Tenzhi

Forum Cartel
  • Posts

    4288
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by peterpeter View Post
    I should of known.
    That one is such a pet peeve for me that even in THIS thread it made me grit my teeth.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Rajani Isa View Post
    You know that will just make the people after a support or ranged set chaff at the bit even more for what they want.
    But even they won't be able to deny that the set is naturally fit for a Stalker.
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Roderick View Post
    New dominator powerset confirmed for Issue 22!
    I can't wait for those melee tassel attacks.
  4. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Beastyle View Post
    Just goes to show, you shouldn't take language for granite. For all intensive purposes, this thread should be taken with a grain assault.
    A rye observation.
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Lord_Kalistoh View Post
    I though that after seeing Minotaur's reply. Being English a foreign language to me, sometimes is difficult to get those things.
    No harm. We've been egregiously (and purposefully) abusing the english language in this thread. I'm sure it might look awful strange (or just awful) to a non-native speaker.
  6. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
    She's a bit hot-headed, and she knows it, and she sometimes says or does some goofy things - but she's also friendly, brave and loyal, and is in a very loving relationship - she's one of the nicest NPCs in the game.
    Like I said: it figures.
  7. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
    I think he new what his attentions was.
    I mite halve had an inking.
  8. I don't think there's an AT I haven't played to at least level 30. Well, except for a Widow... but I'm working on it ever so slowly.
  9. Quote:
    Originally Posted by BrandX View Post
    And Tenzhi is right, I have that "My character wouldn't do that" moment in First Ward with Katie. Though this doesn't bother me, as I just don't run the arc.
    I'm sure that I *am* right, but unless my brain slipped its leash again that doesn't sound like it's related to something I said. Credit where it's due and all that.
  10. Quote:
    Originally Posted by JeNeSaisQuoi View Post
    Yeah, I'm especially doubtful considering what huge critical and commercial flops his last two films have been...
    A film could enjoy such success and still not entertain me, so, not something I find relevant. What I do find relevant is that aesthetic choices were made in both of his Batman films that I didn't like. Now, both of those films ultimately managed to rise above the things that bothered me, but that's only two movies - Nolan hasn't established enough entertainment credit with me for me to loan him blind faith.
  11. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Golden Girl View Post
    I like Fusionette
    It figures.
  12. I play Trick Arrows, and I think it could stand to be better. But it's been brought up ad nauseum to little effect.
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Antoinette View Post
    /decimate
    /murdertithe
  14. Oh good, I thought it was just me.
  15. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Siolfir View Post
    English is a foreign language even to native speakers.
    Says you. I'm affluent in it.
  16. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Blood Red Arachnid View Post
    Many years ago I came under the impression that everyone is lying to me when they talk to me directly
    Indeed. I'm lying to you right now.
  17. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Devlin_Quaid View Post
    ...You used peruse incorrectly.

    Specifically, peruse means to go over something with great effort. You peruse a book you want to know by heart.
    Except when it means to read in a leisurely fashion.

    Language is funny like that. Especially english.
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Zombie Man View Post
    I'll follow your link if you first follow mine.

    *eye rolls away*
    Do we have to? Can't we just assume that your link goes to that other discussion where a bunch of nerdiots were debating whether or not anachronistic speech should be maintained for eternity forestalling the evolution of language?
  19. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Blood Red Arachnid View Post
    older movies like Twelve Monkeys
    You can't see it, but I'm giving you *such* a look right now. There are brows, and the furrowing of them.
  20. Quote:
    Originally Posted by eth_Nargy View Post
    Huh

    You'd figure the picture would look different from normal given the jpeg name
    I think the bananas are new...
  21. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Lycantropus View Post
    His name is Parsley Sage (and one of my SG mates has a Rosemary Ann Thyme plant 'troller as his ally).
    As his ally, or as his fair lady?
  22. Quote:
    Originally Posted by BrandX View Post
    Now I must know what you think this code is! O.O
    Clearly, it means "villain" or "heel".
  23. Quote:
    Originally Posted by New_Dark_Age View Post
    lol yeah racism....not like I am using historical facts

    Explain to me how me stating that there is no "LOGICAL" reason a black man would be on a Norweign base or how there is no "LOGICAL REASON free blacks would be in a movie based in 1775 South Carolina or that the Samurai stood against the Meiji Revolution in Japan is Racism ?
    I completely support your use of historical facts where you've applied them to non-fictional historical accounts. Fictional stories, however, are called fiction for a reason.
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Energizing_Ion View Post
    and with one of the scenes showing one of the dwarves tossing plates and setting the table so fast... >_>
    Chip the glasses and crack the plates! That's what Bilbo Baggins hates!
  25. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Energizing_Ion View Post
    From what I remember Elves did come to help them at Helm's Deep.

    <snip>

    Edit:


    Hmm, just looked at wikipedia (yes, yes...) but it seems I was wrong about the whole thing...hmm...how do I make that stuff up?

    *needs to read the books again*
    IIRC, Elladan and Elrohir show up right after the battle in the book. Perhaps that fuzzy recollection along with the promptings of the movie corrupted your memory.

    In my opinion, the battle at Helm's Deep was symbolic of the strength of Men (racially speaking), feeding into the ongoing theme of the rise of Men (and subsequent waning of other races) heading into the new Age. Having the elves at Helm's Deep took away from this theme.

    In a similar symbolic vein, Faramir was supposed to show that Man could have the strength of character to rise above temptation. I feel that movies really mucked all that up (though overall I still enjoy them).