Positional Defense, Typed Defense, and Stacking


Chaos Creator

 

Posted

Ok, I read this first, but I'm still not totally clear, and I think I just needed to write all this out, because after I did, it started making sense.

http://paragonwiki.com/wiki/Defense

So I have a brandy dandy new Ice Defense, and his single target buffs are Defense against S/L/Melee, then E/N/Rng/AOE.

His AoE buff is a stealth + Melee/Rng/AOE defense.

So lets say, for arguement sake, that I'm buffing someone with 25% S/L/Melee from his single target, and 5% Melee/Range/AOE from my AOE buff.

So his totals are:

25% Smashing/Lethal
30% Melee
5% Range, AOE

Correct?

Now, someone punches him. Thats tagged with a smashing damage type, and melee positional type. His 'Defense' will be calculated as 30%, since it uses the highest one. It will NOT be 55%, because the 'Smashing' and 'Melee' two don't stack.

Right? .

Also, I guess theres no difference in enhancement choices, because +defense buffs everything (Positional vs. Typed) the same.


 

Posted

Correct defense checks take the highest value not the total.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Direwolf21 View Post
25% Smashing/Lethal
30% Melee
5% Range, AOE

Also, I guess theres no difference in enhancement choices, because +defense buffs everything (Positional vs. Typed) the same.

depends on what you are referring to by enhancement choices. something like a steadfast +3% defense would enhance positional and typed equally. if you are looking at +def buffs from things like IO bonuses, then you really want to pick one or the other.

in your example, I wouldn't generally look at getting two IO set bonuses where one raises melee by 3.5% and the other raises s/l by 3.5%. I would look at getting two bonuses that would raise one or the other by 7%


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by kendo View Post
in your example, I wouldn't generally look at getting two IO set bonuses where one raises melee by 3.5% and the other raises s/l by 3.5%. I would look at getting two bonuses that would raise one or the other by 7%
There are exceptions to this strategy though.

Sometimes you're better going with the Touch of Death over Kinetic combat for your build because the actual benefit to your attack from KC sucks (especially the accuracy bit), and therefore getting 1.5% S/L might be a better choice than 3%. Similarly with PBAoEs and Oblivion.

This is especially true for builds that have a lot of one type of defense already, much less true for blasters and others who have to build the defense from zero.

In the end, look at your options, try to follow Kendo's advice where possible, but also, pay attention to your final powers, don't weaken something critical just to chase a set bonus.

Every now and again you see someone slot knockout blow with a full set of Stupefy or Absolute Amazement. Sure they have nice set bonuses, but there's no damage in those sets!


"Hmm, I guess I'm not as omniscient as I thought" -Gavin Runeblade.
I can be found, outside of paragon city here.
Thank you everyone at Paragon and on Virtue. When the lights go out in November, you'll find me on Razor Bunny.

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by GavinRuneblade View Post
There are exceptions to this strategy though.

Sometimes you're better going with the Touch of Death over Kinetic combat for your build because the actual benefit to your attack from KC sucks (especially the accuracy bit), and therefore getting 1.5% S/L might be a better choice than 3%. Similarly with PBAoEs and Oblivion.
That's why you don't stop at just slotting 4 Kinetic Combat. You can easily add a slot or two from another set so you get the bonus and a fully slotted attack. For a armor set that has typed defense already, that's almost always a better choice than Touch of Death. (Presuming you an afford the KCs; if not, Smashing Haymaker gives as much defense as ToD at a fraction of the cost.)

Quote:
This is especially true for builds that have a lot of one type of defense already, much less true for blasters and others who have to build the defense from zero.
Agreed. If the set the OP mentioned is actually Ice Armor and not some hypothetical set, typed def is definitely the way to go.

Quote:
In the end, look at your options, try to follow Kendo's advice where possible, but also, pay attention to your final powers, don't weaken something critical just to chase a set bonus.

Every now and again you see someone slot knockout blow with a full set of Stupefy or Absolute Amazement. Sure they have nice set bonuses, but there's no damage in those sets!
Or a tank slotting attacks with just a Taunt set or even worse, a KB set! {shudder} However, you can usually mix and match pieces from different attacks sets without losing any functionality, and sometimes you can sneak in a IO or two from a non-attack set. One of my favorite "sneaky defense bonus tricks" is to slot 2 Basilisk's Gaze in KoB for the E/NE def bonus, and finish the slotting with 4 IOs from an attack set. Kinetic Combat won't work for this--not enough damage--but other attacks sets like Crushing Impact certainly do.


My Characters

Knight Court--A CoH Story Complete 2/3/2012

 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by GavinRuneblade View Post
Every now and again you see someone slot knockout blow with a full set of Stupefy or Absolute Amazement. Sure they have nice set bonuses, but there's no damage in those sets!
I've met someone who explained this choice by saying that Knockout Blow is nice, but it isn't available often enough to suit him, so he turned it into a set mule. "Yeah," I pointed out, "Now it's never available."


If we are to die, let us die like men. -- Patrick Cleburne
----------------------------------------------------------

The rule is that they must be loved. --Jayne Fynes-Clinton, Death of an Abandoned Dog

 

Posted

A stealth power will reduce your over all threat thus it'll be tougher to tank for you.
second defense doesn't stack type-wise.

So 25% melee does NOT add with 15% lethal from a lethal, melee attack. It will be the highest value, thus 25%.

As an ice tanker, I suggest focusing on +Regen. Getting typed defense is tougher than getting positional.

I'm not a major expert on ice armor but +Regen is a same bet. As your enemies are not going to hit you often and are rarely even going to get the chance due to all the -recharge.

Also, isn't a stealth power's AoE defense reduced if your in combat?


Whining about everything since 2006.

Ammo switching for Dual Pistols was my idea:
http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showthread.php?t=135484

 

Posted

Sorry, hes an Ice Defense Defender . I'm more focused on the +Def i'll be giving out to my team, than the +def i'm getting.


 

Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Direwolf21 View Post
Sorry, hes an Ice Defense Defender . I'm more focused on the +Def i'll be giving out to my team, than the +def i'm getting.
Then don't worry about set bonuses. Those only affect you and not your teammates when you shield them.