Incarnate Trials April - Dec 18
By
Bubbawheat,
Posted on: 2011-12-19 02:16 in CoH and CoV General Discussions
Quote:
What this says to me is that you shouldn't bother doing either, really.
|
Originally Posted by Snow Globe
Neither do I and I don't expect them to. However asking me to provide clinical trial data to that extreme is going to get the exact same type result as asking the developers to release that data.
|
61866 - A Series of Unfortunate Kidnappings - More than a coincidence?
2260 - The Burning of Hearts - A green-eyed monster holds the match.
379248 - The Spider Without Fangs - NEW - Some lessons learned (more or less.)
Quote:
Then ignore that section and that result. Comment on the rest. There is no need to be rude. Say you don't care for the sections you feel have too little data and move on.|
Originally Posted by EU_Damz
All your other figures are indeed interesting but that one sample size with you commenting purely on that one figure has what made everybody think this is just another biased view on itrials.
|
I'll jump onto nearly any available trial. However TPN, MoM, and UG aren't getting a lot of responses on Triumph, so I have little data on them. The developers should be worried about that. They were worried about that prior to October 28 when they were going to remove the Empyrean Merit rewards from BAF and Lambda. Well, on one server at least, Keyes has shown a fairly substantial upswing since the changes on Nov. 10th. The Increased chance (I will not say assured because it isn't) at a rare or very rare hasn't changed anything as far as how often the UG is being run on Triumph.
Triumph: White Succubus: 50 Ill/Emp/PF Snow Globe: 50 Ice/FF/Ice Strobe: 50 PB Shi Otomi: 50 Ninja/Ninjistu/GW Stalker My other characters
Quote:
It's quite hard to ignore something when its the only data you reference though | Then ignore that section and that result. Comment on the rest. There is no need to be rude. Say you don't care for the sections you feel have too little data and move on. |
Thats what im getting at
@Damz Find me on the global channel Union Chat. One of the best "chat channels" ingame!
Quote:
The offending comment was removed. There is nothing else I can do, but you want to keep harping on it. Therefore the problem is on your side of the screen, not mine.
|
Originally Posted by EU_Damz
It's quite hard to ignore something when its the only data you reference though
Thats what im getting at |
Triumph: White Succubus: 50 Ill/Emp/PF Snow Globe: 50 Ice/FF/Ice Strobe: 50 PB Shi Otomi: 50 Ninja/Ninjistu/GW Stalker My other characters
The only reason people are being so upfront with you on your facts is because you tried to draw a conclusion and be VERY sarcastic with a sample size of ONE. How do you expect anybody to consider your sarcasm valid with next to no experience of what your saying?
All your other figures are indeed interesting but that one sample size with you commenting purely on that one figure has what made everybody think this is just another biased view on itrials.
@Damz Find me on the global channel Union Chat. One of the best "chat channels" ingame!