Ideal Leveling Team
1 Fire/Fire Brute
1 Fire/Cold Corr
1 FF/Sonic Def
1 Fire/Kin Corr
1 Fire/Rad Corr
1 Fire/Dark Corr
1 Fire/Thermal Cor
1 Fire/Sonic Corr
There you go!
BrandX Future Staff Fighter
The BrandX Collection
Quote:
Plus the disorients and kd+kb from stone. All mitigation.
Dark itself is still layered with stun/fear/res/heal/def. Not capped out of the box but still has 5% def.
|
Sailboat, I didnt realize that IOs were not allowed. I am still interested in knowing what you find to have excellent layered defences.
Quote:
C'mon. You're just messing with me now. It's SinisterDirge who brought capped defense in as an example of layering, not me. And that capped defense can be achieved in this case only with IOs -- so I didn't bring IOs into it either.
Plus the disorients and kd+kb from stone. All mitigation.
Sailboat, I didnt realize that IOs were not allowed. I am still interested in knowing what you find to have excellent layered defences. |
And now you're (SinisterDirge) claiming the knockdown in Stone makes Dark "layered?"
Examples of layered defenses: Invulnerability, Willpower.
If we are to die, let us die like men. -- Patrick Cleburne
----------------------------------------------------------
The rule is that they must be loved. --Jayne Fynes-Clinton, Death of an Abandoned Dog
Quote:
Yes, this.
8 Fire/Rad Trollers. This has been done with superteams many times in the past.
|
It's an unstoppable force. I've found against AVs and GMs, 7 fire/rads and a scrapper with good single-target damage is a little better, just to have someone dealing huge damage numbers against debuffed-into-uselessness foes. But, it's not like 8 fire/rads need any help with anything.
Never argue with stupid people. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
@vanda1 and @nakoa2
Quote:
Actually I was refering to the disorient from fault stacking with Opressive gloom. Enough mag to make even bosses stop punching your face and wobble around. However, it has been argued that using KB/KD can infact increase surviveability. It could therefore be argued that that is a form of mitigation. Obviously, It cant be argued with you, and frankly, I am not even a fan of that position.
C'mon. You're just messing with me now. It's SinisterDirge who brought capped defense in as an example of layering, not me. And that capped defense can be achieved in this case only with IOs -- so I didn't bring IOs into it either.
And now you're (SinisterDirge) claiming the knockdown in Stone makes Dark "layered?" Examples of layered defenses: Invulnerability, Willpower. |
We are not going to be able to agree here. Obviously you are standing from a perspective that only uses the secondary as mitigation, no pool powers, no IO's, no primary/secondary synergy. Nothing but the defense set and SO's... From that perspective, Willpower and invuln are not very layered either. From that perspective, I wouldn't be interested in playing any of the defense sets.
Eight traps who actually plays the set correctly.
Sadly this is hard to find in this game.
When something good happens to me, I can never enjoy it....
I am always too busy looking for the inevitable punchline...
BEHOLD THE POWER OF CHEESE!
Quote:
No, I'm NOT arguing that. And you never argued that the entire character had layered defenses, although you might have been thinking it. You said DARK had layered defenses. Dark, dark, dark -- not Dark/Stone. THAT'S what I took issue with.
We are not going to be able to agree here. Obviously you are standing from a perspective that only uses the secondary as mitigation, no pool powers, no IO's, no primary/secondary synergy. Nothing but the defense set and SO's...
|
Dark has resistances, a great heal, and insignificant +defense. If "resistances + heal = layered, that's stretching the word "layered" pretty thin. Maybe Dark's controls do count, and I should have thought of them as defenses (as opposed to "controls") in this context -- that's where you should have made your (verbal) stand, not on "but I've soft-capped" (not specific to Dark) or "but Stone..." (not specific to Dark) or "but pools..." which you just now introduced, also not specific to Dark.
You're building a straw man by disputing claims I never made. I totally understand and enjoy synergies and all the other stuff you say isn't in my perspective. I was only saying that saying I don't find Dark by itself (as you implied) particularly layered. On that narrow ground, what is your response? If you meant to say something else, go ahead.
Quote:
From that perspective, Willpower and invuln are not very layered either.
|
Quote:
Obviously, It cant be argued with you |
If we are to die, let us die like men. -- Patrick Cleburne
----------------------------------------------------------
The rule is that they must be loved. --Jayne Fynes-Clinton, Death of an Abandoned Dog
What, no Stone? Def + resists + regen/heals, further layered in self-gimped -rech, -dam, -speed, -jump/fly. First two are optional, at least.
An Offensive Guide to Ice Melee
Sure, I wasn't attempting a comprehensive review of all powersets I'd consider "layered." I agree that the -rech and -dmg "layers" do indeed help survival -- of your enemies.
If we are to die, let us die like men. -- Patrick Cleburne
----------------------------------------------------------
The rule is that they must be loved. --Jayne Fynes-Clinton, Death of an Abandoned Dog
Quote:
So all this back and forth because I didn't say the bolded:
No, I'm NOT arguing that. And you never argued that the entire character had layered defenses, although you might have been thinking it. You said DARK had layered defenses. Dark, dark, dark -- not Dark/Stone. THAT'S what I took issue with.
Dark has resistances, a great heal, and insignificant +defense. If "resistances + heal = layered, that's stretching the word "layered" pretty thin. Maybe Dark's controls do count, and I should have thought of them as defenses (as opposed to "controls") in this context -- that's where you should have made your (verbal) stand, not on "but I've soft-capped" (not specific to Dark) or "but Stone..." (not specific to Dark) or "but pools..." which you just now introduced, also not specific to Dark. You're building a straw man by disputing claims I never made. I totally understand and enjoy synergies and all the other stuff you say isn't in my perspective. I was only saying that saying I don't find Dark by itself (as you implied) particularly layered. On that narrow ground, what is your response? If you meant to say something else, go ahead. Except that each has significant defense, significant resistance, more hit points, increased regen (huge for Willpower, somewhat less for Inv if you count the effects of Dull Pain's hit point boost on Inv's regen rate) and in Inv's case also a large, long-recharge heal. That's 4-5 types of defenses from the secondaries alone, not 2. Sure it can. |
Quote:
The possibility of capped S/L/E/N defense, good resistances and the best heal in the game isn't layered? What the hell is? |
Quote:
That's one way of looking at it.
So all this back and forth because I didn't say the bolded
|
"All these dead bodies and twisted metal are just because I didn't say to cut the blue wire on the bomb, not the red one?"
If we are to die, let us die like men. -- Patrick Cleburne
----------------------------------------------------------
The rule is that they must be loved. --Jayne Fynes-Clinton, Death of an Abandoned Dog
Maybe if the bomb tech is teaching a nub. But you are not a nub are you? You already know to cut the blue wire.
My ideal team, strictly for leveling purposes, with no other considerations made:
1 random tank (or possibly a brute)
1 random kin, preferably a controller.
6 blasters, powersets irrelevant.
Very few teams will kill stuff faster starting from level 1.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dechs Kaison See, it's gems like these that make me check Claws' post history every once in a while to make sure I haven't missed anything good lately. |
IOed Dark can, but hell, Blasters can have capped defense. That's not really a property of Dark.