M_I_Abrahms

Thinking on this, really the only powers concern in Going Rogue, apart from the two new sets will BE the 40-50 range. Specifically, how Epic/Patron powers will work for a side swapped character.

I'm the one doing the scaring, though. And I don't even have to approach, just passing a woman on the street is enough to give them panic attacks.

Less ironic and more the Joker lying his fourth point of contact off. It was all part of a plan, the bank heist, taking control of Gotham's crime through it's money, attacking Dent's transit, so he could be locked up with the accountant.

Hell, even that entire speech was all part of a plan to get Harvey to show that even the best can fall to the Joker's level.

I do feel the need to point out that it doesn't matter how you act if a woman nearly has a heart attack just by looking at your face. And before you comment, I had shaved before several of these incidences.

*ahem*

Do I really look like a guy with a plan? You know what I am? I'm a dog chasing cars. I wouldn't know what to do with one if I caught it. You know, I just... do things.

It's one of those names that can be used by guys as well.

Actually, I'm curious as to why it was called the Praesidium.

You can listen to the most recent episode of any KJSR show here. Just look for the AEntertainment Tonight link. Shows up at the top of the list for me, but I'm not 100% sure if the list shuffles.

As far as spoiler tags go, if you mark no we will do our best to review the arc while revealing as few details as possible. In some cases we won't give out anything more than what can be seen when looking at the Architect window. This is a more difficult review, as we can't give out WHY we we felt the way we did, and we do slip on occasion, but we understand it if the arc itself is supposed to be a bit of a puzzler, or have quite a few surprises to it. However, I will usually warn the listener if there is a timed mission.

If you mark yes, then we can go into greater detail, naming off specific references we noticed, or other details we thought were note worthy. However, we will usually keep major plot points, things that we feel are on the level of the Clockwork or Rikti secret mum. We are essentially trying to entice the listener back into the AE for these arcs, and it is sometimes counterproductive to spell out every detail.

And while I'm talking about the submission form, I would like to ask future submissions if they would enter the number of missions in the arc under "Length", rather than the length given in the Architect window. I understand where the confusion came from, but since the AE defines an arc's length by the size of the file it makes it a less helpful guide for us. A 'medium' arc could be a heavily detailed five mission arc with a lot of clues and text, or it could be a one shot with a lot of customs.


EDIT: For a specific example, let's make up a hypothetical arc. The arc is five missions long, and has several meaningful or humorous references in it. The third mission has a hidden ally that will only appear after clicking a specific glowy, the fourth mission is timed, and right when you think you have the final mission complete, the contact appears in the mission to attack you.

If the submitter of this arc said 'no' to spoilers, we would limit the review to just that is was five missions, made good use of the AE tools available, and had a solid finale. Also, the listener would be warned about the mission four timer. One or two of the references may slip out in conversation, at most.

If the submitter said 'yes' to spoilers, then we would have said all the above, but many of the references would be mentioned. We would also make note of the hidden ally (if the reviewer managed to find said ally). However, we would still not mention the contact's betrayal.

Thus far we've seen three options to deal with heavy load on the Big servers.

1) The server queue for when they fill up
2) Before the queue, when servers got to a certain population, they just stopped letting folks in. Period. Now it was only at times when there were as many people actually online as the server could hold, and the moment someone logged out someone else would be let in, but it still caused a number of complaints.
3) Before the population caps were put in place, folks would just continue to pile on those two servers until it was enough to cause them to crash, meaning NO ONE could play on them AT ALL. Usually followed by the folks that just got kicked off their server to log into a different one, maxing out THAT server and causing it to crash. This would continue until all servers were down and no one could play the game at all.

Of those three options, which would you pick?

So do they.