Silit

I don't care much either way, but I think Vinnie and I both lean toward doing it random.

Nice.

It should be available at any fine bookseller. It is being sold for a discount price in the Pocket D gift shop if you pre-order the new UTBG album, which includes two bonus tracks, and includes Reaver's solo track: Reaver Dirge Legends, part 3.

Dark. Pick up boxing. Proc out the fast animations and spam them, and nothing else. You will never lose.

Nothing changed about defender TK. At all.

No, but really, Reaver is exponentially better at CoH and ((bar)) bar management than just about everyone who's posted in this thread.

Supergroovalisticprosifunkstication.

Hopefully the pointless flamewar stops soon... but throwing some more out there: Lifting or Raising a stalker cap would do nothing to diversify lineups. Lineups would be DIFFERENT from what they are now, but not necessarily diverse.

Throwing even more out there: We plan on running a kin in almost every match, not that it matters at all.

I'm not taking a side, but I'm going to throw this out there since some people seem to have a misconception:

Sharks are not an issue because of bad stalkers who are unable to AS. It has NOTHING to do AT ALL with that. Our stalkers can out-stalk any others in the league (I know like 3 fat kids who are going to get angry right now), and we occasionally ran teams centric around sharking. We aren't the only team to do it either, SMD used the Shrak-spike-jump-team to stunning effectiveness.

In these cases, sharking isn't something you do because you are too bad to AS, it's something you do because you plan on it, and because you know that two sharks through an EF deal 1300+ damage.

Leader: Professor Vindizzle @Vince
Leader: Silit @Detective Silit

Lt: The h0j @h0j
Lt: Klesk @Klesk

HP @HP
March Rain @Ethical Inquiry
Peril @PerilX @PerilXX
PF @PF @PF2
P. Spiner @Infamous Zampf @Infamous Zampf2
Reaver Dizzle@Reaver Dirge
Seethe @Lord Seethe
Tox @Kifflom
Vert @Insaiyan
Z @Z.

Dawk Boy @So Low Jones

My team wasn't ready for a name like Steve. I'm liking becalm though, just because of how dope the GP looks.

Ladder teams aren't static, people can leave/apply to others whenever they want to.

I like your idea for the DC rule. If four or more people DC it's pretty apparent that you are being a goose.

1. Roster cap? No cap, if a cap becomes needed: 16

2. What should the scheduled match timer be? 2 weeks.

3. Matches take place (by default) on Test or Freedom? Test

4. If Test is the default server, and it becomes unavailable before a scheduled match can take place, should the match automatically take place on Freedom at the originally scheduled time, or should a reschedule take place? [b]If and when test goes down: Captains should meet and decide procedure for ladder matches during the down time. To avoid unnecessary complications we should leave it at that.

5. Blind line-up submission or counter-pick? Double Blind. Potential problem: what happens if teams can't decide on a third party?

6. Power(s) you want banned:
• Defender TK
• Dominator Poisonous Ray
• Corrupter Lingering Radiation
Note: To my knowledge TS is working as intended.

7. Limit the number of stalkers? 2 stalker limit.

8. DC rule? If this is in reference to the stalker-quit-win, I think the rule needs to be polished more.

9. List any rule changes/suggestions you have: Timer before a player who recently joined a team can play. I suggest two weeks, like the old ladder.

Psychoalphadiscobetabioaquadoloop and Supergroovalisticprosifunkstication were good.

Make a GP and become our allies in battle.

Leader: Professor Vindizzle @Vince
Leader: Silit @Detective Silit

Lt: The h0j @h0j
Lt: Klesk @Klesk

HP @HP
m3z @M3zm3r1z3
March Rain @Ethical Inquiry
Peril @PerilX @PerilXX
PF @PF @PF2
P. Spiner @Infamous Zampf @Infamous Zampf2
Reaver Dizzle@Reaver Dirge
Seethe @Lord Seethe
Tox @Kifflom
Vert @Insaiyan
Z @Z.

Dawk Boy @So Low Jones


http://becalm.guildportal.com

For right now, let's see how big submitted rosters are. This ladder won't have 100 teams. All of the captains will know each other. I think for now it would be best to simply tell captains to be responsible in recruitment, and not recruit people that are just going to stay on the bench when those people are more than capable of playing for other teams.

As Psoma said: Roster caps don't necessarily translate into more people taking initiative to form teams. At the same time, we don't want the ladder to be comprised of 4 30 man rosters. Let's see how it starts to play out. The old ladder didn't have a cap. If we need one, we will implement one.

Let's take the crap to another thread, this one is already unproductive enough.

Way to step up. Good luck.