Dechs Kaison

Renowned
  • Posts

    6223
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Bionut911 View Post
    How do you get 54x8 ? I've always been confused as to where that 54 comes from
    He means a +4/x8 map run as a level 50. He's taking out the guesswork, because technically a level 2 could run a +4/x8 map
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Frostbiter View Post
    Someone made a thread stating he was disappointed that a full gamewide character wipe did not occur with the launch oh CoH:Freedom. hijinks ensued.
    I think the best part is how he had "naturally assumed" it would happen.
  3. Dechs Kaison

    Downtime

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Clouded View Post
    Absolutely. Just like we need a post about the downtime every single time.
    Classy.
  4. Dechs Kaison

    /MA

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by ClawsandEffect View Post
    I'm working on a Dark Armor/Martial Arts build that hits the positional soft cap and has capped Psi resistance. I know the soft cap is possible with Storm Kick as per the build I cobbled together last night, but the build was not at all endurance friendly. If I can fix the build's end problems we'll be in business I think.

    Mostly just running into a slot shortage.
    Hey Claws, remember my old tank's build? The S/L/E/N softcapped thing?

    I just redid the build in Mids yesterday, but with Martial Arts.

    I still hit the softcap for S/L/E/N and got 10% added to everything else. I added over 150 hitpoints and regenerate about 3 more HP/second. I also got an extra 4 seconds of recharge on Dark Regeneration. I used 2 less Kinetic Combat sets, don't have any powers acting as set mules, and threw Darkest Night in for extra cushion. Oh, and I can stack stuns. And KD in a PBAoE. And I managed to fit Build Up.

    The best part of it all? It fits his concept better and makes him look ****ing awesome.

    /MA was the best thing to happen to my DA tank.
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by The_Spad_EU View Post
    Selectively referring to the section of your post that wasn't hyperbolic isn't really helping your cause...
    Neither was posting in the first place.
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Redlynne View Post
    The FMing Interior (re)Decorator!

    Hire this man, and he and his crew will totally reorganize the interior of your Warehouse! Contact The MAN using your FM Radio! Take *THAT* Television!
    Hm. Not quite, but you did remind me about FM Theory, which would be the perfect way to describe controlling pets.
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Microcosm View Post
    The MFing terminator?
    That's kinda the problem. I need a new gimmick.
  8. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gospel_NA View Post
    ((Of course I have to stop being a baby about pets and learn how to play a MM well first))
    I do have a guide in the works for that.

    I'm stuck at the beginning.

    The rest of it is mostly done or very easy to write. I just never know how to start these things.
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Microcosm View Post
    That was my point, nothing in the Lyso directly affects that particular power of the pet, but the Acc would affect other powers and that's why you could slot it in the pet. Now, what may have happened is the Prot Bot shield was incorrectly set to accept Accuracy enhancement, which would make the Lyso work, and a dev spotted this and "fixed" it, making it no longer able to work on that power.
    Well, you can still slot Lysos. And they still buff the accuracy of the Protector Bot, but the -defense portion no longer buffs the Shield like it used to.
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Deacon_NA View Post
    Assault Bot has 45.8% accuracy and 97.63% damage post-ED. If you change the Edict of the Master Damage to an Acc/Dmg, that becomes 69.93% acc and 95.46% dmg. So for not a lot of sacrifice to damage output, you could up his accuracy which will help especially for exemping.
    Good catch. I know my thought process at the time. I filled in the three SBA enhancements, then the Edict unique and the triple (Because triples are awesome). Then I looked at the power and said to myself, "Well, now I just need more damage." Lo and behold, there it was.

    I might change that, though. Like I said, good catch. I'll trade 2% damage for 20% accuracy.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Microcosm View Post
    I'm quite sure that each of the pet's powers acts individually when it comes to slotting, and therefore the powers in question (Prot Bots' bubbles and Thugs' Maneuvers), which cannot slot any of the aspects of Lysosomes (Acc/-Def/-Tohit), won't be affected by that HO.
    This much is not true. At least, it didn't used to be. The game had no way to tell the difference between +defense or -defense enhancement when it came to Hami-Os. That's why the Lysos are such an exploit, the -def enhancements are stronger than the +def ones. You still run into the same +def ED cap, but you ram up against it much faster with -def enhancements.

    The power itself was coded to not accept -def enhancements to avoid this exploit, but that got overlooked when it came to HOs. Any HO could be slotted in any power so long as it could enhance something, and only later did they realize the unintended consequences of enhancing things not meant to be enhanced (Shield Defense:Active Defense) or things being enhanced in ways they weren't supposed to be enhanced (Protector Bot:Shield).

    The Lysos used to work. I had them in my build, and the defense bonus from them was certainly better than level 50 IOs, especially considering that I still got my accuracy. A somewhat recent change prevented this, though, and I've since respecced.
  11. Dechs Kaison

    /DA or /SD

    Well, Dark Armor Sucks, but I still recommend it every day.

    My Claws/Dark is the only brute I've manage to stick with.

    It's my personal opinion that the PBAoE stun is far better than the fear. It costs almost no endurance and is much more accurate. You don't need to add any slots for it to be a good power.
  12. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Cyberium_neo View Post
    Hm, that's one thing I haven't thought about. So Forms have more dos or survival but Human form allow you to dps and survive?
    What you'll be missing most is the burst damage, particularly burst AoE. Generally, a Nova only needs three AoEs to wipe up a spawn, so consistent DPS is never a factor for consideration.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Cyberium_neo View Post
    In that case, is it possible to play multiple roles like a shapeshifting Kheldian just by being in Human form?
    I don't think they can do it as well. Dwarf Antagonize is many times stronger than Provoke can ever be, plus it is autohit. Nova form has AoE damage powers for every spawn. A human only shade will also be more likely to rely on things like Clarion or Break Frees.

    If you are exemplaring to levels below Eclipse, then in my mind a tri-former is hands down the better pick.
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by DumpleBerry View Post
    See, that's what I'm asking about.

    So if they buy Going Rogue and stay Premium, they only get Praetoria and the Alignment System for 30 days?
    No. If they buy the store version of Going Rogue, it's the same as buying that in the Paragon Market. You should keep that forever.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Cyberium_neo View Post
    So what is the main advantage of having Human form over other form in soloing this sort of mission?
    1.) Consistent DPS - Shapeshifting costs time. Time costs DPS.
    2.) More slots - You have more ways to get the defense bonuses you'd need to really skyrocket survivability.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by ClawsandEffect View Post
    Disagree with the OP, but have a compromise to suggest.

    Allow the IOs to still enhance your powers, but disallow set bonuses.

    That way you wouldn't have to respec your character or use a second build in order to play it, but if you want the set bonuses to work you still need to buy the license.

    Sound like a reasonable compromise?
    I'd agree with that.
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by DarkSideLeague View Post
    Wouldn't replacing the 2 level 50 Def IOs in the Protector Bots with Lysosomes be better? 2 SOs of Accuracy, more than 3 SOs of defense, and 2 SOs of ToHit Debuff (I presume the Seeker Drones the Bots summon are enhanceable).
    As Deacon said, Lysos don't work anymore. There's another one that does, but rather than wait for it to be removed as well, I went with what I know will work for the next forever.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Scene_EU View Post
    As to the BU Proc, wouldn't the Explosive Strike proc be better for additional dmg?
    The Explosive Strike proc can only fire on attacks that have knockback in the attack. Granted, that's most of the attacks, but certainly not all of them. Believe me when I tell you, though, that Build Up Burn patches are pretty incredible.

    Aside from which causes more damage, I wanted the giant +HP bonus as well.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Electric-Knight View Post
    Why make the distinction that it is not part of that expansion?
    Because it simply wasn't a part of the expansion. Incarnates were not tied to the side switching, praetoria's level 1-20 content, or any other feature released with Going Rogue. All that stuff came with i19 and later.

    Setting Going Rogue as a prerequisite was a selling feature, but that Incarnate system was not a part of Going Rogue. This is especially as evidenced by the fact that subscribers no longer have to purchase Going Rogue to play the Incarnate content.
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Electric-Knight View Post
    That question was within the context of the game.
    Then that question was loaded and you know it.

    A prerequisite does not a piece make.
  19. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Electric-Knight View Post
    Given that, how do you think that it is unreasonable to think that this content is part of that expansion?
    Because the Going Rogue expansion didn't come with Incarnate content.
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Electric-Knight View Post
    What else did you have to buy in order to access something that was not a part of that something that you had to buy in order to access it?
    Battery charger for my phone.

    As referenced earlier: Screws for my screwdriver.

    Needed to buy property to use grass seed and my lawn mower.

    Wouldn't have somewhere to use gas if I didn't have a car.

    Wouldn't need a dishwasher if I didn't have dishes.

    I had to pay for gym access to get a personal trainer.

    Bought a TV so I could watch cable.

    Have a computer to surf the internet.

    I could go on quite a while.
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by UberGuy View Post
    Surely a thread which has combined George Carlin and analogies about driving screws is bound for the Ninth Circle of Hell.
    If it makes you feel any better, the first analogy that came to mind was going to be a caulk gun.
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nox__Fatalis View Post
    It's pointless and maybe even a sign of mental illness to post a satire of something no one agreed with in the first place.
    Or it's just hilarious, you stiff old sod.
  23. EK,

    You have to buy a screwdriver to use screws. Most places sell screw drivers and screws separately. Because the screwdriver is a prerequisite, are screws still a part of it?

    At the end of the day, Going Rogue didn't come with even the smallest piece of the Incarnate system.
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Electric-Knight View Post
    (you missed all this and jumped in as though I was arguing something that I wasn't... which is okay, because that was a large part of my point. This is insistence by other people has greatly been about fighting an argument, rather than simple logic/truth)
    I ninja edited the post you quoted and I apologized for jumping into the middle of this.

    I still agree with everyone else that the Incarnate System is not a part of Going Rogue. It's a prerequisite, not a piece.