-
Posts
6294 -
Joined
-
Quote:Yes we all know that CoPs can be done without nukes NOW after enough people gave it some rational thought. But back in the first few weeks after I18 went live everyone seemed so convinced that the only way to do it was to drop 20 nukes that the Devs felt the need to "knee-jerk nerf" nukes just to shake everyone out of that mode of thinking. Basically it was people's over-reliance on the "nuke solution" that caused the Devs to decide to nerf them.Despite the fact that CoP can be easily done without the nukes (25 minutes to setup a CoP, 8 minutes to complete...go figure), the nerfing of the Warburg nukes begins a bad precedent.
Next thing they will nerf nukes in Tin Mage. Not that the midnight badge can't be gained without them but the precedent is there.
Though it is fun to watch the Director spawn then melt from 4 to 8 nukes blasting him in succession. Tends to bring a smile.....
Despite that I agree completely that the nerfing of the Warburg nukes began a bad precedent, especially since I contend that they aren't actually NEEDED for anything. The idea of "spot-nerfing" specific powers in specific situations seems far more problematic in the long run. While it's possible they'll do the same for the Tin Mage Director 11 mission I'm hoping cooler heads have prevailed and they'll let that one go. Sure while it's "fun" to kill Director 11 in under 15 seconds with nukes I've seen him killed in under 30ish seconds several times without nukes so that kind of "fun" only goes so far.
And hopefully they'll decide to not include Ninja/Beast Run among the restricted powers in future trials. That's just going a bit too far really. -
Quote:Yeah I wish Nerius all the luck because he's clearly a fan, but after all it did take Disney 28+ years to do a sequel to TRON. Again I'm not going to say more TRON movies are impossible at this point, but clearly it's not really quite worth holding our breaths for yet either. Like I said before I'll believe it when I see it.Not to mention that Disney finally woke up and realized that TRON is a money maker so you know they are now going to bleed it dry.
-
Quote:The giant armored Samurai in the movie was more an hommage to anime then Brazil. The different fantasy sequences in the movie were homages to different fantasy and sci-fi genres...though mainly were obviously anime influenced.Quote:One could get away with the anime argument if the movies' themes weren't the same. When Gilliam has a giant samurai, though, he's using the visual image to shrink his protagonist down to a child's scale, undercutting the heroic fantasy at the heart of the escapism. When Snyder has one face off Baby Doll (and let's not try to unpack that misfiring nickname), he's only thinking of how cool it looks.IIRC, the "Samurai" in Brazil even spewed out a fiery light in every location Lowry damaged it, much like what happened in Sucker Punch.Quote:If you actually saw the fight, you couldn't help see the anime inspirations of it. My friend told me before he saw the movie, "Man, they are totally ripping off Silver Samurai in Marvel comics", but decided it wasn't the case after he saw the movie.

Honestly this whole back-and-forth discussion about whether or not Snyder "borrowed" from Brazil is basically pointless when it's quite obvious that it indeed happened. Sure Snyder may have been influenced by other anime/comic sources, but Sucker Punch was effectively his attempt to "re-imagine" Brazil, to a very poor result. -
Quote:I think the irony here is that some of us wish Snyder had be much more blatant in his "borrowing" from Brazil because his movie definitely needed the help.Which is what we've been saying...Snyder didn't rip off or knock off Brazil in any way what so ever. At least the movie, didn't show any such blatant "influences". I could just as well say I was influenced by the V for Vendetta movie today to make breakfast, which is accurate as I thought about making eggy's in a basket...but went with sunny side up instead.
-
Quote:Sure getting a team of people willing to work together is always a challenge. But clearly the Devs want us to at least make an attempt at it or else they wouldn't have nerfed nuke usage during the CoP trial.It's one thing to have the alternate tactics, it's another to have a team that will follow instructions and use the tactics.
To me the use of Warburg nukes is a classic Leeroy Jenkins.
It's the sledgehammer you use when you -don't- have a serious plan otherwise.
-
-
Quote:As I said eariler I personally don't care how much (or little) Snyder "borrowed" from other sources.Isn't the term "influence" what people on this thread is equating to "ripping off"..or..err..."knocking off"?
All I know is that whatever he did to produce Sucker Punch didn't work out too well.
-
Quote:"1984" is one of the most famous literary examples of a dystopian future where the government has crushed individual freedom. Basically ANY movie or book since that has had anything to do with a "big oppressive government" can cite 1984 as an influence. Heck, even Star Trek has done episodes related to it.In his Afterword to the "graphic novel" of V for Vendetta, Alan Moore gives a long list of influences, and 1984 heads the list.
-
Quote:Of course I am. I'm a schizophrenic, remember?

Look, people who are trying to quit smoking shouldn't watch Mad Men. The show has nothing to do with smoking, but they display it in unhealthy ways. It's the same issue here. I'm just saying.*** SPOILER ALERT ***Quote:Don't think they even mention what disorder the Blue cooked up for the stepfather in order to throw Baby Doll into the asylum other than mentioning she's suffering from severe depression and the so-called murder of her sister. Then again plot and story elements were scattered about here and there, and only pulled up when the scene called for it. Honestly they could have said it was a home for wayward girls, a prison, or made it a brothel. It wouldn't have mattered at all for this movie.
The whole "threat of lobotomy" subtext of this movie was handled in such a hamfisted way that I'm not really sure how much it would apply to "real world" mental problems at all. Basically it was pretty clear that the "evil stepfather" was using the "corrupt mental institution" as a means to assassinate a bothersome step-child that stood between him and a big inheritance. The lobotomy in this case was just an indirect substitute for directly killing her. This movie really had effectively nothing to do with actual mental institutions or the treatment of mental disorders of any kind.
As Unknown_User said the "real world" setting of this movie was basically immaterial. -
Quote:When it comes to questions like these I think you have to rely more on the "fiction" side of the Science Fiction setting.Here's a question: we all know that Fry isn't brightest crayon in the box due to having no delta brave due to being his own grandpa. Professor Farnsworth has the delta brainwave but is senile due to being around 160 yrs old.
So what is Zap Brannigan's excuse for being such an idiot? Brain injury? Just born stupid and getting worse ever since? Or perhaps they should run a DNA comparison of Fry, Professor Farnsworth and Zap Brannigan to see if they are all related?
Better yet, if technology to keep heads alive in jars forever wasn't developed until after Fry was put on ice.....just HOW did they get all the heads of every US president ever into jars for the head museum?
But since we know that Fry's nephew Philip J. Fry II (son of Yancy Fry) became a famous astronaut it would be funny to learn that Zapp Brannigan somehow descended from that side of the family and was actually related to Fry as well. -
-
-
Quote:***SPOLIER ALERT***If the main character in Sucker Punch ends up lobotomized, it is not a movie I want to see. I don't care why it happens. I want a movie that either celebrates schizophrenia (Donnie Darko) or celebrates one's power to overcome it (A Beautiful Mind). I have no interest in a movie that says, 'Well, as a dreamer in a cruel world, you're better off dead.'
One of the worst parts of Sucker Punch is that it tries to have both a tragic ending and happy ending at the same time. It can't seem to decide what it wants to do. First you have the main character end up being lobotomized despite all her efforts to escape. But somehow we're supposed to think that's OK because she "sacrificed herself" for one of the other girls who ironically was the one who the most pessimistic and kept trying to keep the other girls from "risking" an escape attempt in the first place. The whole thing is just such a messy mess that it was very hard to care what happened to any of them. -
Quote:I agree that worrying about how much (or little) Synder "borrowed" from Brazil is at best a side issue to all this. The fact still remains that even after claiming that he was "inspired" by Brazil he somehow manged to create at best a very imperfect copy of it.I'm far from a Sucker Punch apologist (see review). I just think its fair to critcize the movie for it's short comings (there are plenty), but not fair to call the man a 'thief'. And yes, Sucker Punch could learn a ton from Brazil.

Edited for tone.
-
Quote:Does Brazil look as "pretty" as Sucker Punch? *sigh*Never seen it!
Does it look as pretty? Doesn't sound it from that link.
About the only thing that Sucker Punch did better than Brazil was to get made like 25 years later.
If Sucker Punch didn't have cutting-edge CGI it would be a TOTAL loss.
Yes we can quibble on whether the term "homage" is more appropriate than "rip-off" in this case. But frankly I almost wish Snyder did "rip-off" Brazil a little more directly. His movie would have -greatly- benefited from it.Quote:To be fair, I think it's pretty hard to call something a rip off when the director admits to another movie being a direct influence on his work. It's influence...homage....not rip off. And the movies are far too different to say anything was ripped off. Not to mention that there are many other movies that deal with fantasy worlds created by the main character as a use of escape. It's not that unique a concept. -
Quote:In the very broad sense of "the main character uses stylized escapist fantasy to deal with a bad reality" then yes Sucker Punch "rips off" Brazil. But because Brazil actually has a well formed story and characters you can empathize with I'd say the similarity between Brazil and Sucker Punch is as about as close as night and day.Isn't anyone complaining how much Snyder rips off Terry Gilliam's Brazil in this movie, from the weird fantasy-sequences that mix genres to the "Return I will to old Brazil" finale? Once again, Snyder has taken superficial inspiration from a classic and produced a sleek but hollow pastiche.
Sucker Punch is at best a very dumbed down, CGI-hollow, video-gamey version of Brazil.
-
Quote:According to IMDB TRON:Legacy more or less just "broke even" last week. Now obviously it'll probably make a bunch of extra money on the DVD/blu-ray sales, but still it wasn't really a "super-blockbuster" box office wise. *shrugs*Not to mention that Disney finally woke up and realized that TRON is a money maker so you know they are now going to bleed it dry.
I'm not suggesting a new trilogy won't happen. But by the same token I'm not totally sure it's an automatic guarantee at this point either. Lots of people make "contractual plans" for sequels that never happen. Just saying. -
Quote:Yeah the idea of "nuking them from orbit to be sure" is fine, but basically (like starphoenix was implying) the Warburg nukes are just there as a "crutch" for those teams that can't (for whatever reason) manage something otherwise.
As time goes on I suspect things like the Incarnate powers will make Warburg nukes pretty much unnecessary for anything. Case in point when the CoP Trial was first re-introduced last year everyone got so "nuke crazy" that the Devs actually nerfed it so you couldn't even use them in that trial. People assumed gloom and doom like the CoP was going to be "impossible" without them. Now on Virtue I've been part of a group that's been doing the CoP once a week and we get them done in less than 15 minutes - without nukes of course.
Basically I see the nukes as the "sledgehammer of first resort" when you haven't bothered to figure out the tactics that make them unnecessary yet.
-
I'd say I eventually have the goal to get all the Alphas unlocked on my main character, but if it takes me another six months to do it I'm not going to be too worried about it. I already have the 2 Very Rares I actually "use" so the rest are just there for me to satisfy a new facet of OCD collectoritis.Quote:I have to admit that was tempting to pursue on one of my alts, but I passed on it.
What would be cool though is this: lets say you decide to put an alt on the musculature path of Incarnation, then decide to switch to one of the others: wouldn't it be nice if we could breakdown the previously crafted booster into some shards?
I figure from now on (and especially after I20) I'm going to continue to get a steady stream of Shards. Eventually I'll get the several hundred you need to craft the rest of them. Once all the Alphas are done any new Shards I get will just be fodder for any other Threads I still need in the future.
So basically I see no need for "Alpha breakdowns" because eventually we'll have no need for any Shards for anything anyway. Once you've crafted every possible Alpha they'll just pile up uselessly unless you keep converting them to Threads. -
Well at least I'll say I've heard a lot worse ideas for new badges. How's that for a non-committal answer?

I probably wouldn't mind getting new "hostage count" badges but then again I'm a pretty serious badge-hunter. My guess is that you'd probably have a lot of people whining that such badges would be too "grindy" and the Devs might actually agree with that. The Devs seem to have strange ideas about what they consider "grindy badges" these days so you never really know.
It's an interesting idea regardless. -
I have nothing against the Costume Contests but I really don't think the Devs need to spend any time "institutionalizing" them by creating a dedicated place designed specifically for them. People will manage well enough regardless.
Besides if the Devs are going to spend any extra time creating content I'd rather have them give us the often-rumored "Moon zone" than a place that looks like the set of American Idol.
-
Quote:Exactly. As I mentioned in another thread this movie just seemed like a 109 minute high-speed, jump-cut edited trailer for a real movie that'll never actually be made. It was too busy trying to hype us up to make us want to like it without actually being that likable to begin with.So watched Suckerpunch last night, personally feel that it's really not worth the price of admission and that this film is more of a rental or netflicks kind of thing vs. paying theatre cost for it. Action scenes were hit or miss for me, and for me the action scenes themselves were just there for the sake of being there. The whole movie had this "Look at me, I can be this type of movie to" feel to it.
I enjoyed both Watchmen and 300. This one? not so much... -
Quote:Well I guess I'll beleive in a new TRON trilogy when I see it.We live in the age of franchises, my friend. And trilogies. You may thank Uncle George for that....my understanding is that everyone bar Bridges was signed to two more movies, and that the story will from the end of Legacy.
The Golden Compass was supposed to be the first of a pre-planned trilogy and look what happened there.
-
Quote:I predicted it was going to be a "less than enjoyable" movie.Imagine that, after slamming it since the begining Lothic didn't like it. Wonders never cease.Quote:The 15 or 20 minutes of "action scenes" of this movie were just about its only saving grace. The "movie" that links together these scenes was pretty much absolute drek. When people start ripping these scenes and posting them as remixes on YouTube you'll have something worth spending a few minutes to watch. The rest of the entire 109 minute movie? Not worth the few dollars we spent on it.

RottenTomotes.com currently has this movie rated at 20%. There -is- a reason for that. I've loved the movies Synder has made so far but this was easily his worst one to date. Better luck next time Zack...
41 here and i thought it had a good plot and plently of emotional depth. One opinion hardly speaks for a generation.
We went and actually saw it to give it a chance to prove me wrong.
And it didn't...
Doesn't seem too miraculous to me. Seems more like a sad prediction that came true.
As I said I liked the 20 minutes or so of action set pieces but the attempt to string them together into a feature length film fell flat on its face. I didn't have any problem with how the "dances" worked or any of the "Lolita" factor or any of that so-called "generational" nonsense. The rest of the film was simply boring and didn't make me want to care about it at all. It got to the point where I was wasn't really watching the movie but instead was just waiting for the next 5 minute action sequence to start. That's not a good formula for a good movie.
The fact that it's still rated in the low 20s on RottenTomatoes.com and that it only made about half the box office over the weekend that they expected it to speaks volumes to me. If the critics just "don't get it" then why isn't it making any money regardless? -
Yeah them getting married would not be that surprising. Still, trying to slip something like that in at a Con is fairly pathetic all things considered. They could have at least given her like a 30 second cameo during Legacy to explain all that and put a nice "bow" on her involvement in the overall story. *shrugs*
