-
Posts
869 -
Joined
-
They are TFs. You can log off in the middle, come back, and finish. Most people have time for 1-2 hours, those that don't, who are interested enough, can do the above.
I will not shrink my arcs below one hour, and I'm not sure I'm capable. A few months ago I started writing a short story. It's 250 pages long now and growing. I'm already surprised I can condense what's in my head down far enough to fit it all into 5 missions with the highly restrictive text limits. -
[ QUOTE ][*] Embarrassing Situations in Sitcoms -- I literally have to change the channel or leave the room to avoid seeing the characters humiliated at times.
[/ QUOTE ]
LOL I do the same thing, in any show. I just can't watch, I feel the embarrassment myself. -
Hehe it's all good Tell us what you think of our arcs, should you play any of them, please
-
(QR)
It's been specifically stated that this current engine is capable of MUCH more than they use it for currently, and a new engine is simply unnecessary. -
(QR)
Sorry if it's been said but...
A REASON TO ACTUALLY BE OUTSIDE -
(QR)
Hadn't heard of them having actual character profiles.
Link? -
Did minor update to The Most Important Thing and changed the thread title to reflect what we would like..
-
[ QUOTE ]
This sounds actually really cool to me. I have had a lot of concepts for Broadsword stalkers.
[/ QUOTE ] -
[ QUOTE ]
It's what AR/Devices should have been.
[/ QUOTE ]
No kidding. -
Yeah I put a disclaimer in my story description that the warning about higher level enemies appearing in lower level missions was false.
-
Nope. But it did get corrupted, and I fixed it.
In case anyone else has a problem, maybe they will run into the same thing. The level range on 2 of my missions got corrupted somehow. I had mission 3 for instance showing up as "level range 2147348480-54". I had to manually set 30-54. Either one being default made it unpublishable, I am not sure why exactly. -
My arc isn't complete. I'm still building it. I have no errors, but the publish button went gray. Now, I don't need to publish it yet, but it's sort of a concern. My file size is WELL below limits (74.03%), and I went around clicking in every text field to see if an error showed up. I really don't understand what could be going on.
Are there any known errors that don't show up in the error box right now, so maybe I can be pointed in the right direction on what to look for?
Thanks for any replies. -
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
/signed, the requirements for this thing are just dumb.
[/ QUOTE ] I know!
[/ QUOTE ]
See? He agrees. -
/signed, the requirements for this thing are just dumb.
-
[ QUOTE ]
[censored] grapefruit
[/ QUOTE ]
Fail. On the basis that oranges are in the untasty category, when in fact, they are the best tasting thing on the planet. -
[ QUOTE ]
The Shard has some beautiful scenery. They were everything I had wanted the Plane of Sky to be (have to remember that the Shard predates EQ2's Plane of Sky expansion pack.) I think it's possible that some of their devs admired it as much as I did even if whoever designed it never got much kudos here in CoH.
Nobody ever goes there because those 4 zones are just so freaking BIG.
BIG.
[/ QUOTE ]
The Shadow Shard is a cheap ripoff of Anarchy Online's Shadowlands, which are much cooler, with way more variety in terrain.
Shadow Shard is yawn, because it looks the same everywhere except the Storm Palace. -
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm actually kind of surprised more people don't scale down their GUIs. I couldn't stand how big the default one looks, so I have mine set to 75, and I've even considered cranking it as low as 70.
[/ QUOTE ]
I only just realized you could do that, thanks to this thread. I just figured everyone else was running at ginormous resolutions or something....
And since everyone agrees that MMs have special window needs, here's my MM setup:
Mia Nevermore GUI
[/ QUOTE ]
I, on the other hand, crank my scale UP I can't stand looking at everything being so tiny. -
Here's mine.
No, my netgraph isn't always open, this is a special case, obviously.
My window scale is indeed at 125%. I don't have poor eyesight, I just like it like that. -
Yes she does. I can use /architect anywhere else. I don't use the macro, I just type it, I don't see why the macro would be any different, as it's just the commands strung together in clickable form.