Dz131
-
Posts
1058 -
Joined
-
Quote:do they? I would think having +100% damge across the board beats 10% crit. Having 50% dmg across the board probably beat it imo.Originally Posted by Starflier
Scrappers do more damage, get martial arts, and criticals are so very satisfying. -
the reason I;m asking is that my Brute is a Fire/Shield and that set is also availbe to scrappers so obviously I want the better AT for that combo
-
I started a brute to level along side my MA scrapper. And it seems to me they play basically the same. Except Brute has Fury which past aroudn 50-60% makes all their attacks do like 100% more damage whre as scraps only gets like 10% crit chance.
ALso brute have higher HP and sometimes more mitigation. As well as Frenzy makes them start with 100% fury on demand, so no building up so to speak.
It seems to me Brutes are strictly better than scrappers, I'm just wondring is there anythign I missed that actually scrappers has that brutes dont? -
Any Defeat Alls in a map with assloads of elevators. You never know what floor you missed a mob
-
Quote:yeah you can be in line twice the seoncd one might take a bit tho cos its all the way at the backOriginally Posted by Terminal Velocity
Rather have the first toon, but i was wondering if I could be in line twice.
-
i declare this best thread on the forums
long live cole train -
Quote:I can darw the toon you just posted instead of the one you posted on the 1st page it dont matter to me reallyOriginally Posted by Terminal Velocity
I know... <.< Do I have to have my first arts done before I submit another toon? <.<
-
for teaming fire/kin everyone wants SB
-
When you reach 50 you realized farming is probably the only end game you have.
Basically 'is my gear ready to clear +2/x8 of <insert farm>?' -
Quote:well I wouldnt know about SS being borked without rage. KO blow is still nuts, Footstomp too, punch and haymaker aren't any worse than the other sets counter parts except for maybe smashing dmg.Originally Posted by Umbral
Because Rage is so obscenely powerful that, in order to make a set with Rage that is also even remotely close to being balanced, you need to virtually castrate the rest of the set in order to stop Rage from making everything else completely borked. Without Rage, SS would be a joke of a set (look at how the set performs before level 28). Rage is simply so strong that you can't simply drop it into a set in place of BU (or any other BU variant) and expect it to remain balanced. No other sets are going to get Rage unless it gets a very hefty rebalancing then, and, even then, it's doubtful that other sets would get something akin to Rage because Rage is, where most people are concerned, SS's schtick. Giving other sets Rage would be like asking for other melee sets to be given combos like Dual Blades.
-
I don't know why Rage is exclusive to 1 set. When all others have the standard BU, ok except claws.
-
I might do some 3d stuff too, if I'm not too busy. But it will take longer.
Quote:youre already on the list, from page 1Originally Posted by Terminal Velocity
You know what? That latest art convinced me, i'm throwing in my main.
-
Quote:Superman is NOT lawful neutral. He's Lawful Good. He follows the law as long as it doesn't deviate from Good. Its just that the setting he's in (US) happens to have laws that resemble he's own moral code and the idea of what is good (freedom, equality etc).Originally Posted by FloatingFatMan
Red Kryptonite (Or whatever colour the writers feel like coming up with next).
Or in other words, follows the law only as long as it ties in with his own moral and ethical code
He did it because he KNEW Luthor was a villain. He followed the spirit of the law and the greater good, rather than the letter of the law. Once again, his own moral code and ethics overruling the law of the land.
IMO, doing that makes for a far better hero than someone who slavishly follows the strict letter of the law.
I'm sure Clark Kent has no problems go on a reporting fact finding spree on corrupt politicians even if they are technically with in the law, unless in extreme cases like terriost cells where other people's live are at risk etc. He will never resort to violence or life/death unless he really has to. I mean REALLY has to.
If he followed the law regardless of good/evil eh would be lawful neutral. -
Hitting a slump in the 35-40 zone again..I have a bunch of guys stuck there. HOpefully I can farm my self up to 40 or osmething
Quote:http://img829.imageshack.us/img829/1381/battleguard.jpgOriginally Posted by Battleguard
I've always wanted a picture of my character, so here's him!
http://martham112.deviantart.com/gallery/#/d2pq6p8
photoshop + pencil and stuff. maybe some errors with details because Im lazy
nextQuote:Originally Posted by Lycanus
-
Quote:would you like it if they just gave you a build up like the other sets?Originally Posted by Neogumbercules
I'm at the point now that I'm willing to accept pretty much any change to this power so long as it doesn't bring me to a screeching halt every (what feels like) 5 seconds. UUUGGHHH
/rant.
So how would you all suggest altering Rage to make it more... fun? Personally I would remove the damage crash and replace it with a -recharge crash with the same duration. At least then I could still do something worthwhile with the powers I have available. At least then powers that I activate RIGHT at the moment rage is crashing would still be effective. At least then I wouldn't waste my delicious fiery embrace :0
I know, I know, you can see it flashing when it's gonna run out, but it's easy to miss it, and I'm sure anyone here who plays SS knows how often and easy it is to miss that thing. -
Quote:lolOriginally Posted by Golden Girl
Actually, without the loyalists, there'd be a lot more people alive
-
Quote:well obviously superman isn't going to kill someone, because he would just turn to a robot that changes behavior from good/evil depending where he was.Originally Posted by Omega_Chief
And if the law said kill someone?
He would (imo) either leave the country, or if the government is seriously breaching people's basic rights (eg. Nazi Germany) do something about it. Superman can think for himself like most people, he will obey the law until it pushes him to his limit (eg.point of going to evil), then he will stop.
I havent read this so I have no idea what happened. But I doubt he did it out of spite or anything.Quote:Actually he helped de-throne Luthor after Luthor rather smugly made him an outlaw. So not entirely. -
Quote:wut? Superman adheres to the law and authority. I don't recall him ever going over and above it. Especially to the amount that would label him as a vigilante(eg Batman, 'I'm going to beat you up because you deserve it').Originally Posted by Omega_Chief
You really can't see how that makes him fit the definition offered in this thread?
Supes will follow his own moral code over and above the law, his moral code comes first and he makes Life or Death decisions with it.
As for life and death decisions, it doesn't matter if the option is available to him when the character will never pursue it. Just because he has the potential to do something doesn't have any effect on his character. Everyone has the potential to do evil.
well killing is inherently an evil action, and saving lives good. Which why alot of vigilantes are the 'kill people but for the greater good' types e.g. Punisher.Quote:He does not kill no, but Death makes up only half of "Life and Death" after all :P -
Quote:His personal code doesn't permit him to decide if the person gets to die. Superman will 100% of the time choose to save the person. Its not considered a decision to him. Which is why he is lawful good and not a vigliante.Originally Posted by Omega_Chief
So Superman doesn't save people from burnign buildings? It's a life or death decision based on his own personal moral code after all, he's deciding who lives or dies after all.
If even once he has a mental debate of the pro/cons of letting a person die in a burning building and leaves the guy there to burn to death because he's a criminal or whatever. I'd say he's a vigliante.
Until he does that, he's not a vigliante. -
I get blind invites all the time and it sucks
-
Quote:you're going to marry a miner?Originally Posted by Scooby_Dont
Those demolitionists are starting to annoy me. Coming up behind me with those huge "jackhammers." Listen boys, enough is enough. Next time I want flowers, or candy. A bottle of wine or two. Maybe a nice dinner...
I swear the next enraged miner to try that had better be prepared to be an engaged miner!
-
depending on your isp your payment might be blocked. WOW does the same thing
I'd use a proxy or find someone in west to help -
Quote:Really? In that case Lex Luther would be dead by now. Since Superman would go after him even after he was cleared in court, because 'he played the system for the last time!!'. But that's obviously not how superman operates. He obeys the law (majority incarnations), and doesn't intervene with the process unless he absolutely has to. No doing vigilante actions.Originally Posted by Shadowe
I think I can make a fairly convincing argument that Superman makes life and death judgements on peoples lives based on his own set of morals and values.
Just because he chooses to always save lives and never kill doesn't mean he's not making that judgement. If it's not his own morals and values, one would have to ask who is enforcing those morals on him. He got them as he grew up, but nobody is forcing him to keep them except himself.
Uh ok. So you're saying a 9 point system is more complex than a 4 point system, but trying to map the 4 point system to the 9 point one would get messy. Ok then I agree with that.Quote:Quite thoroughly. Your argument was a clear cut matching of the four-alignment CoH system onto a subset of the classic 9-alignment system from D&D, and is clearly not correct. You then argued that a 2-alignment system would be more complex than a 9-alignment system, in an attempt to refute someone else's post which stated that the mapping of 9 alignments onto 4 is more complex (less transparent, harder to deduce without prior knowledge) than simply defining the 9 alignments. I pointed out that it is not that 4 alignments are more complex than 9, but that mapping those 9 alignments onto 4 generates complexity in the mapping process, so the equivalency is mapping the 9-alignment system to your proposed 2-alignment system. I contend that it is too complex to do so. -
Quote:Are you sure your don't have it the other way around? Generalization is what makes complicated things easier/quicker to grasp. Same with stereotyping etc. Its why people do it in real life all the time, rather than going into detail about everything, because 'that makes everything too complicated'.Originally Posted by Omega_Chief
While Shad is right about certian things in my assesment, just Good and Evil really is a massivley complicated system.
So complciated infact that in an attempt to make life easier for eeryone we have to invent more classifications for things to even begin to make sense.
As if you'll recall back before GR when we had two alignments, Villian (Evil) covered everything from people out only for profit, to people trying to make teh world confrom to what they thought was best by force to spycopathic killers.
And that's just 'evil', the more general the label gets the more complicated it becomes to define exactly what it means and if a charater falls under it or not. -
Quote:I was going to ignore you but that was actually a pretty good responseOriginally Posted by FloatingFatMan
Cheap? Nah, that one cost at least $49.99.