Ironik

Forum Cartel
  • Posts

    5889
  • Joined

  1. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Oliin View Post
    It's a little iffy, but I'd consider Synecdoche, New York to be fantasy (along with pretty much all of Charlie Kaufman's films). I know it's more surrealism and symbolism, but they present themselves as fantasy so what can you do.
    Philip Seymour Hoffman is in The Invention of Lying and Mission: Impossible 3, which are both sci-fi.
  2. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Starwinds View Post
    So of the 21 award winners in the last decade, only 2 or 3 haven't done something in those genres (depending on if Sean Penn has that I couldn't find, and how you come down on Daniel Day Lewis and Russell Crowe)... Personally, I think that shows that the genre is perfectly acceptable for "serious" actors.
    Oh yeah, looks like Sean Penn hasn't been in an SF/F film yet. Looks like this year's Tree of Life is Fantasy, though, so he's going to lose his outsider status soon.

    Russell Crowe's breakout part was as the escaped virtual character in Virtuosity opposite Denzel Washington. (Denzel has been in a good half-dozen SF/F films: Deja Vu, Fallen, Book of Eli, Manchurian Candidate, The Siege, The Preacher's Wife.)

    Daniel Day Lewis is in Nine, which is a musical. (It features an awesome number by Kate Hudson.) I'll agree that some musicals aren't Fantasies because the musical numbers are given realistic settings (Cabaret), but the rest are definitely a subgenre of the Fantasy genre.
  3. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Defenestrator View Post
    If you're talking about AFTER they became big stars, Humphrey Bogart, though he made "The Return of Doctor X" early in his career. This was more akin to Jennifer Anniston getting her start in "Leprechaun," though. And I certainly wouldn't refer to either of those movies as some big budget regurgitated CGI spectacle (or the equivalent of what was made during those respective eras).
    I think any time in their career would suffice, really.

    Quote:
    I would definitely put Katherine Hepburn in the category you're looking for, though.
    Wasn't Rainmaker a Fantasy? It's been 30-some years since I've seen it, though.
  4. Someone speaking of Elizabeth Taylor recently proclaimed archly, "She was a real class act. She wouldn't have been caught dead in the kind of movies they make today, with all these aliens and comic book types."

    Nevermind the "class act" bit -- 15 minutes reading about her dalliances will cure anyone of that impression -- I take umbrage at the "kind of movies they make today" comment. As if movies are somehow bad now and were great when she was at the height of her superstardom. Say what? Besides, the lady was in The Flintstones, for crying out loud.

    But this got me to thinking: has there ever been a movie star of her stature who HASN'T been in a Science Fiction or Fantasy film? With the caveat that Musicals are Fantasy (I mean seriously, music comes out of the air and everyone suddenly knows choreography? That's as imaginary as anything Tolkien ever thought up), I'm having a hard time thinking of any. The only possibility I have is John Wayne, but he was in an awful lot of serial-type flicks in his early days, so maybe there's some sort of Buck Rogers-y kind of thing there. (I'm inclined to say that being in The Greatest Story Ever Told makes him eligible, but people are twitchy about that sort of thing.)

    So what do you think? Are there any big movie stars who haven't been in a Sci-Fi or Fantasy movie? I'm sure there must be a couple, but heck if I can think of them.
  5. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Lothic View Post
    To be perfectly honest I'm not "sold" on this new Wonder McBeal concept either, and I'm saying that as probably one of the few people on this thread who's chosen to not automatically pre-judge this show before I see it. *shrugs*
    I'm on board with using "Wonder McBeal" for this show.
  6. Dual Guns is fast. Crap damage, though.
  7. Ironik

    6 hours downtime

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Skimpy View Post
    Another 90 minutes without an update. Come on, it's not rocket science!
    Go outside, walk around, help out a little at the local animal shelter. Came back tomorrow. Patience is a virtue.
  8. Ironik

    6 hours downtime

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by lll Phoenix lll View Post
    1) It's not an exploit that's the best part
    2) there are tfs done in 6-11-15 mins so you don't need 6 hours to do more than 10
    3) Actually my fault on this one. Was talking about vill accolades. Hero accolades took me a day
    4) Well that includes chances and ways to farm in a smart way
    5) At least you believe one

    Also you are right about the last thing you said. Being a show off is not something to be proud so yeah it was stupid of me saying these but yeah its true

    Anyway our subject is this long time maintenance which im pretty sure the reason are the lag spikes
    If you can do all of this then I want you nerfed.
  9. Ironik

    Sucker Punch

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
    And the obvious example of one that used it constantly throughout for valid thematic purpose would be Inception. It's not that Snyder lacks the technical skill in cinematography, just that he doesn't know how to employ it.
    Film fetishes:

    Zack Snyder -- slo-mo
    Michael Bay -- explosions
    J.J. Abrams -- lens flares
  10. Ironik

    Sucker Punch

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by TrueGentleman View Post
    (It is also whitewashing historical revisionism of at its most meretricious. But that's another thread.)
    And that's all of maybe 60 seconds of film time. Churchill has such a tiny role I'd have to watch the film again to see if those articles are correct. Since the screenplay was based on the letters and diaries of the two men in question, perhaps that's how they saw Churchill.

    Even if it is an error, it's not germane to the movie's point or its brilliance. There's no such thing as an historical film that gets all the facts correct.
  11. Ironik

    Sucker Punch

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Kawkazn View Post
    To each their own, I like that style. It is a lot better than this crap...
    Horse crap or bull crap, take your pick. How about instead of having to chew crap we eschew crap altogether?

    You know what film uses slo-mo with an artistic (and restrained) degree? RED. That movie was not just the best action film of 2010, it's the best one in years. I can think of two really excellent scenes that use slo-mo for a period of seconds rather than minutes, all to emphasize the action rather than to fetishize it. Some of the slo-mo in 300 and Watchmen was just weird because it didn't seem to be doing anything other than be slow motion. A couple times it was used to good effect but mostly it wasn't.
  12. Ironik

    Sucker Punch

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Jet_Boy View Post
    If you're looking for something more, grab your tissue box and go see "Exist, Consume, Worship" or " The Emporer's Oration..." SP is only going to disappoint you.
    Are you dissing The King's Speech? If you haven't seen it, you should. It is emotional, it is powerful, it is hilarious. It is, however, subtle. Unlike Snyder's over the top video game style of bombastic filmmaking, it gets under your skin by doing things most people aren't even aware off. For instance, Snyder does slo-mo, then explosion, then twirly-fighty thing. Rinse, repeat. In The King's Speech, when the king is first starting to open up to the speech therapist, the camera has a very slight Dutch tilt to it. Colin Firth is also off-center in the frame. What this does is make you slightly uneasy and you don't know why. Gradually, as he overcomes his difficulty, he starts to take center screen and the frame becomes level again and they start shooting him from below rather than from above. What that does is make you feel subconsciously that he's regaining his confidence and taking control of his problem.

    It's that attention to detail that won it all those Oscars. It's a superb script that's brilliantly acted, but it's so much more than that and so much better than anything Snyder has ever done.
  13. Quote:
    Originally Posted by The Demacian View Post
    As for the batman/logan cherry-picking thing, well, people in alpha say CoH was originally going to be that way, but people were doing it more often for maximum synergy / OPness more than they were doing it for making a cool character. So that can cause a similar problem: the bigger the gap becomes between min-maxers and story/character aficionados, the more the min-maxers will avoid others and treat them like second class citizens.
    This is where my "every power at each level is equal" idea comes into play. If Fire Ball and Ice Ball both do 50 damage, the only thing you're choosing there is coolness. If one offers a DoT and the other a Slow, then you have to build characters into *every* villain group who are resistant to these powers. Then you have characters like Frostfire who would be resistant to both, making him tough for everyone. Extrapolate that out to every ability in the game. Not easy, but probably doable if starting from scratch.

    As for particular characters outside CoH, it's hard to map most against the CoH ATs, but the Origins are pretty well thought out and many characters fit neatly into specific Origins. Yes, some like Wolverine cross Origins, since he's a Mutant who was altered by Science, but Superman is Natural, Spider-Man is Science (as are a lot of Marvel heroes: Fantastic Four, Hulk, Captain America), and so on.

    My issue with the Well is that whatever it is (I say it's Magic and nothing anyone has said so far has convinced me otherwise), your character becomes that Origin. It's like when the various Marvel characters got cosmic powers and became Captain Universe. For that amount of time they were Cosmic origin, regardless of what they were before. The Incarnate thing is worse because it's permanent. Now, for some of my characters who are part and parcel of the Coh backstory and are Magic-themed, it's fine. For others I don't mind if their origin is changed. But for many it's annoying to have this forced on them.
  14. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Anti_Proton View Post
    Only because you walked right into it:

    "Any technology sufficiently advanced is indistinguishable from magic"
    Except that the Well's not technology. Everything the Well has touched so far is explicitly stated to be Magic.
  15. Tangential to this discussion, I was thinking the other day there ought to be a badge called "Unconquered" or something. ("Undefeated" is already in the game.) Awarded to level 50s who have never been defeated. Maybe a super version if you've done it without playing it safe, such as facing off against regular-mission EBs and AVs rather than just bosses.
  16. Ironik

    6 hours downtime

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Dante View Post
    Oh HELLS BELLS!




    (Had the afternoon off, was looking forward to getting some decent gaming time in. I'll be sulking under this rock if anyone wants me. )
    We're getting a foot of snow here, so I'll be shoveling. I think what I'm trying to say is, "Shut it."
  17. Feel better. Avoid the carriers. Rub hands together for at least 30 seconds or soap/hand sanitizer won't work.
  18. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Hero_of_Steel View Post
    Is this it?


    Fight Scene - Without the glow
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDgDH8DDnEs#t=1m28s
    I think that's it. I never really watched the show.

    And holy crap, is that Don Cheadle?
  19. Okay, that's three bad books in a row. I'm done seeking out superhero fiction until Peter Clines finishes the sequel to Ex-Heroes. (Seriously read that book!)

    So let's turn back time to good superhero fiction. I'll start with John Ridley, comic book writer, author and screenwriter.



    The set-up for this story is that a supervillain blew up San Francisco, leading to the outlawing of all metanormal humans. So the supers who don't leave or get deported are hunted down and killed by cops specifically assigned for that job. Not an original premise, but this story is so kinetic and relentless that it doesn't matter. This is not great literature -- it's a modern superhero pulp book that a geek like me considers a beach read. If there's a moral to the story at all, it's that fanaticism is bad. Also, not revelatory, but the conflicted heroine at the heart of the book is equal parts crazy and bad-***, which keeps it interesting. I'm not sure this is meant to be examined deeply; it's more like a Mike Hammer book with super-mutants.



    At first, this sequel wasn't doing it for me. The writing felt lazier, almost stream-of-consciousness, with half-finished thoughts. But it was an easy enough read so I stuck with it for a while longer. I was just about to put it down when Ridley upped the ante in the extreme and really turned up the heat. I literally said out loud, "No you did NOT." But he had. Read it to find out what that was. He also doubles your fun by adding yet another bad-*** hot chick, who just so happens to have a bit of a conflict going with the existing bad-*** hot chick from the first book. As if the mutants and bureaucracy weren't enough, now they have to compete against each other.

    I don't care if people think these are slight books, nothing more than souped-up crime fiction: I like 'em.


  20. Bitter Seeds by Ian Tregillis is astonishingly well written. This really is a very literary book. It's also excruciatingly slow. This is an alternate WW II story about Nazi Ubermenschen facing off against British warlocks. Great idea, really evocative set-up, and then... nothing. Well, almost nothing. The action scenes are few and far between. Tregillis' point is obviously that war is hell. In this instance it's literal, as the warlocks make deals with demons. Superior prose, inferior plot.

    Apparently this is the first of a proposed trilogy. If the ratio of content to words continues, at some point someone could cut out all the plodding bits and cut together a snappy story. Won't be me, though - I'm out of this series.


  21. To call Dull Boy by Sarah Cross a "dull book" is too easy a target. Plus it's not completely true -- it's more clumsy than anything else. This is very much a Young Adult novel in that the characters don't quite feel real and the dialogue and behavior of the teenagers doesn't come across as realistic. It's almost as if Cross doesn't remember what it was like to be a teenager herself, since the scenes among the teens feel so painfully forced in a "beginner writer" sort of way.

    There are so many references to the X-Men (including one scene where the titular character says to the Wolverine-esque girl-with-an-attitude that they should do a "fastball special." If the book were more interesting, I'd be tempted to map the characters on their X-Men analogues because they're all there, including Emma Frost. There's so much angst that it weighs down the story tremendously. By the time they get to the big action scene, it's too little too late, and not really all that impressive.

    1.5 stars.


  22. The third book in the Quantum Prophecy series completely fizzled on me. It's a very lame ending to the series. There are a couple of decent set pieces, but the overall feeling I had at the end was one of being let down.
  23. Ironik

    Quantum Chef

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by starphoenix View Post
    It could have a Science Fiction flavor to it by creating very alien dishes shown on SF shows and movies that actually taste good.
    See, that wasn't so hard. Be a lot of blue food, though.
  24. Quote:
    Originally Posted by Hero_of_Steel View Post
    I remember the TV Movie “The Last Electric Knight” & its TV series spin-off “Sidekicks” starring the annoying kid from Red Sonja.

    Since he glowed & had electricity crackling around him when he did his martial arts, I would say that it was magic.
    No, it was a little Asian kid or maybe a little black kid. I mean, as in teeny-tiny.

    Edit: Maybe it was a movie. I just recall it was a little kid and we mocked it relentlessly.