posed about the Lynda Carter Wonder Woman series, just exactly why did most people watch it?
    Actually regardless if you liked the show or not Xena was probably the most successful "Wonder Woman clone" series since the actual Lynda Carter series. Other shows like Buffy:tVS, La Femme Nikita and Alias were very vaguely Wonder Woman-esque, but Xena probably has come as close to Wonder Woman as we've seen so far.

    Now I'm not suggesting a new Wonder Woman show made in 2011 would have to somehow copy what Xena did (assuming you could quantify that). I'm just suggesting if a show like Xena could last 6 seasons I really don't understand why someone couldn't figure out how to do that for Wonder Woman too.