What if all the Tanking At's were streamlined?
By
Aett_Thorn,
Posted on: 2011-12-08 23:35 in Tankers
Quote:
Rule #1: Follow the Tank.|
Originally Posted by KnightofKhonsu
Heh heh heh...which is even more crazy on Tanker Tuesdays when all the tankers charge in at once thinking they are leading the charge! lol
|
Rule #2: Witty dies first.
Rule #3: It's all Rangle's fault.
Clicking on the linked image above will take you off the City of Heroes site. However, the guides will be linked back here.
Quote:
From the developer standpoint, creating a new archetype is currently infeasible. However, that doesn't mean redefining multiple classes simultaneously is significantly more likely.
|
Originally Posted by Ultimus
Also think of it from a developer standpoint, is it easier to create an entire new AT with new powersets, etc, or to modify one class to give additional benefit?
|
[Guide to Defense] [Scrapper Secondaries Comparison] [Archetype Popularity Analysis]
In one little corner of the universe, there's nothing more irritating than a misfile...
(Please support the best webcomic about a cosmic universal realignment by impaired angelic interference resulting in identity crisis angst. Or I release the pigmy water thieves.)
Quote:
You stated a point based on which you want to make changes:|
Originally Posted by Ultimus
Not sure what you are referring to or the point you are trying to make? And if we are discounting IO's then everything is balanced and Arcanaville has proved it.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ultimus
The problem I think is the Tanker is too specialized, there is no content in the game that a Tanker can tank that a Brute or Kheldian cannot. (The game defines both Brutes and Kheldians as "Tanks)
|
Is there some content that a defender can debuff that a corr cannot?
Or that a controller can control but dominator cannot?
There is "can" and there is "better"
I find that the boards are full of arguments about a small fraction of the player base and what is theoretically possible, and requests to change the game for everyone to cater that small group.
Any argument involving IO sets is invalid unless your solution is changing IO sets