Rule of 5 question


Aett_Thorn

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
No it's not, because they're *not* IOs.
Here's a really important reason why not to call them AT"IO"s: Preemies below the IO threshold can slot them. They're not IOs. They're not crafted. Don't call them IOs.


Paragon Wiki: http://www.paragonwiki.com
City Info Terminal: http://cit.cohtitan.com
Mids Hero Designer: http://www.cohplanner.com
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dispari View Post
I don't know why Dink thinks she's not as sexy as Jay was. In 5 posts she's already upstaged his entire career.

 

Posted

According to the WIKI we are All using the wrong 'official' terminology.

The WIKI suggests ------- ATE (do they taste good or just Bite?)
------------------------------ or AE (that one would cause No Confusion, right?)

http://paragonwiki.com/wiki/Archetype_Enhancements

Still I do agree having a single common referent for these enhancements will avoid confusion, and any use of IO in that referent really is misleading.

Jak


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by JakHammer View Post
According to the WIKI we are All using the wrong 'official' terminology.

The WIKI suggests ------- ATE (do they taste good or just Bite?)
------------------------------ or AE (that one would cause No Confusion, right?)

http://paragonwiki.com/wiki/Archetype_Enhancements

Still I do agree having a single common referent for these enhancements will avoid confusion, and any use of IO in that referent really is misleading.

Jak
The devs and Zwillinger call them ATOs. That's good enough for me.


@Roderick

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by JakHammer View Post
According to the WIKI we are All using the wrong 'official' terminology.

The WIKI suggests ------- ATE
Which means we need to update the wiki. No one calls them that.


Paragon City Search And Rescue
The Mentor Project