Dark One

Forum Cartel
  • Posts

    2661
  • Joined

  1. *shrug* I was just going by what I saw on wiki. Iron Man has never really been one that's on my radar.
  2. Let's see...Iron Man was created in 1968 and is the epitome of the wealthy capitalist. In the middle of the Cold War.

    Ya, I don't think Tony Stark was officially in print in Russia at that time. (Could very well be wrong though).
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Terwilliger View Post
    What was wrong with Evil Puck?
    Warkupo nailed it.

    To me, that Joker looked like a bishonen pretty boy masquerading as the J-man.
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Hazmatter View Post
    Artemis when she realized her bow and quiver were missing... "I feel naked! And not in a fun way."

    Oh, if Kid Flash had been within earshot...
    I did a double take at that. Had to rewind my recording.

    That Joker was just plain...weird. That voice was jarring and not in a good way. Unfortunately, we got the, "Hello Megan" bit back. Had hoped that was done with.
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Captain_Photon View Post
    That's... in no way unusual. What?
    Seems to be a bit early for trailers, IMO. Just feels...wrong...to me.
  6. Why are they releasing trailers almost a year prior to the movie?
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Lothic View Post
    And I'll bet that 60% of the time it works every time too.
    I've not actually worn it out yet. It's sitting on my shelf along with my Ghostbusters Ectoplasm energy drink, my Vault-Tec lunchbox, and all my other swag.

    I was being silly with the alien ladies comment.
  8. Side note:

    I have a bottle of the Tiberius Star Trek cologne. I bought it just for laffs. But it actually smells kinda good. A nice sandalwood base to it. Plus, it's a hit with the alien ladies.
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Tymers_Realm View Post
    Umm...
    The Simpsons are gonna be around for Season #25, actually...
    I did say, "Most likely". Last I had heard was that Fox was only interested in a 24th season. This was with the whole paycut/no merchandising monies fiasco with the six main VAs.
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Obsidius View Post
    Trek's always been a show to address certain social situations, from racism and nationalism to euthanasia. That being said, politics (or at least some of their base concepts) have also been used as points of contention in Trek.
    There's a difference between that and the stuff that tends to happen in Family Guy. Case in point, the episode where Brian and Stewie travel back to the beginning of WWII. There's a part where there's a campaign button for a pair of candidates from the '08 election on one of the Nazis. That is what I meant by overbearing.
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Obsidius View Post
    Agreed. I think seeing Seth use his "serious" side in a Trek venture could be interesting, and possibly a good angle for a new Trek series. I'd be willing to give him a shot.

    As for the 300 in the Family Guy employ, he's already talking about making another animated series. If he gets green lit, he can simply finish Family Guy the season before the new show launches, and just transition the crew over to working on the new project.
    Well, since Simpsons is going to most likely end on the 24th season, he would have no reason to end Family Guy. They could just make Sunday nights MacFarlane night and be done with it.

    And I wonder if the Star Trek would be free of overbearing political soapboxing?
  12. Well...there'd be a baby character, a talking animal, a fat idiot, and a whole lotta fart jokes...

    /sarcasm
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Clouded View Post
    Exactly.

    Speaking of their defenses or lack therefo...this is 2149 and the best fencing they decided on was wooden posts (with metal holdings) and wooden stakes sticking out from the fence and up from the ground? Well, there's turrets but why not a more robust fencing?! C'mon man!

    EDIT: And why don't there jeep/buggy things have doors on them?!?! HEEELLOOOOO? At least the sixers were smart enough to have Tank type vehicles.
    The problem with high tech stuff (like say a laser or sonic fence) is that it breaks down and needs constant maintaining. They can't rely on resupply from the future or being (possibly) able to make the things necessary to keep higher-tech fencing options in working order, especially given the size of the fence around Terra Nova.

    Sometimes, simple is best.

    But the door thing? Ya, that's kinda stupid design.

    Quote:
    Personally, I'm a bit disappointed in Taylor. If I was the first one there, I'd have been out stealing me a dinosaur egg, hiding out safe in my bunker until that thing hatched, then I'd raise that little sucker as my personal pet and ride. Once it was full-grown, we would be out kicking *** all over the place. Forget those silly rover vehicles. I'd be out riding a freaking Tyrannosaurus like a horse, with one of those big *** sonic-cannons mounted on the front of my saddle, with a dual laser cannon headpiece slipped over Dino's head, so everywhere he turns to look, we're blowing **** up. Then let's see about the Sixers and their little cars...
    T. rex didn't exist at the time they are in. That guy was in on the tail-end of the dinos. He was around for like 2 million years or so, right before the extinction event.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by NinjaPirate View Post
    Well, it seems that a large amount of the people recruited for the colony were not chosen for their intelligence. You're living an a place where nearly every creature WANTS TO KILL YOU. So, you... traipse off into the woods in small groups and go swimming.

    Also, the mini-pterodactyl episode was numbered 1-03 on my cable video-on-demand. The memory-erasing virus episode teaser is numbered 1-05. Are they skipping episodes?


    -k
    I wouldn't worry about the numbering. My on-screen guide almost never gets episode numbers correct.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by TerraDraconis View Post
    Jinx I'm not so sure about his coming back. Something I noticed all along with the opening credits. The regulars where all there all season but Jinx was never in the group shot on the catwalk at the end of the opening credits.
    And it looks like Kate is gone from Sanctuary. In the opening group shot, she's not there anymore.
  16. Dark One

    Movies....

    Harold & Kumar Go To White Castle
    Dead or Alive
    Eurotrip
    The 2 Dune movies that SciFi did
    Van Helsing
    Out Cold
    Wild Things
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Lord_Nightblade View Post
    Hell yeah. In the Pale Moonlight is easily my favorite episode of Star Trek ever.
    Did they make sure to Dance with the Devil?
  18. They had actual animatronics there for parts of the movie. The rest was filmed using the same technique that was done in Avatar, iirc.
  19. Q has always needed 5 across the eyes...
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Nemo_Utopian View Post
    I think all meanings of snuff are supposed to be relevant to the story.
    Even tobacco products inhaled through the nose? Having not read the story (yet) I can't say.
  21. That...title...takes on different meanings, if one thinks about it...

    >.<
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Beastyle View Post
    The rule is, "no dedicated discussion and/or comparing/contrasting City of Heroes Freedom™ with other video games," and "no discussion of competing products."
    /headdesk

    And exactly what constitutes "competing products". That's what we need to know. Because in one response you say Connect 4 strategies are verboten, but in another you say they are ok. Again, the whole mixed messages thing.
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Beastyle View Post
    We had a pen and paper RPG thread before.

    Please keep in mind that the rule mainly applies to video games. If you really want to discuss Connect 4 strategies...
    Which is it? Video games only or every game? You say, "mainly applies" which means its not just video games. You're giving conflicting messages here.
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by MaestroMavius View Post
    Made over a year ago...

    All they are doing is loosening the restriction. It was against the rules to even mention the name of one before, now we can at least name them, we just can't discuss them.

    Still don't agree with it, still want it reversed, I don't want to see the misconception that this is new spread though.
    Well, the addition of board games, pen and paper games, and the like to the verboten list more than makes the loosening to the mentioning of them not quite worth it. One step forward, two steps back...
  25. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
    Intent does matter. To prove to you that intent matters, you have, in what I have just quoted above, continued to mischaracterize that intent and criticize the action based on that falsely presented intent.
    You remember what the road to hell is paved with, right?

    It doesn't matter what their intent was, when the result is a) less posters; b) less people paying; c) community that was gutted.

    Quote:
    Portraying these rules as the Devs being afraid that a discussion of a board game is going to impact people paying for CoH is one of the dumbest things I've read on these boards. Which is a very high mark to cross.
    Not devs. The devs were active in game discussion threads prior to the rule change. Ergo, it most likely wasn't them that came up with it.

    They don't want talk of "competing" products? Think about it. What does that actually mean? They don't want people hearing about other games so that people won't rush out to play 'em. Playing 'em generally means buying (or renting) them. Money spent on that is money that isn't going to NCSoft.

    And this rule change came about around when a certain Distinguished Concept Unveiled Operations was in beta. That was, and remains, a fear-based response that people were going to jump ship.