My character isn't a god!
Also, an example of ad hominem is the following statement:
When suggesting your superiority, you are inflicting inferiority to me. As such, you are claiming your superiority is based purely off my inferiority. As such, your entire argument is based purely off this one line of logic "I am superior and you are inferior." |
Until you demonstrate that you're willing to discuss anything with civility, I'm done with you.
2) My apologies for pointing this out, but you and Dechs did strike the first aggressive, rude, and confrontational blows. Should you both had also chosen to word yourselves a bit more carefully, this never would have happened and we'd probably be better off and having a much friendlier conversation or debate.
|
In my opinion, specifically MY OPINION, if you can't work the Well of the Furies into your tight and special snowflake backstory, you've failed as a roleplayer anyway.
|
My response was harsh, but attacked only your opinion for being close minded and intolerant. After that, you didn't ask if I had alternatives, you didn't ask for my explanation. You went on an ad hominem, straw man rampage.
Again, you've shown your colors. You demonstrate no desire to discuss with civility in mind. I chose every one of my words carefully, intending no personal insult to you at all. I attack your words, your stance, how you defend it, and nothing more. You have attacked me. You have misrepresented my stance. You have slung insults at me.
Where to now?
Check out all my guides and fiction pieces on my blog.
The MFing Warshade | The Last Rule of Tanking | The Got Dam Mastermind
Everything Dark Armor | The Softcap
don'T attempt to read tHis mEssaGe, And believe Me, it is not a codE.
It's in his dialog about Battalion, which unfortunately is not on paragonwiki, I guess because nobody cares enough to attempt to transcribe his giant wall of text looping branching dialog tree. But here's the relevant bit copy-pasted from in-game, SPOILER WARNING: <quote snipped>
He's telling you about how the Battalion eats Wells, and what would happen if they managed to consume ours. |
Hm, that wasn't how I read it. Prometheus seemed to be saying "this is what will happen to YOU if we can't stop Battalion". All Incarnates draw power from the Well directly, as opposed to non-Incarnates who are barely connected and draw little or no power.
Stop playing the victim already, Dechs. Nobody thinks you're the victim as much as anyone thinks I am. You got just as aggressive, by your own words no less, as you claim I have. The only 'strawman' I see now is you trying to justify your bitter, angry words in some hail-mary attempt to not look like a total jerk.
Congratulations, you've failed and prolonging this angry, child-like behavior is not helping anyone.
Now, I want you to pay close attention to that quoted piece. In fact..
In my opinion, specifically MY OPINION, if you can't work the Well of the Furies into your tight and special snowflake backstory, you've failed as a roleplayer anyway. |
Special Snowflakes are bad roleplayers. I just used the Well of the Furies as a very clever way to mask over the true culprit, which is 'believing one's character is any more special than any other', which you have shown to be the case in your own little DechsWorld time and time again by claiming superiority and blah blah blah.
My initial attitude has changed somewhat, as WELL WRITTEN AND EXPOSED alternatives to the Well are more than acceptable. Shock and awe someone can have a change in opinion in a discussion! What is the world coming to?!
Also, read the quoted text again, when you get the blood out of your eyes. You two DID strike the first PURPOSEFULLY aggressive blow, just because my opinion is against yours. And I can admit it was because I chose poor wording. Nalrok and I both acknowledged it was a stupid, pointless argument that NEVER would have happened if all parties took slightly more care in wording and had a bit more understanding.
And last I checked Nalrok and I put this whole mess behind us and acted very civil. Oddly enough after you stopped posting because you had to go to bed. Funny, I wonder who is turning into the real issue now?
But, even if you have an alternative? You are not superior to an Incarnate. You simply cannot be. If you can't accept this, you're going into Minority Territory. People who have alternatives tend to accept they are going to end up weaker by some varying degree because, let's face it?
You can't beat Potential. Not in this setting. At least within the current canon storyline. If you claim you can,, you're throwing the setting out for yourself and THAT IS BAD ROLEPLAYING.
But, I think I'm done with you, Dechs. You're going to respond, again, by being a hypocrite. But most importantly? You're going to continue to act like an angry, bitter little child who is upset at mommy for not buying him 24 more super packs.
Grow up, and maybe we'll talk again. Get over yourself, and maybe you'll be worth my time.
Nalrok will still be given an apology, but you? Not sorry for anything but what was stated before. But your continued rampage? Nah. Grow up, kiddo.
Apology redacted, as you're using it as ammunition against my friend. I'd like to ask that you keep as civil as you and I have; that is, the insults need to stop since he hasn't insulted you once.
My guides:Dark Melee/Dark Armor/Soul Mastery, Illusion Control/Kinetics/Primal Forces Mastery, Electric Armor
"Dark Armor is a complete waste as a tanking set."
Reppu, Dechs hasn't insulted you in the slightest. Additionally, you shouldn't act SHOCKED when someone vehemently disagrees with your opinions - you admit in your own signature that your posts are HIGHLY opinionated and aggressive!
Don't put words in his mouth saying he attacked you ad hominem, and then call him "an angry child" in the next few paragraphs.
@Amarlex in game, on the Virtue server.
Reppu, Dechs hasn't insulted you in the slightest. Additionally, you shouldn't act SHOCKED when someone vehemently disagrees with your opinions - you admit in your own signature that your posts are HIGHLY opinionated and aggressive!
Don't put words in his mouth saying he attacked you ad hominem, and then call him "an angry child" in the next few paragraphs. |
Agreed with the above and Nal throughout this thread as well.
And that signature/disclaimer is a load of bullocks.
I am a highly opinionated person who does not hold his tongue... And I don't get people reacting negatively to me all the time... The likely reason? because I have respect for other people and I tend to post, and speak, respectfully (some people prove that doing so won't get anywhere and I may fire off a little more roughly, but it is rare).
The reactions to Reppu's posts (and it is not just within this thread, from what I gather), are not because of some strongly opinionated, "aggressive" stance that the person post with... it's because of the egocentric stance and disrespect towards those who have different views. That's not aggressiveness... it is self-defeating.
Reppu may think that other people are upset, angry or hurt by the views expressed... as opposed to seeing that people were just trying to point out the inherent flaws in the holier-than-thou approach to things, in general.
Within the confines of the super egocentric, any such responses mean that the all-important opinions of master have been met with disappointment in witnessing that the little snowflakes aren't as important as they had wished.
Sadly, it is the egocentric that are the precious snowflakes, living in their crystal tanks, firing off public dismissals as though they were fireballs and seeing intelligent responses as nothing but burning corpses-to-be.
Haha... apologies for waxing somewhat poetically...
and round up everyone that knows more than they do"-Dylan
I should have simply opted to not respond to him. Whatever, again, he's not worth the time and neither has this entire argument. What little progression I have made in this thread gets side-railed because he is unhappy with me, and not just my opinion.
And since it paints me as a villain to point out the levels he's going to to be 'right', which you all seem to be willing to ignore in favor of pointing out what I am doing 'wrong', there's no reason to continue this, bluntly, stupid, childish exchange between children pretending to be adults. This is for ALL parties involved, not just people I disagree with. I've been a few levels of childish as well.
Either way, Dechs is someone I HAVE respected in the past, but his persistence in aggressive and borderline violent retort is to be taken note of, as much as it's being ignored and hand-waved off, while my own are being chewed apart because, again; minority opinion, minority support.
Then again, I am not here to gain 'approval' from anyone. I simply wanted to speak my mind. I did. It dragged on far, far too long.
@Nalrok: Apologies again for that, but to each their own. But if you believe he hasn't insulted me, that's... blind of you, in respects to how you view your friend. He has, maybe not as bluntly as I have in return, but he has been insulting and rude. You're free to ignore it because he is your friend or it's not as obvious as my end, but that doesn't mean he's not insulting me and is TRYING to. And if he claims otherwise, then it's a case of 'badly worded'.
@Electric: I think the main difference is, I don't offer respect right off the bat. My version of our shared reality is not quite so gumdrops and rainbows. Respect should be earned, and while it is self-defeating to not offer respect at first, and thusly not gain respect in return... I don't mind this stance. If someone earns my respect through how I do things, then I know I've found a genuine friend. Maybe I have less friends than all of you, but the ones I do have are ones who won't abandon be because the tides have changed. That's more than enough for me.
@Brenn: As I've said to Nalrok, yes. Yes he has. Again, you're either blind to it because of the difference between subtle and blunt, or it's opinionated. I DO feel he has insulted me, I DO feel he has been rude in return for all his screaming at me for being opinionated, and I DO feel this entire mess is, as Reiska put it, a really perverted tango.
If Reiska can see it for what it is, can Dechs 'friends' rub a little bit of the sleep from their eyes and realize that as well? Yes? No?
Either way, I don't really care at this point. Dechs is allowed to act childish and gets a cookie, I act childish and get the paddle. This? This is just how friends work, I guess. Which is why I can't 'win' here, if there was anything to be 'won' at all.
But, I stand by what I said; Dechs has been acting like a hypocrite and a child, as much as I've been acting childish and rude.
You are not a victim.
@Amarlex in game, on the Virtue server.
@Nalrok: Apologies again for that, but to each their own. But if you believe he hasn't insulted me, that's... blind of you, in respects to how you view your friend. He has, maybe not as bluntly as I have in return, but he has been insulting and rude. You're free to ignore it because he is your friend or it's not as obvious as my end, but that doesn't mean he's not insulting me and is TRYING to. And if he claims otherwise, then it's a case of 'badly worded'.
|
My guides:Dark Melee/Dark Armor/Soul Mastery, Illusion Control/Kinetics/Primal Forces Mastery, Electric Armor
"Dark Armor is a complete waste as a tanking set."
I never said he insulted you. I said you insulted him and that you ceased to be civil, using my apology as a way of getting at Dechs. Not cool.
|
But, again, intentions can be mistaken.
I never claimed to be a victim. I am fighting an uphill, pointless battle. No offense, but can you read and not assume? Thank you. And try to abide by one, simple request; Stop playing Dechs off as innocent. Neither of us were, and neither of us should be supported for what we did. It only promotes this sort of behavior.
Except I am innocent, Reppu. I may have had harsh words, but they have never been personal insults. Four additional people have tried to tell you this now. I wish we could have discussed this in a civil manner.
Enjoy yourself in game.
Where to now?
Check out all my guides and fiction pieces on my blog.
The MFing Warshade | The Last Rule of Tanking | The Got Dam Mastermind
Everything Dark Armor | The Softcap
don'T attempt to read tHis mEssaGe, And believe Me, it is not a codE.
Except I am innocent, Reppu. I may have had harsh words, but they have never been personal insults. Four additional people have tried to tell you this now. I wish we could have discussed this in a civil manner.
Enjoy yourself in game. |
If only you had accepted my attempt to do that in the first place, instead of aiming to go full-circle and try to paint yourself out as the 'mature' one, this would have ended sooner. But, I suppose I shouldn't have expected more, and I'm glad I didn't.
Enjoy yourself in game.
I honestly hope that you can distance yourself from this thread and then come back to it and read it through and see that you're incorrect about what you keep insisting Dechs did and, more importantly, realize that Dechs said nothing that should be taken in any way that you keep insisting.
It's really coming off rather oddly to me and I honestly hope that you can just see the truth eventually.
Also, the whole thing about "respect after it is proven to be deserved" is exactly why we have so many problems from people (and, no, you are far from the only person who holds to this process). The worst part about that angle is... If you only give respect when it has been proven that you deserve it... when and how exactly do you think you'll be proving that you deserve it?
Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none.
It doesn't work if you don't do the first part.
I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt to everyone I meet. I'm strong enough to handle being wrong, because I know the beauty in having others prove me right.
Anyway, I'm not harping on that philosophy too much... I just felt like sharing my view on it, since you mentioned it.
and round up everyone that knows more than they do"-Dylan
As you should, too.
Also, let me stress something one more time before walking away; Dechs was insulting me, but not in an obvious, easy to point out manner. His choice of mannerisms, wording, and conversation was insulting. It's a case of subtle enough to insult only the person it's directed to.
Do other people find it insulting? No. I had other people look it over to confirm that theory of mine. BUT, this does not mean it was not insulting to me, which is was. And that's what matters; he insulted me, but refuses to acknowledge anything he said COULD be insulting, even if it WAS insulting.
It's just a case of opinion. I felt insulted. He should acknowledge it, but feels he did not do so, and feels justified to state such.
If you look at it from an ironic point of view... I feel the same way. I don't attempt to insult people (unless I AM), feel bad when I do, and apologize when it's pointed out.
You can easily insult someone and not even word it purposefully to do so. That is how opinions work. That is how internet conversations tend to turn out.
But, I'll just state it one more time, tl;dr - Dechs insulted me. You all may think he couldn't have, but he did. That's all. You may disagree, but I will still have been insulted.
My guides:Dark Melee/Dark Armor/Soul Mastery, Illusion Control/Kinetics/Primal Forces Mastery, Electric Armor
"Dark Armor is a complete waste as a tanking set."
"Jerk". And escalating from there. I can't do that because that's not what happened.
What Dechs was doing was looking down at me, and insulting my intelligence. This is what I found to be insulting, far more than any single word. The catalyst for this was having an unpopular opinion, but also saying (abrassively, admittedly), that people who can't work within a setting are bad roleplayers.
While I do feel this is normally a roleplaying sin, my opinion has shifted somewhat when GOOD examples are given. Those are rare, however, and normally I see poor examples that make me cry. An example would be the World of Darkness roleplayers who are using City of Heroes as a substitute until their MMO is finished. This is setting-breaking and I feel is bad roleplay.
Maybe you can excuse it through PORTALS, but I feel this is just another poor excuse for even poorer roleplay.
But, I am rambling at this point. Dechs was chastising me for being rude, while being rude in doing so. Ironically enough, in his opening statement, Dechs may have accidentally proved my initial point right. But, I'm not going back into that.
To sum it up, again;
Dechs did not use a choice word to insult me. It was his constant tone, superiority flaunting, and intelligence-questioning tone that put me off, far more than YOU did for telling me to shove it, in fact, Nalrok. What you did was far more obvious and easily shrugged off. What Dechs did was far more grating and provoked my initial salvo of exchange.
When it continued, I stopped getting quite as annoyed by it. Although that annoyance returned when everyone was claiming he was doing nothing wrong at all, but this is because people were looking for obvious things. I stopped being bothered entirely when I felt this entire exchange lost it's purpose, and just began to be a back-and-forth character attack, which Dechs can deny but that is what it became, on both ends.
Ultimately, we both went so-far off topic that it's hysterical. My opinion still stands; People who cannot work within the setting are generally going to be bad roleplayers for it. If they can promote an alternative that still works within the setting, that is acceptable and happily accepted.
Kheldians that are not Kheldians are frowned upon and generally not roleplayed with, because changing the core of the race is "What?"
People who roleplay a power set as something else are entirely fine. Unless "Fire Blast" is suddenly "Ice Blast", then that's just "What?"
Soldiers of Arachnos (And Widows) who have no past dealing with Arachnos are eyerolled at, and only roleplayed with if the reason to explain their Arachnos Training not being Arachnos Training is good.
And I'm rambling, again.
Ugh. Just, yeah. Dechs insulted me, with no 'generic word' used. If you can't understand what I mean, oh well. I was still insulted and went on the defense/attack because of it. That's all.
Edit: NOW, keep in mind this is no excuse for me doing the same thing from time to time. It is simply what insulted me, and what caused my escalating backlash. Stressing that because if I don't, I will get called out on it. Eye for an Eye, so on and so forth.
What Dechs was doing was looking down at me, and insulting my intelligence. This is what I found to be insulting, far more than any single word. The catalyst for this was having an unpopular opinion, but also saying (abrassively, admittedly), that people who can't work within a setting are bad roleplayers.
|
Let me explain that pointing out logical fallacies does not equate to insulting your intelligence.
For instance: If I point out you're driving with a flat tire, that means that you have problems with your car, but it's certainly not the same as calling you a bad driver or a stupid person for driving with a flat tire.
You may not like that I have pointed out the logical fallacies, and there's no reason you should. If you have logical fallacies in your argument, it means your argument either has nothing to stand on or is being defended with invalid reasoning.
Nothing I have said was a personal insult or an attack of your intelligence. I have not been looking down on you. I have merely pointed out weaknesses in your argument and holes in your defense. Nothing more.
Where to now?
Check out all my guides and fiction pieces on my blog.
The MFing Warshade | The Last Rule of Tanking | The Got Dam Mastermind
Everything Dark Armor | The Softcap
don'T attempt to read tHis mEssaGe, And believe Me, it is not a codE.
I'll note that I do think some of the epic ATs' powers are suitably generic that they can be taken in a concept that isn't that AT. Kheldian form-shifting isn't generic enough, but human-form powers are (it's just light/dark energy stuff). Bane mace powers and crabs in general aren't really generic enough, but huntsman (rifle only) builds are. What you get is a riflesman with exceptional tactical training. And I can't really think of much about Widows that is visably tied to their Arachnos origin. The claws are ones available to Claws users on other melee AT. And the claws/mental blast combo isn't even one I recall seeing at all on Widows in game anyway--they've been pure claws or pure mental blast. For SoAs in general, you would just have to ignore the first costume (Arachnos-specific) you get and never use it. Unless at some point you roleplay disguising yourself as a SoA like in... I think it was one of the new redside intro arcs from when Mercy Isle got a redo?
And I'll admit to not having had read all of the Well lore there was--I was mostly going off the impressions I got from Mender Ramisel's arc. I just last night had an extended conversation with Prometheus, which I hadn't done before because I had thought he was only one of those NPCs there for systems explanation, like the Guy Who Knows Something at the Black Market and such. I hadn't realized he was basically a big lore info-dump. Anyone know of any other sources, or places I can talk to him? (I couldn't get him to talk about Batallion.) My talk with him's given me some very interesting thoughts about how the Well relates to my characters.
For those who haven't, I strongly suggest having a talk with him. It sounds more like the Well is more of a general embodiment of potential and power which people draw upon both consciously and unconsciously. So if your character does something that normal humans or even superheroes can't manage, they might be unconsciously drawing upon the potental shared by all humans, which the Well embodies.
I'm still figuring out where one of my character stands in regards to this, since she sort of does some of the same things the Well does (provides power to others). Mainly because she largely operates as a god of growth (things like banishment rituals and the God-Killer Sword would work against her), though definitely not as powerful as, say, Mot or Rularuu. I think in her case I'm comfortable enough having her play at Incarnate level without drawing from the Well--the Well embodies human potential, and she's more spirit than human, with alternative capablities and limits. For a few of my characters and one of another player's characters, she acts as a source for their powers in much the same way the Well does (and given the dramatic and weird transformations she tends to visit upon them, severence from her would definitely be lethal). Her generosity with the power she hands out tends to leave her less strong personally than she would otherwise be. I play her as Mind/Empathy--Empathy because of the power she grants to others, and Mind because she plays off people's desires in the same way that Mot plays off their despairs. Except that instead of absorbing the ones who give in fully to her, she makes them into her 'children'.
As for other characters, some of them I haven't really given that much thoughts. A fair number likely will incorporate the Well when (and if) they reach a sufficient power level (not all of them consciously). There're a couple or so extradimensional characters so that come from a sort of psychic collective which they draw their power from (separating them from it wouldn't be outright lethal but would be mentally tramatic, making them feel forsaken and alone). Those ones could reach Incarnate power levels, but often operate below it depending on how much of their collective's power is provided to them. A lot of regular threats wouldn't warrant that much power being diverted to them, but something like Mot would.
One of mine will never actually reach an Incarnate power level, but she operates more through trickery as she's a living dream entity. So all things she might do to you, including (eventual) Incarnate-level powers she might seem to exhibit are pure illusion. For example, the people she 'heals' and 'rezzes' were never actually hurt since she created the illusion of them being hurt in the first place. Though rather than the obvious Illusion Controlller, she's a Dark/Dark Controller because of her nature as a Nightmare (and because the ways the combo can screw with enemies just seemed to fit for a Nightmare).
EDIT: I just tried talking to Prometheus on a character who's done all of the trials instead of only some. He's more informative the more trials you've done. That explains why I missed out on so much of this lore. And, wow, some interesting relevations. But it gets more and more spoilery.
Prometheus also gives additional info if you've cleared the entire Who Will Die? chain.
Ah, I see the problem.
Let me explain that pointing out logical fallacies does not equate to insulting your intelligence. For instance: If I point out you're driving with a flat tire, that means that you have problems with your car, but it's certainly not the same as calling you a bad driver or a stupid person for driving with a flat tire. You may not like that I have pointed out the logical fallacies, and there's no reason you should. If you have logical fallacies in your argument, it means your argument either has nothing to stand on or is being defended with invalid reasoning. Nothing I have said was a personal insult or an attack of your intelligence. I have not been looking down on you. I have merely pointed out weaknesses in your argument and holes in your defense. Nothing more. |
You... don't get it. But that's okay. It's a robotic point of view you're using, and that's fine. I'll leave it at that. I'm way too tired of this back and forth.
|
But now we're down to semantics.
Where to now?
Check out all my guides and fiction pieces on my blog.
The MFing Warshade | The Last Rule of Tanking | The Got Dam Mastermind
Everything Dark Armor | The Softcap
don'T attempt to read tHis mEssaGe, And believe Me, it is not a codE.
Never saw nothing about getting cut off and dying.
He's telling you about how the Battalion eats Wells, and what would happen if they managed to consume ours.
Prometheus sighs dejectedly.
Sadly, those who are so tied to the 'well's' die an agonizing death as every shred of power is torn from their body. It is not so much the loss of this power that kills them, but the sudden "ordinariness" of their mortal form. All the many injuries that healed or were repaired miraculously, all the years of battle... they suddenly and instantly take their toll as the power of the well is undone.
The fate of Incarnates, however, is quite a rosy one compared to that which befalls those who are not, if only because the torment ends quickly.