Blasters: /Dark Manipulation. A possibility?


Amber_V

 

Posted

I'd love to see this implemented.
/signed ^-^


 

Posted

Actually they won't just do that. Mental Manipulation has a power or two made for it. Also if I remember correctly the dev's said it was easy to make, thats why it was done. So aslong as the powers arn't too complex they could design a new one or two.


 

Posted

what ever the dark manip set

/signed


Is not going to remain VIP after Jan 14th 2012, but may remain an active Premium account holder.
See some of you guys/gals in other/new MMOs Soon(tm)
N.B. If you are going to do smt, please do it or GTFO and STFU nab

 

Posted

Given that in prowerset proliferation they are trying to save themselves some work, I think "Dark Manipulation" will be based very closely on an existing set, in this case Dark melee.

So, I think it will look like this:

1) Touch of Fear

2) Shadow Punch

3) Smite

4) Cloak of Darkness (without the immob prot and +perception)

5) Soul Drain

6) Petrifying Gaze

7) Cloak of Fear

8) Dark Consumption

9) Midnight Grasp


The OP is wrong about Dark Blast being able to be ported unchanged though. A blaster doesn't want the snipe so early, and I can't see Blasters being allowed a self heal (Life Drain). An AoE stun that does no damage isn't really Blaster primary material either. And Aim aught to go in.

1) Dark Blast

2) Gloom

3) Dark Obliteration (from Soul Mastery)

4) Aim

5) Moonbeam

6) Teneberous Tenticles

7) Night Fall

8) Torrent

9) Blackstar


Edit: Or possibly swap Petrifying Gaze and Teneberous Tenticles between the primary and secondar.


I really should do something about this signature.

 

Posted

Confront? On a blaster?


 

Posted

Grenades Secondary?


Nuff Said...
Coolio Wolfus leader of Coolio�s Crusaders on Union.
Tekna Logik leader of Tekna�s Tormentors on Defiant.
AE arc 402506, 'The Rise and Demise or Otherwise of Tekna Logik...'.

 

Posted

[ QUOTE ]
Confront? On a blaster?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ghah. Stupididty attack!!!


I really should do something about this signature.

 

Posted

[ QUOTE ]
Confront? On a blaster?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, Confront would be [censored] for a blaster... because it's only single target, Taunt would be far better