-
Posts
2017 -
Joined
-
Quote:10% is a big number. Especially when you're talking $$$ and subscriber numbers. Only a complete idiot would disagree.Wrong. It atrophied because this game was designed from the get go to be PvE, and as such has always had a dedicated PvE population. Nearly all of the playerbase has no interest in PvP and never has. Even in PvP's heydey it was lucky if the PvP population was 10% of the community.
A large group of people used to play PVP frequently in this game. I imagine that number would only have grown under F2P if the mechanics had not been changed in I13.
All of this discussion has happened before. All of this discussion will happen again. -
-
I'll be sure to pop along. Thanks for organising it Nalrok AthZim!
-
-
Nope. Check out the war walls in the background. It's the Circle of Thorns from primal earth.
Why not use these designs for the Mu intead? They're underused as a villain group and their current look SUCKS. -
Quote:Originally Posted by AvateaPlease note that El Topo has now posted an update on the new Circle of Thorns' look in the Development forums: http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showthread.php?t=267927
Have a look and feel free to share your feedback in that thread!
Thank you all!
Behold, straight from comicon, the new look for the Circle of Thorns:
Minions:
Bosses:
Apparently all the players wanting generic dragon age-esq armor for their characters wasn't enough. We now get to see the NPCs we fight wearing similar things.
Would it be so bad to maintain the Circle of Thorns as they are? They are a unique and interesting villain group in the game. They look awesome. They're the typical evil robed cultists that can be found in ALL different genres. I for one am a massive fan of the Circle of Thorns as they currently are in the game and have no idea why these new designs were introduced. -
-
Quote:I say draw your own conclusions because I didn't actually put forward a conclusion.Why write "draw your own conclusions" when you clearly mean "draw my conclusions?" When you don't know the facts, as you clearly say we don't, it's called leaping to a conclusion, or "making stuff up." The boards could use less of that.
Someone in PS told me they're aiming for Q1 2013. That may have changed. -
I like that the NPC's are just normal humans. They're meant to be the Jimmy Olsen/Jim Gordan to our Batman/Superman. I'd say update the models, but keep the designs.
-
Quote:They've stopped releasing information on the # of subscribers.That could be taken both ways. It could mean that NCSoft has officially got back enough money in revenue to pay the cost that went to developing the game. I wouldn't really say it's due to a lack of players playing per capita - not unless they plan to shut everything down a year from now.
CoH2 is on the horizon.
Draw your own conclusions. Currently we know nothing. (And that includes the current number of subscribers.) -
Glowing spandex! Green Lantern/Tron style!
AAAW YEAH! -
Quote:There's a vocal minority of loud mouth players that enjoy PVP in every game. The idea that a game system is responsible for their behavior is ridiculous. The vast majority of people who PVP don't behave this way. (Although the inferiority complexes of certain posters would have you believe they do!)I'm going to wager a guess that (s)he doesn't like the kind of player attitudes and/or drama the typical PvPer brings to the game. Mind you, CoX PvPers are, in my experience, a cut well above the "typical PvPer" of other MMOs on average, but I've run into my fair share of jerks even in CoX.
CoH's account numbers may have been that a couple years ago. They're no way near that now. There's a reason they're changing their financial model. -
I think removing it from Atlas would be a really good idea.
Not because I want to stop PLing/farming. That stuff is FINE. As a long time player I like a way to get to 50 really fast and to grind out currency fast.
What I don't like is: New players logging into the game for the first time. Being invited to a farm team. Joining up because they don't know any better. And then thinking that's all their is to the game.
This needs to be avoided. If any newbies join the game and ask "hey I just bought architect edition...where can I find it?" We can just point them to Steel Canyon or another zone. But let's face it. Those types of guys are going to be in the minority. And, judging from the amount of attention the MA has gotten recently, they are not the people the devs are targeting. -
Quote:This guy gets it.My thoughts?
I find it laughable when anyone chimes in on the 'paying for powers' debate with the battlecry of "It's been done before with COV and GR!!!1@!!" For the exact reasons you listed above.
Yes, while it's technically correct that we're locked out of 4 sets if we don't have GR. I simply can't view that as paying for powersets. It's an expansion I'm paying for, that happens to include 4 power sets, among a plethora of other goodies. Trying to claim that it has precedent because we have to buy the expansion to play the sets is silly.
Unless I'm missing something and buying Beam Gun set also gets me 3 or more new zones and arcs ala CoV and GR it just doesn't equal out.
However, that's just a personal gripe. I dislike when people that have a legitimate case use barely thought out reasons to justify it, when all they need to do is let it stand on it's own merit. All it does it weaken the case instead of reinforcing it.
No, simply put, no matter how anyone wants to 'Spin' it. Our $15 a month has given us every powerset (bar expansions) for free. This will change with Freedom and...
That is a really good thing! Seriously.
I gave much thought to it when F2P was announced. I knew we'd see powersets being sold eventually. At 1st I really didn't like the idea. Feeling like my 7 years of loyalty wasn't being considered, since the longtime players will be the ones wanting new sets the most (having played all the others)
I also don't go for the "Just use you monthly PP stipend" excuses as that ignores the fact that spending the PP on powersets negates the ability to spend it on anything else... No, fact is ViP's will be expected to shell out extra cash on top of the Sub from here on out. That too, is a good thing.
What changed my mind on the issue? What got me to go from being upset over it to actually wishing it would launch sooner? I realized the potential.
We've gotten used to getting 1 or 2 new sets a year. Sometimes not even that. This new model has the potential to put numerous new sets in our hands. By taking in money for specific items/features they can then turn around and put more time into creation of more. I realized that this new model means we'll get sets we've been asking for that otherwise would've never been created. That makes me smile.
I have no problem with having to spend $10 for a single powerset since I'll get 10 times the use out of it then the equivalent $10 server transfer. If it means Blasters get Martial Arts secondary sooner rather than later! It means Staff fighting and Street Fighting and numerous other sets get to see the light of day when they otherwise wouldn't.
That is a very good thing indeed!
We would not be seeing these new powersets if it wasn't for micro-transactions. (Assuming, for the sake of argument, that they weren't all actually made to be released with Going Rogue before marketing had a better idea.)
So if you don't like microstransactions then pretend they don't exist. Pretend they haven't been introduced. Pretend the dev team don't have the investment from them. Pretend the dev team didn't use that investment to make the sets. Pretend you don't have these new sets in the game.
The naysayers still have the OPTION of not buying these sets, relying on the rarely released free sets, and maintaining their status quo.
I don't understand the butthurt. -
-
-
-
Quote:Fair enough. Didn't notice your other post.How can I follow you into a thread in which I posted first?
You stop following me into my threads with your deliberate pot-stirring. Good day, sir!
All I ask then is that you stop quoting me/obsessing over me/reading my mind/etc.
If you have a problem then send me a PM. -
Quote:Constant negativity?You are again called out on your constant negativity and you feign surprise... again. Sorry you're being treated like you treat us.
What part of asking if there's any mention of PVP is negative? How am I treating a "group of people" (which you are apparently the spokesperson of) in a negative way?
It's an innocent damn question and I'd appreciate it if you got off my back. You're following me into threads and psychoanalysing me. It's getting old. Back off. -
Quote:"No" would have been more than sufficient as a response.Yes, they plan to remove PvP from the entire game except from that little hidden island in Cap au Diable that is going to be made into an entire zone where 12 year olds can question each others sexuality and hurl epithets at one another and leave the rest of the server alone.
And I left the information out of the show notes just to spite you.
Cause lolpvp.
Honestly, it's Tunnel Rat. Talking about Visual Effects of the new powersets. I have no idea how you'd expect there to be a mention of anything PvP related in there, or there to magically be some PvP related information that I didn't drop into the original post.
Or are you just hosing down every thread you can with your pet personal issue just for the lulz?
Thanks for the hostility. Internet warrior. -
Any mention of PVP bugfixes/changes?