Please for the love of God, fix the Victorian Steampunk face.
By
Aggelakis,
Posted on: 2011-07-14 08:03 in Suggestions and Ideas
Quote:
Solo =/= "think they can't handle a Trial".
|
Originally Posted by Golden Girl
But it's still unlocking some Incarnate goodness for people who think they can't handle a Trial
 |
If the game spit out 20 dollar bills people would complain that they weren't sequentially numbered. If they were sequentially numbered people would complain that they weren't random enough.
Black Pebble is my new hero.
Quote:
I don't need your sympathy - I have the face I want *chuckle*|
Originally Posted by Bad_Influence
I am sorry that you don't want us to have a face we paid real-world money for, but.... I did pay real-world money for that face, we all did. And I think we should get what we paid for. If you want a Bare n' Ugly face, you got Classic Steampunk looking right at you in the faces list, this very instant. I feel little sympathy, you have literally dozens of female faces with zero makeup right now in addition to that. And now you want to take away one of the FEW made-up faces we have. Nice.
This is the Suggestions forum, and my suggestion to re-enable the beauty-marked and made-up Victorian Steampuink face is just that: a suggestion. Sorry you dont like it, but I want what I paid for. |
Seriously, I've posted more than once now that I'm all for there being two versions of Victorian Steampunk
Classic Steampunk isn't the same face; it has different eye color and tilt, etc. I don't really get how you somehow think they're pretty much the same face, save one had no red lips from the beginning. They're not the same - end of story, so stop telling me I could have just chosen Classic Steampunk if I wanted 'Bare n' Ugly'. I prefer Victorian Steampuck. I even preferred it over Classic Steampunk when it had Red Lips. Now that it doesn't, I prefer it that much more.
And you can suggest a thousand times to have the Victorian Steampunk face reverted. I shall continue letting the Devs know, each time the topic comes up, that some of us like the change they made.
The best fix by far is two faces, the original and current, or makeup options that exactly reproduce one or the other, and I'm for that just as much as you are. But again, I'm 100% against a simple reversion.
Well Socorro, in this thread as in the other one I detect a tidge too much antic, malicious glee in what you have to say regarding the current status of Bare n' Ugly, you're actively rejoicing that others do not have a version that they like - so I think you and I are done talking.
Quote:
"[Me] actively rejoicing that others do not have a version that they like..." Please!!!|
Originally Posted by Bad_Influence
Well Socorro, in this thread as in the other one I detect a tidge too much antic, malicious glee in what you have to say regarding the current status of Bare n' Ugly, you're actively rejoicing that others do not have a version that they like - so I think you and I are done talking.
|
You're incessant melodrama is just begging to get tagged.
What part of me saying many times now that we should have two faces are you not getting? Fine, don't talk to me, but I'll respond on your thread anyway if you briing this up again.
Have a good one
@Golden Girl
City of Heroes comics and artwork